What was the strategic plan of the Soviet command. The idea. The strategic plan of the Soviet High Command was based on two strikes. Disappointment in allies

In accordance with the military-political goals of the further conduct of the war, in the early spring of 1942, when active armed struggle on the Soviet-German front almost ceased, both belligerents began to develop strategic plans for military operations.

The development by the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command and the General Staff of the strategic plan of action of the Soviet Armed Forces for the next stage of the war and the implementation of measures to prepare a new military campaign had a number of characteristic features. They were determined by the unique conditions of the military-political and strategic situation that had developed by the spring of 1942. Firstly, there was no firm confidence that the second front would be opened in a time frame that met the general interests of the struggle of the anti-fascist coalition, that is, in 1942. At the same time, the Nazi leadership was aware that there would be no second front in the near future. Therefore, it could use maximum forces and means to launch new active operations on the Eastern Front. Secondly, the Allies did not fully fulfill their obligations to deliver military materials to the USSR under Lend-Lease. Therefore, the Soviet Union had to rely only on itself.

The Soviet command took into account measures for significant organizational restructuring and technical re-equipment of the Soviet Army, as well as the creation of large reserves, which could not be completed earlier than the summer of 1942. Meanwhile, numerous data indicated that a new major enemy offensive on the Soviet-German front would begin already in the spring of 1942

On March 18, 1942, military intelligence reported to the General Staff: “The preparation of the spring offensive is confirmed by the transfer of German troops and materials. During the period from 1.1 to 10.3, up to 35 divisions 1 were transferred, and manpower was continuously being added to the active armies. Intensive work is underway to restore the railway network in the occupied territory of the USSR, and there is an intensified delivery of military and transport vehicles, ammunition, and artillery. It is possible that a decisive German offensive on the Eastern Front will occur with a simultaneous Japanese offensive against the USSR and pressure from the Germans on Turkey in order to force it to allow German troops to enter the Caucasus... The Germans, not being able to carry out an appropriate regrouping of forces at the front, did not will be able to repeat the offensive on a wide front. They concentrate all their efforts on preparing successive operations: first with the goal of capturing the Caucasus and the Murmansk (Kirov - Ed.) Railway, then spreading operations to the north with the goal of capturing the cities of Moscow and Leningrad. By solving these problems, the main strategic goal would be achieved - isolating the USSR from its allies, depriving it of oil, and if not defeating it, then reducing it to the point where it loses all significance. This is the main plan of the German command.

1 In fact, fewer were transferred - about 20 divisions.

The center of gravity of the spring offensive will be transferred to the southern sector of the front with an auxiliary attack in the north, with a simultaneous demonstration on the central front against Moscow...” 1 And as a conclusion, the report noted: “Germany is preparing for a decisive offensive on the Eastern Front, which will unfold first on southern sector and will subsequently spread to the north. For the spring offensive, Germany, together with its allies, will field up to 65 new divisions... The most likely date for the spring offensive is mid-April or early May 1942.”

On March 23, 1942, state security agencies reported to the State Defense Committee: “The main blow will be delivered in the southern sector with the task of breaking through Rostov to Stalingrad and the North Caucasus, and from there towards the Caspian Sea. This way the Germans hope to reach the sources of Caucasian oil. If the operation with access to the Volga at Stalingrad was successful, the Germans planned to launch an offensive to the north along the Volga. This summer, the Germans will strive not only to reach the Volga and the Caspian Sea, but will also undertake major operations against Moscow and Leningrad, since their capture is a matter of prestige for the German command.”2

Such strategic intelligence forecasts could not but influence the assessment of the situation by the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command and its decision to further conduct armed struggle at the new stage of the war.

In the spring of 1942, the Headquarters did not have sufficient forces and means at its disposal to conduct an offensive on a large scale, but it was impossible to postpone active actions for a long period of time. In this situation, writes Marshal of the Soviet Union A.M. Vasilevsky, “the fronts went on the defensive. We were faced with the question of a military action plan for the next six months. It was discussed in detail at the General Staff. None of us had any doubts that the enemy, no later than the summer, would again take serious active actions in order to again seize the initiative and inflict defeat on us. We critically analyzed the results of the winter. Now the Headquarters, the General Staff and the entire leadership of the Armed Forces tried to more accurately reveal the enemy’s plans for the spring and summer periods of 1942, to define as clearly as possible the strategic directions in which the main events were destined to play out. At the same time, we all understood perfectly well that the further development of the entire world war, the behavior of Japan, Turkey, etc., and perhaps the outcome of the war as a whole would largely depend on the results of the summer campaign of 1942.”3

1 IVI. Documents and materials, inv. No. 5, pp. 296-297.

2 IVI. Documents and materials, inv. No. 6083, l. 6.

3 A. Vasilevskii. Life's work. M., 1975, p. 203.

The strategic action plan of the Soviet Armed Forces for a longer period was supposed to provide for the ultimate political goal of the war for 1942 - the defeat of the enemy and the liberation of all occupied Soviet territory. This was the basis for the development of a solution begun by Headquarters and the General Staff after the completion of the winter offensive campaign.

Assessing the situation that had developed by the spring of 1942, Supreme Commander-in-Chief II. V. Stalin assumed that the Nazi command in the summer of 1942 would be able to conduct large offensive operations simultaneously in two strategic directions - Moscow and the south of the country. He attached particular importance to the Moscow direction, where the enemy had more than 70 divisions.

J.V. Stalin believed that the Soviet Armed Forces did not yet have enough forces and means to launch large offensive operations in the spring of 1942 in the absence of a second front in Europe. Therefore, he considered it expedient for the near future to limit himself to active defense on the entire Soviet-German front, while at the same time conducting private front-line offensive operations in its individual sections 1.

The General Staff, in particular its chief, Marshal of the Soviet Union B. M. Shaposhnikov and his deputy, General A. M. Vasilevsky, basically held the same opinion as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. Marshal B. M. Shaposhnikov was firmly committed to limiting himself to only active defense at the first stage of strategic actions, withstanding the enemy’s blow, exhausting and bleeding him out at the beginning of the summer, and then, having accumulated reserves, moving on to broad counter-offensive actions 2.

The State Defense Committee envisaged the following as the main immediate task: to create powerful trained reserves by May - June 1942, to accumulate weapons, ammunition, tanks, aircraft and other military equipment, as well as the necessary material resources to support troops in the subsequent offensive. The General Staff completed all justifications and calculations for the strategic action plan for 1942 by mid-March. The main idea of ​​the plan: active defense, accumulation of reserves, and then transition to a decisive offensive. However, work on the plan continued in connection with the proposal of the command of the South-Western direction to conduct a large offensive operation in May with the forces of the Bryansk, South-Western and Southern fronts.

The final version of the action plan of the Soviet Armed Forces was reviewed and approved at the end of March at a joint meeting of the State Defense Committee and the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command. At this meeting, Marshal B. M. Shaposhnikov once again outlined the opinion of the General Staff on the advisability of transitioning the entire army to temporary active defense and concentrating the main strategic reserves in the western direction and partly in the Voronezh region, where the main events could play out in the summer. This opinion was justified mainly by the numerical superiority of the enemy forces and the absence of a second front in Europe. B. M. Shaposhnikov did not agree with the proposal of Marshal S. K. Timoshenko about the possibility of carrying out a major offensive operation in the spring by forces of the Bryansk, South-Western and Southern fronts, citing the difficulties of organizing such an operation and the lack of necessary reserves. However, the arguments of the General Staff were not fully taken into account. The meeting ended with the instruction of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief to prepare and conduct offensive operations in the near future in the Kharkov region, in Crimea and in other areas.

1 See G. Zhukov. Memories and reflections. T. 2. M., 1974, pp. 64-65. See also there.

Thus, the strategic plan of the Headquarters for 1942 generally corresponded to the military-political goal of the Soviet state for the next stage of the war and was basically active in nature. The first part of this plan was developed in most detail, which concerned the planned actions of the Soviet Armed Forces in the spring and early summer of 1942 (April - June). During this period, the Soviet Army was to remain in a temporary strategic defense with the task of completing the begun reorganization of troops and re-equipping them with new equipment, as well as accumulating reserves in order to launch a new offensive from the summer of 1942. In order to give the defense an active character, the plan also provided for a series of offensive operations on separate directions of the front from the Barents to the Black Sea with the common task of consolidating the success of the past winter campaign, improving the position of troops in certain areas and, with preemptive strikes, disrupting the enemy’s preparations for the summer offensive.

The second part of the plan outlined the transition of the Soviet Armed Forces from the summer of 1942 to a decisive offensive along most of the Soviet-German front with the main attack on the southern wing. It was developed in the most general terms, since detailed planning of major offensive operations could only be carried out taking into account the results of military operations in the spring of 1942.

In accordance with the decision made, the Headquarters assigned specific combat missions to the fronts of the active army in April - early May for the coming spring stage of the struggle.

On April 20, the troops of the Bryansk Front were ordered to carry out an operation in early May with the forces of two armies and a tank corps in the Kursk-Lgov direction with the goal of capturing Kursk and cutting the Kursk-Lgov 1 railway.

The Southwestern Front received permission to conduct the Kharkov operation with the assistance of part of the forces of the Southern Front. According to the plan approved by the commander-in-chief of the South-Western direction on April 10, the goal of the operation was to forestall the enemy in launching offensive operations in the Kharkov direction and retain the initiative. The Southwestern Front was supposed to, using bridgeheads on the right bank of the Seversky Donets, northeast and southeast of Kharkov, deliver two attacks in converging directions on Kharkov, defeat the Kharkov enemy group and capture Kharkov, an important stronghold of enemy defense.

The southern front was supposed to defend the occupied lines, covering the Rostov and Voroshilovgrad directions and the Lozovaya, Barvenkovo, Izyum areas. It was assumed that the Southwestern and Southern Fronts would create the necessary conditions for the deployment of a large joint offensive operation in the summer in order to liberate Donbass and reach the Dnieper line.

In order to facilitate command and control of troops on the southern wing of the Soviet-German front in the upcoming offensive in the summer of 1942, Headquarters considered it necessary to create the North Caucasus direction on April 21. It included the Crimean Front, the Sevastopol defensive region, the North Caucasus Military District, the Black Sea Fleet and the Azov Military Flotilla. Marshal of the Soviet Union S. M. Budyonny was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the troops of the North Caucasus direction, Secretary of the Krasnodar Regional Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks P. I. Seleznev was appointed a member of the Military Council, Deputy Commander-in-Chief for the naval unit was Deputy People's Commissar of the Navy Admiral I. S. Isakov, Chief of Staff - General G.F. Zakharov.

1 This offensive was subsequently canceled by the Supreme Command Headquarters.

The troops of the North Caucasus direction were supposed to completely clear Crimea of ​​the enemy and prevent amphibious landings on the coast of the Azores and Black Seas in the Rostov-Tuapse area, as well as airborne assaults on the Kerch Peninsula and in the territory of the North Caucasus Military District. In the event of the enemy’s attempts to launch an offensive in the Rostov direction, these troops, in cooperation with the troops of the Southern Front, were to firmly hold the line of the Don River, not giving the enemy the opportunity to advance into the North Caucasus.

The fronts of the active army also received active offensive missions in other directions of the Soviet-German front.

The troops of the Kalinin and Western Fronts were ordered to complete the operations begun in the winter to defeat the enemy's Rzhev-Vyazma grouping with the subsequent development of an offensive on Smolensk. At the same time, the commander of the Western Front received the task of carrying out an air transport operation in order to strengthen the cavalry group of General P. A. Belov, operating behind enemy lines, with personnel, weapons and logistical means. 1. These troops were supposed to hold and expand the area they occupied area, as well as strike at communications, railways and enemy bases in the areas of Smolensk, Yartsev, Vyazma, Pochinka 2. The duration of the operation was determined from May 10 to 25. According to the Headquarters directive, 120 aircraft were involved in the operation, which were to be allocated by the commander of the Air Force, the commander of long-range aviation and the commander of the Western Front. The commander of the country's Air Defense Forces was entrusted with the task of covering airfields for loading heavy aircraft. Return flights were supposed to evacuate the wounded from Belov's group.

The Headquarters demanded that the troops of the North-Western Front complete the liquidation of the Demyansk enemy group, which was deeply wedged into the location of Soviet troops at the junction of the North-Western and Kalinin fronts.

The troops of the Karelian Front were supposed to prepare and conduct private operations in the Murmansk, Kandalaksha, Kestenga directions and reach the state border 3, and the troops of the 7th Separate Army were to completely clear the left bank of the Svir River from Finnish troops and seize bridgeheads on its right bank 4.

In the strategic plan of the Headquarters, the Navy was taken into account mainly as a force carrying out independent combat operations in the Northern and Black Sea maritime theaters. The Baltic Fleet was intended to be used on a limited basis, since it was blocked in Kronstadt and Leningrad. The Northern Fleet was tasked with protecting sea communications in the Barents and White Seas, as well as on the Northern Sea Route. He was also entrusted with the task of disrupting the enemy’s maritime communications, but especially important was the organization and conduct of special operations that were supposed to ensure the safety of convoys heading to the northern ports of the Soviet Union. In addition, the forces of this fleet were involved in joint actions with the 14th Army of the Karelian Front, which was conducting an operation in the Murmansk direction. The Black Sea Fleet, together with the Troops of the Primorsky Army, was supposed to not only actively participate in the defense of Sevastopol, but also to support the combat operations of the Crimean Front on the Kerch Peninsula, supply troops, strike enemy communications and repel attacks by torpedo boats and enemy aircraft on their bases and ships .

1 P. A. Belov’s group included the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps and separate units of the 4th Airborne Corps.

2 Archives of the Moscow Region, f. 132a, op. 2642, no. 41 pp. 130-131

3 Archives of the Moscow Region, f. 132a, op. 2642, no. 31, no. 173-175.

4 Ibid., pp. 178-179.

Aiming the Navy at solving independent problems, the Headquarters also drew attention to the shortcomings in the use of fleet forces in joint actions with front-line troops in coastal areas. The directive of the Chief of the General Staff gave specific instructions on the use of naval artillery, improving the organization of interaction between ground forces and navies, reconnaissance organization and other issues.

Fronts operating in the western and southwestern directions simultaneously with offensive missions received instructions on the creation of reserves and the construction of military defensive lines: “In order to create reserves and form shock fists for us to use in the desired directions in offensive actions, the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command considers it advisable to hide behind in some sectors of our common front with smaller forces in order to group the released forces and assets in army and front-line reserves and prepare them for participation in our upcoming offensive operations, as well as for counterattacks in case of an unexpected enemy attack.

In these types of activities, the Headquarters considers it necessary that... the front urgently build a military defensive line along the entire front, which should make it possible to free up some troops for the formation of shock fists” 1.

In the instructions of the Headquarters on strengthening the defense of the fronts, it was ordered to bring the depth of the main defense line to 10-12 km. Along with this, the Headquarters carried out significant measures to strengthen old and build new rear defensive lines to a significant depth, reaching a total of 600 km (to the Volga River).

In the southwestern direction, the construction of a line was underway on the line Voronezh, Starobelsk, Rostov-on-Don; The old defensive lines along the Don River were improved and defensive lines were built around such large cities as Voronezh, Rostov, Saratov, and Stalingrad. In the western direction, the Mozhaisk defense line was erected and the defenses around Moscow and the old lines along the Oka and Volga rivers were strengthened. To defend the Caucasian direction, at the end of 1941, construction began on a field fortified line along the Lower Don from the village of Nizhnechirskaya to Azov with a total length of 700 km, as well as lines along the Kuma and Manych rivers. However, by the spring of 1942, all of them were poorly developed in depth in the main directions. In addition, due to an unsuccessfully chosen location for the defensive structures, some of them were flooded during the spring flood.

In May 1942, the construction of defensive lines began between the Don and Kuban, along the Terek River and contours around Tikhoretsk, Voroshilovsk, Grozny, Mineralnye Vody, Krasnodar.

The Headquarters also paid great attention to strengthening the defense of Leningrad. The evacuation of the city's population continued.

Navigation on Lake Ladoga was being prepared. A second route was created through the Shlisselburg Bay, about 30 km long. For this purpose, the Kobono-Koredzhi port was built on the eastern shore of the lake.

1 Moscow Region Archives, f. 132a, op. 2642, no. 32, no. 89-95, 185-187, 190-195.

The ship's crew was replenished: metal barges were built in Leningrad, wooden ones - at the shipyard on the Syas River. Small steamships and barges from the Volzhsky, North-Kama and other shipping companies were transferred to Ladoga.

By a resolution dated April 9, 1942, the State Defense Committee assigned responsibility for organizing transportation across the lake to the Ladoga Military Flotilla, commanded by Captain 1st Rank V. S. Cherokov. The North-Western River Shipping Company was operationally subordinate to the commander of the Ladoga Military Flotilla. Measures were taken to strengthen the air defense of the Ladoga highway.

The partisan movement was also taken into account as an important factor in the strategic plan of the Headquarters, the forces of which were to be used on a large scale to disorganize the enemy rear.

Thus, all fronts deployed from the Arctic to the Crimea received not only instructions to improve defense in their zones, but also offensive tasks with limited goals. They had to solve these tasks in conditions of temporary defense until the summer of 1942, that is, before the start of a new strategic offensive with decisive goals - the defeat of the main enemy groups and the liberation of Soviet territory. The general goal of all spring offensive actions was to improve the operational-strategic position of the Soviet Armed Forces in the main directions, to reveal the intentions of the opposing enemy, to defeat his groups, and with preemptive strikes to thwart the plan of the German command to launch a new major offensive on the Soviet-German front, thereby giving the strategic defense of the Soviet troops an active character. When launching preemptive strikes, the greatest importance was attached to the Kharkov region - the most important strategic facility in the southwestern direction. All this was supposed to create favorable conditions for the deployment in the summer of large offensive operations on a huge front from the Baltic to the Black Sea in order to defeat the main enemy groups and create a decisive turning point in the war in favor of the USSR, which began near Moscow in the winter of 1941/42.

Taking into account the timing of reserve readiness and the degree of reorganization of the Air Force and armored forces, the summer offensive of the Soviet Army could begin only in the second half of July 1942.

The Headquarters of the Supreme High Command positioned its reserves so that they could be used, depending on the prevailing situation, both in the southwestern direction - to repel the expected enemy attack and launch a decisive offensive, and in the western direction - to reliably provide the Moscow region. Therefore, the main forces of the reserves were concentrated in the areas of Tula, Voronezh, Stalingrad, Saratov, from where they could quickly be advanced to one or another threatened direction. All marching reinforcements of the active army were distributed between these two directions.

The new offensive plan in 1942 was based on the Nazi leadership's desire to achieve the political goals of the war against the USSR, which Nazi Germany failed to achieve in 1941. The strategic concept of the Wehrmacht Supreme Command defined the Soviet-German front as the main front of the struggle. It is here, the leaders of fascist Germany believed, that lies the key to winning victory over the anti-fascist coalition, to solving the problem of gaining world domination. The overall strategic plan was to deliver a powerful strike with concentrated forces in one strategic direction - the southern wing of the front - and to consistently expand the offensive zone to the north.

In a conversation with Japanese Ambassador Oshima on January 3, 1942, after the defeat of the Nazi troops near Moscow, Hitler confidentially told him: “The Soviets will be defeated next summer... Summer is the decisive stage of the military dispute. The Bolsheviks will be thrown back so far that they will never be able to touch the cultural soil of Europe.” Developing and concretizing his adventurist plans, he continued: “I intend to no longer conduct offensive operations in the center of the front for now. My goal will be an offensive on the southern front. I decided, as soon as the weather improved, to attack again in the direction of the Caucasus.

This direction is the most important. We need to reach oil, Iran and Iraq. If we get there, then I hope the liberation movement of the Arab world 1 could also help our breakthrough. Of course, in addition, I will take care to destroy Moscow and Leningrad...

If England loses India, the whole world will collapse. India is the core of the British empire. It is necessary that Germany and Japan consult on joint plans for 1942 and 1943. Both allies must under no circumstances stop halfway. I am sure that England can be destroyed. I don’t yet know how to eliminate the USA” 2.

The question of draft plans for a new offensive campaign first arose in February 1942, when the situation on the Soviet-German front had somewhat stabilized. A new offensive in the East was planned to begin immediately after the spring thaw. On February 20, the head of the operational department of the General Staff of the Ground Forces, General A. Heusinger, had already presented the first draft of the offensive plan to General F. Halder. This plan provided for two stages of struggle: spring and summer-autumn. In the spring of 1942, the goal was to capture the Kerch Peninsula and Sevastopol with the forces of Army Group South, as well as to eliminate Soviet troops in the front bulge in the Barvenkovo ​​area, which was supposed to create the necessary conditions for the deployment in the summer of that year of the main operation on the southern wing of the Soviet- German front. The plan for the summer offensive itself provided for a single strike by large Wehrmacht forces on the southern wing with the goal of breaking through to the Caucasus.

At the end of February 1942, Ribbentrop, in a conversation with the Japanese ambassador in Germany, said: “Plans for the campaign are now being developed by the General Staff. In general terms, the plan is the one outlined by Hitler at the end of January: in all operations against the USSR, the southern sector should have the greatest importance - the offensive will begin there, and the battles will gradually turn to the north... In any case, if it is possible to cut off the USSR from external assistance and expand the capture in the south, including the entire Donbass and the Caucasus, then even if it is not possible to completely break the Soviet regime, the USSR will still lose all significance and strength... Operations against the Middle East will follow operations against the Caucasus.”

During March, the General Staff of the Ground Forces was systematically developing a plan for a new offensive in the East under the code name Operation Siegfried. On March 28, 1942, at a meeting at Wehrmacht headquarters, a detailed plan for the summer offensive was discussed. General W. Varlimont, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Wehrmacht Operational Command, who was present at the meeting, subsequently wrote down:

1 This refers to anti-British elements in Arab countries, which the Nazis intended to rely on in the fight against the British.

2 N. Jacobsen. 1939-1945. Der zweite Weltkrieg in Chronik und Doku-menten. Darmstadt, 1961, S. 288.

“...Hitler, despite the failures that befell the Germans, again returned to his basic idea, which he adhered to in December 1940 and the summer of 1941. He again wanted to concentrate his main efforts on the extreme flanks of a widely extended front. The only difference was that the large losses suffered by the ground army and which could not be fully compensated forced him to set himself successively one goal after another, starting from the southern sector, from the Caucasus. Moscow as the target of the offensive... has so far completely disappeared” 1.

Noteworthy is the testimony of Keitel, who, during interrogation on June 17, 1945, testified: “As a result of the 1941 campaign, it became clear that a moment of a certain balance of power was emerging between German and Soviet troops. The Russian counter-offensive, which was completely unexpected for the high command, showed that we had grossly miscalculated our assessment of the reserves of the Red Army. Moreover, it was clear that the Red Army was making maximum use of the winter stabilization of the front to further strengthen, replenish and train new reserves. It was not possible to win the war with lightning speed. However, this in no way took away our hope of achieving a military victory with a new offensive.

When drawing up the plan for the 1942 campaign, we were guided by the following guidelines:

a) the troops of the Eastern Front are no longer able to advance along the entire length of the front, as was the case in 1941;
b) the offensive should be limited to one section of the front, namely the southern;
c) the goal of the offensive: to completely exclude Donbass from the military-economic balance of Russia, cut off the supply of oil along the Volga and capture the main oil supply bases, which, according to our assessment, were located in Maykop and Grozny. The exit to the Volga was not planned immediately over a wide area; it was planned to exit in one of the places in order to then capture the strategically important center - Stalingrad. In the future, it was planned, in case of success and isolation of Moscow from the south, to undertake a turn with large forces to the north (provided that our allies would take over the Don River). I find it difficult to name any time frame for this operation. The entire operation in the southern sector was supposed to end with a major encirclement of the entire southwestern and southern groups of the Red Army, which were covered by our army groups “A” and “B” ... "2

Historians have at their disposal documentary materials about the plans of the fascist political leadership and military command for the summer of 1942. In their final form, the goal and plan of the new offensive campaign in the East were formulated in OKW Directive No. 41 of April 5, 1942, and then specified in Directives No. 44 and 45, signed in July.

The military-political goal of the new offensive of the fascist Wehrmacht on the Soviet-German front was to regain the strategic initiative and destroy the “remaining” forces of the Soviet Army, to capture the maximum number of the most important political, economic and military centers of the Soviet Union.

The strategic plan of the Hitlerite command was to “... while maintaining the position in the central sector, take Leningrad in the north and establish contacts on land with the Finns, and on the southern flank of the front to make a breakthrough to the Caucasus” 3.

1 W. Warlimoit. Im Hauptquartier der deutschen Wehrmacht. 1939-1945. Frankfurt a/M., 1962, S. 242.

2 Quote. from: "Military Historical Journal", 1961, No. 9, pp. 83-84.

3 Hitlers Weisungen fur die Kriegfuhruug 1939-1945. Dokumente des Oberkom-mandos der Wehrmacht. Frankfurt a/M., 1962, S. 184.

The solution to these tasks was supposed to be carried out sequentially “taking into account the situation created after the end of the winter campaign, the availability of forces and means, as well as transport capabilities.” At first, Hitler’s command needed to create conditions for carrying out the so-called “main operation” in the south of the Eastern Front “with the goal of destroying the enemy west of the Don, in order to then capture oil-bearing areas in the Caucasus and cross the Caucasus ridge.” For this, the fascist German troops needed to improve their operational situation, stabilize and strengthen the Eastern Front and rear front-line areas. Their specific tasks boiled down to capturing the Kerch Peninsula, Sevastopol during the spring, cutting off the Barvenkovo ​​ledge of Soviet troops, eliminating their bridgehead north-west of Novgorod, and leveling the front line in the Moscow direction.

By the end of May, the fascist German command expected to complete the concentration of the main forces of the strike forces to carry out the “main operation.” The immediate goal of this operation envisaged the delivery of a series of successive, complementary strikes, which were to develop “from north to south in such a way that in each of these strikes, in decisive directions, as many forces as possible would be concentrated, both of the ground army and, in particular, aviation."

The first strike was planned to be delivered from the area south of Orel to Voronezh. From here, the mobile formations were supposed to advance down the Don towards the group, which was delivering a second blow from the Kharkov area to the east. Then it was planned to unite in the area west of Stalingrad the troops advancing along the Don and the troops striking east from the Taganrog, Artemovsk region. After this, it was planned to quickly develop success directly to Stalingrad and the North Caucasus.

Operations in the north to capture Leningrad and the Kirov railway were planned to be carried out after the defeat of Soviet troops in the south and the capture of the oil regions of the Caucasus, the richest agricultural regions of the Middle and Lower Don and Kuban. In the western direction, where Soviet troops had significant forces, the enemy planned deterrent actions and private offensive operations to improve its operational position.

Thus, according to the plan of the fascist command, the German armed forces in the summer offensive of 1942 were supposed to achieve the achievement of political goals set by the Barbarossa plan. The enemy intended to deliver the main blow on the southern wing. The Wehrmacht was no longer capable of launching simultaneous attacks in other strategic directions, as was the case in 1941.

Having concentrated all their reserves in the south of the Eastern Front, the rulers of the “Third Reich” hoped that the loss of Donbass and Caucasian oil would weaken the Soviet Union and provide Germany with the opportunity to successfully continue the war, and the exit of German troops into Transcaucasia would disrupt the USSR’s communications with foreign countries through the Caucasus and Iran. Moreover, the Nazis, not without reason, hoped that the breakthrough of German troops in Transcaucasia would allow them to drag Turkey into the war against the USSR.

The implementation of the military-political goals of the entire offensive of the Nazi army in the East in the summer of 1942 largely depended on the successful solution of the initial tasks planned by German strategists for May - June 1942.

In order to ensure the secrecy of the summer offensive of 1942, the fascist leadership carried out a number of disinformation activities.

In order to keep the direction of the main attack secret, the General Staff of the German Ground Forces decided to create the impression that German troops would launch a powerful offensive in the western direction in order to defeat the central group of Soviet troops and capture Moscow. For this purpose, the headquarters of Army Group Center, at the direction of the OKH, developed a plan for a special operation under the code name “Kremlin”. The calculation was made that her plan would become known to the command of the Soviet Army and it would be misled. This plan provided for the implementation of a whole complex of various disinformation activities, which were closely linked in time to the preparation and implementation of the offensive in the south. However, Operation Kremlin did not achieve its goal.

So, in the spring of 1942, both warring parties developed strategic plans and were preparing for the next round of active operations on the Soviet-German front, which was caused by the urgent need to have a strategic initiative in their hands.

In accordance with the general plans for the upcoming actions, groupings of forces of the operating armies were created.

The Soviet active army included 9 front-line formations, a separate army and troops of the Moscow defense zone, 3 fleets with 3 flotillas operationally subordinate to them. By May 1942, three high commands of strategic directions still remained - Western, South-Western and North Caucasian, headed respectively by General G. K. Zhukov, Marshals S. K. Timoshenko and S. M. Budyonny. The forces of the active army included 10 strike aviation groups of Headquarters, formations and long-range aviation units, as well as the Moscow Air Defense Front and the Leningrad Air Defense Army. The strategic reserve of the Headquarters included 2 combined arms armies (1st reserve and 58th) and about 80 separate formations and units. In total, the troops of the Soviet active army (excluding the country's Air Defense Forces and the Navy) at that time numbered 5.1 million people, almost 3.9 thousand tanks, 44.9 thousand guns and mortars x, about 2.2 thousand .combat aircraft.

1 Without 50-mm mortars, of which there were 21.4 thousand.
2 IVI. Documents and materials, inventory No. 3, p. 364; f. 244, op. 287, no. 47, pp. 65-66.

The Northern, Baltic and Black Sea fleets had 140 warships of the main classes: 2 battleships, 6 cruisers, 32 destroyers and 100 submarines 1.

The fascist German armed forces had 3 army groups on the Soviet-German front, which included 9 field and 4 tank armies, 3 operational groups and 3 air fleets. The total number of enemy forces that opposed the Soviet army in May 1942 is shown in Table 11.

Thus, the ratio of forces and means of the parties was: in people - 1: 1.2, in guns and mortars - 1: 1.3, in combat aircraft - 1: 1 in favor of the enemy; in tanks - 1.2: 1 and in warships - 2.2 M in favor of the Soviet troops and navy 2. With such a ratio of forces and means, both sides entered a new stage of the Second World War in the spring of 1942, launching active operations in its main front.

Soviet command plans

After strategic miscalculations in planning and a series of successive defeats in the spring and summer of 1942, the Soviet command had only one current task - to stop the enemy's continuous advance to the east, stabilize the defense and only then begin planning a future offensive. However, during the summer period of 1942 this task could not be completed. German troops advanced across steppe flat terrain, practically devoid of natural obstacles necessary to create a defensive line without careful engineering support. The fighting took place in the summer, when German equipment was operated without any technical problems. In addition, the German military command, especially at the battalion-regiment-division-corps level, was significantly superior to the Soviet command and control personnel of similar appointments in terms of the level of management methodological culture and the effectiveness of combat operations. The calculations of the military leadership of the Red Army for the second half of the summer and autumn of 1942 under these conditions were quite traditional and tested in practice. It was supposed to retreat deep into the vast Russian territory, stretch German communications, and then force the enemy to participate in bloody battles on terrain that, from an engineering point of view, was convenient for defense. In the steppe, this role could be played by a river or a settlement, which would be difficult to overcome on the move. Subsequently, the entire strategy was connected with the onset of winter cold, under conditions of which the enemy inexplicably lost combat effectiveness, while Soviet troops continued to fight with the same intensity. Only then should a retaliatory strike follow, in accordance with national psychology, planned and carried out with the goal of completely destroying the enemy and achieving strategic superiority in a given theater of operations.

From the book History of Public Administration in Russia author Shchepetev Vasily Ivanovich

1. Creation of the Soviet state. Formation and development of Soviet public administration Finding itself in the center of a global and national crisis, which ended with the collapse of the Russian Empire and the Civil War, Russia chose a completely new path

From the book On the Path to Victory author Martirosyan Arsen Benikovich

Myth No. 43. Marshal of the Soviet Union, Four times Hero of the Soviet Union Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov is the most victorious marshal during the war. This is the shortest myth, but despite this - due to its special historical and political significance, including for the mass

From the book The Road to Stalingrad. Memoirs of a German infantryman. 1941–1943 by Cizer Benno

Command Experience - II These two examples of the use of battle groups are typical of a technique where armor is concentrated on the defensive, but is used offensively at the right moment. Commanders not very familiar with tank warfare tactics and those who dealt only with

From the book A Short Course in Stalinism author Borev Yuri Borisovich

METHOD OF COMMAND Shortly before his death, Marshal Rokossovsky said: “This dropout only interfered with the fight.” We? commanders? he was deceived: they agreed to any of his most absurd orders, but acted

From the book Above the Fiery Arc. Soviet aviation in the Battle of Kursk author Gorbach Vitaly Grigorievich

1.1. General situation, command plans The configuration of the front line in the Kursk region was formed during the fierce battles that took place on the Soviet-German front from the autumn of 1942 to the spring of 1943. Starting this period with the sensational encirclement of the 6th Army in the area

author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Grouping of forces and plans of the Soviet command Before starting a detailed analysis of the features of planning military operations of the Red Army in the upcoming war, a few words should be said about the conceptual views of the Soviet leadership on the nature of the upcoming

From the book The Largest Tank Battles of World War II. Analytical review author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Grouping of forces and plans of the German command The development of a plan for an attack on the Soviet Union became the “collective creativity” of both German headquarters structures - OKH and OKW. The leading place was taken by the German headquarters of the ground forces (OKH) of the Wehrmacht, headed by its chief

From the book Death of Fronts author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Composition of the group and plans of the German command (Army Group Center) Combat operations on the territory of Belarus and Lithuania were to be carried out by formations and units of Army Group Center under the command of Field Marshal von Bock. Army Group Center consisted of 31

From the book Death of Fronts author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

The intention of the command of the 1st BF In such conditions, when the main forces of the 9th German Army were concentrated against the Vistula bridgeheads, the offensive of the troops of the 1st Belorussian Front with a breakthrough of the defenses on these bridgeheads exposed the main forces of the German troops to severe

From the book The Road to Stalingrad. Memoirs of a German infantryman. 1941-1943. by Cizer Benno

Command Experience - I Of the days of fighting described above, December 17, 18 and 19 had some features that at that time became typical for many tank divisions: the division commander personally led the forward forces of a powerful and mobile assault group. This technique

From the book Frontiers of Glory author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Plans of the Soviet command After strategic miscalculations in planning and a series of successive defeats in the spring and summer of 1942, the Soviet command had only one current task - to stop the enemy’s continuous advance to the east, to stabilize

From the book Frontiers of Glory author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Plans of the German command Unlike Soviet plans, the German attack on Stalingrad was an integral part of the complex Operation Braunschweig for the offensive of Army Group South in the spring and summer of 1942, carried out in accordance with the directive

From the book Frontiers of Glory author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Actions of the Soviet command The command of Army Group Center did not intend to use tank divisions in the first massive attack on the morning of July 5, 1943. It was going to place the main emphasis on the use of heavily armored vehicles of the 505th heavy

From the book Fighting in the area of ​​the Khalkhin Gol River May 11 – September 16, 1939 author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

SOVIET COMMAND PLAN 83. At dawn before the attack. Armored car BA-6 from the 8th motorized armored brigade on the eastern bank of Khalkhin Gol. August 1939 (AVL). The idea of ​​the Soviet-Mongolian command was to pin down the enemy from the front,

From the book Behind the Scenes of World War II author Volkov Fedor Dmitrievich

Plans for the destruction of the Soviet state In preparation for a military campaign against the USSR, Hitler and his generals developed far-reaching plans for the destruction of the Soviet state. On the territory of the USSR it was planned to create four Reichskommissariats - colonies of Germany:

From the book Tsarist Rome between the Oka and Volga rivers. author Nosovsky Gleb Vladimirovich

30. In the history of architecture, it is known that the plans of “ancient” Rome from the era of Servius Tullius are “for some reason” surprisingly similar to the plans of the Moscow White City and Moscow Skorodom. It turns out that architectural historians have long paid attention to a curious circumstance.

After the defeat near Moscow and the failure of the “lightning war” plan against the USSR, the position of Nazi Germany worsened. But she still had enormous forces and resources to continue the criminal war.

By the spring of 1942, the Nazi army gained a foothold on new frontiers. At the same time, the troops of its central group were located 150 and in some places even 120 km from the Soviet capital. Having carried out emergency measures to mobilize forces and transferred a significant part of the reserves from the West to the Eastern Front, Hitler and the generals obedient to him were preparing a new offensive here. The absence of a second front in Europe favored this.

Fascist Germany not only made up for the losses suffered in the battles against the Red Army, but also increased its armed forces compared to the beginning of 1942 by more than 700 thousand people. By May 1942, the Nazis, together with their allies, had 6,200 thousand people, up to 43 thousand guns and mortars, about 3,230 tanks and assault guns, and almost 3,400 combat aircraft on the Soviet-German front. 76.6% of all Wehrmacht divisions were here.

At that time, the active Red Army included 5.5 million people, 43 thousand guns and mortars, 1,200 rocket artillery installations, 4 thousand tanks, and more than 3 thousand combat aircraft.

Preparing for a new offensive, the enemy still retained confidence in the superiority of the Wehrmacht over the Red Army. But the Nazi leaders no longer considered it possible to carry out an offensive along the entire Eastern Front. The idea of ​​the German high command for the summer campaign of 1942 was to conquer the Caucasus and the Lower Volga region. True, the Chief of the General Staff of the Ground Forces, General Halder, was a supporter of launching an offensive in the Moscow direction. He, like a number of other German generals, hoped that the capture of Moscow and the defeat of the central group of Soviet troops would not only ensure the success of the summer campaign of 1942, but would also decide the fate of the entire war in favor of Germany. The commander of Army Group North, Field Marshal Küchler, also put forward his plan. He proposed, first of all, to capture Leningrad.

In the end, however, the enemy decided to concentrate his main efforts in the south of the Soviet-German front. As a result, the main task assigned to the Nazi troops for the summer campaign of 1942 was to capture the southern regions of the USSR, rich in strategic raw materials. These operations were considered decisive. The capture of Leningrad was also dependent on their progress. In the Moscow direction, only restraining actions and improving the operational position of German troops through private operations were envisaged. Expecting to recapture the strategic initiative, the enemy believed that he would achieve victory over the Soviet Union.

This plan for continuing the aggression was adventurous at its core, since it, like the enemy’s previous plans, was based on underestimating the forces of the Soviet Union. But the promotion of military-economic goals to the forefront in the strategic plan of the campaign was not accidental. It was dictated by the very specific aspirations of the Hitlerite command. Subsequently, they were characterized as follows by Field Marshal Paulus: “The main military operation of 1942 was to be carried out in the area of ​​​​operations of Army Group South.” The strategic goal of the operation is to capture oil-rich areas of the North Caucasus. The seizure of Caucasian oil was considered vital for the further conduct of the war by the armed forces of Germany and its allies.”*

The conquest of the Caucasus, according to the calculations of the German command, was supposed to bring a number of other significant benefits: to involve Turkey in the war against the USSR, to deprive our country of communication with the outside world through Iran, to lead the Soviet Black Sea Fleet to destruction and, finally, to open the way for Nazi Germany to the Middle East. East.

In accordance with his plan, by the end of June 1942, the enemy concentrated in the zone from Kursk to Taganrog about 900 thousand soldiers and officers, 1260 tanks, over 17 thousand guns and mortars, 1640 combat aircraft. Here were up to 35% of all its infantry and over 50% of tank and motorized formations located on the Soviet-German front.

Attaching great importance to keeping his strategic plans for the summer campaign of 1942 secret, the enemy put a lot of effort into misinforming the Soviet command. In this regard, a special role was assigned to Operation Kremlin, developed and carried out by the headquarters of Army Group Center at the direction of the High Command of the Ground Forces (OKH). It included a whole series of disinformation activities aimed at creating a false impression among the Soviet command that the fascist German army would deliver its main blow in the summer of 1942 in the Moscow direction.

Meanwhile, the complex tasks facing the Soviet Supreme High Command required it to correctly assess both the balance of forces between the USSR and Nazi Germany at the end of the first year of the war, and the immediate prospects for the struggle on the Soviet-German front.

When analyzing the situation, it was taken into account that, having thwarted the enemy’s plan for a “blitzkrieg” war, the Soviet country successfully mobilized forces and means to continue the fight against the aggressor. More and more tanks, aircraft, artillery, jet weapons, and ammunition entered service with the troops. There were over 5.5 million people in the active army. The troops acquired combat experience and had a high moral and political spirit.

At the same time, the Headquarters and the General Staff saw that the winter offensive of the Red Army remained unfinished, and the enemy was preparing to resume active operations. It was also obvious that he still had superiority in the number of troops and their technical equipment. The Red Army still lacked trained reserves, and the formation of new formations and associations, although it was proceeding at an increasing pace, was still limited by the level of production of the latest types of weapons. The Soviet troops, having suffered heavy losses during the winter campaign, needed to recuperate, and this task had not yet been resolved by the spring of 1942.

Under the current conditions, the most appropriate use of forces and means was of particular importance. And the Headquarters, based on a correct understanding of the general situation, came to the conclusion that only by exhausting the enemy forces in defensive battles on fortified lines, by combining defense with strong counterattacks, could the Red Army go on a decisive offensive. In this regard, it was considered necessary by the beginning of the summer of 1942 to basically prepare Soviet troops for temporary strategic defense.

However, this idea was ultimately not fully implemented by Headquarters. Along with the transition to defense, it was decided to conduct a whole series of private offensive operations - near Leningrad, in the Demyansk region, in the Lgov-Kursk and Smolensk directions, in the Kharkov region, in the Donbass, and Crimea. This decision - to defend and attack at the same time - was, as the subsequent course of events showed, erroneous, especially considering the scale of the planned offensive.

As for assessing the enemy’s strategic plans for the summer campaign, the Headquarters and the General Staff, contrary to Soviet intelligence data, believed that the Moscow direction would again be the main one, while in the south the enemy would launch an auxiliary strike. It was taken into account that in the central sector of the Soviet-German front by the spring of 1942 there was the largest group of Nazi troops consisting of 70 divisions.

Of particular concern were the Oryol-Tula and Kursk-Voronezh directions, from where the Nazis could strike at the capital, bypassing it from the southwest. In accordance with this assessment of the situation, the Headquarters strengthened the troops of the Western and Bryansk fronts to the detriment of the Southwestern and Southern fronts.

These miscalculations in assessing the plans of the Nazis negatively influenced the course of military operations in the summer of 1942.

Tests

1. Name the reasons for the major failures of the Red Army in the first months of the Great Patriotic War.

A) the German attack was sudden;

B) Soviet soldiers did not want to fight for the Stalinist regime;

C) the troops were not put on combat readiness;

D) there was a lack of experienced command personnel.

2. On August 8, 1941, the following was appointed Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Soviet troops:

A) G.K. Zhukov

B) I.V. Stalin

B) S.K. Timoshenko

3. For the first time in World War II, German troops were forced to go on the defensive in battle:

4. On September 18, 1941, by decision of the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command, four rifle divisions were renamed guards. The battle in which these divisions distinguished themselves took place under:

A) Yelney;

B) Smolensk;

B) Leningrad.

5. The defense of Moscow was led by:

A) A.M. Vasilevsky;

B) G.K. Zhukov ;

B) K.K. Rokosovsky.

6. The strategic plan of the Soviet command in the summer campaign of 1942:

A) conducting active defensive battles with a subsequent transition to a counteroffensive in all decisive directions;

B) going into defensive position along the entire front line;

C) a tactical retreat to the Volga in order to draw the enemy deeper into Soviet territory.

7. Indicate what tactics were the basis for the Kursk operation of the Soviet troops:

A) wear down the enemy in defensive battles followed by a counteroffensive;

B) advanced offensive of Soviet troops;

C) going into defensive mode due to the enemy’s clear advantage

8. 2438 soldiers were awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union for the operation of:

A) liberation of Orel;

B) crossing the Dnieper

B) liberation of Kyiv.

9. Match names and facts:

P.M. Gavrilov air ram

N.F.Gastello heroic battles on the outskirts of Moscow

G.K. Zhukov strengthening the defense of Leningrad

V.G. Klochkov heroic defense of Sevastopol

F.S. Oktyabrsky heroic defense of the Brest Fortress

10. Match events and dates:

Defensive stage of the Battle of Moscow July 10 – September 10, 1941

The offensive stage of the battle for Moscow October 30, 1941-July 4, 1942

11. The USSR surpassed Germany in the production of military products in:

A) late 1942;

B) mid-1943;

B) early 1944

12. The following changes occurred in the confessional policy of the USSR during the Great Patriotic War:

A) the patriarchate was restored;

B) dioceses were restored, churches were opened;

C) the law on the separation of church and state was repealed

D) the activities of priests at the front were allowed.

13. In the second half of September 1943, Soviet partisans carried out Operation Concert. Her goal:

A) mass departure of concert brigades to partisan detachments;

B) undermining enemy communications, disabling railways ;

C) the destruction of the highest ranks of Hitler's army.

14. The plan for the counteroffensive of Soviet troops near Stalingrad had the code name:

A) "Typhoon"

B) "Citadel"

B) "Uranus".

15. The offensive Belarusian operation, developed by the Soviet high command, bore the code name:

A) "Bagration"

B) "Kutuzov"

B) "Suvorov"

16. Japan did not enter the war against the USSR in 1941 because of::

A) the situation on the Soviet-German front;

B) the United States entering the war with Japan;

C) the unpreparedness of the Kwantung Army;

D) the fact that the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

17. The USSR’s statement about the country’s entry into the war against Japan was made at the conference:

A) in Tehran;

B) in Moscow;

B) in Yalta

D) in Potstdam.

18. August 5, 1943 The first fireworks display took place in Moscow. It sounded in honor of:

A) liberation of Kharkov;

B) breaking the blockade of Leningrad;

B) liberation of Orel and Belgrade

19. On March 26, 1944, Soviet troops first reached the line of the State Border of the USSR. This happened in the area:

A) Soviet-Polish section of the border;

B) Soviet-Romanian border near the river. Rod;

B) Borders of the USSR and Norway.

20. On January 12, 1945, a week before the appointed date, Soviet troops launched a powerful offensive along almost the entire sector of the front from the Baltic to the Carpathians. The reason for this attack:

A) the desire to get ahead of the allies and be the first to enter German territory;

B) Charles de Gaulle's request to help the anti-fascist uprising in Paris.

C) W. Churchill’s request to save the Allied troops in the Ardennes from defeat.

21. At the Potsdam (Berlin) conference the following decisions were made (several answers)

A) about reparations from Germany;

B) on the transfer of the city of Koenigsberg and the surrounding area to the USSR;

B) about the management of post-war Germany.

D) on the appointment of Stalin as commander of the united allied forces.

D) on the arrest and trial of Nazi war criminals.

22. The meeting on the Elbe River of Soviet and American troops took place in 1945:

A) A.T. Tvardovsky

B) K.M.Simonov

B) S.V. Mikhalkov

A) A.A.Alexandrov

B) N.V. Bogoslovsky

B) V.P. Solovyov-Sedoy

25. The breakthrough of the Siege of Leningrad occurred in:

A) January 1943

B) July 1943;

B) January 1944

26. Name the highest body of state power during the Great Patriotic War:

A) Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR

B) State Defense Committee

B) Council of People's Commissars

27. When the Battle of Kursk began:

28. Give answers to the questions:

28.1 When military operations were opened on the Second Front_________________________________________________________

28.2 Who headed the delegations of the USSR, USA, Great Britain at the Tehran Conference in 1943 _____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose of the lesson: to reveal the role of the rear as one of the factors in the victory of the Soviet people over Germany; understand the reasons and essence of changes in the policy of the Soviet state towards the church during the war; understand the sources, the most important features and forms of people's war behind enemy lines.

Basic knowledge: the essence of the occupation regime; the moral and psychological state of Soviet society during the war; the activities of the Orthodox Church during the war; restructuring the economy on a war footing; the contribution of science and artistic culture to the defeat of the enemy; methods of fighting the enemy of partisans and underground fighters.

Basic concepts: occupation regime; evacuation; guerrilla warfare.

Lesson equipment: workbook (issue 2, § 32); reader; tables; map "The rear of the country during the war."


The lesson begins with a conversation about homework issues. You can invite individual students to complete tasks 6, 7 (p. 67) in the workbook (issue 2), as well as conduct a screening test.

What was the significance of the Battle of Moscow?

a) The strategic initiative passed into the hands of the Soviet command;

b) the plan for a lightning war was thwarted;

c) a second front was opened in Europe.

What was the strategic plan of the Soviet command in the summer campaign of 1942?

a) Conducting active defensive battles with subsequent transition to a counteroffensive in all decisive directions;

b) going into defensive position along the entire front line;

c) a tactical retreat to the Volga in order to draw the enemy deep into Soviet territory.

What measures were provided for by the order of the People's Commissar of Defense of the USSR issued on July 28, 1942 (several answer options are possible)?

a) Creation of barrage detachments to shoot unauthorized Red Army soldiers retreating;

b) destruction of all populated areas without exception during the forced withdrawal of Soviet troops;

c) mobilization of the able-bodied urban population to work at industrial enterprises and construction sites;

d) bringing to court martial the commanders of the Red Army who allowed the unauthorized abandonment of positions;

e) the formation of penal battalions and companies.


Plan for learning new material

1. The moral and psychological state of Soviet society during the war.

2. The Church during the Great Patriotic War.

3. Evacuation. Life and everyday life of people in the rear.

4. Science and education during the war.

5. Artistic culture.

6. Guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines.


1. It is advisable to start the first question by listening to a prepared report on the essence of the occupation regime established by the Nazis.

It is possible to reveal the problem of the moral and psychological state of Soviet society during the war by combining the teacher’s story with completing task 1 (issue 2, pp. 51-52) in the workbook and working on the document “From the speech of I.V. Stalin on July 3, 1941 .” placed at the end of the paragraph. After reading the document, the teacher asks: why in his speech on the radio did Stalin address the people with the words: “Brothers and sisters!”? What turning point in the relationship between government and society did this appeal reflect?

You can also organize a discussion of a problematic task: what, in your opinion, did the Soviet people defend during the war: the Motherland, socialist conquests, Stalin? How would you explain the widespread use of the slogan “For the Motherland!” at the front? For Stalin!"?

2. When starting to explain the second question, the teacher must emphasize that during the war years the authorities also changed their attitude towards the church. Next, the teacher combines his story with completing task 2 (issue 2, p. 53) in the workbook.

3. Having revealed the essence of the concept of “evacuation,” the teacher organizes a collective discussion of task 3 (issue 2, p. 55) in the workbook. Then you can create a problematic situation: what factors do you think allowed the Soviet Union to rebuild the economy on a war footing in a short time? In conclusion, you can listen to messages prepared at home about the life of people in the rear. In addition to the textbook material, the teacher can use the data given in the work of M. S. Zimich “Everyday life in the hard times of war. 1941-1945" (M., 1994. - Issue 1 and 2).

About the card system. The Soviet state introduced rationed sales of goods using cards with differentiated norms and conditions of sale for different groups of the population. On July 18, 1941, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR adopted a resolution to introduce in Moscow, Leningrad, and their suburbs cards for bread, meat, fats, sugar and other essential products, as well as for basic necessities (fabrics, shoes, clothing, etc.). At the end of October, a card system for the sale of bread, sugar and confectionery was introduced in all cities and workers' towns of the country. At the end of 1941, rationed food supplies were organized throughout the country...

Supply standards in the country were differentiated according to the social and production principle. Preferential rights were enjoyed by workers in sectors of the national economy who were supplied with bread on ration cards of the first category and were of decisive importance in strengthening the defense power of the state. These included workers, office workers and engineers in the military industry, coal and oil industries, hazardous workshops of ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy, etc. The needs of such population groups as children, nursing mothers, and war veterans were also taken into account. According to supply standards, the entire population was divided into 4 groups: workers and persons equivalent to them; employees and persons equivalent to them; dependents; children up to 12 years old inclusive...


The supply standards for the population of the USSR established at the beginning of the war



The supply standards for meat and fish were also differentiated. The usual monthly allowance for these products on a work card was as follows: meat, fish - 1.8 kg, fats - 0.4 kg, cereals and pasta - 1.2 kg. Employees, dependents and children received less than these standards.

4. Students study the fourth question independently by reading the text of the corresponding section of the textbook and filling out the table “Science during the Great Patriotic War”:



To consolidate the material studied, the teacher gives a task: name the best examples of Soviet weapons and military equipment and the names of their creators.

5. When covering the fifth question, it is advisable to use the computer version of the textbook. If this is not possible, the question is studied by combining the teacher’s story with completing task 6 (issue 2, p. 57) in the workbook. The teacher can accompany his story by working with illustrations placed on the insert of the textbook, and also use recordings of songs from the times of the Great Patriotic War.

6. The study of the sixth question can be organized as a mini-conference with short presentations by students.

At the end of the lesson, it is advisable to discuss the question: what is the contribution of home front workers to the common cause of defeating the enemy?


Homework assignment. § 33 and questions to it. Tasks 4, 5 (p. 56), 7, 8 (p. 58), 9 (p. 60-61) in the workbook (issue 2).



What else to read