home

Solve inequality with logarithms with solution. Complex logarithmic inequalities

Do you think that there is still time before the exam, and you will have time to prepare? Perhaps this is so. But in any case, the earlier the student begins training, the more successfully he passes the exams. Today we decided to dedicate an article to logarithmic inequalities. This is one of the tasks, which means an opportunity to get an extra point.

Do you already know what a logarithm (log) is? We really hope so. But even if you don't have an answer to this question, it's not a problem. It is very easy to understand what a logarithm is.

Why exactly 4? You need to raise the number 3 to such a power to get 81. When you understand the principle, you can proceed to more complex calculations.

You went through the inequalities a few years ago. And since then, you constantly meet them in mathematics. If you're having trouble solving inequalities, check out the appropriate section.
Now, when we have got acquainted with concepts separately, we will pass to their consideration in general.

The simplest logarithmic inequality.

The simplest logarithmic inequalities are not limited to this example, there are three more, only with different signs. Why is this needed? To better understand how to solve inequality with logarithms. Now we give a more applicable example, still quite simple, we leave complex logarithmic inequalities for later.

How to solve it? It all starts with ODZ. You should know more about it if you want to always easily solve any inequality.

What is ODZ? DPV for logarithmic inequalities

The abbreviation stands for the range of valid values. In assignments for the exam, this wording often pops up. DPV is useful to you not only in the case of logarithmic inequalities.

Look again at the above example. We will consider the ODZ based on it, so that you understand the principle, and the solution of logarithmic inequalities does not raise questions. It follows from the definition of the logarithm that 2x+4 must be greater than zero. In our case, this means the following.

This number must be positive by definition. Solve the inequality presented above. This can even be done orally, here it is clear that X cannot be less than 2. The solution of the inequality will be the definition of the range of acceptable values.
Now let's move on to solving the simplest logarithmic inequality.

We discard the logarithms themselves from both parts of the inequality. What is left for us as a result? simple inequality.

It's easy to solve. X must be greater than -0.5. Now we combine the two obtained values into the system. In this way,

This will be the region of admissible values for the considered logarithmic inequality.

Why is ODZ needed at all? This is an opportunity to weed out incorrect and impossible answers. If the answer is not within the range of acceptable values, then the answer simply does not make sense. This is worth remembering for a long time, since in the exam there is often a need to search for ODZ, and it concerns not only logarithmic inequalities.

Algorithm for solving logarithmic inequality

The solution consists of several steps. First, it is necessary to find the range of acceptable values. There will be two values in the ODZ, we considered this above. The next step is to solve the inequality itself. The solution methods are as follows:

multiplier replacement method;
decomposition;
rationalization method.

Depending on the situation, one of the above methods should be used. Let's go straight to the solution. We will reveal the most popular method that is suitable for solving USE tasks in almost all cases. Next, we will consider the decomposition method. It can help if you come across a particularly "tricky" inequality. So, the algorithm for solving the logarithmic inequality.

Solution examples :

It is not in vain that we took precisely such an inequality! Pay attention to the base. Remember: if it is greater than one, the sign remains the same when finding the range of valid values; otherwise, the inequality sign must be changed.

As a result, we get the inequality:

Now we bring the left side to the form of the equation equal to zero. Instead of the “less than” sign, we put “equal”, we solve the equation. Thus, we will find the ODZ. We hope that you will have no problems with solving such a simple equation. The answers are -4 and -2. That's not all. You need to display these points on the chart, place "+" and "-". What needs to be done for this? Substitute numbers from the intervals into the expression. Where the values are positive, we put "+" there.

Answer: x cannot be greater than -4 and less than -2.

We found the range of valid values only for the left side, now we need to find the range of valid values for the right side. This is by no means easier. Answer: -2. We intersect both received areas.

And only now we begin to solve the inequality itself.

Let's simplify it as much as possible to make it easier to decide.

We again use the interval method in the solution. Let's skip the calculations, with him everything is already clear from the previous example. Answer.

But this method is suitable if the logarithmic inequality has the same bases.

Solving logarithmic equations and inequalities with different bases involves initial reduction to one base. Then use the above method. But there is also a more complicated case. Consider one of the most complex types of logarithmic inequalities.

Logarithmic inequalities with variable base

How to solve inequalities with such characteristics? Yes, and such can be found in the exam. Solving inequalities in the following way will also have a beneficial effect on your educational process. Let's look at the issue in detail. Let's put theory aside and go straight to practice. To solve logarithmic inequalities, it is enough to once familiarize yourself with the example.

To solve the logarithmic inequality of the presented form, it is necessary to bring the right side to the logarithm with the same base. The principle resembles equivalent transitions. As a result, the inequality will look like this.

Actually, it remains to create a system of inequalities without logarithms. Using the rationalization method, we pass to an equivalent system of inequalities. You will understand the rule itself when you substitute the appropriate values and follow their changes. The system will have the following inequalities.

Using the rationalization method, when solving inequalities, you need to remember the following: you need to subtract one from the base, x, by definition of the logarithm, is subtracted from both parts of the inequality (the right from the left), the two expressions are multiplied and set under the original sign relative to zero.

The further solution is carried out by the interval method, everything is simple here. It is important for you to understand the differences in the solution methods, then everything will start to work out easily.

There are many nuances in logarithmic inequalities. The simplest of them are easy enough to solve. How to make it so that to solve each of them without problems? You have already received all the answers in this article. Now you have a long practice ahead of you. Constantly practice solving various problems within the exam and you will be able to get the highest score. Good luck in your difficult work!

An inequality is called logarithmic if it contains a logarithmic function.

Methods for solving logarithmic inequalities are no different from except for two things.

First, when passing from the logarithmic inequality to the inequality of sublogarithmic functions, it follows follow the sign of the resulting inequality. It obeys the following rule.

If the base of the logarithmic function is greater than $1$, then when passing from the logarithmic inequality to the inequality of sublogarithmic functions, the inequality sign is preserved, and if it is less than $1$, then it is reversed.

Secondly, the solution of any inequality is an interval, and, therefore, at the end of the solution of the inequality of sublogarithmic functions, it is necessary to compose a system of two inequalities: the first inequality of this system will be the inequality of sublogarithmic functions, and the second will be the interval of the domain of definition of the logarithmic functions included in the logarithmic inequality.

Practice.

Let's solve the inequalities:

1. $\log_(2)((x+3)) \geq 3.$

$D(y): \x+3>0.$

$x \in (-3;+\infty)$

The base of the logarithm is $2>1$, so the sign does not change. Using the definition of the logarithm, we get:

$x+3 \geq 2^(3),$

$x \in \)

Very important! In any inequality, the transition from the form $\log_a(⁡f(x)) ˅ \log_a⁡(g(x))$ to comparing expressions under logarithms can only be done if:

Example . Solve the inequality: $\log$$≤-1$

Solution:

$\log$ $_(\frac(1)(3))⁡(\frac(3x-2)(2x-3))$$≤-1$	Let's write out the ODZ.
ODZ: $\frac(3x-2)(2x-3)$ $>0$
$⁡\frac(3x-2-3(2x-3))(2x-3)$$≥$ $0$	We open the brackets, give .
$⁡\frac(-3x+7)(2x-3)$ $≥$ $0$	We multiply the inequality by $-1$, remembering to reverse the comparison sign.
$⁡\frac(3x-7)(2x-3)$ $≤$ $0$
$⁡\frac(3(x-\frac(7)(3)))(2(x-\frac(3)(2)))$$≤$ $0$	Let's build a number line and mark the points $\frac(7)(3)$ and $\frac(3)(2)$ on it. Note that the point from the denominator is punctured, despite the fact that the inequality is not strict. The fact is that this point will not be a solution, since when substituting into an inequality, it will lead us to division by zero.
$x∈($$\frac(3)(2)$ $;$$\frac(7)(3)]$	Now we plot the ODZ on the same numerical axis and write down in response the interval that falls into the ODZ.
	Write down the final answer.

Answer: $x∈($$\frac(3)(2)$ $;$$\frac(7)(3)]$

Example . Solve the inequality: $\log^2_3⁡x-\log_3⁡x-2>0$

Solution:

$\log^2_3⁡x-\log_3⁡x-2>0$	Let's write out the ODZ.
ODZ: $x>0$	Let's get to the decision.
Solution: $\log^2_3⁡x-\log_3⁡x-2>0$	Before us is a typical square-logarithmic inequality. We do.
$t=\log_3⁡x$ $t^2-t-2>0$	Expand the left side of the inequality into .
$D=1+8=9$ $t_1= \frac(1+3)(2)=2$ $t_2=\frac(1-3)(2)=-1$ $(t+1)(t-2)>0$
	Now you need to return to the original variable - x. To do this, we pass to , which has the same solution, and make the reverse substitution.
$\left[ \begin(gathered) t>2 \\ t<-1 \end{gathered} \right.$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $\left[ \begin{gathered} \log_3⁡x>2 \\ \log_3⁡x<-1 \end{gathered} \right.$	Transform $2=\log_3⁡9$, $-1=\log_3⁡\frac(1)(3)$.
$\left[ \begin(gathered) \log_3⁡x>\log_39 \\ \log_3⁡x<\log_3\frac{1}{3} \end{gathered} \right.$	Let's move on to comparing arguments. The bases of logarithms are greater than $1$, so the sign of the inequalities does not change.
$\left[ \begin(gathered) x>9 \\ x<\frac{1}{3} \end{gathered} \right.$	Let's combine the solution of the inequality and the ODZ in one figure.
	Let's write down the answer.

Answer: $(0; \frac(1)(3))∪(9;∞)$

Your privacy is important to us. For this reason, we have developed a Privacy Policy that describes how we use and store your information. Please read our privacy policy and let us know if you have any questions.

Collection and use of personal information

Personal information refers to data that can be used to identify a specific person or contact him.

You may be asked to provide your personal information at any time when you contact us.

The following are some examples of the types of personal information we may collect and how we may use such information.

What personal information we collect:

When you submit an application on the site, we may collect various information, including your name, phone number, email address, etc.

How we use your personal information:

The personal information we collect allows us to contact you and inform you about unique offers, promotions and other events and upcoming events.
From time to time, we may use your personal information to send you important notices and communications.
We may also use personal information for internal purposes, such as conducting audits, data analysis and various research in order to improve the services we provide and provide you with recommendations regarding our services.
If you enter a prize draw, contest or similar incentive, we may use the information you provide to administer such programs.

Disclosure to third parties

We do not disclose information received from you to third parties.

Exceptions:

In the event that it is necessary - in accordance with the law, judicial order, in legal proceedings, and / or based on public requests or requests from state bodies in the territory of the Russian Federation - disclose your personal information. We may also disclose information about you if we determine that such disclosure is necessary or appropriate for security, law enforcement, or other public interest purposes.
In the event of a reorganization, merger or sale, we may transfer the personal information we collect to the relevant third party successor.

Protection of personal information

We take precautions - including administrative, technical and physical - to protect your personal information from loss, theft, and misuse, as well as from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction.

Maintaining your privacy at the company level

To ensure that your personal information is secure, we communicate privacy and security practices to our employees and strictly enforce privacy practices.

What else to read

Why dream of a woman hitting a man with a stick Any dream about women is a harbinger of intrigue and quarrels. For a woman to see herself in a dream with a beard is a sign of imminent widowhood or ...

What does it mean to fly on an airplane in a dream Before you find out what the plane is dreaming of, you need to remember what happened the day before. Perhaps you have heard...

What did 2 black cats dream about In life, many problems and superstitions are associated with her, although in a dream she rarely brings evil and turns into bad luck ....

\(\log\) \(_(\frac(1)(3))⁡(\frac(3x-2)(2x-3))\)\(≤-1\)	Let's write out the ODZ.
ODZ: \(\frac(3x-2)(2x-3)\) \(>0\)
\(⁡\frac(3x-2-3(2x-3))(2x-3)\)\(≥\) \(0\)	We open the brackets, give .
\(⁡\frac(-3x+7)(2x-3)\) \(≥\) \(0\)	We multiply the inequality by \(-1\), remembering to reverse the comparison sign.
\(⁡\frac(3x-7)(2x-3)\) \(≤\) \(0\)
\(⁡\frac(3(x-\frac(7)(3)))(2(x-\frac(3)(2)))\)\(≤\) \(0\)	Let's build a number line and mark the points \(\frac(7)(3)\) and \(\frac(3)(2)\) on it. Note that the point from the denominator is punctured, despite the fact that the inequality is not strict. The fact is that this point will not be a solution, since when substituting into an inequality, it will lead us to division by zero.
\(x∈(\)\(\frac(3)(2)\) \(;\)\(\frac(7)(3)]\)	Now we plot the ODZ on the same numerical axis and write down in response the interval that falls into the ODZ.
	Write down the final answer.

\(\log^2_3⁡x-\log_3⁡x-2>0\)	Let's write out the ODZ.
ODZ: \(x>0\)	Let's get to the decision.
Solution: \(\log^2_3⁡x-\log_3⁡x-2>0\)	Before us is a typical square-logarithmic inequality. We do.
\(t=\log_3⁡x\) \(t^2-t-2>0\)	Expand the left side of the inequality into .
\(D=1+8=9\) \(t_1= \frac(1+3)(2)=2\) \(t_2=\frac(1-3)(2)=-1\) \((t+1)(t-2)>0\)
	Now you need to return to the original variable - x. To do this, we pass to , which has the same solution, and make the reverse substitution.
\(\left[ \begin(gathered) t>2 \\ t<-1 \end{gathered} \right.\) \(\Leftrightarrow\) \(\left[ \begin{gathered} \log_3⁡x>2 \\ \log_3⁡x<-1 \end{gathered} \right.\)	Transform \(2=\log_3⁡9\), \(-1=\log_3⁡\frac(1)(3)\).
\(\left[ \begin(gathered) \log_3⁡x>\log_39 \\ \log_3⁡x<\log_3\frac{1}{3} \end{gathered} \right.\)	Let's move on to comparing arguments. The bases of logarithms are greater than \(1\), so the sign of the inequalities does not change.
\(\left[ \begin(gathered) x>9 \\ x<\frac{1}{3} \end{gathered} \right.\)	Let's combine the solution of the inequality and the ODZ in one figure.
	Let's write down the answer.