M3 general. Another lend-lease. Tank M3 "Lee". Three story nightmare. experimental vehicles based on the M3 tank

Official designation: M3 Medium Tank
Alternative designation: “General Grant”, “General Lee”
Start of design: 1940
Date of construction of the first prototype: 1941
Stage of completion: mass-produced in 1941-1943.

As you know, there are no more permanent solutions than temporary ones, and the American M3 tank, known to us under the names “Grant” and “Lee”, confirmed this theory by 100%. But at first it was planned that the M3 would be produced only before the appearance of the M4 tank ...

May 1940 brought bad news from Europe. It turned out that the Allies seriously underestimated the power of the Wehrmacht. But most importantly, the German tanks Pz.III and Pz.IV turned out to be stronger than the British "cruisers" and most French tanks, with the exception of SOMUA S-35 and Renault B-1bis. Against this background, the presence in the US tank corps of tanks armed only with a 37-mm cannon and machine guns looked like an obvious anachronism. Paradoxically, the most powerful American vehicle turned out to be the Medium Tank M2 with just such a composition of weapons, and it became obsolete literally after it was put into service.

The Americans were not going to put up with this fact, and already on June 5, 1940, the commander of the infantry of the US Army sent a request to the Department of Armaments to install guns with a caliber of at least 75 mm on all medium tanks. Fortunately, the officials reacted immediately - already on June 13, the tactical and technical requirements for the new tank were determined, and on July 11, the preliminary draft was approved under the official designation Medium Tank M3. The Americans were in a hurry, because the war approached the borders of Great Britain, and France suddenly became an ally of Germany. So, the manufacture of individual components and assemblies of future M3 tanks began in advance. In fairness, it should be noted that the M3 medium tank did not differ much from the M2. In fact, the calculation was made precisely for this, and the main differences between these two machines were only the armament and its layout.

The main requirement put forward by the Ordnance Department was the installation of a 75 mm gun. Here the Americans faced two big problems: the complete absence of a tank artillery system of a suitable caliber and the impossibility of placing existing suitable guns in the small turret of the M2 tank. In this situation, I had to go to various "tricks", which later cost the tankers of the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition dearly.

The 75-mm T7 gun with a barrel length of 2134 mm was chosen as the main one, which was a modified version of the T6 gun, adapted for firing unitary shots from a 1897 model gun. This old French-style artillery system turned out to be very reliable and at one time served as a prototype not only for American field guns, but also for the Russian “three-inch gun”. After the next modernization, which consisted in the installation of a semi-automatic shutter, the gun received the designation M2, and the gun mantlet began to be designated as M1. Preliminary tests were carried out on a prototype medium tank T5E2, mounting the gun in a sponson on the right side. The experience was considered successful and the same installation option was used on the M3. Such a decision impressively increased the firepower of the tank, but the American engineers were unable to provide an optimal firing sector. Horizontal guidance of the gun could only be carried out manually and within 15 ° in both directions. In addition, the tank artillery system turned out to be unbalanced in terms of mass distribution, as a result of which a counterweight had to be attached to the barrel, sometimes mistaken for a muzzle brake.

Partially, this design flaw was corrected in the next modification of the gun under the M3 index. The barrel length was increased to 2810 mm, which made it possible not only to increase the muzzle velocity of the projectile from 564 m/s to 610 m/s, but also to abandon the counterweight. However, the production of M3 guns, which were planned to be installed on T6 tanks (the future M4 “Sherman”), was limited and most of the medium tanks of the M3A1 series received M2 guns.

In fairness, it should be noted that in the current situation, the installation of the “main caliber” in the sponson had certain grounds and had previously been tested on tanks of other countries. In 1918, the British considered projects with the installation of 57-mm guns in “diamond-shaped” tanks, but in the end they preferred the lighter Vickers Medium Mk.I, only in 1940 returning to this topic again for one reason only - at that time the main the tank gun was a 2-pounder (40-mm) cannon with a low explosive action of the projectile, although some of the tanks were assembled in the "artillery" version and equipped with a 94-mm short-barreled howitzer with low armor-piercing qualities. Here is such a specificity.

The French did it even easier. From the very beginning of the creation of an infantry support tank, which resulted in the appearance of the Char B1 from Renault, the presence of a 75-mm cannon in the frontal hull plate was a prerequisite. And then no one was embarrassed by the extremely narrow sector of fire on the horizon. Why they did it this way - yes, because in the concept of French strategists, all the main goals should have been just ahead of the course.

Such “hybrid” weapon installation schemes were practiced at that time, and the 75-mm cannon in the sponson of an American tank does not look like such a “savagery” or “design miscalculation”, as they are trying to present now.

The next round of meetings between representatives of the army and officials took place in mid-August 1940 at the Aberdeen tank training ground. This time, the requirements for a medium tank were clarified - the parties agreed that the chassis of the M2 medium tank with a new hull and new armament would be used for the M3. The installation of a 75-mm gun was coordinated in the side sponson on the right side of the front of the hull, and a 37-mm gun and a 7.62-mm Browning machine gun coaxial with it were to be installed in the turret. The rotation of the turret together with the gun could be carried out in two ways: manually and using a hydraulic system.

Thus, the “distribution of duties” was carried out: a large-caliber gun had to fight field fortifications, and a turret gun was well suited for destroying light armored vehicles. But in any case, the M3 tank was then considered as a transitional model from the M2 to the M4. In fact, the release of "triples" continued until 1943.

The approval of the M3 tank project coincided with the reorganization of the US armored forces, during which the Tank Corps became the Tank Forces, and on August 26, a model of a new combat vehicle was presented to representatives of the specially created Tank Committee. According to the final specification, in addition to two guns, a commander's cupola with a 7.62 mm Browning machine gun was mounted on the main turret. Reservation of the frontal part of the hull was 50.8 mm, sides - 38.1 mm. Machine-gun sponson mounts, inherent only to the M2, were absent, and only pistol loopholes remained in their place. The volume of fuel tanks was also increased, the radio station was installed in the left sponson, the crew seats became more comfortable and received seat belts.

Two days later, on August 28, 1940, a contract was signed for the supply of 1000 M3 tanks instead of the same number of M2A1 tanks. The Ordnance Department gave only 60 days to complete the design work - during this time it was necessary to produce about 10,000 working drawings, so the Detroit Tank Arsenal faced a non-trivial task. Despite the fact that the plant in Detroit was reconstructed, in September it was possible to start manufacturing individual units according to preliminary sketches, fortunately, the structural similarity with the M2A1 made it possible to do this without any problems.

The assembly of the first prototype began in Rock Island, as drawings and details arrived. In parallel, the tank turret was made and sent to Aberdeen, where it was equipped with a mask and a gun. Preliminary tests were carried out on the M2 tank, and the first demonstration of the “modernized” vehicle to representatives of the Department of Armaments took place on December 20, 1940 and was very successful. Nevertheless, the engineers failed to meet the 60 days allotted by the Department, although, by American standards, the creation of the M3 tank passed an extremely short time. Preliminary design work was completed only by February 1, 194, and on March 13, the first prototype was completed, so far without a turret. On the same day, trial runs were carried out at the Rock Island Arsenal and on March 21 the tank was sent to Aberdeen. There, a tower with a commander's cupola was installed on the prototype, which had only one observation slot on the right side, and preliminary tests were carried out. During April, a batch of pre-production vehicles was delivered, and only on May 5 did the first production tank arrive in Aberdeen.

It just so happened that the production of M3 tanks was ahead of the supply of guns to them. Not only long-barreled M3s, but also M2s were lacking, and most of the production vehicles of the first series were operated without them as training ones. True, this only had to do with the tanks that remained in the United States. Products for export went with a full complement of weapons and equipment.

As mentioned earlier, the undercarriage of the M3 medium tank was borrowed with minor modifications from the M2A1 tank of the same class. On each side there were three bogies with spring-loaded track rollers. Structurally, the cart consisted of the following components: two rubber-coated track rollers were suspended on a pendulum with the help of stressed horizontal helical springs protected by an armored casing. A roller supporting the upper branch of the caterpillar was mounted on the top of the bogie. the trolley assembly was attached to the lower side armor plate of the hull with bolts. The caterpillar was assembled from steel tracks with rubber inserts, which had a width of 406 mm.

The latest series were equipped with a 421 mm wide track and a new type of support roller installation. Now it was mounted on a bracket moved back, and a skid appeared in its place.

The first version of the hull, used for the production of M3 tanks, had a riveted design and layout with a front transmission, a middle location of the fighting compartment and an engine compartment in the aft.

The shape of the hull turned out to be very exotic, which, however, was not surprising - the Americans once again tried to combine business with pleasure - that is, to ensure comfortable work for the crew with high firepower.

The most unusual was the bow of the hull, assembled from three armor plates 50.8 mm thick, which had a double angle of inclination. In the upper part of the frontal armor plate, a cutout was made for the hatch, which was closed by an armored cover with a viewing slot protected by bulletproof glass. The second hatch, but smaller, was made on the left side. The rear side armor plates of the superstructure, 35.8 mm thick, were beveled towards the longitudinal axis of the hull and connected to the transverse armor plate. The sides and stern armor plates of the same thickness were strictly vertical, but the upper stern plate received a slight angle of inclination. On top of it were attached two boxes with spare parts and tools. The roof of the superstructure with a thickness of 20 mm was installed horizontally. The lower evacuation hatch was missing, since it was concluded that it would be more convenient for the crew to leave the wrecked vehicle through the hatch on the starboard side of the hull. As it turned out later, this decision was not justified.
In general, the picture was favorable, with the exception of a couple of "nuances". First of all (and this was very striking) the tank had a huge height of 3.12 meters. To understand whether this is a lot or a little for a medium tank of the early 1940s, we can compare the Soviet "monsters". For example, the height of the five-turret T-35A tank was 3.34 m, the three-turret T-28 - 2.17 m, and the two-turret SMK and T-100 - 3.15 and 3.41 m, respectively. So in terms of camouflage and low ground, the crews of the "grants" were guaranteed problems.

But that was not all - counting on the M3 tank as a temporary measure, the Americans decided to simplify their lives to the maximum. Almost all armor plates were assembled using bolts and rivets. What this turned out to be for many tankers, primarily those who served the “lower floor”, was revealed in 1942, when the M3 entered the African front and experienced the effect of armor-piercing shells of the German and Italian anti-tank guns. When a “blank” hit, quite often all these “cogs” were completely torn out and, in fact, turning into secondary fragments, severely crippled the crew.

The layout of the crew seats, taking into account the layout of weapons, was originally designed for 7 people. The driver's seat was located in the left front of the hull. At the level of the head there was a viewing slot protected by armored glass, below there was a dashboard which included: a speedometer, a tachometer, an ammeter, a voltmeter, an oil pressure gauge, an engine temperature gauge and a clock. The controls consisted of two steering levers, a gearshift lever, a handbrake, and gas and clutch pedals. Two 7.62-mm Browning course machine guns were rigidly attached in front of the driver. Later, one of the machine guns was dismantled, closing the hole under it with an armored plug. The stowage carried an 11.43 mm Thompson submachine gun. After the release of the first series of tanks, they demanded to remove it, but then this decision was considered erroneous. On the right side of the front of the hull, behind the gun, there were gunner's seats (slightly behind the driver's seat) and loader (to the right of the gun lock). Directly, the 75-mm gun (of any variant) in the M1 mask was equipped with a gyro-scoring stabilizer in the vertical plane.

The main part of the fighting compartment, where the tower was installed, was also designed for three people. The commander was located in the center behind the 37 mm gun and served the 7.62 mm machine gun in the commander's cupola. To the left of the gun lock was the gunner's place, to the right - the loader. The maximum elevation angle of the 37-mm gun was +60°, the minimum -7°, which theoretically made it possible to conduct barrage fire on air targets. During testing of prototypes of the M3, it turned out that the M6 ​​gun was also unbalanced and had to be balanced using a metal cylinder attached under the barrel.

However, very soon it was concluded that there would not be enough space in the tank for seven, and the duties of a radio operator were transferred to the driver. By and large, this step turned out to be quite justified.

The means of communication consisted of a VHF radio station SCR 508, which was located to the left of the driver's seat, and an internal intercom (intercom) of the Tannoy type. The external communication antenna was installed on the right side on the beveled rear armor plate of the hull superstructure. The SCR 506 radio station could be installed on command tanks, but the vehicles of the early production series were partially equipped with the SCR 245.

In the aft part of the hull, a Wright R-985EC2 aircraft-type radial engine with an HP 340 power, equipped with an air cooling system, was installed. Torque from the power plant was transmitted using a drive shaft and a multi-plate dry clutch, which passed through the fighting compartment to the transmission. Then the torque was transmitted to the steering differential and then to the final drives and drive wheels located in front.

When the M3 tank was just being launched into mass production, Wright was already overloaded with orders, including for export deliveries. In order not to slow down the pace of tank production, the production of R-985EC2 engines had to be placed at the Continental Motors enterprise.

Electricity was generated by an auxiliary generator with a current strength of 50A and a voltage of 30V, driven by a two-stroke single-cylinder gasoline engine. The current was supplied to the lamps of internal and external lighting.

M3 tanks of all modifications, made in the USA, did not have a single standard color. Depending on the series and year of issue, they could be painted in green in various shades (from dark green to khaki). Later, from about 1943, due to combat experience, it was recommended to apply camouflage color patches, but all American tanks that took part in the hostilities retained standard camouflage, with rare exceptions.
The registration number assigned to each tank by the Department of Ordnance was applied in different colors on the side plate in the engine area on both sides: the name of the USA country is blue, the W code is blue, the six-digit number is white or yellow.

The insignia of the American armed forces was applied to the turret and the front plate of the hull - a white star in a blue circle superimposed on a white stripe. However, this rule was not always observed. Some of the tanks received stars without circles or stars and stripes around the perimeter of the yellow turret.

Also, tactical designations were applied to the turret and hull with white paint: the serial number of the vehicle in the company was the first, followed by the letter designation of the company (for example, 9E or 4B), but in some cases a simple number without a letter was assigned. At the beginning of the war, geometric figures were drawn on the sponson, on the port side next to the door, indicating the number of the company, battalion and regiment in the division. However, since 1942 they also almost completely disappeared. The distinctive signs of the division were applied on the middle sheet of the transmission.

On tanks that fought in North Africa, instead of a star, the American star-striped flag was on the frontal armor. However, it soon became clear that this unmasks the car, and since 1943 they have almost completely disappeared.

As mentioned earlier, the first serial modification was the M3, the construction of which began in April 1941 at the enterprises of the Detroit Arsenal (Detroit Tank Arsenal), American Locomotive Company and Baldwin Locomotive Works. Further, with the growth in serial production, the number of assembly shops only increased - in July, Pressed Steel Car Company took over the assembly of M3 tanks, and in August Pullman Standard Car Company joined it. By this time, production had been brought to a predetermined level, and the delivery of tanks was now carried out without delay.
The first modification was in serial production for a relatively short period and ended in March-August 1942, but during this time 4924 M3 tanks were built. By enterprises, they were distributed as follows: Detroit Arsenal - 3243 (until August), Pressed Steel - 501 (until March), Pullman - 500 (until March), American Locomotive - 385 (until August) and Baldwin Locomotive - 295 (until March) . As a result, the very first modification was also the most massive.

The sad experience of meeting with anti-tank artillery and armor-piercing shells of tank guns led the Americans to disappointing results. If frontal armor plates did not break through very often (as a rule, if anti-tank guns with a caliber of more than 37 mm were not fired from distances of less than 500 meters), then the mantlet of a 75 mm gun and the sides were struck very confidently. There were still small reserves for increasing armor, but in this case, the load on the suspension increased even more, and in this case it could simply not withstand it. The mobility of the tank also decreased, but the main drawback was that when a large projectile hit, the rivets could not withstand and the crew was literally bombarded with secondary fragments of armor and bolts. A way out of this situation was found fairly quickly.

In general, I saw two options - to make the body welded or cast. For new version М3А1 the second path was chosen, since American metallurgists gained enough experience in the production of cast towers. In fact, only the upper part of the hull, covering the transmission, the control compartment and the front of the combat compartment, had to be cast. The shelling tests of the first castings gave very encouraging results, and on October 9, 1941, the Armaments Committee approved a plan for the production of M3A1 tanks with a cast hull.

Externally, the new modification differed from the M3 in the smoother outlines of the hatches on the upper part of the fighting compartment and along the sides. On the cast hull, the upper hatch was shifted with an inclination to the stern and deployed 45 °; On the first M3A1 tanks, hatch hinges were placed on the side of the turret, but all subsequent vehicles received hinges on the opposite side. They also abandoned the pistol loopholes in the rear wall of the superstructure and removed the side door, which was often torn off by a direct hit by a projectile. Of the other improvements, it is worth noting the introduction of three fans of the fighting compartment, as on the M4 Sherman tanks. On later M3A1 tanks, side escape hatches were also abandoned, which made it possible to increase the projectile resistance of the hull.

The production of M3A1 tanks was launched at the American Locomotive Company, where 272 vehicles were assembled from February to August 1942. As an alternative power plant, due to a shortage of Wright gasoline engines, a Guiberson T-1400-2 diesel installation was tested. In general, the tests of the diesel M3A1 were successful, although the Giberson turned out to be very capricious in operation. The Arms Committee considered it necessary to recommend the T-1400-2 for installation on all series of M3 series tanks, but only 28 vehicles, called M3A1 (Diesel), received a diesel engine. However, the main reason for the cessation of production was the cast body - for all its advantages, it turned out to be difficult to manufacture. The cast structure was to be replaced by a simpler welded one, which was done on the M3A2 modification.

The new hull was developed by engineers at the Rock Island Arsenal almost in parallel with the production of cast turrets. In shape and configuration, it practically did not differ from the M3 modification, but welding made it possible to significantly increase manufacturability and reduce the cost of manufacturing hulls. Release of tanks of the series M3A2 lasted at the Baldwin Locomotive company for only four months - from January to March 1942, and ended with the assembly of ... a total of 12 cars. They were replaced almost immediately by a new modification of the M3A3, which had the same body, but with a new power plant.

This time we again decided to return to experiments with diesel engines. The fact is that in addition to certain advantages over gasoline engines (a low-speed diesel engine made it possible to achieve better cross-country ability with an increased power reserve), there was another subtle nuance. When the M3 tank was created, its designers did not expect that Continental radial engines would be in demand in such large quantities for primary needs - that is, for the aviation industry. For tanks, they became sorely lacking, and in August 1841 it was proposed to use a completely new type of diesel engine on the M3 series machines.
Since the experiments with the Gibersons ended with only partial success, a specific power plant was developed for the medium tank. In fact, the new General Motors 6046 engine was a pair of two 6-71 automobile diesel engines (in-line, two-stroke), located in parallel and connected into one common unit. At the same time, each of the engines retained autonomous fuel, lubrication, cooling and start-up systems. Accordingly, the transmission had to be redesigned. Now it consisted of two single-disk dry friction clutches, a transverse connecting gear, a cardan shaft, a gearbox, a turning mechanism and final drives.
Due to the increased dimensions of the power plant, the length of the engine compartment had to be extended by 300 mm, and this refinement was carried out by reducing the volume of the fighting compartment. The design of the aft hull has also undergone changes. In particular, an armored box of the exhaust air channel was installed at the level of the tracks, where the reflector of the exhaust gases and the air that cooled the engine was located. The vertical aft armor plate was tilted by 10 °, removing the technological hatch doors in it. At the same time, wide double-leaf armored blinds were placed above the engine.

Thanks to the higher efficiency of the diesel, the fuel capacity has been reduced to 652 liters, while the range on the highway has increased to 240 km. A small negative point was an increase in combat weight by 1 ton, but in total this did not play a big role.

The first sample of the M3 tank with a GM 6046 diesel engine was manufactured by the Detroit Arsenal and delivered to the Aberdeen Proving Ground in the early autumn of 1941. The Military Commission, having evaluated the test results, in October approved plans to build a new modification of the tank. Production was again launched at the Baldwin Locomotive company, where the new tank began to be produced under the designation M3A3 - a total of 322 vehicles were assembled.

Shortly thereafter, the design of the tank underwent a regression - the riveted hull, so successfully used on M3A3, was again replaced with a riveted one. This, partly forced step, was the result of increased orders not only from the US Army, but also from the allies. Tanks needed to be delivered to Great Britain, the USSR, Australia and New Zealand, so the total bill in the contracts went to thousands of vehicles. The Americans could not give a plan with a simultaneous transition to a welded hull structure in 1941, and in such a difficult situation it was decided to continue the production of tanks of the M3A3 series, but with a riveted hull. Such a “regression” variant was designated M3A5 and was produced from January to December 1942, becoming the second mass modification after the M3 - a total of 592 tanks were built.

After installing the GM 6046 diesel engine, experiments with the power plant did not end. An inspection conducted at the Chrysler plant by representatives of the military department in June 1941 was forced to state that there were still not enough tank engines. Then William S. Nadsen (who was a member of the National Defense Advisory Commission, which was responsible for coordinating the work of the American defense industry) proposed to create an alternative version of the power plant, based on existing developments.

At the end of 1941, Chrysler introduced a unique power unit under the A57 Multibank index. This design consisted of five 6-cylinder automobile engines connected in a star shape. The power of this power plant was only 370 hp, but in the absence of more profitable options, the A57 was accepted for production and installed on tanks M3A4. As you might guess, the new modification was a continuation of the M3A2-M3A3 line, differing from it only in the hull length increased to 6147 mm. Such an “improvement” was the result of the increased dimensions of the engine, due to which the engine compartment “grew” by 280 mm and the stern of the tank received an overhang 381 mm long. Other features include two convex roofs of the engine compartment: the lower one protected the fan, and the upper one covered the cooling system units. In addition, two fuel tanks had to be removed from the engine compartment. Instead, two additional fuel tanks of 352 liters each were installed outside.

The changes also affected the chassis. Since the center of mass has shifted, the middle and rear bogies have been moved 150 mm back. Accordingly, the length of each caterpillar branch has increased from 79 to 83 tracks. The support wheels were now mounted on brackets attached to the top of the track roller bogies, and were moved back a little.

The production of tanks of the M3A4 modification continued from the end of June to August 1942 at the Detroit Arsenal. A total of 109 vehicles were built, after which the company was reoriented to the production of M4A4 Sherman tanks, also equipped with A57 engines.

The mass appearance of the M3 tanks happened just at the moment when the production of medium tanks T-34 and heavy KV-1 was in full swing in the Soviet Union. Armed with 76.2 mm guns, these vehicles turned out to be very dangerous opponents for the Panzerwaffe, so it was somewhat strange that in the UK they continued to “stamp” cruiser tanks of the A15 type, equipped with only a 40 mm gun and protected by 30 mm armor, by the hundreds. The bitter experience of the battles in Greece and France made British designers think hard, but while they were thinking about the further development trends of their own armored vehicles, the Crusader, A9, A10, and even more so the Light Tank Mk.VI, were outdated by the middle of 1941.

In this situation, there was only one conclusion - it was necessary to look for a reliable ally capable of providing thousands of tanks and armored vehicles in the shortest possible time. And such allies were then the United States. At first, the British tried to persuade local manufacturers to expand the production of their own equipment, such as Matilda II or Valentine, but the Americans responded with a categorical refusal, citing a lack of capacity. Actually there were two reasons. The first has already been voiced and I am only partially true - another unpleasant moment for the British was their unenviable position on all fronts. The only success was achieved only in North Africa, and even then, until Rommel appeared there. In the rest of the theater, including even Somalia, the troops of the British Commonwealth suffered, if not a complete fiasco, then at least a significant defeat. Based on this, the UK had no choice but to agree to the purchase of American tanks. The British Purchasing Commission, which included front-line officers, looked at the events with more sober eyes than their American counterparts, and therefore the choice turned out to be very small - the medium M3 became the first tank that was supposed to go to fight on the side of the British Commonwealth.

After assessing the capabilities of the machine, the British came to the conclusion that North Africa would become the main theater of operations for it, where a major offensive was planned for 1941. The allied tank program at the beginning of the same year provided for the production of 1000 medium tanks monthly, but already in June the plan for 1942 was 2000 tanks. This is not counting supplies for the US Army. At the same time, the opinion of the commission about the M3 was not so rosy.

Now they are trying to present the receipt of the M3 tanks by the Royal Tank Corps as an undoubted happiness - the main argument in this matter is the superiority of the American vehicle over the British "cruisers" in terms of armor and weapons. However, not all British tankers shared this opinion during the war years.

In terms of armor, the “American” was, of course, one of the most “thick-skinned”, but in terms of overall security, any of the M3s was inferior to the Matilda II infantry tank, also differing for the worse in its huge dimensions. The only advantages of the M3 were the presence of a more powerful cannon armament and a spacious fighting compartment. At the same time, the installation of a 76.2-mm gun in the side sponson could hardly be called a good solution. On the other hand, the American 37 mm tank gun was slightly weaker than the British 2-pounder (40 mm) tank gun.

The A22 “Churchill” Mk.I infantry tank that appeared next (which more likely belonged to heavy tanks) caught up with the M3 in almost all parameters, including dimensions, but in terms of total muzzle power, the advantage still remained with the M3. In addition, in 1940-1941. The TOG heavy tank was tested, the armament of which initially tried to include a 75-mm cannon in the frontal hull plate and two 40-mm cannons in sponsons. Reservation of the frontal and side surfaces was 62 mm. Even taking into account the transfer of the 40 mm gun to the turret and the elimination of the sponsons, the TOG looked more powerful than the M3. Another thing is that the “American” is usually compared with cruising-class tanks (A9, A10, A13 and A15), which he outplayed in all respects, with the exception of speed and mobility. In general, the attitude of the British to the M3 was twofold and there were some improvements.

There was simply no time for a radical change in the design of the tank. The Americans were required to develop a new elongated cast turret, in the niche of which a British-style radio station No. 19 was installed. Closer to the rear, viewing devices were placed (one from each side) and loopholes for firing from personal weapons. The commander's turret was absent as unnecessary, and its place was taken by a low superstructure with a double-leaf hatch, behind which they made an outlet for the antenna. In total, this made it possible to reduce the height of the tower by about 30 mm and, accordingly, reduce the visibility of the tank. Actually, the improvements were completed on this. Modification of the M3 tank for the UK received its own name "Grant" I, in honor of the American General W.S. Grant, who commanded the northerners during the Civil War. The first contracts with Baldwin, Lima and Pullman were signed at the end of 1940, and deliveries of serial products began six months later.
Since 1942, tanks began to be produced for the UK Grant II, which were M3A5s with American-style turrets and minor changes in equipment. Somewhat earlier, in June 1941, the lend-lease law came into force and the British had the opportunity to almost double the number of tanks supplied. This time, an agreement was signed for the supply of standard M3 tanks, called "Lee" I. Subtle British humor was reflected here, as General R.E. Lee once commanded the troops of the southerners (remember the history of the Cromwell and Cavalier tanks) ).

The British M3 tanks initially had a “native” color, and in this form, most of the vehicles that arrived in 1942 were used in battles in Libya and Egypt - there was simply no time left for repainting. Subsequently, by the forces of the crews and repairmen themselves, the tanks tried to completely paint them in sand-colored desert camouflage as soon as possible, or at least apply stripes. The registration numbers were retained, but the letter W was replaced by a T. A standard British cockade of vertical red-white-red stripes was applied on board the hull, although not all British M3s had them.

As a rule, a contour of a geometric figure with a number inside was drawn on the tank turret. The figure: a square, a circle or a triangle, denoted the number of the tank squadron, and the number - the serial number of the vehicle in the squadron. The color of the contour and the number was determined arbitrarily. The division and brigade markings were eight and a half (216 mm) - nine and a half inches (240 mm) red squares with a white number inside and were applied on the front of the left wing and the rear of the right or on the armor cover of the transmission. Emblems of brigades and divisions could be drawn on opposite wings.

A little non-standard for the British army, the tanks that fought in Burma were painted. These vehicles were painted green with large white stars on the hull and turret. Almost all tanks retained registration numbers. Some of them also had individual numbers on the frontal armor, and their own names on the sides (for example, "Cossack").

During 1941-1942. The British Army received 2887 M3 tanks of four variants, which exceeded their total number that entered service with the United States. Only "Grant" Mk.I was delivered 1685 pieces. Other variants of the M3 received the following British designations and were delivered in smaller quantities: M3 - "Lee" Mk.I(968), M3A1 - "Lee" Mk.II, M3A2 - "Lee" Mk.III, M3A4 - "Lee" Mk.IV(49), M3A5 - "Grant" Mk.II (185).

In addition, after the arrival of more modern M4 Sherman tanks, some of the tanks were converted into various kinds of auxiliary vehicles;

"Grant" ARV- Conversion of Grant I and II tanks into ARVs, carried out in 1943. On all machines, weapons were dismantled, in place of which repair equipment and a winch mechanism were installed. There were two versions of the ARV - without a turret (the niche was welded and a hatch cut out in it) with an anti-aircraft machine gun and with a dummy turret (only a few tanks were redone).

Grant Command- modification with dismantled weapons (only a turret with a dummy 37-mm gun was left) and an additional radio station in the hull. The car was intended for use by senior officers.

Grant Scorpion III- modification of the mine trawl percussion series "Scorpion". A massive frame was mounted in front of the hull, on which a rotating drum with chains was installed. At the same time, the 75-mm gun was removed, and the counterweight was loaded aft. Several examples have been built.

Grant Scorpion IV– further development of the previous model. The main difference was the installation of an additional Bedford engine at the rear of the tank, the power of which was used to rotate the drum.

"Grant" CDL- one of the most original modifications of the Grant tank, work on which began back in 1941. The idea was to blind the enemy with beams of powerful searchlights in a night battle. The first experiments were carried out on infantry tanks "Matilda" II, one unit of which was sent to the Middle East at the beginning of 1942, but then there was not enough determination to use them in battles. The appearance of the M3 tanks brought the CDL project to a new level. Improvements were reduced to the installation of a fixed cabin instead of a tower where a searchlight was installed. At the same time, the 75-mm cannon in the side sponson and the bow 7.62-mm machine gun were preserved. Later production vehicles also received a fake 37 mm cannon in the wheelhouse.

Grant CDL tanks were sent in 1943 to the 1st Tank Brigade, but since the war in Africa ended in battles, they did not have time to use them. The tanks were sent to Europe, but even here the CDL remained unemployed for more than a year. Only in the spring of 1945 did several vehicles take part in the night crossing of the Rhine and Elbe rivers.

The “temporary measure”, as one would expect, turned out to be not so temporary - the M3 tanks served almost until the end of the war due to their technological design and ease of maintenance. Last but not least, this happened thanks to a successful running gear, which, with minor changes, moved from the M2, first to the M3, and then to the M4. Therefore, it is not surprising that the "li" became a kind of "ancestor" of several types of self-propelled guns and armored vehicles for special purposes at once.
Primary attention, of course, was given to self-propelled guns. The experience of fighting in France and North Africa turned out to be simply invaluable, and the Americans briskly undertook to catch up. Most of these self-propelled guns are quite worthy of a separate story, therefore, in the article about the M3 tank and its modifications, we will limit ourselves to a general description of these vehicles.

M12- one of the first proposals for the development of a heavy self-propelled guns appeared in June 1941 and did not meet with much interest from the side of the "gunners". The proposal was to install on the chassis of the M3 tank a 155-mm T6 gun from the times of the 1st World War, which had long been gathering dust in warehouses. Although such a move promised considerable advantages and the prototype, released in February 1942, was successfully tested, the military reacted coolly to it. Despite the fact that between September 1942 and March 1943, the assembly of 100 M12 units was launched by the efforts of the Pressed Steel Car Company, things progressed very slowly. Only in December 1943, before the planned landing in France, did the Americans “suddenly” remember that they had a really effective means to deal with long-term German fortifications. In total, having transferred the order to Baldwin, they assembled 74 self-propelled guns and the same number of M30 transporters.

T6- a variant of a self-propelled gun with the installation of a 105-mm gun on an open platform. One prototype built.

T24- a variant of the 76.2-mm self-propelled gun developed in the fall of 1941. The goal of the project was to obtain an anti-tank self-propelled gun, but the installation of the gun in the wheelhouse open from above was unsuccessful and in 1942 work on it was stopped. One prototype built.

T26- the only prototype of a 75-mm self-propelled gun.

T32 \ M7 "Priest"- In October 1941, Major General Jacob Devers (Jacob Devers), anticipating the need to have mobile heavy artillery, ordered the Arsenal in Rock Island to manufacture a prototype self-propelled 105-mm howitzer. An embrasure was cut in the frontal sheet of the cabin to install the gun barrel. A carriage was mounted in the hull, on the starboard side - a turret with a 12.7-mm anti-aircraft machine gun. The crew consisted of 6 people. The initiative was supported and in February 1942 two prototypes were tested. The results were encouraging - the self-propelled gun showed a maximum speed of 40 km / h, a cruising range on the highway - 210 km, on the ground - 140 km. This made it possible to launch mass production of self-propelled guns already in April, when she received an index M7 and title Priest. A total of 4267 cars were produced. In parallel, a similar project was developed in the UK with the installation of a 25-pounder gun, which later became known as Sexton.

T36- the only version of the self-propelled anti-aircraft installation on the M3 chassis. The project, proposed in the fall of 1941 by the Air Defense Committee, provided for the installation of one 40-mm anti-aircraft gun in an original turret. Work was stopped in 1942 due to the high complexity of the design. One prototype built.

T40 \ M9- the first version of the self-propelled guns on the M3 chassis, built in series. The project was drawn up at the end of 1941 and assumed that by installing outdated 76.2-mm anti-aircraft guns of the 1918 model of the year on a tank chassis, it would be possible to get a full-fledged anti-tank self-propelled gun. The idea turned out to be rational and even an order for 50 machines was issued, but already during the tests it became clear that the T35 project (the future M10) has more prospects. However, in 1942, 28 self-propelled guns were built under the designation M9, which were used to a limited extent inside the United States.

Now let's move on to special-purpose armored vehicles. Far from being of secondary importance was attached to this topic in the USA, since the success of many operations depended on good supplies. However, other options were also not forgotten.

T1– a self-propelled trawl equipped with a double disc roller mounted in front and one roller at the rear. Initially, this version of the trawl was intended for the M2A1 tank, but after the appearance of the M3, the priorities changed. The tests were held with varying success, and in the end it was concluded that the disk trawl of this design was unsuccessful.

T16- the first version of the artillery tractor, which appeared in 1942. The turret was removed from the standard M3A5 tank and a winch was installed at the stern. The tests of the T16 ended successfully, but the serial construction of the tractor was abandoned due to the limited internal volume of the hull, where there was not enough space for artillery crew and ammunition for the gun.

M30- transporter of ammunition and other ammunition for 155-mm M12 self-propelled guns.

M31- in the same 1942, it was found out that a good BREM could be made from the M3 tank. To do this, the guns were replaced with dummies, and a lifting beam with a block, a winch with a pulling force of 60,000 pounds (27.21 tons) and tool boxes were installed at the stern. The prototype under the designation T2, released in September 1942, successfully passed the tests, but was accepted for production only as a "limited supply" vehicle. Its modernized version M31, which appeared in September 1943, became truly massive. Despite the fact that this version was also considered a “limited standard” vehicle, by 1944 the number of converted tanks exceeded a hundred. At the same time, converted tanks of the M3A1 modification were designated as M31V1, and M3A5 as M31V2. In the British army, these vehicles were designated ARV I.

M33- A variant of the BREM M31 converted into a tractor for a heavy 155-mm gun. Improvements were reduced to the dismantling of the beam with the block and the tower, instead of which a compressor and pneumatic hoses were installed to control the brakes of the towed gun. To protect against enemy infantry and attack aircraft, a 12.7-mm Colt-Browning anti-aircraft machine gun was installed on the roof of the hull. After the construction and successful testing of the first prototype under the designation T1, an order was issued for mass production.

M44- a modernized version of the M33 tractor equipped with a commander's cupola over the hull sponson. A small series has been released.

In addition, the chassis of the M7 self-propelled howitzers and the Sexton guns with their weapons removed were converted into armored personnel carriers (ARS), called Kangaroo(Kangaroo). In the fighting compartment, all weapons and equipment were dismantled, including anti-aircraft machine guns with a turret, the embrasure was closed with armor plates, additional armor plates were mounted along the sides, and seats for 16 soldiers were installed inside. Armored personnel carriers were reduced to special units and attached to armored units, for example, the 79th Armored Division of Great Britain, which fought in North-Western Europe.

At the beginning of the war, with the participation of M3 tanks, active experiments were carried out to install flamethrowers. A fairly successful model of the E2 flamethrower was tested on the M2A1 medium tank, and in 1941 its improved version of the E3 was installed on the M3. In order to make room for the fire mixture tank, the 75 mm gun was removed. The E3 flamethrower itself was installed instead of the 37 mm gun in the turret. After testing the prototype, it became clear that in such a configuration the tank would become too vulnerable, since a single flamethrower was hardly an adequate weapon for its size.
The second version of the flamethrower tank appeared in 1942. Cannon armament was completely preserved, since the E5R2-M3 portable flamethrower was transported in a stowage inside the fighting compartment and installed instead of a turret machine gun if necessary. However, this option turned out to be unclaimed due to cramped conditions when servicing the flamethrower.

M3 tanks were also used for various experiments as testbeds for experimental designs. In 1941, one tank of the M3E1 modification was assembled, on which the Ford AAA engine was installed, which in the future formed the basis of the power plant for the M4A3 tank. Option M3A5E1 It was distinguished by an experimental Twin Hydromatic transmission, and in 1942 the M3A4 tank was tested with a steering wheel mounted on the rear track roller trolley. In the same period, one of the M3A3(?) tanks was equipped with a suspension with horizontal coil springs.

The Americans also created their own analogue of the British version of the CDL. The lighting equipment was housed in a tower with circular rotation, similar in design to the CDL. The tank was named T10 "Shop Tractor" and, although 355 vehicles were converted, none of them were used in hostilities./p>

It just so happened that it was the British "Grant" that were the first to enter the battles of the Second World War. In January 1942, things were still not going well for the Allies. Having defeated the Italians in the Horn of Africa (Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea) in other theaters of operations, the troops of the British Commonwealth retreated everywhere. The most critical situation then developed in Libya, where General E. Rommel launched an offensive against the positions of the 8th British Army under the command of General N. Ritchie and the Free French unit. Unable to withstand the onslaught, the allies left Benghazi and retreated to Gazala, where they managed to stabilize the front for four long months with great difficulty. During this time, the British command managed to assemble a significant grouping of 849 tanks of various types, the basis of the strike power of which was 167 M3 tanks. The "grants" were distributed among three armored formations of the XXX Corps: the 4th armored brigade of the 7th armored division, as well as the 2nd and 22nd armored brigade of the 1st armored division. In addition, the troops of the British Commonwealth had 149 M3 Stewart light tanks, 257 A15 Crusader cruiser tanks, 166 Valentine infantry tanks (various modifications with a 57-mm gun) and 110 Matilda II. In addition, there were several dozen light tanks Mk.VIb and cruising A10 and A13, the combat value of which was not estimated too highly.

The Italo-German forces were somewhat more modest but, more importantly, they were inferior in quality to the Allies. In total, under the command of E. Rommel there were 332 German and 228 Italian tanks of the M13 / 40 and M14 / 41 types (this number, apparently, also included L3 / 35 tankettes). The main striking force, contrary to popular belief, the Germans were not “fours”, but “troikas”. By type, they were distributed as follows: Pz.Kpfw.II - 50, Pz.Kpfw.III Ausf.J - 19 (variant with a long-barreled 50-mm gun), Pz.Kpfw.III Ausf.F - 223 (variant with a short-barreled 50 -mm cannon), Pz.Kpfw.IV Ausf.E \ F - 40. Light tanks Pz.Kpfw.I were used in small numbers.

The offensive of the Italo-German troops began on May 26, 1942 on a wide (by local standards) front. As expected, Rommel delivered the main blow with his own forces around Bir Hakeim, and the Italians under the command of General Courvelle attacked on a 20-mile flank. The calculation turned out to be correct - the British did not expect such a maneuver, having previously concentrated their tanks in the center of the front, and after only a day, the threat of complete encirclement loomed over them. While the allies, among whom the Free French units bravely fought, tried to break out of the practically slammed trap, the 3rd RTR (3rd Royal Tank Regiment of the 4th armored brigade) came to the rescue, almost completely equipped with “grants”.

The first meeting with the “triples” of the 8th German tank regiment (8 Pz.Rgt) on May 27, however, ended for the crews of the “grants”, very unsuccessfully. The British tank group of the 8th Royal Irish Regiment (24 medium and 20 light M3) came under an unexpected flank attack, losing 19 "grants" and almost all of the "stuarts". However, it was too early to rejoice. Having received time to deploy 3 RTR launched a counterattack, causing significant damage to the enemy. According to crew reports, German "twos" and "troikas" were hit by armor-piercing shells from a range of 1100 meters, and for Italian tanks they were hit from an even greater distance - 2750 meters (this is not surprising, given that their frontal armor was only 25-30 mm). The situation for 8 Pz.Rgt was further complicated by the lack of StuG.III self-propelled guns from the 33rd Assault Regiment, which did not have time to arrive at the attack site in time. However, help arrived in the form of 5 Pz.Rgt. tanks, which took part of the blow. The tank battle near Gazala ended in favor of Rommel - having lost 30 of their tanks, the Germans managed to disable 16 "grants", after which the British were forced to retreat.
But the events of May 27 did not end there. On the contrary, the denouement of those terrible was just beginning. In the afternoon, the British literally squeezed the Afrika Korps in the area between Maabus er Rigel, El Adem and Bir Hakeim. One 15th Pz.Div (tank division), already battered in battle, was opposed by three tank brigades (1st, 2nd and 22nd), advancing from three directions. The resulting “cauldron” under normal circumstances did not threaten Rommel with anything other than extermination, but the British troops acted separately, without coordination between the branches of the military, which led to a completely natural result. The Germans not only managed to repel all attacks, but also turned the tide of the second part of the battle. Having recovered from the shock, the Germans applied the old solution, proven over the years - against tanks with anti-shell armor, 88-mm anti-aircraft "flaks" came into action, which were soon joined by Marder self-propelled guns equipped with captured Soviet 76.2-mm F-22 guns. The Italians also made their contribution, whose 75-mm self-propelled guns also “shot” the Allied tanks quite well. The commander of the 135th anti-aircraft artillery regiment, Colonel Volz, later recalled how the battle ended on May 27, 1942:

“We drove for a long time and eventually stumbled upon a convoy of corps headquarters trucks fleeing from the enemy, which themselves were crushed by the transport of the fleeing divisional headquarters. In this chaos, I noticed several 88mm cannons. We rushed through the crowds of soldiers and suddenly came face to face with Rommel. He put a “fuse” in me and said that the anti-aircraft gunners were entirely responsible for the whole mess, because they did not shoot. I forced myself to pull myself together and ran to the guns, stopped them and took three 88-millimeter papers: In no time I stopped another half of the heavy anti-aircraft battery of the operational headquarters of the corps. Suddenly, at a distance of 1500 m, enemy armored vehicles appeared - from 20 to 40 tanks. They pursued a fleeing Afrika Korps transport, which had no artillery cover and was defenseless in the face of enemy tank attacks. At the center of the chaos was Rommel, the headquarters of the Afrika Korps, regimental headquarters, reconnaissance trucks - in a word, the nerve center of the forward combat units.

It seemed that now everything would be decided - a catastrophe was inevitable. In record time we brought our guns into position. As soon as I saw that it was possible to shoot, I ordered to open fire. We had to shoot as quickly and accurately as possible. Fire! The shells rushed to the target. First direct hit. The Briton got up. The tanks that were moving towards us turned back. But here they are ready for a new attack. “Anti-aircraft guns - front! shouted General Nering. “Woltz, you must build anti-aircraft guns in front, use all available guns to provide flank defense.” We felt inspired. Fortunately, Major Gürke appeared with a second heavy battery. Half an hour later, the adjutant of the army headquarters arrived with heavy batteries belonging to the army operational unit, which received orders personally from Rommel. In an atmosphere of extreme haste, a front of anti-aircraft guns with a length of about three kilometers was formed against the British armored vehicles.

German anti-aircraft guns fired from a distance of 1500-1000 meters - quite enough for an armor-piercing projectile to pierce even an 80-mm vertical armor plate, so the “grants” had little chance of surviving. By evening, 24 "grants" were left on the battlefield, lined and burned.
Now the Allies could not stand it any more and the retreat soon turned into a flight with heavy losses in equipment - suffice it to say that on June 13 they had only 70 tanks left. The apogee of German success was a short-term siege and capture of the city of Tobruk on June 15th. This defeat was all the more offensive because the city had huge stocks of weapons, ammunition and food, and was defended by its 33,000-strong garrison, which had the ability to support from the sea, where the British fleet reigned supreme. As trophies, the Germans captured 30 tanks, about 2 thousand cars, 1.5 thousand tons of fuel and hundreds of tons of supplies. Accordingly, the local airfield also fell into their hands. In these battles, almost all the “grants” were lost, but a significant number of them were simply abandoned during the retreat. The overall result was simply stunning - with half the forces, Rommel defeated the 8th British Army, simultaneously advancing 600 km deep into Libyan and Egyptian territory. Allied losses amounted to 80,000 soldiers killed, wounded and captured. The command of the British Commonwealth did not know such a failure since May 1940.
However, Rommel's troops were also not in the best shape. As of July 1st, 1942, only 26 combat-ready tanks remained in the Afrika Korps, compared to about 100 British tanks remaining in Egypt as a reserve. From the current situation, the attack of Cairo and Alexandria looked like pure suicide, but the British, succumbing to panic, had already begun the evacuation of rear units and headquarters. If Rommel had known what was going on in the rear and the enemy, the war in Africa could have taken a completely different turn.

Unable to move on, the Italo-German troops tried to capture El Alamein, while waiting for reinforcements for tank units that came only by sea. In many ways, the Allies owed their victory precisely to the fact that in 1942 the British fleet seized the initiative in the Mediterranean Sea, and the aircraft of the British Commonwealth countries began to predominate in the air. The supply of tanks was greatly reduced, although transports were still arriving in Libyan ports, transferring improved Pz.Kpfw.IV Ausf.F2 from Italy.

The supply of the allies was much better. After the change of command, British Generals Alexander and Montgomery assembled 935 tanks, among which were the M4 Sherman. For example, in August 1942, the 8th Tank Brigade had 57 "Grants", 31 "Shermans" and 52 "Crusaders", and in the 9th Tank Brigade there were 37 "Grants", 36 "Shermans" and 49 "Crusaders". ". A qualitative improvement became possible after the decision in July 1942 by the US government to send 300 M4 tanks and 100 M7 self-propelled guns as material assistance to the British, who were frankly unsuccessful in Africa.

Against them, Rommel was able to put up 440 tanks of all types (including captured M3s, Matildas and Valentines) and on August 31 a new major offensive began, the purpose of which was to destroy the enemy group at El Alamein. This time the Allies managed to hold out, losing 65 tanks and 1,750 men. The losses of the Germans in armored vehicles were smaller - 50 tanks, but the Afrika Korps lost 3,000 people killed and wounded, without breaking through the defense.

Both sides again went on the defensive, but time clearly played into the hands of the allies. During August-September 1942, significant reinforcements arrived in Egypt, including the 1st American armored division. As a result, the total number of tanks increased to 1441 units, a significant part of which was concentrated near the Libyan border failed. In addition to British vehicles, more than a third of the tanks were now M3 and M4 (253 and 288 units, respectively). The Germans, despite significant losses, were able to collect 540 tanks, of which almost 60% were Italian. Despite the numerical superiority, the allies for a long time did not succeed in inclining the course of the battle in Libya to their side.

Having launched an offensive near El Alamein on October 23, the allied forces advanced very sluggishly, although they managed to push the enemy back from the city. The newly formed 10th Tank Corps, mostly equipped with "grants" and "Shermans", was withdrawn from the battles on October 27, having lost most of its equipment. Particularly fierce battles flared up on November 3-4, when the Germans still had to start a retreat - by this time, the German tank divisions had retained 35-40 combat-ready vehicles, mostly "triples" and "fours", and the total losses left 320 tanks of all types and 55.000 people.

Despite the success achieved, the allied forces advanced very slowly. The pace of their offensive was only 1.5 km per day, so they reached the Libyan-Tunisian border only in February 1943. This looks somewhat strange considering that on November 8, 1942, Anglo-American troops landed in Morocco and over the next two months occupied not only that country, but also Algeria. Thus, the Afrika Korps was squeezed into the “Tunisian pincers”. The only consolation for Rommel was the arrival of the 5th Panzer Army under the command of General J. Arnim, consisting of only one infantry and one tank division. The advantage of this army was to equip it with new equipment, including six Pz.Kpfw.VI "Tiger" heavy tanks (the only "Tiger-Kompanie" squad in the sPzAbt 501).

In the meantime, the number of tanks "Grant" was increasingly reduced both in combat conditions and for technical reasons, and on December 23 the total number of irretrievably lost tanks reached 350. In this regard, at the beginning of January 1942, 131 remained in the British army. grant”, and in February there were already 88.

Fighting in Tunisia, which began in late December 1942, was initially limited. The Allies were very cautious, but did not hesitate to throw French troops into battle with outdated equipment (suffice it to mention the Renault D1 medium tanks, long out of service in the metropolis), which had recently defended Algeria from them. Over the next month, neither side took active action, which created the illusion of the Anglo-American command's inability to attack the enemy. This delusion cost the Allies dearly - already on February 14, the Germans launched a powerful counteroffensive with the forces of three tank divisions (10, 15 and 21 Pz.Div) in the area of ​​the Kasserine passage. German tankers covered a distance of 150 km in five days, destroying and capturing about 200 M3 and M4 tanks. It would seem that military luck was again on the side of Rommel, but it was just the “swan song” of the African Corps, which completely depleted its reserves. After several counterattacks and the pulling of significant forces to the places of breakthroughs, the Allies managed to stop the offensive by February 23, and on March 3 the Germans had to retreat to their previous positions. Now the stay of the remnants of the Italo-German troops in Tunisia was only a matter of the coming months, although there was still no talk of a complete defeat. Having a fourfold superiority in tanks (for other branches of the military, the indicators were slightly more modest), the Allies were able to force the enemy to capitulate only on May 13, 1943. At the same time, by the end of the battles, the Germans still had 120 tanks against 1100 Anglo-American!

The British Grant fought quite a bit during the landing in Sicily. The main tanks of this campaign were, respectively, the medium M4 "Sherman" and the heavy infantry "Churchill". Also, several old Bishop self-propelled guns arrived from North Africa. Somewhat later, already during the landing on the continental part of Italy, M10 and Priest self-propelled guns were used in large numbers, some of which were transferred from Sicily.
Since the "grants" were no longer regarded as full-fledged combat vehicles, they were assigned other tasks. More precisely, it was Sicily that became the first theater of operations, where various auxiliary vehicles based on the M3 tank were used most massively. For example, before the landing, a significant number of Grant Scorpion and BREM minesweepers were prepared.

Also, as armored units were saturated with M4 tanks, older M3s began to be used as command vehicles. Moreover, the improvements were carried out by field workshops, and therefore the tanks were obtained in various configurations. Some of them kept the tower, but without a 37-mm gun, the tower was completely dismantled from others.

The most notable of the "grants" was, quite naturally, the commander's tank, which drove General Montgomery. They say that he has not changed this M3 since the days of El Alamein and literally kept it as a talisman. The tank wore a camouflage pattern of medium sand and olive green patches, somewhat standing out from the rest. The British general did not change this “grant”, at least until the beginning of October 1944, which once again served as an example of the durability of the tank design (however, it practically did not participate in real battles).

True to its obligations, the United States, back in 1941, was considering the possibility of a joint landing with the forces of the British Commonwealth in North Africa, where it was supposed to open a “Second Front” and finally solve the problem with the Italo-German presence on this continent and withdraw France from the war. The final version was approved a few months later - the goal was the Algerian port of Oran, where on November 8, 1942, a large landing of allied troops was landed as part of the Central Operational Group. The American armored forces on this sector of the front were represented by several formations, among which the 1st Armored Division was the largest. The plans of the allies really came true, but not immediately.
Only one unit was equipped with M3 medium tanks - it was the 13th tank floor, formed on July 15, 1940 on the basis of the 13th cavalry regiment of the 7th cavalry brigade.

Of course, the Americans did not immediately enter the battles. After a series of local battles with the French troops, who surrendered a day later, there was a long pause while the Allies regrouped. American tanks from the 2nd battalion received their baptism of fire on November 26, when a battalion of M3 light tanks entered the battle with German tanks from the 190 Pz.Abt.

Further, on November 28, the Americans were given the task of "supporting with fire and maneuver" the Northamptonshire regiment of English infantry, which attacked enemy positions at Jedea. The Americans, who had no combat experience, did not show their best side - some of the tanks were shot by several disguised German anti-tank guns, and the rest had to retreat to their original positions. The following clashes with the Germans for the 13th regiment also did not end in anything good. Suffice it to say that by December 1942, the total losses amounted to 84 light tanks of both battalions and 40 medium tanks of the 2nd battalion. In the same period, the gradual re-equipment of this battalion with M4 tanks began, but they managed to equip only one company with them. Even the American tankers themselves admitted that the medium M3s were clearly weaker than the German Pz.IVs with any gun.

The real defeat was inflicted on the 1st armored division during the battle of Kasserine, where it was opposed by units of the 10th and 21st German tank divisions. Only during February 14-15, 1943, during the battles at Sbeitla (Sbeitla), the Germans managed to destroy almost all medium tanks M4 of both battalions of the 1st Tank Regiment and M3 from the 3rd Battalion of the 13th Tank Regiment. Relatively lucky was the 3rd battalion, which until then had remained in the rearguard. The ambushed M3 tanks during the battle on February 17 knocked out five German Pz.III and Pz.IV. Four days later, the battalion, with the support of British units, was thrown to repel enemy attacks near Jabal el-Hamra.

Despite the brutal (by American standards) losses, the use of M3 tanks continued until May 1942, until the remnants of Italian and German troops surrendered in Tunisia. As of the beginning of the month, the 1st division still had 51 medium tanks M3 and 178 M4. "Lee" were part of only three tank battalions and, a small number, in the 2nd battalion of the 13th regiment. The last major operation with their participation took place in March 1943, during the assault on Bizerte - here the M3 tanks supported the advance of the 34th division. The remaining cars were subsequently transferred to parts of the Free French.

The M3 tanks served quite a bit in the Pacific. The first and last to “sniff the gunpowder” were the tankmen of the 193rd tank battalion of the 27th infantry division, who participated on November 20-23, 1943 in the battles for the Tarawa atoll and the nearby islands of the Gilbert archipelago. Actually, the units of the battalion did not attack Tarawa itself, but the Makin Atoll, located next to it. The operation was planned very carefully, since the landing force had to overcome a wide sandbank, where tanks and soldiers were in full view in front of Japanese machine-gun nests and artillery.

The medium tanks of Company A (Company A) were part of the second wave of landing and were supposed to support the infantry attacking the Japanese fortifications with the fire of their 75-mm guns, as well as cover the LVT amphibious vehicles with fire. The Japanese were ready to attack and long before the arrival of the Americans managed to build a whole network of defensive structures. The most powerful of them was the Western Tank Barrier (West Tank Barrier), almost impassable for light "Stuarts". However, the 193rd battalion had both types of vehicles.

On the morning of November 23, 1943, medium tanks of the M3A5 modification went into battle, quickly breaking the resistance of the Japanese troops, although the operation did not go exactly as the Americans had planned. Between 09:10 and 09:23, two medium tanks from the Belle Grove transport were first to unload on the shore - they were to provide fire cover for the light tanks, amphibians and infantry that had already unloaded from the first transport vessel. Soon a third transport with 16 amphibians arrived. The first wave of attackers lay down without even passing 100 meters - the situation for the tankers was complicated by the type of terrain - in fact, the tanks moved along a flat beach flooded with water. At the same time, the LVTs were able to advance a little further and the medium tanks of A Company were between them. Despite the fact that the attacking group was moving in shallow water, two M3s hit the shell craters, which were indistinguishable in the muddy water, and died out. The crews tried to get out of the stopped cars, but were immediately mowed down by machine gun fire. The rest of the tanks tried to maneuver among the reefs, being under constant fire from the 37-mm anti-tank guns of the Japanese. The battalion commander, Captain Robert S. Brown, later admitted that at that moment the battle entered a critical stage. The situation was also complicated by the fact that the tankers were firing at the Japanese fortifications, literally through the discordant ranks of the LVTs, and some of the amphibians were damaged by tank guns. However, the defense was still able to break through in several places. The crew of one of the M3s managed to bypass the line of fire from anti-tank guns and, avoiding an explosion in a minefield, suppressed one machine-gun nest. According to the tank commander, a total of 100 shells were fired, of which at least 30 hit the target, killing many enemy soldiers.
As soon as the situation stabilized, the LVT and M3 crews began a total cleanup of the beach. In fact, between 10:58 and 11:30 the Americans had already taken control of the situation and further, as they say, was a matter of technique. An hour later, the ring around the Barrier was closed, in which the timely approach of the Stuart light tanks played a significant role.

After 12:00, the Japanese began to retreat into the forest, leaving only small groups of soldiers and snipers on the front line. At this time, the tanks of companies A and F made an advance deep into the island, without engaging in combat with the enemy. At about 12:30 the tank group came under fire from 37 mm anti-tank guns and the F Company commander requested support. Five medium M3s moved forward, beginning to methodically clear the area of ​​machine-gun emplacements. An hour later, the tanks reached the southern end of the island, where they met strong resistance from the Japanese infantry. At this time, G Company, supported by three medium M3s, advanced along the road - here the Japanese equipped two long-term firing points with heavy machine guns and was also intended for a 37-mm gun, but was equipped only with machine guns. The first two bunkers were destroyed fairly quickly, but there were problems with the third one. Nevertheless, by 16:00 the “box” slammed shut. Two American groups squeezed the Japanese troops without any possibility of a breakthrough, and the final chord was the attack of four M3 medium tanks, which crushed the last major pockets of resistance with their 37-mm and 75-mm guns. The other four M3s were no less successful on the eastern side of the island, and they were actively supported by 105-mm field guns, unloaded after the paratroopers.

In total, by 17:00, the Japanese resistance on Makin began to be of a focal nature, and by the end of the day, the remnants of the defenders began to surrender. The actions of the tankers of the 193rd tank battalion could be assessed as successful, however, the island lacked powerful anti-tank weapons, and there were no Japanese tanks at all. After that, the American army did not use M3 medium tanks in battles (except for vehicles based on them), since in 1943 the basis of the US tank forces were the newer M4 “Sherman”.

While fighting was going on with the German-Italian armies in North Africa, thousands of kilometers away, the “grants” for the first time in their history had to engage in battle with the Japanese. Somewhat strange is the fact that it was not the Americans who fought on them, and not even the British, but the Indians. As we know, until 1947, India was part of the British Commonwealth and its army was obliged to take part in all hostilities conducted by the mother country. For a long time, the Indians, who were under the strict control of the British, received only "recyclables" and then in extremely limited quantities.

Everything changed in February 1942, when the Japanese "suddenly" landed troops in the British colonies of Southeast Asia. Burma (now Myanmar) was the first on the way of the 15th Japanese army, under the blows of which three Chinese divisions (5th, 6th and 66th), retreating deep into China, and the British army under the command of General Alexander did not survive. It cannot be said that the capture of Burma was lightning fast, but on May 1 Mandalay was taken, after which almost the entire country was under the control of the Japanese.

General A. Wavel, who commanded the defense of India, formed one British and six Indian divisions, which he brought into two army corps. Also, as a matter of urgency, the organized Indian Tank Corps, by coincidence, received modern equipment in the form of M3 “Stewart” light tanks and medium M3 tanks of various models.

The 251st and 252nd tank brigades received both “native” and export versions of the M3 tanks, but the first of them managed to rearm on the M4A4 “Sherman” even before entering Burma. At the same time, the 252nd brigade, two regiments of which were equipped with "grants", was already in June 1942 sent to the Middle East and placed at the disposal of the 31st Armored Division (31st Armored Division), to reinforce the British contingent. The tanks were unloaded in one of the ports of Iran and sent to Basra (Iraq), closer to the African front. They never had a chance to take part in the battles, and in May 1943 the brigade was re-equipped with M4 tanks and sent to Egypt, where the fighting had long ended.

In total, as of June 30, 1942, about 390 medium tanks were delivered to the Far Eastern borders of the British Empire: 212 were stationed in India, 114 in Burma, and another 57 were sent to Iraq. In April 1943, the situation changed somewhat - 896 tanks were listed only for India.

One of the most distinguished was the 254th Indian Tank Brigade (254th Indian Tank Brigade), formed on April 1, 1941 in Risalpur and then called the 254th Armored Brigade. The renaming, carried out on April 1, 1942, was timed to coincide with the supply of new tanks, which were distributed between the 3rd Carabiniers, 149th Royal Armored Corps and 150th Royal Armored Corps Regiment. Another unit (7th Indian Light Cavalry) was equipped with Stewart tanks. Being part of the 14th Army, the brigade was alternately subordinate to the 5th and 7th Indian Infantry Divisions, from the spring of 1943, constantly being in battle.
With "grants", not to mention the "Shermans", the Japanese army had practically nothing to oppose. The main tank on the Burmese sector of the front was the light Ha-Go, whose short-barreled 37-mm cannon could only penetrate the side armor of the M3 from an extremely short distance (no more than 300 meters). The Indians and the British hit the Japanese tanks at a much greater range. Here is how the actions of the Japanese against the Indian "grants" are described:

“In impotent rage, Japanese officers rushed at the tanks with sabers, trying to hit the crew through the viewing slots. In the infantry, suicide squads were organized, who, with mines or Molotov cocktails in their hands, rushed under the tanks or, hiding in the thickets, tried to put mines on bamboo poles under the caterpillars of the tank.”

Indeed, in the jungles of Burma, the Japanese actively used magnetic mines. In 1943, the British managed to capture several of them and conduct extensive tests. As it turned out, they were ineffective against the side armor of the M3 tanks, but the thinner bottom and roof of the hull were destroyed without much difficulty. To counteract in the first case, the option was chosen with the laying of sandbags, which extinguished the inertia from the mine explosion. Against mines laid on the ground, only mine clearing helped, since the coating of the zimmerite type was not used on British tanks in Burma.

The most difficult trials continued to fall on the lot of the 254th brigade, commanded by Brigadier General R. Skunks. He was the brother of Lieutenant General G.P. Skunks, who strongly opposed the mass use of tanks in the jungle. In his opinion, in areas difficult for tanks to reach, preference should have been given to infantry and artillery, and tanks were given a supporting role. The “brigadier”, in turn, proved the fallacy of this opinion and, in the end, turned out to be right.

In January 1944, during the second battle near Arakan on the Burmese coast, the actions of infantry units were supported by tankers. Among them was the 25th Dragoon Regiment (25th Dragons), equipped with M3 tanks. A few weeks later, in February 1944, the Japanese received reinforcements in Ha-Go tanks and launched a counteroffensive, reaching the positions of the headquarters of the 7th division. Having an advantage in technical support, the British Commonwealth forces then managed to defend a "patch" measuring 800x1500 meters. A role in this success was played by the actions of the M3 tank crews, who provided fire support to the defending units. Air support had no less influence - throughout the entire period of fighting in the encirclement, transport aircraft constantly dropped provisions and ammunition to the besieged troops, while the Japanese units were actually cut off from their supply bases.

After the failure of the counter-offensive, the Japanese General Staff developed a larger operation called "U-Go", the purpose of which was to defeat the intruding British-Indian units. To strengthen the group, Indian units subordinate to Azad Hindu, the self-proclaimed government of India under the control of the Japanese, were also involved. The operation began at the end of March 1944, and one of the most significant objects was the capture of the road from the Impala to Kohima. This time, Skunk had the opportunity to test the theory of using a large mass of tanks in the jungle. The 3rd Regiment of Carabinieri on M3A1 tanks and the 7th Indian Light Cavalry Division on Stuarts went into battle. As a result, there were several oncoming tank battles, and the first of them took place on March 20, when a column of "li" tanks of company "A" was attacked by six Japanese "Ha-Go" tanks. The result of this small battle was the destruction of five (according to the Americans, they all burned down) and the capture of one Japanese tank. The British lost only one "li", which was destroyed after breaking through the fuel tank and detonating gasoline vapors. In this case, the side 35-mm armor from an armor-piercing projectile of 37 mm caliber at an extremely close distance turned out to be weak protection. However, this was the exception rather than the rule. Further, the crews of the Li tanks provided effective assistance to the British infantry, while the Japanese had practically no anti-tank weapons, with the exception of a few 47-mm anti-tank guns.

This success made it possible to attract larger forces to defeat the enemy, and soon the 149th and 150th RAC regiments, also equipped with Li tanks, were brought up to Kohina. In addition to supporting infantry, M3 tanks were actively used to destroy long-term fortifications and bunkers, which was important in difficult terrain. In fact, in a number of cases, "li" were used as assault guns, since the high-explosive shells of their 75-mm guns were the best suited for destroying all sorts of obstacles.

Ultimately, the operation "U-Go" did not bring the expected results. The Japanese side lost over 60,000 killed and wounded, while the losses of the British Commonwealth forces amounted to just over 16,000 people. By the first days of July, it became clear that the plan to defeat the enemy troops had completely failed, and from that moment on, the Japanese forces fought constantly to hold the remaining bridgeheads, until the surrender in 1945. In particular, in the winter of 1945, the crews of the 3rd Carabiniers fought at Shwebo and Saganga, and in March they participated in the liberation of Mandalay. After the end of the campaign in Burma, the M3 series tanks were decommissioned, and some of the formations that fought on them (such as 3rd Carabiniers) were sent to the metropolis for re-equipment and transfer to more "hot spots" of the British Empire.

So, as mentioned earlier, several dozen M3 tanks of various modifications were handed over to the Free French tankers in the spring of 1943. Continuing to remain in Tunisia and not representing great combat value, the French decided to use the former American "li" for crew training, which they successfully did over the next year. French tanks did not take part in the hostilities and messages like "... during the landing in Normandy and in the south of France, the British and American troops were armed with the latest tanks, and the MZ tanks were in the French and Polish divisions that were part of the American army" must be evaluated critically . Of course, there were tanks with such a designation in the French army, but this is not about medium “li”, but about light “stewarts” of the M3 and M5 types.

However, there is another interesting fact. It is generally accepted that the French M3s were not used beyond Africa, however, on the Der Zweite Weltkrieg forum there is a photo of a wrecked tank of this particular brand. The commentary states that this "li" was blown up by a Vietnamese mine during the battles of 1952. So, this issue is still not clear.

Oddly enough, but the fourth place in terms of the number of M3 was Australia. Being one of the most distant British dominions, this island nation constantly needed new technology, which came very late. While things were going on in Europe and Africa, the British were having a tight time in Australia, but at the end of 1942 the situation changed radically. After the delivery of the M4 tanks, the older M3s were sent in mass quantities to the “periphery” and by December the Australians had 502 “grants” and 255 “li”.
One could say that the metropolis clearly deprived its dominion, but this was not entirely true. American tanks were indeed not considered the best, but the Japanese, who occupied the Pacific islands, often had no tanks at all. The strongest opponent for the M3 was perhaps the Shinhoto Chi-Ha medium tank, which had 25 mm frontal armor and an upgraded 47 mm gun. As you can see, in terms of its parameters, the “Japanese” in many respects corresponded to the Italian tanks of the M13 \ 40 type, and we know perfectly well how the meetings with the “grants” ended for them. However, for the most part, Japanese tank formations were equipped with older Chi-Ha and Ha-Go light tanks.

The Australians were not easy guys. Although the front every year moved away from the borders of Australia for thousands of kilometers, this did not stop them from implementing new ideas and experiments. One of such interesting projects was equipping the M3 tank with equipment for overcoming deep fords and swamps. The work was carried out by specialists and technicians of the 4th tank brigade. The solution, from a technical point of view, was absolutely simple. A special casing was attached to the stern of the tank by welding in order to provide air access to the engine. A 12-inch (30.5 cm) high pipe was installed on the roof of the commander's cupola. In trials in 1943, a tank equipped with this equipment was able to ford a depth of 9 feet (2.75 meters), which was only slightly inferior to its full height.
Similar work was carried out in the 5th tank regiment. The idea was similar, but the implementation was somewhat different. To supply air to the engine, a pipe was used, one end of which went out through the commander's cupola, and the other was attached to a hole in the engine compartment. Exhaust gases were removed using a long pipe. Thanks to the almost complete sealing of the hull, it was possible to literally achieve an underwater course - now the tank could overcome water obstacles up to 4.5 meters deep.

Another option involved the installation of two wooden pipes (for air inlet and exhaust outlet) and was the simplest. Of course, such an effect as in previous cases was not achieved, but such a “modernization” was available to any field maintenance team. On trials, the tank easily crossed a ford up to 1.5 meters deep.

Despite the successes achieved, the Australian armored forces did not acquire underwater tanks. In the presence of well-equipped engineering troops, there was practically no need to re-equip the M3, and besides, since 1943, this tank began to be actively replaced by the M4 Sherman. The cars that were “retired” began to be converted into various auxiliary equipment. So, several M3s were disarmed and converted into M1 and BREM bulldozers. After September 1945, the Australian "li" and "grants" equipped with gasoline engines hastened to write off, but the tanks with diesel engines remained in service. So, by August 1947, 149 more “grants” remained in service, but most of them needed repairs.

During the reform of the Royal Australian Tank Corps, which took place in 1948, it left only one tank floor equipped with "Churchill" and two tank brigades - on "grants" and "matilds", respectively. It is quite understandable that it was difficult to call the presence of tanks of the last two types other than scrap, but in the conditions of a total reduction in the military budget, there was simply nothing to replace them with. In the end, the "grants" were finally withdrawn from service only in 1955. Several tanks were saved and are now on display in museums of armored vehicles.

Separately, it is worth highlighting the order for the Canadian Army. At the end of 1940, an order was received from the Canadian government for 1,157 M3 tanks in a slightly modified version. Changes included the installation of mudguards between the wheeled carts, which were designed to evacuate mud and snow, and additional jettisonable fuel tanks at the stern. In order not to load American enterprises, the order was placed at the factories of the Montreal Locomotive Works, owned by the American Locomotive Company.

M3 tanks made in Canada, unlike the American ones, had a single khaki camouflage. Canadian red-white-red flags were applied to the front on the middle sheet of the transmission and along the sides of the hull. On the sides, and on the front sheet above the flag, a five-digit registration number starting with the letter T was applied with white paint.

Among the other countries that received the M3 tanks was, oddly enough, distant Brazil. Being aloof from the great tank battles, the Brazilians did not disdain not even the newest equipment, especially since it was almost for nothing. Since 1943, under Lend-Lease, 104 tanks of various modifications (M3A3 and M3A5), including several M31s, have been delivered from the USA. At the beginning of 1944, there were plans to send them to Italy, to help the allied forces, who were clearly "stalled" in the mountainous Apennines, but this idea was soon abandoned. After the war, the Brazilian M3 remained in service until the early 1950s, and some vehicles underwent modernization in the same period - instead of diesel engines, they installed Continental radials. The work was carried out by the Central Park of Mechanization on its own. Now one of the surviving M3A5 is installed as a monument in Sao Paulo.

After receiving newer technology, the Brazilians did not send the obsolete M3 for scrap, but sold them to Paraguay. In particular, it is indicated that the Paraguayans received several modernized M3A5s with radial engines. However, there is no detailed information on this. According to official data, only the M4 Sherman and M3 Stewart tanks were in service with the Paraguayan army in the 1940s and 1950s.

The failures of the first months of the war against Germany and its allies by September 1941 put the Red Army in a very difficult situation. Having lost during this time, according to the most conservative estimates, about 25,000 tanks, the Soviet troops constantly rolled back, leaving huge industrial areas to the enemy. The occupation of Ukraine and the blockade of Leningrad looked especially hard against the general background. Military enterprises had to be urgently evacuated, including the Kharkov Locomotive Plant, which was the main one for the production of T-34 tanks. Deliveries of heavy KV tanks to the front were also reduced - the Leningrad Kirov Plant was blocked. It was possible to restore the number of tanks of this type only by the beginning of 1942, after the deployment of evacuated factories in the Urals.

But the front did not wait. Tanks were required immediately, and it was difficult to fight on the T-40 and T-60 alone, produced at the Moscow plant No. 1. The way out was seen in the supply of equipment from abroad. Soviet military commissions went to Great Britain already in August 1941, where they quickly managed to agree on the supply of the following tanks: the infantry A12 “Matilda’ II”, the infantry “Valentine” Mk.I and the landing A17 “Tetrarch”. Following them, a contract was signed for the purchase of A22 "Churchill" heavy infantry tanks and "Universal Carrier" transporters.

Much more modest was the story of the Americans, whose “range” turned out to be not so wide. As in the case of the British Lend-Lease, the Soviet representatives were offered M3A1 light tanks and M3 medium tanks. The latter were produced in significant quantities and were quite affordable for export deliveries. Although by this time more modern variants like the M3A1 and M3A3 were available, the choice was made in favor of the earlier M3. Perhaps the mass character of this modification played a role. In any case, 1386 tanks were shipped to the Soviet side, but the military acceptance of the GBTU accepted only 976. Considering that the Americans considered 417 M3 and M4 tanks to be “drowned”, the Soviet Union received less than was stipulated in the contract.

The tanks were delivered in convoys via Murmansk, but some of them arrived via Iran. Such an unusual route was due to the presence of “extra” M3s in the American tank units that fought in North Africa. Since the spring of 1942, active rearmament with the M4 Sherman began, and older tanks were gradually withdrawn from combat. As a result, part of the M3 was sent to the USSR, despite the fact that delivery by land routes through the Middle East was somewhat faster.

The Soviet tankmen did not like the American tank. This is not an unfounded statement - for the entire period of operation, the M3 practically did not deserve good reviews. Of course, in 1942, the "American" was clearly more comfortable for a crew of six, had a smoother ride and was not difficult to manage. According to these parameters, the M3 looked clearly better than the same “thirty-fours”, the workmanship of which left much to be desired. But let's not forget that the production of tanks in the United States was carried out in "greenhouse" conditions, while the Soviet industry literally worked to the point of wear and tear under the most unfavorable circumstances. However, six months later, the quality level of the T-34 was raised to the required levels, and the M3 turned out to be an “outsider” among the exported tanks.

In the Soviet nomenclature, designations such as A12 or their own names did not take root. Instead, various abbreviations were used, which still causes confusion when analyzing the types of tanks used in a particular operation. Let's deal with this issue in more detail:

A12 Matilda – Mk II or MK II
A22 “Churchill” – Mk IV or MK IV(sometimes even MK.IU, where "U" is a replacement for the Latin numeral "V")
M3 And M3A1- light tank M3l or M3L
M3- medium tank M3s or M3S
"Universal" – "Universal"

In the case of American tanks, the letters “C” and “L” sometimes completely disappeared from the reports, so in some cases it is now very problematic to determine which of the M3s was used in battles. In addition, in our writers, these tanks are commonly referred to as "grants", which is not entirely true, since most of them still belonged to the "native" modification of the M3 for the US Army and it would be more appropriate to use the name "Lee". However, in order not to introduce confusion, we will also adhere to this tradition.

The M3 and M3A1 tanks sent to the Soviet Union were also not repainted and retained American registration numbers. Moreover, American stars were simply repainted red. The only striking difference was the names on the sides and front sheets, which were not proper names, but rather slogans: “For our Soviet Motherland”, “Death to fascism”, “We will avenge the tortured Soviet people”, “Soviet heroes”, “Under the banner of Lenin forward to victory”, etc. However, the first M3s that arrived in the USSR received only white tactical numbers, which could be applied both to the frontal hull sheet and turret, and to the sides in the engine area. So far, it has not been possible to trace any general scheme for applying these numbers. Tanks operated in winter were repainted with washable white paint.

In addition, by agreement with the allies, since 1945, a white recognition stripe was applied to Soviet tanks on top of the turret along the perimeter. In turn, the Americans and the British drew two stripes. This was done for a reason - the fronts were approaching and not all fighters on both sides knew what a Soviet or American tank looked like - in such a situation, the stripes helped to more accurately determine the identity of the vehicle.

Among the first units to receive M3 medium tanks was the 114th Tank Brigade. Its formation began in February 1942 in the city of Slobodsky (Kirov region), but the material part was received in the city of Gorky over the next two months. It is very interesting that almost all the equipment used in the 114th brigade was American: Dodge, Ford-6 and Chevrolet trucks, Harley-Davidson motorcycles, etc. The basis of the brigade was the 319th and 320th tank battalions - in total, the 114th brigade had 69 M3s and M3l tanks.

It was not until mid-May 1942 that the formation of the brigade was completed in full, when the Soviet offensive began on the Barvenkovsky ledge. The American tanks took the first battle on May 16 - on this day, the brigade entered the battle in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bSavintsev, Muzorov Bayrak and Malaya Komissarovka. After the failure of the operation, the 114th brigade was urgently transferred to the area of ​​​​Valakleya, V.-Burluk, Barvenkovo ​​to release the encircled formations of the 6th and 12th armies. Based on the current situation, on May 23, the brigade was transferred to the control of the Consolidated Tank Corps, which also included the 64th brigade and the 92nd separate tank battalion, which brought its total strength to 102 tanks. The first success was achieved on May 25, when, in cooperation with infantry formations, the corps participated in the liberation of the city of Csepel. There were no losses in American tanks 25, but during the day the Soviet troops lost 29 tanks, knocking out and destroying 19 German ones. On the morning of May 26, a new order was received - to break through the defensive orders of the German units from the outside, squeezing the Soviet grouping into "pincers". The reports noted that during May 26-27, tankers fought stubborn battles with the enemy and, having overcome his resistance, were able to break through the encirclement, helping units of the 300th Infantry Division.

The total losses in the tanks also turned out to be rather big. Despite the fact that not a single tank was lost on the 26th, as of the evening of May 27th, the 114th brigade had only five M3s and five T-60s. According to unspecified data, along with the M3s, older medium tanks M2A1 were also used, so the total number given includes these vehicles. The last major battle with the participation of M3s took place on that very day in the area between the settlements of Krasnaya Gusarovka and Gusarovka, where the remaining American tanks by that time were knocked out.

The 5th Guards Tank Brigade took part in the unsuccessful offensive near Barvenkovo, but unlike the 114th brigade, its battle path turned out to be more thorny. Before the start of the operation, the guards had only Soviet-made tanks, mainly T-34s and T-60s. After a successful breakthrough of the German defense, the 5th Guards Brigade. was surrounded, having lost most of her equipment. The breakthrough, undertaken on the morning of May 26, was led by the tanks of the 5th Guards Tank Brigade, led by its commander, Major General Mikhailov - at that time, 7 T-34s, 6 T-60s and one KV-1 remained in the brigade. The largest tank group from the 21st Tank Corps (60 vehicles of various types) was concentrated in the Lozovenka area. In total, 74 tanks and 22 thousand people went on the attack, of which only 5000 and five tanks of the 5th Guards Brigade came out to their own.

After that, the 5th Guards Brigade. was reorganized and equipped with foreign technology. A few months later, the brigade was transferred to the North Caucasian Front, where the Soviet offensive was more successful. Further, tracking the quantitative composition is somewhat problematic, since modern sources provide conflicting data.

For example, you can find a mention that after the reorganization, the place of the "thirty-fours" was taken by English and American tanks: 18 "Valentine", 16 M3l, 4 M3s and 2 M4A2. However, the monograph “Breakthrough of the Blue Line” (“Military Chronicle” No. 3-2004) provides other information as of September 13, the brigade had 21 T-34 and M4A2 medium tanks, as well as 14 “Valentine” (not counting eight SU-76 self-propelled guns) . As of September 26, the total number of tanks is estimated at 44 units, but there was not a single "American" among them (40 "Valentine", 3 T-34, 1 BT-7). Based on these data, we can conclude that if the "grants" were operated as part of the 5th Guards. tbr., then an extremely short time.

The only tank unit that took part in the liberation of the Caucasus and was equipped with "grants" in a sufficient number of operations was only the 257th tank regiment, subordinate to the command of the 56th army. The first battle in the framework of this large-scale operation, "grants" and "stuarts" took place in the early morning of September 14, 1943. The tankers, in cooperation with the rifle units, had to break through the front line of the enemy’s defense in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bNovyy and heights 95.0. The Germans resisted very fiercely, in which the minefields contributed a lot. However, by the middle of the day, the infantry managed to find a passage between the fields, and three tanks immediately slipped through this narrow "gallery". Having burst into the outskirts of the New settlement, the tankers failed to gain a foothold, since the infantry could not pass behind them - all three tanks were hit by artillery, the rest retreated to regroup. The total losses that day amounted to six M3s tanks.

The offensive resumed on September 15, when the front line of the enemy’s defense was still able to break through, it was decided to postpone further advance for the next day due to darkness. The task assigned to the 257th regiment was to force the Psif River and reach the Pebeps River. Having established interaction with the infantry, by 10:00 a.m. the tankers managed to break through the intermediate line of defense and by the end of the day captured the height of 149.8. During September 18-21, the regiment, having crossed the Psif river, fought stubborn battles in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe settlement of Ilyichevsky, Osnva, Kars. Although the combat mission was partially completed, however, irretrievable losses amounted to only 5 M3l and M3s tanks. One of the reasons for the slow advance of the tanks of the 257th TP was the complete absence of their own artillery.

After the regrouping, the offensive of tank formations resumed on September 22-23, when the Chekups River was forced. In the afternoon, Soviet tanks came under fire from four camouflaged self-propelled guns, after which they were attacked by German tanks. Having repulsed this sudden attack from the enemy, the Soviet tankers temporarily went on the defensive and all day on September 24 they were regrouping. Losses for the previous two days amounted to 5 "grants". In total, when the Soviet troops prepared for the liberation of the Taman Peninsula (October 2, 1943), only 13 vehicles remained in the 357th tank regiment. Other tank formations also did not differ in complete equipment: the 63rd brigade - 17 T-34s, the 85th tank brigade - 13 T-34s, the 1449th sap - 9 SU-122s. Nevertheless, it was they who were given the task of capturing the Vyshestebliyevskaya field and preventing the enemy from reaching the Kiziltash estuary. In the most difficult battles from October 2 to 9, the tankers, being under constant fire from long-range artillery and anti-tank weapons, managed to fully complete the task, after which a long respite was obtained.

After the Caucasus, the 257th separate tank regiment was transferred to the west and included in the Separate Primorsky Army. The new task was even more difficult than the previous one - it was necessary to liberate the Crimea. Being on the Kerch bridgehead, the 257th detachment advanced together with the 85th and 244th tank regiments, as well as the 1499th sap, equipped with SU-152 self-propelled guns. In total there were 80 tanks and 20 self-propelled guns. Here is how the actions of the regiment are described in the book "Difficulties of Liberation" (given with abbreviations):

“On the morning of April 11, by order of the commander, he set out from waiting positions in the Adzhimushkay area and an army mobile detachment, in whose head the first battalion of the 257th tank regiment moved with a landing of submachine gunners and two army reconnaissance companies. The army mobile detachment received the task, moving along the Kerch-Sultanovka highway behind the mobile detachment of the 16th rifle corps, to capture the forces of the corps in the village of Mikhailovka, turn around to the south of the mobile detachment of the 16th corps and, in cooperation with it, go into a rapid pursuit of the enemy along paths parallel to the withdrawal the main forces of the 5th army corps of the enemy in the general direction of the settlements of Marfaka, Dzhav-Tobe, Uzun-Ayak, Arma-Eli with the task of reaching the flank and rear of the retreating Kerch group of Germans and, together with the troops of the army pursuing the enemy from the front, encircle and destroy it.

Having deployed at the indicated line and having as a forward detachment one tank battalion with a landing of machine gunners and two army reconnaissance companies in vehicles, the 257th tank regiment on the move shot down small enemy units defending along the Turkish Wall, and by 14.00 on April 11 bypassed from the north west captured the village of Marfovka, defeating the 9th cavalry regiment of the 6th cavalry division of the Romanians and inflicting heavy losses on the 4th artillery regiment of the same division. Most of the soldiers and officers of the 9th cavalry regiment were taken prisoner, including the commander of this regiment with his headquarters ...

... During the night of April 13, an army mobile detachment completed the liquidation of small enemy groups remaining in the Feodosia region and, having replenished with fuel, in the first half of the day made a forced march along the Feodosia-Karasubazar highway. Due to the lack of fuel, the army detachment continued to advance in the direction of the village of Zuya with only one tank company of the 257th tank regiment, which had machine gunners on its armor. By the end of April 13, a tank company, in cooperation with the forward detachment of the 32nd Guards Rifle Division, captured the village ...

... On April 23, the main forces of the 11th and 16th rifle corps approached Sevastopol, and the front commander decided to launch a second offensive with larger forces. Up to 5 rifle divisions and tank units of the Primorsky Army (one tank brigade - 63rd Tamanskaya and 3 tank regiments - 85th, 257th and 244th) and the 19th tank corps, which by that time numbered a total of 42 tanks and 28 self-propelled guns. Artillery preparation was set to last one hour. The 8th Air Army was supposed to support the offensive ...

The 257th separate tank regiment, with 30 tanks in service, on the orders of the commander of the 16th rifle corps, interacting with units of the 383rd rifle division, attacked the enemy in the direction of the northern outskirts of the Kadykovka settlement, the fork in the highways and the Gornaya height. At 11.30, the tanks of the regiment passed the front line of the enemy's defense and reached the Nameless Farm, 1.5 km northwest of Kadykovka. Here the tanks were met with heavy anti-tank fire, and attempts to move forward through the hollow were unsuccessful. By the end of the day, the regiment, having lost 5 tanks burned out and 6 damaged, returned to their original positions.
The offensive on April 23 showed that, despite the excellent work of artillery and aviation, it was not possible to destroy the defensive structures, although in some directions the infantry advanced 2–3 km and occupied the enemy’s front trenches. According to intelligence data, the enemy still had 72,700 soldiers and officers, 1,345 artillery pieces, 430 mortars, 2,355 machine guns, as well as 50 tanks and self-propelled guns in the bridgehead.

On April 24, the tank units of the Primorsky Army and the 19th Tank Corps were once again used to break through to Sapun Gora through the Bolshevik collective farm, having suffered heavy losses, but had no success. During the two days of the battle, 97 tanks and self-propelled guns were lost (burned out and lined). After a series of unsuccessful attacks, on the orders of the chief of staff of the front and the commander of the Primorsky Army, the corps was withdrawn to the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe village of Kamara, where it began to repair tanks and prepare for further hostilities.

Indeed, the losses in technology were very large. As of May 7, 1944, the OTA had only 166 tanks and 30 self-propelled guns, while there were practically no replenishments over the above period of time. The number of the 257th detachment also decreased, but did not look catastrophic - at that time there were 22 tanks left in the regiment. The operation carried out on the same day to destroy the German troops, who occupied a tough defense on Sapun Gora, was successful. As a result, by the end of the day, the 242nd Mountain Rifle Division with the 257th Tank Regiment were 300 meters from the eastern outskirts of the Karan settlement and, with the support of the 16th Corps, captured it on the afternoon of May 8th.

Now the time has come for the liberation of Sevastopol - on the morning of May 9th, let the enemy pull up reserves and regroup, Soviet tankers and infantry units broke into the city. The resistance of the German troops was very strong - suffice it to say that the remnants of tank and assault regiments operated in the city, equipped with Pz.III and Pz.IV of various options, as well as 75-mm StuG III anti-tank self-propelled guns. And yet, the tankers of the 257th detachment and the infantry of the 83rd marine rifle managed to drive the enemy out of the Georgievsky monastery area, completely clearing the area by 17:00. After the completion of the operation to liberate the Crimea, the remaining Grant and Stuart tanks were taken to the rear, and the 25th separate tank regiment received new T-34-85 tanks.

The operation to withdraw troops from the encirclement near Kharkov had not yet ended, when in June 1942 a new, no less large-scale operation began on the Bryansk Front. The Voronezh direction was chosen as a priority, in which both sides concentrated significant tank forces. The command of the Red Army, having received in mid-June information about the regrouping of enemy troops and the concentration of troops in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe cities of Kolpny, Shchigry and Kursk, decided to form an "adequate counterweight". The Soviet "armored fist" outnumbered the German one, numbering about 1640 tanks against 795: 191 KB, 650 T-34-76, 42 BT and T-26, as well as 757 light and infantry tanks of other types (T-60, T -70, "Valentine", etc.) There were 12 tank brigades alone, but only one of them was equipped with American tanks.

As part of the 192nd brigade by the end of June 1942, there were 30 ((according to other sources - 31) M3l and 14 M3s, divided between the 416th and 417th separate tank battalions, and before the start of the offensive, all tanks were in good order (which is impossible It was said about the T-34 and KV). The brigade was part of the 61st Army and actually spent most of the time on the rear lines. Considering the originality of the M3s design, this tank could be more useful as a weapon to fight enemy armored vehicles from ambushes or shelters. The power of the 75-mm gun was just enough to effectively combat the German tanks Pz.Kpfw.III Ausf.G\H, equipped with 50-mm cannons with a barrel length of 60 calibers and 30-mm frontal armor. the basis of the German tank units in the battle in the Voronezh direction. Actually, it is difficult to say anything definite about the success of the use of "grants" in the summer of 1942 on the Bryansk Front, since reliable information regarding their combat work is still not found. Statistics By August, the number of combat units in the brigade increased to 64 tanks by adding five heavy KV-1 and eight infantry "Churchill". However, on October 1, 1942, the 192nd brigade retained only 38 vehicles: 14 M3l, 25 M3s and 3 Universal armored personnel carriers. Thus, there were no losses among the “grants” at all, or they were replenished at the expense of reserves, which is very doubtful.

The last peak in the activity of using the M3 in the ranks of the Red Army came in the summer of 1943. As you might guess, the largest grouping of American tanks was concentrated to conduct a defensive operation on the Kursk Bulge. As of July 1, the Central Front had at least four tank units equipped with "Americans": So, only in the 48th Army of the Central Front there were 85 "grants": 30 M3s, 8 M3l and 8 SU-76s, in the 193rd detachment - 55 M3s and 3 SU-76s. The Voronezh Front had a slightly smaller number of M3 medium tanks: the 245th detachment - 26 (according to other sources 27) M3l and 12 M3s, the 230th detachment - 6 M3s and 32 M3l.

The most difficult test fell on the lot of the 230th detachment, which was in the reserve of the 52nd Guards Rifle Division. On the afternoon of July 5, the infantrymen repulsed several powerful attacks of the 2nd SS Panzer Corps, but by 15:00 an acute shortage of ammunition began to affect. The situation became critical when German aircraft burned 13 vehicles with shells urgently delivered to the front line. The division was fragmented into several parts, but even then the guards did not retreat, continuing to fight in a partial environment. In order to prevent the enemy from completing the pursuit and completely closing the ring, the command of the 52nd Guards Rifle Division issued an order to withdraw and concentrate in the area of ​​the village of Bykhovka, where three companies of the 230th detachment were in reserve. The fourth company buried its tanks in the ground at a height of 227.4, in anticipation of a German breakthrough. The tankers also received the task of covering the infantry units at about 15:00. Subordinating to the command of the infantry division, the commander of the tank regiment D.A. Shcherbakov sent one company of tanks against the armored group of the Das Riech division, and the other two against the avant-garde of the Leibstandart division. The first battle took place about 6 km north of Berezov at a height of 233.3. The second, more numerous group of "Americans" met the enemy 1.5 km south of Bykhovka. In both cases, both the qualitative and quantitative advantage was on the side of the Germans, whose armored groups were based on Pz.IV tanks. Armor-piercing shells fired from long-barreled guns successfully pierced the frontal armor of "grants" and "stuarts" from a distance of more than a kilometer. In fact, the oncoming battle did not work out - the Germans simply shot the Soviet tanks that attacked them. The battle at Hill 233.3 ended between 15:45 and 16:00 with the loss of seven M3 tanks, although it is not specified which type they belonged to. Judging by the surviving photographs, at least two "grants" were completely destroyed. There is no data on losses from the German side. Nevertheless, the death of almost an entire company of the 230th detachment was not in vain - the tankers completed their task, delaying the advance of the enemy and giving the infantry formations the opportunity to regroup.
No less difficult was the fate of the "grants" of the 245th rep. During the fighting in the area of ​​​​the villages of Cherkasskoye and Korovino (Yakovlevsky district of the Belgorod region), from July 4 to August 28, 1943, the regiment lost all materiel and was assigned to reform.

Probably the most "variegated" was the composition of the 91st separate tank regiment of the 4th Army of the Karelian Front. At the beginning of 1943, Soviet divers raised 12 M3 tanks from a sunken vehicle, which were then repaired in the workshops of the 297th repair battalion. However, the regiment received only 11 vehicles, since the 12th had to be dismantled for spare parts. Unfortunately, information about the combat use of these machines has not yet been found. From the report on May 27, 1944, it is known that the 91st detachment had 14 BT-7 tanks, five BT-5s and one M3s - it is possible that some of the American vehicles failed for technical reasons.

After the completion of operations near Kursk and Kharkov, the number of M3 medium tanks began to steadily decline. In the southern direction, the remaining “grants” were gradually withdrawn to the rear, and in the central sectors of the front they disappeared due to natural attrition (combat losses, impossibility of repair, lack of spare parts, etc.) Apparently, the last formation that used M3s tanks on Soviet-German front, became the 41st Tank Brigade of the 5th Tank Corps of the 1st Baltic Front. According to the summary for the evening of November 13, 1943, the brigade had 61 "thirty-fours". However, by the beginning of March 1944, the 41st brigade had only 24 T-34-76 and 38 (!) "Grants". Where the American-made tanks were transferred from is not specified. It is possible that the "sources" were formations of other fronts, which at that time were being retrained for new equipment. It is also known that by the time the 5th TC was transferred to the 2nd Baltic Front (in April 1944), 204 T-34s of various modifications and 20 "grants" remained in it. They finally broke up with the M3s only at the end of May 1944, when the 41st brigade mastered the much more modern T-34-85, on which it ended the war.

The Soviet M3s played its last "chord" in the summer of 1945. The only tank of this type was part of the 267th Tank Regiment of the Trans-Baikal Front. Apparently, the “grant” got to the Far East a little later than the others, and due to a combination of circumstances, he managed to successfully survive until August 1945, when Soviet troops entered Manchuria. By this time, the regiment was based on the British "Valentine" in the amount of 40 units, but there was also one "Churchill" and M3l each. It is possible that it was here that the M3s “shaken the old days” for the last time in battles with the Japanese.

Of the other compounds that used "grants", the following can be noted:

92nd Tank Brigade of the 31st Army

101st Tank Brigade of the 31st Army(Western Front), as of August 1942, had 30 M3s and 30 M3l;

15th tank brigade(Transcaucasian Front), as of November 1, 1942, had 1 M3s, 16 M3l and 22 "Valentine";

21st Training Tank Regiment(Transcaucasian Front), as of November 1, 1942, had 1 M3s, 4 M3l, 12 T-26s and 31 T-60s;

196th tank brigade(Kalinin Front), as of November 1942, had 4 M3s, 4 M3l, 4 T-60s, 10 Matilda IIs and 1 Valentine;

241st tank brigade(Don Front), as of February 1943, had 3 M3s and 3 M3l;

separate tank battalion of the 53rd Army of the North-Western Front(formed from repaired equipment), as of February 1943, had 13 tanks: 7 T-34, 4 T-70, 1 KV-1 and 1 M3s;

37th Tank Regiment of the Shock Army, in February 1943, had 10 M3s and 7 M3l (by April, their number was reduced to 4 and 3 vehicles, respectively);

39th Separate Tank Brigade of the 4th Shock Army, as of March 1944, there was 1 M3s;

41st Tank Brigade, 5th Tank Corps, as of March 1944, there were 38 M3s (another 20 M3s belonging to the 5th shopping mall operated on the 2nd Baltic Front);

5th Army(2nd Belorussian Front), as of June 1944, it included 3 M3s tanks.

Outdated "grants" periodically tried to find another use. For example, in the spring of 1943, the possibility of using a certain number of M3 tanks as armored personnel carriers was seriously discussed. The Soviet version of "Kangaroo" differed significantly from the British-American counterpart, if only in that the dismantling of weapons and turret was not provided. In fact, a variant of an armored personnel carrier tank was proposed, inside the fighting compartment of which it was possible to place an assault force of 10 infantrymen with PPSh assault rifles. The negative point was the impossibility of firing from both guns. Apparently, while the discussion was going on, the strength of the M3s managed to decrease and the issue of the transfer of troops disappeared by itself. However, it is possible that in front-line conditions "grants" could be used in this way.

As for the use of M3 tanks on the side of Germany and its allies, there is no unambiguous assessment here. The first trophies appeared in the Wehrmacht after the unsuccessful offensive of the British Commonwealth forces in North Africa. As you know, not all the "grants" burned down on the battlefield - some of the tanks were left for technical reasons and, after a small repair, went back into operation, but on the other side. Apparently, at least two dozen fully combat-ready vehicles fell into the hands of the Germans, but not all of them were used in battles. At least in modern sources there is no mention of encounters with captured M3s. There is also no information about “secondary” trophies, when previously captured tanks were again transferred to the previous owners. Most likely, the Germans used the “grants” as anti-tank weapons or as infantry fire support vehicles. In the German army, American tanks received the designation Pz.KpfW.M3 744(a) "Lee".

It is authentically known that one of the captured tanks (judging by the footage of the newsreel it was M3A3 - welded hull) was being tested in Germany. Interestingly, in 1943, the obviously outdated American vehicle was compared with the latest Pz.Kpfw.V "Panther" and Pz.Kpfw.VI "Tiger". Of course, the M3 lost to them in all respects.

Also, more than a hundred tanks of the M3 type went to the Germans in 1942-1943. on the Eastern Front. They managed to return some of the vehicles to service - judging by the German photographs, single copies were used in the battles near Mtsensk and in the occupied territories to reinforce the rear units.

There is no exact information about the coloring of captured tanks captured by the Germans. According to German photographs, it can now be established that all captured M3s (regardless of the theater of operations) retained their previous color. Apparently, the Germans did not apply tactical numbers, or they did it with rare exceptions (sometimes they simply painted numbers on the sides of the turret and hull with light paint). A distinctive feature was large crosses on the sides, turret and frontal hull plate. In some cases, the height of the crosses reached the full height of the sponson.

It is possible that in the fall of 1942, M3 tanks were captured by Italian troops, both in Africa and in the Soviet Union. Regarding the Soviet M3, we can definitely say that the Italians did not receive a single machine in working condition. But in Libya and Egypt, there may have been precedents for the short-term use of British ‘grants’ and ‘li’.

The Romanian army received at the beginning of 1943 from the good-natured Germans a whole "assortment" of Soviet captured equipment. To make up for losses and strengthen the grouping of the Romanian troops in the Crimea, 4 amphibious tanks T-37A and T-38, 4 M3s, 5 M3l, 4 "Valentine IV" and 19 other tanks were sent, including several T-34 and T-60. It is claimed that all this technique was used only for training purposes.

Sources:
A.R.Zbiegniewski "M3 and M4 Tanks in Pacific Combat", Kagero
M. Kolomiets, I. Moshchansky "Lend-Lease Tanks", EC "Exprint"
V. Zamulin "Forgotten battle of the Fiery Arc (Great Patriotic War. Classified removed)", 2009
B. Tyncherov "British tanks in the Crimean campaigns of 1854-1945", Sevastopol, 2010
"Fights for Kharkov in May 1942" (Front illustration 2000-6)
"Breakthrough of the Blue Line" (Military Chronicle 2004-3)
"British and American tanks of the Second World War" P. Chamberlain and K. Alice. AST \ Astrel. Moscow. 2003
"Encyclopedia: Weapons of World War II". Chris Bishop, Barnes & Noble, 1998
"World War Two tanks", George Forty, Osprey Automotive
M3 Lee\Grant Medium Tank. 1941-45, Osprey, New_Vanguard, 2005
M3 Lee\Grant. American medium tank "(Military technical series No. 164), Kirov Society of Military Equipment and Modeling Lovers, 2000
Com-central: AFV News Discussion Board
Units in Burma
American Forces in Action. The Capture of Makin (November 20 - 24, 1943)
M3 "GRANT" in the service of the Red Army
I.B. Moshchansky "The largest tank battles of the Second World War"
I.B. Moshchansky "Difficulties of liberation"
The 7th Armored Brigade Engagements - 1942
M3 Lee Canadian: By Steve Guthrie

PERFORMANCE DATA OF THE MEDIUM TANK M3A1 "Lee"

COMBAT WEIGHT	30700 kg
CREW, pers.	6
DIMENSIONS
Length, mm	5640
Width, mm	2720
Height, mm	3120
Clearance, mm	431
WEAPONS	one 37 mm M6 cannon in the turret, one 75 mm M2 cannon in the sponson and three 7.62 mm Colt-Browning М1919А4 machine guns (one in the turret and two in the hull)
AMMUNITION	178 shots for the 37mm cannon, 50 shots for the 75mm cannon and 9200 rounds
AIMING DEVICES	telescopic sight
BOOKING	hull forehead - 50.8 \ 45-90 ° superstructure forehead (top) - 35.8 \ 37 ° superstructure forehead (bottom) - 50.8 \ 60 ° hull side - 35.8 \ 90 ° tower - 50.8 \ 43-85 ° tower roof — 22 \ \ 0° cannon mask — 89 \ 90 ° stern - 38 \ 90 ° roof - 13 \ 0-7 ° bottom (front) - 25 \ 0 ° bottom (center and stern) - 13 \ 0 °
ENGINE	Wright R973EC2, radial, carbureted, 9-cylinder, 350 hp, 662 liters of fuel
TRANSMISSION	mechanical type with synchronizer, differential, cardan shaft and 6-speed gearbox (5 + 1) of the Synchromesh type
CHASSIS	(on one side) 6 support rollers interlocked in 3 bogies, 3 support rollers, front drive and rear guide wheels, suspension blocked with vertical coil springs; large-section rubber-metal caterpillar
SPEED	40 km/h on the highway 24 km / h on a country road
HIGHWAY RANGE	193 km
OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME
Climb angle, deg.	?
Wall height, m	0,60
Ford depth, m	?
Ditch width, m	2,29
MEANS OF COMMUNICATION	radio station SRC508 with whip antenna and intercom Tannoy

M3 "Lee" / "Grant"

M3 "Lee" / "Grant"

American medium M3

History of creation
The entry of the United States into the First World War was very late, which brought them many different benefits. Expecting that the war would continue for a few more years, American military experts made the absolutely correct conclusion that tanks were needed in this war: heavy breakthroughs and light "cavalry" tanks. The first corresponded to the British tanks Mk, and the second - the French FT-17. Based on them, American designers (together with the British) created their own heavy tank Mk VIII, which became the crowning achievement of heavy tank building of the First World War, and the Ford M 1918 light two-seat tank, also known as the 3-ton Ford because of its mass. These machines were created taking into account both their own combat experience and the experience of the British and French. 1,500 Mk VIII tanks were ordered, called "Liberti" (Freedom) or "International" (International), since the tank was created on two continents, and 15,000 Ford M 1918 tanks. However, only one Mk VIII tank and 15 Ford M 1918 vehicles were manufactured for the armistice. After that, their release was stopped.
At the end of the war, the American General Rockenback tried to reorganize the tank units in such a way that they became an independent branch of the military. He was supported by combat commanders Major Georg Patgon, Sereno Brett and Dwight Eisenhower. But in 1920, the American Congress passed the National Defense Act, according to which the creation of tank units as a separate branch of the army was prohibited. The existing tank units, as well as all management of the development of new vehicles, were transferred to the infantry commander of the American army, in whose apparatus a tank commission was created. As a result, the idea of ​​​​an "armored strike" was buried, and the cavalry did not switch to tanks and retained their horses. True, in 1931, the cavalry mechanization commission began to deal with tanks, which gave a certain impetus to design research. However, until the beginning of World War II, the American army, in fact, was successful - it never received tanks for itself.
Experienced medium tank T1
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the American mechanized forces at Fort Meade in Maryland still consisted of World War I tanks and American-made light Renaults.
Work on the advanced design of tanks, however, was nevertheless carried out both by a number of private firms and at the state arsenal in Rock Island, Illinois, at an artillery factory. The first two designs, which appeared in 1921 and 1922, were medium tanks, very similar to their progenitor, the British D tank. But they had a rotating turret and a 57 mm gun. The third (Tl medium tank, created in Rock Island in 1926) had a mass of 23 tons, which exceeded the 15 tons established by the task, selected from the condition of the carrying capacity of the bridges. 220 hp engine provided speeds up to 20 km / h. The armament of the tank consisted of one 57-mm cannon, coaxial with a machine gun, in the main turret and another machine gun in a small turret mounted on top of the main one, in its rear part. The hull of the tank was made of armor one inch thick (25.4 mm). This tank was deemed too slow by the military. In 1930, the T2 tank was built. With a mass of 15 tons, which fully corresponded to the task, a more powerful "Liberti" with a power of 312 hp was used on it. The armament of the tank consisted of a 47-mm cannon and a heavy machine gun placed in the hull, a 37-mm cannon and a standard-caliber machine gun coaxial with it, installed in the turret. Outwardly, this tank was very similar to the English 12-ton tank "Vickers Medium Mk I", which in fact was chosen as a prototype. All of these tanks were transferred to the mixed mechanized unit, which was based at Fort Eustis in Virginia and consisted of military vehicles, cavalry and mechanized artillery, for testing. Subsequently, another tank unit was created at Fort Noko, Kentucky. But even this did not give real results for the development of American tank forces.
At the same time, tank designer J. Walter Christie, nicknamed by the US military an "eccentric" was working in the United States - a man who was as talented as he was quarrelsome and addicted. He presented to the Ordnance Department several samples of his wheeled-tracked tanks and self-propelled guns. Army officials, distinguished by their usual incredulity, bought only five tanks from him for military trials, after which his vehicles were rejected. But in other countries, these designs were regarded as promising! Christie's ideas were used in the USSR, Great Britain and Poland. In the USSR alone, about 10 thousand wheeled-tracked tanks of various modifications were produced, which were based on Christie tanks. Even the legendary T-34s used its suspension.
So, in search, the 30s passed. Experimental models of medium tanks TZ, T4, T5 and their various modifications were created, but none of the medium tanks was mass-produced.
September 1, 1939 came. Tank wedges of Germany for 18 days passed Poland and met with the tank wedges of the Red Army, which carried out the Liberation Campaign in Western Ukraine and Belarus. The further war in Europe, which ended with the defeat of the French and British armies near Dunkirk, showed the United States that the war was on the verge and they would not be able to sit out across the ocean, but would have to fight seriously.
Experienced medium tank T2

Experienced medium tanks T1 and T2
It immediately became obvious that America was far behind in the development of tank forces. The reaction followed quickly. Already in July 1940, General George Marshall and General Staff ordered General Edn R. Chaffee to remove all armored units from the infantry and cavalry units and form two armored divisions with support battalions. And, if on June 30, 1940, the National Army Supply Program was adopted, then on July 10, General Chaffee began to form new armored units. All produced tanks were only for him. To arm the divisions, it was supposed to produce 1,000 tanks, and the output was to reach up to 10 vehicles per day.
The M2A1 medium tank of the 1939 model, the M2 tank, is urgently adopted for service. This tank was designed in Rock Island and represented a further development of the medium experimental tank T5. With a mass of 17.2 tons, the M2 tank had 1 inch thick armor, a 37 mm Mb cannon and 8 7.62 mm Browning Ml 919 A4 machine guns along the perimeter of the hull and in the turret. Nine-cylinder "Wright Continental R-975" with 350 hp. provided him with speeds up to 26 miles / hour (42 km / h). The M2A1 tank had armor of 1 inch and a quarter (32 mm), an enlarged turret and a 400 hp engine, which made it possible to maintain speed with increased weight. they looked old-fashioned with high straight sides and were poorly armed for medium tanks, since they were already produced for the army with the same 37-mm cannon and two or three 7.62-mm machine guns.
In June 1940, Lieutenant General William Nadsen, founder of the General Motors Corporation and head of the national defense program K.T. Keller (who is also the president of the Chrysler Corporation) decided not to produce M2A1 tanks at their factories, as this required a complete restructuring of production, because they believed that they could earn more by supplying cars to the army. And they intended to transfer the order for tanks to the American Locomotive Company and Baldvin concerns. Quite unexpected for them was the allocation of 21 million dollars for this production, including the financing of the construction of a new tank plant. K.T. Keller assured General Wesson, chief of artillery of the US Army, that the Chrysler Corporation was capable of building tanks. It was assumed that 1741 tanks would be produced in 18 months. The Chrysler concern was given only 4.5 months to restructure production and submit a project for the construction of an arsenal completely independent of suppliers.
When the Rock Island Arsenal built two prototypes of the M2A1 tank, General Wesson allowed Chrysler engineers to study them. On July 17, 1940, one Chrysler M2A1 tank was valued at $33,500, a price that the artillery committee, out of caution, accepted as "floating". Within a month, the contract was worked out and signed on August 15. 1000 M2A1 tanks were to be delivered to the US Army by August 1940, and their production was to begin no later than September 1941. This date was appointed by the Chrysler concern itself, considering a month to be quite a sufficient period for preparing production for the release of new products.
The first tanks produced by Chrysler were two wooden M2A1 mock-ups made according to drawings received from Rock Island. But on August 28, 1940, the order for 1000 M2A1 tanks was canceled, although 18 units still managed to be released. Some of them were sent to Western Sahara. We were unable to find information about their participation in the battles. In 1941, instead of a cannon, a flamethrower was installed on one of the tanks, and it was mounted in the stern with a fire mixture. This one received the M2E2 index, but remained a prototype.
By this time, as a result of the discussion about the possible armament of the M2A1 tank with a 75-mm gun (which was envisaged in the design of the T5E2 tank, cited by General Gaffis from the Artillery Department in Aberdeen), a new "unscheduled" tank was created. The design department of the landfill developed all the necessary documentation in just three months. The car was given the designation MZ and the name "General Lee", in honor of Robert Edward Lee (1807-1870), commander-in-chief of the army of the southerners in the Civil War of the North and South of 1861-1865. in USA.
The designers of the MZ tank installed a 75-mm gun in the side sponson on the starboard side of the hull, as on tanks of the First World War. This was reflected in a certain uncertainty of the designers in their abilities and unwillingness to give up their views on the tank as on a mobile dog. In a cast turret shifted to the port side, a 37-mm gun was mounted, coaxial with a machine gun. Another machine gun was in a small turret on top.
The design in all respects was archaic. Note that a similar design, with a gun in the hull, had a Soviet tank, created back in 1931, under the leadership of the German designer Grotte. On the other hand, the MZ was superior to all British tanks, even the "Churchill" Mk I, in which the 75-mm gun was located in the hull between the tracks, and the 2-pounder (40-mm) was in the turret. The "Lee" was inferior to the French B-1 bis tank, which also had multi-tiered weapons.
Work on the construction of the tank factory "Chrysler" began on September 9, 1940 at the 113th section of the suburb of Detroit - Varen Townshire. The government subsidized this construction, which covered an area of ​​about 77,000 acres. All preparatory work was completed by January 1941, when the engineers of the Chrysler concern, together with the engineers of the American Locomotive Company and Baldvin concerns, worked out the technological processes. Experienced tanks of these firms began to be tested on April 11, 1941. The first tank "Chrysler" donated to the government, the next was sent to the Aberdeen Proving Ground for testing on May 3, and another was kept as a sample for the selection committee. Serial production of General Lee tanks began on July 8, 1941. The approval of the Lend-Lease Regulation on March 8 of the same year removed all restrictions on the supply of tanks for Great Britain and the USSR, and new tanks immediately went overseas. This gave an impetus to all firms in increasing the production of armored vehicles. The firms "PulIman-Standart Car Company", "Pressed Stell" and "Lima Lokomotive" were involved in its production. The MZ tank was produced for a little over a year, from July 8, 1941 to August 3, 1942. During this time, the concern "Chrysler" produced 3352 MZ tanks of various modifications, "American Locomotive company" - 685 units, "Baldvin" - 1220 units, "Pressed Stell" - 501 units, "Pullman - Standard Car Company" - 500 , a total of 6258 machines of various modifications. In addition, the Canadian firm "Monreal Lokomotive company" produced 1157 MZ tanks for the Canadian army. In August 1942, all enterprises switched to the production of M4 Sherman tanks. However, Baldvin continued to produce MZ tanks of the third and fifth modifications until December 1942.
MZ tank design
MZ tanks of all modifications had such an original look that it was difficult to confuse them with other models.
According to its design, the tank was a machine, from the time of the First World War, with the location of the gun in the side sponson, as on the British tanks Mk I, Mk VIII, and instead of a fixed wheelhouse - a rotating one. The engine was located behind, - in front, - under the rotary floor of the tower. Between them is the fighting compartment. The engine was connected to the transmission by a cardan shaft. Under the shaft were the engine control rods. All this was covered with a removable casing. Transmission parts were installed in a cast armored body, made of three parts, bolted together through flanges. They formed a very characteristic bow of the tank. All this was also fastened to the tank hull with bolts, which was the same for all modifications. The same design was used on the early models of the M4 "Sherman" tank. The body of the tank was made from flat sheets. The thickness of the armor was unchanged on all models and amounted to: two inches (51mm) - frontal armor, one and a half inches (38mm) - side and stern sheets, half an inch (12.7mm) - hull. The bottom had a variable thickness: from half an inch (12.7 mm) under the engine to one inch (25.4 mm) in the area of ​​​​the fighting compartment. The walls of the tower had armor - two inches and a quarter (57mm), and the roof - seven eighths of an inch (22mm). The front plate was installed at an angle of 60 degrees to the horizon, the side and rear plates were installed vertically. Armor plates were fastened with rivets (modifications MZ, MZA4, MZA5) or by welding (modifications MZA2 and MZAZ) to the inner frame. The MZA1 tank had a fully cast hull. However, due to the complexity of manufacturing, only three hundred cars were produced. On the right side of the hull, a cast sponson with a 75-mm gun was installed, which did not go beyond the dimensions of the hull. The height of the sponson, along with the size of the engine, determined the height of the tank. A cast turret with a 37-mm gun rose above the hull, shifted to the left, it was crowned with a small turret with a machine gun. The resulting pyramid was over 3 m - ten feet and three inches (3214mm). The length of the tank was eighteen feet and six inches (5639mm), width - eight feet eleven inches (2718mm), ground clearance - seventeen and one-eighth of an inch (435mm). But the tank turned out with a spacious fighting compartment, and is still considered one of the most comfortable. From the inside, the hull was pasted over with sponge rubber to protect the crew from small fragments of armor. Doors were installed along the sides, there were hatches on top and in the machine gun turret. This ensured a quick landing of the crew, and most importantly, a convenient evacuation of the wounded from the tank through the side doors, although the doors reduced the strength of the hull. Each crew member had viewing slots and loopholes for firing personal weapons, protected by armored visors. On the aft plate of the hull there was a double-leaf door for access to the engine, the junction of the wings of which was closed with a narrow bolted strip. On the sides and top of the door were two air filters. They were round and box-shaped. On the engine plate there were air intakes, closed with nets, and the doors of the upper hatch. Hatches at the top and rear facilitated access to the engine for maintenance. A entrenching tool, a towing cable, a tarpaulin, canisters, spare rollers were attached to the engine plate, and spare tracks were mounted on the fenders. Often infantry helmets were also located there. Sometimes the tool was fixed on the stern plate.
On MZ tanks, both "General Lee" and "General Grant", modifications of MZA1, MZA2 and all vehicles based on them, an aviation star-shaped nine-cylinder carburetor engine "Wright Continental" R 975 EC2 or modification C1 with a power of 340 hp was installed. It provided the 27-ton tank with the highest speed of up to 26 miles / hour (42 km / h) and with a transportable fuel supply of 175 gallons (796 liters), 120 miles (192 km). The disadvantages of the engine include its high fire hazard, since it ran on high-octane gasoline, difficulty in maintenance, especially the cylinders that were below. But in 1941 it was the only engine that satisfied tank builders. Since March 1942, the Baldvin company began to install water-cooled General Motors 6-71 6046 automobile diesel engines on MZ tanks, but two engines each with a total power of 375 hp, which increased the mass of the tank by 1.3 tons, but, due to greater power and efficiency, speed and power reserve increased slightly. These tanks were designated MZAZ and MZA5. In June 1942, the Chrysler concern installed a new 30-cylinder in-line water-cooled Chrysler A 57 engine on the tank. The installation of this engine not only increased the mass of the tank by two tons, but also the length of the hull and, as a result, the length of the tracks. Speed ​​and power reserve were maintained. The British on the MZ tanks, which are in service with their army, could replace regular American engines with British Guiberson radial diesel engines during operation. At the same time, no modifications to the hull were made.
The driver, even on tanks supplied to England, was located in front on the left. On the dashboard were installed: speedometer, tachometer, ammeter, voltmeter, fuel gauge, thermometer and clock. The tank was controlled using the gearshift lever, brake pedals, accelerator and handbrake.
The undercarriage of the tank was a rubber-metal caterpillar supported by three bogies on board. The supporting trolley had a welded frame, on which, through two spiral vertical springs, a rocker arm with two rubber-coated support rollers was attached. From above, a support roller was installed on the frame. Track rollers were made both with solid disks and with spokes. This support trolley was also used on M2 medium tanks and the first M4 samples.
The caterpillar drive was carried out through an asterisk, which was located in front of the hull and had two removable ring gears fixed on bolts. Behind - a guide roller with a tension crank mechanism, which was also bolted to the body.
The tracks were rubber-metal and had 158 tracks, 16 inches (421 mm) wide and 6 inches (152 mm) long each, on MZA4 tanks - 166 pieces each, due to the elongated hull. The track was a rubber plate, with a metal frame pressed inside it, through which two metal tubular axles passed, on which connecting brackets with a fang were put on, connecting the tracks into a caterpillar. For each truck, two fangs were obtained, enveloping the rollers of the supporting cart. The drive sprocket grabbed the caterpillar by the connecting brackets. The rubber track plate was smooth. The last tanks were equipped with a plate with chevron protrusions, which was also installed on the M4 "General Sherman" tanks.
The MZ tank had a fairly strong armament. The main firepower is a 75 mm cannon mounted in a sponson. This gun was designed at the Westerflute arsenal, based on the 75 mm French field gun Puteaux and Dupont, model 1897, adopted by the US Army after the First World War. The gun, which received the M2 index, had a barrel length of 118 inches (Zm), was equipped with a pickup stabilizer, a semi-automatic shutter, and a barrel purging system after firing. The aiming stabilization system on the MZ tank was used for the first time in the world and subsequently served as a prototype for similar systems for tanks of many armies of the world. The vertical aiming angles were 14 degrees, in the horizontal plane the gun was aimed by turning the entire tank. The vertical aiming of the gun was carried out both by an electro-hydraulic drive and manually. The ammunition was located in the sponson and on the floor of the tank.
However, when installing the M2 gun on the tank, it turned out that it went beyond the front line of the hull. This greatly alarmed the military, who were afraid that the tank could catch on something with the cannon while moving. At their request, the barrel length was reduced to 92 inches (2.33 m), which underestimated the combat characteristics of the gun. Such a truncated gun was assigned the MZ index, and when mounted in a tank, in order not to alter the stabilization system, a counterweight was put on the barrel, outwardly similar to a muzzle. By the way, a similar story happened with the Soviet T-34 tank. At the request of the military, the designers reduced the initial length of the F34 gun barrel by 762 mm, which reduced its power by 35%. But the gun did not speak for the dimensions of the tank! It seems that the conservatism of the military does not depend on either the nation or the social order.
The 37 mm cannon was created in the same arsenal in 1938. Its modifications M5 or M6 were installed on the M3 tank, in a 360-degree rotating turret. The vertical aiming angles made it possible to fire at low-flying aircraft. A machine gun coaxial with the gun was also installed in the tower, and on top - a small 360-degree rotating turret with another machine gun. The turret had a rotating polik with walls separating the fighting compartment into a separate compartment. The gun's ammunition was located in the turret and on the rotating floor.
The 37 mm gun hit armor up to an inch thick and seven eighths (48 mm) from a distance of 500 yards (457 m), and the 75 mm gun hit two and a half inch armor located at a 30 degree inclination to the vertical.
Both guns were equipped with periscope optical sights. At the 75-mm gun, it was located on the roof of the sponson and allowed direct fire up to 1000 yards (914m).
The tank was equipped with four "Browning" machine guns with a caliber of 0.30 inches (7.62 mm) of the 1919 model, which were used on tanks back in the First World War. One machine gun was in the machine gun turret. But for some reason the British did not like it, and this turret was not installed on the General Grant tanks. Moreover, on the "General Lee", who were in the British army, this turret was removed, and installed instead. The second machine gun was paired with a 37 mm gun. Two more were motionlessly fixed in the hull, in front of the driver. The crew was also armed with 0.45 inch (11.43mm) Tompson submachine guns, pistols, and grenades. In the British army, 4-inch (102 mm) grenade launchers for smoke grenades were installed on the tower.
MZ tank layout
Ammunition was 65 shells for a 75-mm cannon, 126 shells for a 37-mm gun (on tanks "General Grant" - 139), 4000 rounds for machine guns, 20 magazines for machine guns, 6 grenades, 12 flares, and 8 smoke grenades .
The crew of the tank consisted of 6 people. The commander was in the turret of the 37-mm gun and was observing from the small turret. When necessary, he fired from a machine gun. Nearby was the gunner of the 37-mm gun, and below him, in the center of the vehicle, was the loader. All of them were placed on the swivel floor of the tower. The gunner of the 76-mm gun was located inside the sponson, and next to him, in the tank hull, behind the gun breech, was the loader. The driver sat in front and on the left and could conduct indirect fire from forward machine guns.
Modifications of the M3 tank
The basic model of the MZ tank (English designation Lee I) had an angular riveted hull, a cast turret and a Wright Continental R 975 EC2 or C1 radial aviation gasoline engine, modified for installation on tanks, and was produced until August 1942. A total of 4924 tanks were manufactured, including 3243 tanks at the factories of the Chrysler concern, 385 tanks at the American Locomotive company, 295 tanks at Baldvin, 501 tanks at Pressed Stell, and Pullman-Standart Car Company. "- 500 pieces. MZ tanks produced in Canada had some differences in the chassis. In total, the company "Monreal Lokomotive Work" produced 1157 MZ tanks for the Canadian army.
The first modification of the M3A1 tank (English designation Lee II) had a cast streamlined hull and a 75-mm M2 gun, with a shortened barrel and a counterweight at the muzzle. The rest of the characteristics corresponded to the base model. The tanks were produced by the American Locomotive Company from February to August 1942. A total of 300 cars were made.
Modification of the MZA2 tank (English designation Lee III) had a welded hull and a 75-mm cannon, with a shortened barrel and counterweight. Baldvin produced only 12 vehicles in January 1942, after which it switched to the production of M3A3 tanks.
Modification of the M3A3 tank (English designation Lee V) differed from the M3A2 only in the engine. These tanks were equipped with two water-cooled General Motors 6-71 6046 diesel engines with a total power of 375 hp. This increased the mass of the tank to 63,000 pounds (28,602 kg), but due to the greater power and efficiency of diesel engines, the speed increased to 29 miles / hour (46 km / h), and the cruising range - up to 160 miles (256 km). The external difference of the tank from the base model is a slightly modified form of the engine compartment. A total of 322 MZAZ tanks were produced by Baldvin from March to December 1942.
The British called the Lee IV the M3A3 tank, but with the Wright Continental engine, while maintaining the same hull shape. Apparently, the replacement of engines was carried out by the British during operation.
Modification of the M3A4 tank (English designation Lee VI) was carried out by the Chrysler concern at the Detroit Arsenal from June to August 1942. A total of 109 machines were manufactured. The tank was distinguished by a new 30-cylinder in-line Chrysler A 57 "water-cooled engine, designed and supplied at the concern's factories. Installing this engine increased the tank's weight to 64,000 pounds (29,056 kg) and length to 19 feet 8 inches (5995 mm), which also caused an increase in the length of the tracks to 166 tracks in each.But the speed and power reserve remained the same as in the base model.
Modification of the M3A5 tank is the same M3A3, only with a riveted hull. Produced by "Baldvin" from January to November 1942 in parallel with the M3A3 tank. In total, the company made 591 tanks.
M3 tanks were delivered to the UK. There, they dismantled the upper machine-gun turret and installed a hatch, and also applied their own camouflage.
After the approval of the provision on Lend-Lease, a commission arrived from Great Britain for the purchase of weapons, including for the purpose of selecting American armored vehicles for their own armed forces, since most of the weapons were left in France during the evacuation of Dunkirk. The commission was supposed to buy (for cash!) Experienced American developments. She chose the M3 tank, but suggested changing its design: installing a new turret, abandoning the upper machine-gun turret, and installing British radio equipment. All these proposals were worked out on the M2 tanks. It was decided to establish in the United States and the production of M3 tanks of the English model. This tank was named "General Grant", in honor of Ulysses Simpson Grant (1827-1885), commander-in-chief of the federal forces of the northerners in 1864-1865 during the American Civil War, and in 1869-1877 - US President from the Republican parties. So, in the name of the tank, two warring sides of American society were reconciled.
Tank "General Grant", classified in England as a "cruising tank", had two modifications:
- "Grant I" - created on the base tank MZ
- "Grant II" - created on the chassis of the MZA5 model.
Tanks "General Grant" had the same characteristics as the base models, but one machine gun less, and guns without counterweights. American "Browning" machine guns could be replaced by British "Bren" or "Bes" machine guns. During operation, sometimes regular engines were replaced with British Guiberson radial diesel engines.
Some of the "General Grant" tanks were converted by the British into command vehicles. All weapons and the turret were removed from the tanks, a more powerful radio station, control devices, additional equipment necessary for the work of the regiment or division commander were installed, the tank received the designation - "Grant OP / Command tank". A very small number of tanks were converted.
In 1941, very original designs appeared, the so-called "Canal Defense Tanks". Frightened by the rumors about the preparations for forcing the English Channel by German troops, very skillfully spread by the special services of Nazi Germany, the British made great efforts to create an antiamphibious defense of the strait. One of the measures was the installation of powerful searchlights on the MZ tank. The turret with the 37-mm gun was removed, and a specially designed turret with an arc searchlight with a power of up to 15 million candles was installed instead. The light flux was focused through a narrow viewing slot in the armor of the tower. To keep these secret vehicles from being too prominent, a fake barrel of a 37mm gun was mounted on the turret for camouflage. At the same time, the machine gun in the turret, the 75-mm cannon and the rest of the machine guns were preserved. Such tanks were intended for night combat, when the enemy is illuminated and blinded by searchlights and destroyed by airborne weapons. The work was carried out both in England, where the tank received the designation "Grant CDL", and in the USA, where this tank was called "Shop Tractor T10". The work was carried out in the USA at the factories of the American Locomotive Company, from May to December 1943, 355 tanks were converted, mainly MZA1. As in the British and American armies, these tanks were a strategic reserve and were surrounded by a veil of secrecy. But they did not have to take part in the hostilities.
In 1942, the United States tried to arm the Ministry of Health with a flamethrower. On several machines, instead of a 37-mm gun, they installed in the turret, and a tank with a fire mixture was installed at the stern, modeled on the M2E2, or instead of a 75-mm gun. The machines received the designation MZE2, and remained prototypes.
What the designers failed to do was done by the soldiers themselves in the field. They mounted an E5R2-M3 backpack flamethrower instead of a machine gun in the upper turret of the Lee tanks. Such tanks received the designation M3E5R2. We could not establish the number of converted tanks and the type of chassis.
Finishing the story about the modifications of the MZ tank, I would like to mention the latest of them, created in 1942. The designers abandoned the sponson and the cabin, creating a small turret box, which was protected by thicker armor, and crowned with a turret with a 75-mm gun. turned out to be so successful that she was given a new M4 index and her own name - "General Sherman". But the story about this tank, which has become a milestone in the history of world tank building, requires a separate book. We only note that many elements of the new tank were tested on the MZ tanks, in particular, the chassis and engines: on the MZE1 - "Ford-GAA", on the MZA1E1 - b-cylinder "Lycoming engine". transmission: on MZA1E1 - double hydromechanical, on MZA5E2 - single hydromechanical. Externally, the tanks did not differ from the basic models.
Fighting vehicles based on the M3 tank
Both in the USA and in England, work was underway to create self-propelled guns on the chassis of the M3 tank. All standard armament was removed from the tanks, the armored cabin was remade for the gun being installed. In the United States, prototypes of self-propelled guns were created:
- T6, with an openly mounted 105-mm cannon;
- T24, with an open-mounted 3-inch (76.2 mm) gun;
- T36, with a 40-mm anti-aircraft machine mounted in a rotating, specially designed turret;
- T40 / M9, with an openly mounted 3-inch anti-aircraft gun M1918;
- M33, with a 155-mm cannon installed in a closed wheelhouse on the chassis of the T2 (M31) repair and maintenance vehicle, created on the basis of the M3A3 and M3A5 tanks. Machine guns were installed on the roof of the hull;
- M44, which was a further development of the M33, with a modified wheelhouse and commander's cupola.
None of these vehicles were put into service.
The British managed to create a more successful design of a self-propelled 105-mm howitzer. The experimental model had the designation T32, and the serial model - M7 and its own name "Priest" (Priest) and was used in the armies of many countries.
105-mm M2A1 or M1A2 was openly mounted on the chassis of the M3 tank, from which the following were removed: sponson, turret, upper armor plate. The opening of the sponson was closed with an armor plate, which was fastened with rivets. An embrasure was cut in the frontal sheet of the cabin to install the gun barrel. A carriage was mounted in the hull, on the starboard side - with a 12.7-mm anti-aircraft machine gun. Crew - 6 people. Reservation and engine, as in the base model. Speed ​​25 miles per hour (40 km/h). Cruising range on the highway 125 miles (210 km), on the ground - 87 miles (140 km).
The M7 self-propelled howitzer was produced at US factories from 1942 to 1945. Two prototypes were created by the Baldvin concern in February, and the production of the M7 self-propelled guns and its modifications was carried out at the factories of the American Locomotive company, Pressed Stell and Federal Machine & Welder. A total of 4267 cars were produced, which have proven themselves well.
The Americans and the British paid due attention to engineering vehicles.
The first example of such a machine in the United States was the T16 artillery tractor. All armament, the turret were dismantled from the M3 tank, and a winch was installed inside the hull. But the tractor was not put into service due to the tightness in the hull. Even for repair vehicles, the military demanded comfortable conditions for their maintenance.
The serial model was the repair and recovery vehicle T2. The turret, weapons were also dismantled from the tank, the hull was fully armored and a non-removable cargo boom with a lifting capacity of 10 tons, with a winch, large boxes for tools and spare parts was installed. The production of cars began in September 1943. Created on the chassis of the MZAZ tank, they received the designation M31V1, and on the MZA5 chassis - M31V2. In the British army, these vehicles were designated ARV I.
The British created their repair and maintenance vehicle ARV according to the same principle: all weapons were dismantled, the tower, but the crane with a manual winch was removable. There were also boxes for tools and spare parts. The vehicle could be armed with anti-aircraft machine guns, most often with a pair of 7.62 mm Bren machine guns. In the "in the stowed" position, the arrow was removed, disassembled into several parts and fixed on the sides of the hull from the outside.
To break through minefields, the Chrysler concern tried to create a special T1 minesweeper. A trawl was attached to the MZ, consisting of twin disc rollers and a separate pressure roller. But this minesweeper did not show any advantages over the English trawl "Scorpion", which the British mounted on MZ tanks. To do this, they had to remove the 75-mm gun from the sponson. Tanks with the "Scorpion I" trawl were designated "Grant Scorpion III", and with the "Scorpion II" trawl - "Grant Scorpion IV". An interesting feature of the designs of the Scorpion II trawls was the presence of two Bedford engines at once to drive the trawl device. The trawl itself looked like a drum, with chains welded to it. The engines, in special armored boxes, were located in place of the aft boxes for spare parts, and their shaft drives went to the drum along the hull. Because of this, the side doors could not be opened, so the crew had to climb into the tanks and leave them only through the upper turret hatches, which created some inconvenience. The dust they raised with their ground-thrashing chains blinded the driver and made it difficult to move.
The M3 tank, which entered service with the Canadian army, did not suit the Canadian strategists. Brought up in the "best traditions" of British conservative military thought, they believed that another tank was needed to support the infantry - slower, less maneuverable, more lightly armed. A "General Lee", in their opinion, was a breakthrough tank, with a powerful, 76-mm cannon, although not well placed. In January 1941, an order for the design of a new tank was issued to the company "Monreal Lokomotive Work". The designers used the chassis and engine from the MZ tank. That's just the driver was placed, according to the English traffic rules, on the right. The upper part of the hull and the turret were cast, of their own design. They abandoned the sponson with a 76 mm gun, the hull became symmetrical and lower. The side doors were kept. The machine-gun turret was removed from the gun turret and installed in front of the hull, on the left, next to the driver. This gave a resemblance to the tanks "Crusader", the first modifications. In the tower, shifted to the starboard side, a 2-pounder (40-mm) gun was installed, traditional for English tanks of that time, coaxial with a machine gun. But the "cunning Canadians" made such a mask that it was possible to install a 2.5 mm pounder (57 mm) gun in it, without altering it. The tower had hatches like on the M3 tank - on top, for the crew and behind, for dismantling the gun. The driver did not have his own hatch. The driver had viewing slots, on the doors of the hull and along the sides of the tower. Doors and removable sheets with ventilation grilles for engine maintenance were retained on the hull.
In June 1941, an experimental model of the tank, designated RAM Mk I, entered sea trials. A large order was given for these tanks, but only 50 RAM Mk I were produced, after which the tank was rearmed with a 2.5 pounder (57 mm) gun and named the RAM Mk II. These machines were produced in 1094 units. On the latest machines, the hull did not have side doors.
RAM tanks were in service only with parts of the Canadian army. Several pieces, for comparative testing, were sent to the United States. There they were assigned the M4A5 index, which made it possible for many researchers to consider the RAM as a modification of the M4 "Sherman" tank.
With a sufficiently deep study of the project, the RAM tank could become a good replacement for the MZ "General Lee" tank, which is practically comparable in its characteristics to the M4 "Sherman". But the traditionalism of thinking, as well as the weak technical base for the production of tanks, did not allow Canadian designers to take a decisive step forward and create a design designed for the future.
In parallel with the creation of the M7 self-propelled 105-mm howitzer, work was underway to install a 25-pound English field gun on the chassis of the RAM tank. The design, like the M7 self-propelled howitzer, was with an open-top gun mount, but the driver was placed on the right, and the hatch for loading ammunition on the left. This self-propelled gun was given the name "Sexton" - "Sexton". In 1943, production began at the factories of the company "Monreal Lokomotive Work". In total, until the end of 1945, 2150 vehicles were produced.
The leadership of the armed forces of Australia, like all countries of the British Commonwealth, practically did not engage in the development and production of weapons, relying on the industrial power of Great Britain. However, the events of 1940 seriously forced us to think about our own defense. In November 1940, the General Staff of the Australian Armed Forces issued a technical assignment for a tank that met the country's industrial production capabilities. The weight of the tank was to be 16-20 tons, armament - one 2-pounder (40 mm) cannon and one 0.303 inch (7.62 mm) machine gun, armor - 2 inches (50 mm), travel speed up to 30 miles per hour (54 km/h). This task corresponded to the English cruiser tank A15 Mk.I "Crusader", which was mass-produced. But military engineers, having become acquainted with American tanks. preferred the M3 "General Lee" tank.
The introduction of this machine into production faced great difficulties. Australian industry did not produce 2-inch armor, nor engines of the required power, nor 76-mm tank guns. Although the tank had to be redesigned, in January 1942 the first of the three experimental vehicles was tested, and serial production began in August. The tank received the name "cruising tank AC I "Sentinel" - "Sentry" (AC - Australian Cruiser). Thus, it did not take much time for the Australian industry to create its own tank: only eleven months from the date of issue of the order and 22 months - from the beginning of the development of technical specifications.
The chassis of the "Sentinel" tank was taken from the M3, but the undercarriage was somewhat strengthened by installing a "Hotchkiss" type suspension. The hull was made cast, to which, like on the MOH, the bow with the transmission and the cover of the engine compartment were attached with bolts. The cast turret had armor up to 65 mm thick. Armament consisted of a 2-pounder (40 mm) British tank gun in the turret and two 0.303-inch (7.62 mm) water-cooled Vickers machine guns. One machine gun was installed in the frontal part of the hull, and the second - in the turret, coaxial with the gun. Powerful armored casings were put on machine guns, which gave the car a special look and became a characteristic feature of these tanks. consisted of three Cadillac engines in one block. It provided the tank with a target speed of 30 mph and a cruising range of 360 km. Periscopic devices were supplemented by viewing slots with armored shutters, through which it was possible to fire from personal weapons. The tank had reliable means of communication. The crew consisted of five people: the commander, the gunner, the loader-radio operator, the driver and the machine gunner of the course machine gun. The tests revealed a number of shortcomings of the tank: the engine cooling system worked unsatisfactorily, the turret rotated slowly, especially when the tank was on a slope. The weapons were also weak. Nevertheless, the success of the Australian designers was evident.
A total of 66 AC I tanks were produced. After that, it was re-equipped with a 2.5-pound (57-mm) gun and the index was changed to AC IL. In February 1943, a modification of the AC III tank was developed with a 25-pound (84-mm) field gun, adapted for mounting in a tank turret. The design of the tower has been slightly changed. The front plate of the hull was installed obliquely, the course machine gun was removed and the machine gunner was reduced in the crew. The next step was the installation of a 17-pounder (76-mm) high-speed gun of our own design on the tank. This gun had good armor penetration, and the shells had a powerful high-explosive effect. I had to increase the shoulder strap, which allowed the design, and make a new large tower. The result was an AC IV tank, comparable to the American Sherman tank. American observers noted the strong impression made by the AC III and AC IV tanks on the US military, in particular, on General MacArthur. But by that time the threat of a Japanese invasion of Australia had already passed, the Australian troops, according to the allies, were sufficiently saturated with Anglo-American equipment. The production of tanks of their own designs was regarded by the leadership of Great Britain and the United States as a kind of "sabotage" against Lend-Lease. Therefore, in addition to the prototypes AC3 and AC4, new Sentinel tanks were no longer built. The vehicles that remained in service were used until 1956 as training ones.
Chassis of self-propelled howitzers M7 and cannons "Sexton" with weapons removed were converted into armored personnel carriers (ARS), called "Kangaroo" (Kangaroo). In the fighting compartment, all weapons and equipment were dismantled, including anti-aircraft machine guns with a turret, the embrasure was closed with armor plates, additional armor plates were mounted along the sides, and seats for 16 soldiers were installed inside. Armored personnel carriers were reduced to special units and attached to armored units, for example, the 79th armored division of Great Britain, which fought in North-Western Europe. Armored personnel carriers ARS "Kangaroo" were the first vehicles of this type, widely used in the British army.
Combat use of the M3 tank
Tanks "Lee / Grant" occupied, in fact, an intermediate position between tanks and self-propelled artillery mounts, so it is quite difficult to evaluate their combat effectiveness.
For the middle of 1941, it was one of the most heavily armed tanks, surpassing all that existed, except for the French B-Ibis, which had a 75-mm cannon in the hull, and the Soviet KV-2, with a 152-mm gun in the turret. The German experimental tank "Rheinmetall NbFz" surpassed it in terms of the total mass of weapons, but only five such tanks were made and they were used for purely propaganda purposes.
The armament of the "Lee / Grant" tanks made it possible in those years to fight on an equal footing with any tanks of fascist Germany and its allies. A 37 mm gun mounted in a turret hit armor up to an inch thick and seven eighths (48 mm) from a distance of 500 yards (457 m), and a 75 mm gun in a sponson hit two and a half inches (65 mm) armor, with a slope of 30 degrees to the vertical. Note that the 76-mm gun of the Soviet KB heavy tank from a distance of 500 m pierced armor 69 mm thick and, therefore, in terms of the ability to fight German tanks, these vehicles were equal.
Tank guns, caliber 37-50 mm, and a short-barreled 75-mm cannon of the StuG III assault gun, known to us as Artshturm, could not penetrate the frontal two-inch armor of the MZ from a distance of 500 m. In addition, from a 37-mm gun it was possible to fire at the aircraft, thanks to which the tank had a very effective anti-aircraft cover. The large size of the tank had a psychological impact on the enemy, especially in the countries of Southeast Asia.
The tanks of the "canal defense" were the first to start combat service: "General Grant CDL" and "Shop Tractor T 10". They were consolidated into the 79th armored division of Great Britain, which included tanks "Matilda CDL". The division was located on the coast of the English Channel, all vehicles were on alert in anticipation of the German landing. They were a strategic reserve and were classified. But there was no landing and the CDL tanks did not have to take part in the hostilities. MZ tanks received their baptism of fire in Africa.
In January 1942, the German-Italian troops, under the command of General E. Rommel, launched an offensive against the 8th British Army, under the command of General N. Ritchie, in Libya and pushed it back from the city of Benghazi to the city of Gazala. Here the front stabilized for four whole months. The English dug into the ground. Their line of trenches stretched over 40 miles from Gazala on the Mediterranean coast to Bir Hakeim in the Kerinak desert. On this flank, the Free French infantry battalions held the defense.
Both belligerents used this lull to reinforce their troops. 8th British army was replenished with new tanks, among them 167 MZ "General Grant". In total, there were 849 tanks in the armored units, reduced to the 13th and 30th corps. Tanks "Grant" were armed with parts of the 4th armored brigade of the 7th armored division, the 2nd and 22nd armored brigades of the 1st armored division of the 30th corps. In addition, the corps had 149 General Stuart MZ light tanks with a 37 mm gun and 257 Crusader tanks with a 57 mm gun. The 13th Corps, which consisted of the 1st and 32nd Army Tank Brigades, had 166 "Valentine" tanks with a 2.5-pounder (57mm) gun and 110 "Matilda" tanks armed with a 2-pounder (40mm) gun , but had a frontal armor of 78 mm. At Heliopolis, near Cairo, American instructors trained British tankers. The British command positioned its tank units in the center of the line, expecting frontal attacks.
General E. Rommel also received new tanks through Tripoli. His famous African Corps consisted of the 15th and 20th Panzer Divisions, the 90th Light Division, as well as Italian units: the Ariete armored division and the Trieste motorized division of the 20th corps. In total, he had 19 PzKpfw IIIJ tanks with a long-barreled 50-mm gun, 223 PzKpfw IIIF tanks with a short-barreled 50-mm gun, 40 PzKpfw IV tanks with a 75-mm gun and 50 PzKpfw II light tanks with a 20-mm gun. In the Italian units, which also included 10 and 21 corps, under the command of General Cruwell, they were armed with 228 M13 / 40 and Ml4 / 41 tanks with a 47-mm gun.
On May 17, 1942, in Russia, far from Africa, the German offensive near Kharkov began, and on May 26, General E. Rommel launched an attack on the British.
The Italian troops, under the command of General Cruwell, delivered an auxiliary blow on a 20-mile stretch, and the main forces of the German troops, bypassing Bir Hakeim, went through the desert to the rear of the British. The French were part of the allied forces, but, after stubborn fighting, they managed to get out of the encirclement.
The victorious procession of the Teutons tried to stop the 3rd Royal Tank Regiment of the 4th armored brigade, armed with Grant tanks. The meeting of this regiment with the 15th Panzer Division of the Germans ended very badly for her. 50-mm shells did not penetrate the frontal armor of American tanks, and 37-mm shells even bounced off. While the M3, unlike the tanks "Matilda" and others, could easily fight the enemy from long distances. The 15th Panzer Division of the Germans was almost destroyed. The fight against the "General Grant" tanks was entrusted to 88-mm anti-aircraft guns and self-propelled guns "Marder-III", which was the chassis of the Czechoslovak 38t tank, armed with captured Soviet 76.2-mm F-22 cannons. But the tankers' sacrifices were in vain. The English armored units acted without interaction with the infantry. Brave "Tommies" lost faith in victory and retreated. By June 13, the British had about 70 serviceable tanks left. In June, Tobruk was besieged. Two days later, the 33,000-strong garrison surrendered, despite large stocks of weapons - food and the possibility of support from the sea. Among the trophies of the Germans were 30 tanks, about 2 thousand cars and 1.5 thousand tons of gasoline. Having put the infantry on British vehicles, having replenished his forces with captured tanks, including the MZ, Rommel rushed forward to El Alamein, encountering practically no resistance. Technology couldn't keep up with that pace. The desert was covered with cars and tanks that were out of order.
When Rommel's army approached El Alamein on July 1, it had only 26 serviceable tanks. Another "miracle" happened. Rommel stopped. For a month of fighting, the German-Italian troops traveled about 600 km and practically defeated the 8th British Army, whose losses reached 80 thousand people. Although the British still had more than 100 tanks in Egypt, they did not think to resist, they built fortifications near Cairo and Alexandria and evacuated headquarters and rear units from Egypt.
In July-August, local battles took place near El Alameyyom, the parties were building up their forces. In June, the US government decides to urgently send to Egypt 300 of the latest M4 General Sherman tanks and 100 Priest self-propelled guns, as well as aviation and artillery. In August, General G. Alexander, 8th Army B. Montgomery became commander-in-chief of British troops in the Middle East. In addition to the existing corps, the 10th Corps was formed, consisting of two tank and one infantry divisions. The British already had 935 tanks, including 200 M3 "General Grants", which received the unofficial name "The Last Egyptian Hope".
On August 31, E. Rommel launched an attack on El Alamein. He managed to collect 440 tanks, including repaired and captured ones. During the four-day battles, the German-Italian troops lost 3 thousand people and 50 tanks, the British lost 1750 people and 65 tanks, but the Germans failed to break through the defenses.
In the next two months, the Anglo-American troops built up strength. Indian, Australian, New Zealand, Canadian and American units arrived in Egypt, in particular, the US 1st Armored Division, armed with M4A1 tanks. The number of tanks reached 1441, of which 253 MZ and 288 M4 "General Shennan". Rommel, against 230 thousand allies, had about 80 thousand people and 540 tanks, of which 60% were light Italian. All the main forces of the Germans were on the Eastern Front. All the reinforcements went there, including the Special Corps "F" of General G. Felmi, formed from the Germans, who had been living in the Arab East for a long time, and the Arabs. Instead of Africa, this corps had to fight the Red Army in the Caucasus.
The offensive near El Alamein began on October 23, 1942. But already on October 27, the 10th Panzer Corps was withdrawn for replenishment. The Germans have learned how to deal with M3 and M4 tanks! The battles of November 3 and 4 became decisive. After them, only 35-40 combat-ready vehicles remained in the German tank divisions. Note that in the battle of El Alamein, the German-Italian troops lost only 55 thousand people and 320 tanks. However, even the newest tanks in large numbers, and superiority in other branches of the military, could not raise the morale of the British command. Although the enemy was almost defeated, the rate of advance was only 1.5 km per day. And, only by mid-February, the troops reached the Libyan-Tunisian border.
In November - December 1942, the Anglo-American troops occupied, practically without resistance, North Africa, which was under the rule of the Vichy French government, a protege of Nazi Germany. In response to this, German infantry and tank divisions were transferred to Tunisia, transformed into the 5th tank army, under the command of General Yu. Arnim. Together with the troops of Rommel, she was supposed to keep Tunisia. The 5th Panzer Army included 501 separate heavy tank battalions, armed with the latest PzKpfw VI "Tiger" tanks, with an 88-mm cannon. There were many PzKpfw IV tanks in the army, armed with a long-barreled 75-mm gun.
At Christmas, fighting began in Tunisia. Until February 1943, there were limited actions of the ground forces, the main battles were fought. In early February, the 2nd American Corps, which included the 1st armored division, launched an offensive. On February 14, the 15th and 21st German Panzer Divisions, supported by the 10th Panzer Division, responded with a counterattack in the area of ​​the Kasserine mountain pass. In five days of fighting, the Germans traveled 150 km, captured almost three thousand Americans, destroyed almost 200 M3 and M4 tanks, and many other equipment created a threat of a breakthrough to the airfields of American tactical aviation. The Allies had to take emergency measures, transfer new armored units. to the breakthrough area, to attract large aviation forces. On February 23, the German counteroffensive was stopped, and by March 3 they were driven back to their original positions.
The German-Italian troops were finally defeated only by May 13, and this, despite the double superiority of the Allies in infantry, triple in artillery and four times in tanks, at the beginning of the offensive, as well as the constant supply of troops with everything necessary. By the end of the fighting, the German-Italian troops had 120 tanks left, while the Allies had about 1100 vehicles.
In these battles, the superiority of the M4 "General Sherman" tanks over the MOH was revealed. MZ tanks began to be withdrawn from service in the armies of Great Britain and the United States and were transferred to the allies - India, Australia, New Zealand, as well as French and Polish military units formed in Great Britain. The MZ tanks that remained in the army were converted into various combat vehicles: command vehicles, minesweepers, repair and recovery vehicles, which were used until the mid-50s.
When landing in Normandy and in the south of France, the British and American troops were armed with the latest tanks, and the MZ tanks were in the French and Polish divisions that were part of the American army. Despite this, during the advance of the German troops in the Ardennes, the stamina of the French as part of the 7th US Army near Strasbourg and the Polish Panzer Division in the Lower Meuse held back the German tanks, which saved the American 7th Army from complete defeat.
Formally, armored units in India began to form on May 1, 1941. The basis was made up of American "General Stuart" light tanks supplied by Lend-Lease. The events of 1942 forced them to accelerate their formation.
In February 1942, the British fortress of Singapore fell. After that, the Japanese 15th Army, under the command of General Iida, launched an offensive in Burma. The 5th, 6th and 66th Chinese divisions retreated in panic to China, and only on the Saluen River in Yunnan Province, the Japanese were stopped by units of the 71st Chinese Army. British troops, under the command of General G. Alexander, also bravely retreated to India, with practically no resistance. Rangoon fell on March 8, Mandlalay fell on May 1. In total, 12 thousand people went to India, and when crossing the Chin Pass, all the weapons were thrown. For the defense of India, General A. Wavel forms one British and six Indian divisions, consolidated into two corps. Armored units began to form, replenished with the latest General Grant and General Lee tanks. By the end of 1943, the Indian Armored Corps was formed, consisting of three divisions. Parts of the 32nd division as part of the 254th and 255th armored brigades were formed from parts of the 7th British armored brigade, which fought in the African desert. The 31st division consisted of the 251st and 252nd armored brigades, the 43rd of the 267th and 268th armored brigades.
Since 1943, MZ medium tanks have been in action in the jungles of Burma. Here, the massive use of tanks, as in the desert, was impossible. Therefore, they were used in small units, or even one at a time, to support infantry, often fighting on mules, buffaloes and elephants.
In Burma, the MZ tank showed its best side. Japanese tanks with their 37mm cannons could not penetrate their frontal armor from a distance of 500 meters, at which they themselves fell victim to the 75mm General Lee guns. He had the Japanese army and effective anti-tank guns. In impotent rage, Japanese officers rushed at the tanks with sabers, trying to hit the crew through the viewing slots. In the infantry, suicide squads were organized, who, with mines or Molotov cocktails in their hands, rushed under the tanks or, hiding in the thickets, tried to put mines on bamboo poles under the caterpillars of the tank. The tankers had to put the infantry on the armor, and the Japanese had no choice but to use aircraft. To do this, the Ki-44-II "Otsu" fighters were armed with two 40-mm Xa-301 cannons instead of the 20-mm cannons installed in the wing. Two 12.7 mm machine guns were retained. These aircraft were used as ground attack aircraft to attack armored targets, although the guns had only 10 rounds per gun. The 64th Aviation Regiment of the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force fought on such machines, under the command of Major Yasukiho Kurse.
Despite their clear technical superiority, the British were in no hurry to advance in Burma, shifting the brunt of the fighting onto national formations - Indian, Chinese and African units. Fighting in Burma continued until mid-1945.
Self-propelled 105-mm howitzers M7 "Priest", made on the chassis of the MZ tank, have proven themselves well in battles in the Libyan desert as part of the 8th British Army. Therefore, they were adopted by the British, American and French armies and used as artillery in direct infantry support in all subsequent hostilities: in Sicily, in Italy, in Europe. M7 howitzers were in service with many armies of the world until the mid-50s.
Command and staff vehicles began to be made from M3 tanks in 1943. After the dismantling of weapons and ammunition, a very free compartment was obtained in the tank hull, which was equipped with a powerful radio station and other equipment necessary for the headquarters work of a regiment or division commander. Outwardly, the machines were similar to the ARV-1, since they did not have guns and turrets. However, the US troops sometimes retained the turret with the 37mm gun. These "tanks" were the vehicles of the commanders of tank regiments and divisions, and they also housed the task force of the headquarters of the tank division. At the same time, the units were equipped with any other tanks, not only the MOH. A small number of tanks were converted.
The ARV recovery vehicles were reduced to special units and went in the second echelon of the advancing tank units, with the task of repairing and evacuating damaged vehicles. However, there were no tank battles on the Western Front like those in Russia. Therefore, ARVs were used to a limited extent.
The Kangaroo armored personnel carrier was a vehicle designed specifically to transport infantry behind advancing tanks. Reduced to separate units, they were attached to the British armored divisions that fought in Europe. But their combat use was also insignificant. After the Second World War, "Kangaroo" for some time were in service with the Australian army.
But in the USSR, MZ tanks were met without enthusiasm. By the middle of 1942, the production of T-IIIJ and T-IIIL tanks with 50-mm armor and a long-barreled 50-mm cannon, which pierced armor up to 75 mm from a distance of 500 m, the T-IVF tank and the StuG III assault gun ( known to us as "Artsturm") with a long-barreled 75-mm gun with even greater efficiency. Armor no longer saved the MZ tank. Speed ​​and stealth were needed, which this tank did not have. Tall, having especially poor cross-country ability on Russian roads, with an insufficiently powerful engine (power 340 hp versus 500 hp for the T-34 of the same mass), besides, it is very sensitive to the quality of fuel and lubricant, the tank "Lee "did not cause good reviews from our tankers. But even such shortcomings would be tolerable if there were no rubber-metal tracks on the tank. During the battle, it burned out and the tracks fell apart. The tank became a stationary target. The tankers did not forgive this. Neither comfortable operating and maintenance conditions, nor large side doors that made it easy to evacuate the crew from a wrecked vehicle, nor strong weapons could mitigate their sentence. That is why the MZ tanks received the contemptuous nickname "Common Grave for Six" from Soviet tankers. The report of the commander of the 134th tank regiment, Colonel Tikhonchuk, dated December 14, 1942, with an assessment of the tanks of the MZ "General Lee" has been preserved:
"American tanks in the sands work extremely poorly, the tracks are constantly falling off, getting stuck in the sand, losing power, due to which the speed is extremely low. When firing at enemy tanks, due to the fact that the 75-mm gun is installed in the mask, and not in the turret , you have to turn the tank, which burrows into the sand, which makes it very difficult to fire."
Note that neither the British nor the Americans used the MZ tanks with such intensity as the Russians, because the intensity of the fighting in Africa and on the Western Front was very far from what was happening on the Eastern Front.
The Allies also realized the shortcomings of the "Lee / Grant" MZ tanks and, therefore, removed them from production. Since August 1942, the M4 "General Sherman" tank began to be produced in the USA, and the Mk VIII "Cromwell" tank in the UK.
By the way, a similar fate befell the Soviet supertank KV. Invulnerable in 1941, it ceased to satisfy the military in 1942, primarily due to driving performance, and even the question was raised of its removal from production and replacement with the T-34 tank, which had thinner armor, but was more maneuverable. To improve the maneuverability of KB tanks, among other measures, the designers even went to reduce the thickness of the armor, although the 75 mm armor of the tank had already made its way through German artillery !!!
In the USSR, Lend-Lease supplied tanks of the M3A3 and M3A5 modifications with diesel engines. In total, about 300 cars were delivered. The delivery went in two ways: northern - by sea to Murmansk and southern - through Iran.
It was not customary for the Red Army to write about the combat use of American M3 "Lee" tanks, so as not to praise the military equipment of an ideological enemy. .However, in the 5th volume of the "History of the Second World War", published in 1975, there is a photograph of the tank attack of the Soviet troops on the M3A3 "General Lee" and "General Stuart" tanks in the Kalach region on the Don in the summer of 1942 (although the American historian Steven Zaloga dates it to 1943), which suggests the presence of American tanks in the 13th Corps of the 1st Tank Army. The 134th Tank Regiment operated jointly with the 4th Guards Cossack Corps in the area of ​​the northeastern city of Mozdok, fought against the German Corps "F". Company commander Captain Nikolaenko P.I. and tank commander Junior Lieutenant Gretsky V.N. for the battles of December 12-14, 1942 in the area of ​​the Norton farm in the Stavropol Territory, he was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union (Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of March 31, 1943).
It is known that "Lee" tanks also fought near Kharkov, in the Kalmyk steppes south of the city of Stalingrad (now Volgograd), in the North Caucasus, possibly in the Far East.
During the transportation of tanks by PQ sea convoys, ship crews used 37-mm cannons of MZ tanks installed on the deck to repel attacks by enemy aircraft. Perhaps this is the only case of using tanks in naval ocean battles.
Tank painting and markings
MZ tanks made in the USA were painted green in various shades - from dark green to khaki. On the side plate in the engine area, on both sides, the registration number assigned to the tank during construction by the Department of Arms was applied. The name of the country "USA" and the letter "W" were written in blue paint, indicating that the tank was transferred to the troops, and the six-digit number was written in yellow or white. The insignia of the American armed forces was applied to the turret and frontal hull plate - a white star in a blue circle superimposed on a white stripe. In this form, the tanks were supplied to the allies under Lend-Lease.
In the US troops, tactical numbers were applied to tanks with white paint on the turret and hull: first, the serial number of the vehicle in the company, followed by the letter designation of the company. For example: 9E or 4B. On the sponson, on the port side next to the door, geometric figures were drawn indicating the number of the company, battalion and regiment in the division. The distinctive signs of the division were applied on the middle sheet of the transmission. On tanks that fought in North Africa, instead of a star, the American star-striped flag was on the frontal armor.
Later it was recommended to apply black camouflage spots to the tank. This recommendation took into account combat experience, when crews splashed mud on tanks to improve camouflage.
The M3 tanks shipped to the UK were painted dark olive to American standards. On site, they were repainted in British tricolor camouflage: yellow, green and brown sinuous stripes with black trim. But the first tanks heading for North Africa often went into battle on the move and there was simply not enough time to apply camouflage. The tanks were repainted on the spot in a sand color or only stripes of this color were applied. Tanks fought in the desert and in olive "overalls".
The registration number was retained, only the letter "W" was replaced by the letter "T". When the tank was repainted in the standard camouflage scheme, the number was restored with white paint. In the field, the number could not be painted over, but protected with a stencil, and it turned out, as it were, in an olive frame. A standard British cockade of vertical stripes of red-white-red was applied on board the hull. A contour of a geometric figure with a number inside was drawn on the tank turret. The figure: a square, a circle or a triangle, denoted the number of the tank squadron, and the number - the serial number of the vehicle in the squadron. The color of the contour and the number was determined arbitrarily. Division and brigade markings were eight and a half (216 mm) - nine and a half inches (240 mm) red squares with a white number inside and were applied on the front of the left wing and the rear of the right or on the armor cover of the transmission. And on the opposite wings, emblems of brigades and divisions could be drawn.
Perhaps the most original painting belongs to the MZ "Grant" tank, exhibited at the British Royal Museum of Armored Vehicles in Bovington - one of the largest tank museums in the world. On the main sandy background, it has sinuous gray camouflage stripes with a black and white stroke!
Most of the British MZ tanks that fought in Burma were painted green with large white stars on the hull and turret. Almost all tanks retained registration numbers. Some of them had individual numbers on the frontal armor.
Tank crews in both the British and American armies assigned their own names to their tanks, which they wrote on the tanks in a very arbitrary manner.
The M3 tanks, made in Canada, were painted khaki. Canadian red-white-red flags were applied to the front on the middle sheet of the transmission and along the sides of the hull. By analogy with the American armed forces, a five-digit registration number was applied with white paint on the side of the hull in the engine area on both sides behind the flag and on the front sheet above the flag. The name of the country was not written, and instead of the letter "W" the letter "T" was used.
In 1945, on all tanks that fought in Europe, two white stripes began to be applied at the top of the tower around the perimeter. While on the Soviet - one lane. This was done by special agreement to facilitate air identification of allied forces.
The allies in the anti-Hitler coalition, who received tanks under Lend-Lease, did not repaint them. Only American identification marks were painted over, their national and tactical numbers were applied. Ordnance Department registration numbers were generally retained.
In the USSR, M3 tanks were also not repainted, but instead of American insignia, they painted red stars. Often white American stars were simply painted red. Registration numbers and all technical inscriptions in English were preserved. Tactical numbers on the towers were written in an arbitrary form. Also, slogans such as: "For our Soviet Motherland", "Death to fascism", etc. could be applied to the body of the tank. The lack of documentary material does not allow these inscriptions to be reproduced. Tanks that survived until the winter were repainted in the field in white with lime, through which the standard paint appeared.
It is known that individual M3 tanks captured by the Nazis were used in the tank units of the Wehrmacht. Photographs have been preserved, from which it can be judged that, for the purpose of better identification, the Germans painted black and white crosses on their hull and turret much larger than on their own machines. In the engine compartment, to facilitate recognition from the air, they even stretched the Nazi flag! From the memoirs of participants in the battles in Africa, it is known that E. Rommel used Grant tanks in English camouflage, without having the time and opportunity to repaint them.
Tactical and technical characteristics of the MZ tank, its modifications and combat vehicles based on it
Table 1

* The height is indicated without an anti-aircraft machine gun.
** Height shown with jib removed.
Ta6face 2

1. Tank NPP - a tank of direct infantry support.
2. "Grant" CDL (Lee CDL) - channel defense tank - instead of a 37-mm gun, it was installed with a capacity of up to 15 million candles. It was used in England for the antiamphibious defense of the English Channel.
3. BTR - armored personnel carrier. It was made from self-propelled guns M7 "Priest" and "Sexton", with dismantled weapons. Could carry up to 20 infantry.
4. BREM - armored recovery vehicle. Manufactured on the chassis of all types of M3 tanks, withdrawn from service.
5. The engine "General Motors 6-71 6046" is diesel, the rest are carbureted, running on gasoline, with an octane rating of at least 80.
6. The caliber of weapons is indicated in the metric system. In the English system used during the Second World War, there will be:
- machine guns: caliber 7.62 mm - 0.303 inches; 12.7mm-0.5"
- guns: caliber 40 mm - 2.0 pounds; 57 mm - 2.5 lbs; 76 mm - 17 pounds; 84 mm - 25 lbs.
Bibliography:
1. White Series. Supplement to the magazine "M-Hobby". Issue #5. Editor-in-chief A. Sirotin, Responsible for the issue: .Duchitsky
2. V.D. Mostovenko "Tanks" Military Publishing M, 1958
3. I.P. Shmelev "Tanks in battle" Publishing house "Young Guard" M, 1984
4. I.P. Shmelev "". "Technique-youth", N8, 1980, pp. 44-45.
5. D.S. Ibragimov "Confrontation" M, DOSAAF Publishing House, 1989
6. "Weapons of Victory" under the general editorship of V.N. Novikova M., "Engineering", 1987
7. V.G. Grabin "Weapons of Victory" M. Politizdat, 1989
8. A.A. Grechko "The Years of War" M. Military Publishing House, 1976
9. "From "Barbarossa" to "Terminal". View from the West." M. Politizdat, 1988
10. "History of the Second World War 1939 - 1945" v.Z. M. Military Publishing House, 1-974 Encyclopedic Dictionary Wikipedia

- (German). Coarse, clean sand; the same as gravel. Dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language. Chudinov A.N., 1910. GRANT [Eng. grant gift] 1) gift, donation, official provision of funds for charitable purposes ... ... Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language

GRANT (Grant) Hugh (b. September 09, 1960, London), English actor. He studied literature at Oxford, played in student theater and made his film debut in Privileged (1982), funded by the Oxford Film Foundation. After… … Cinema Encyclopedia

GRANT (Grant) Hugh (b. September 9, 1960), English actor. He studied literature at Oxford, acted in student theater and made his film debut in Privileged (1982), funded by the Oxford Film Foundation. After that I played... encyclopedic Dictionary

The only medium tank adopted by the US Army between the two world wars was the M2, which was actually an oversized M2A4 light tank.

M2 - this unremarkable combat vehicle - became a milestone for American tank building, since it was on its basis that the massive M3 medium tank was created, which became the "school desk" of the US Army tank forces.

CREATION

The first version of the tank, which began production in the summer of 1939 at the Rock Island State Arsenal, was armed with a 37 mm M6 cannon mounted in a multifaceted conical turret and eight Browning M1919A4 machine guns (four in the corner sponsons of the hull, two in the front plate corps and two - anti-aircraft). The crew consisted of six people. On the second version - M2A1 - they used the turret from the M2A4 light tank, slightly increased the armor and boosted the engine. The mass production of the latter - 1000 units - was supposed to be deployed at the new arsenal in Detroit, but on August 28, 1940, the order was canceled.

Events in Europe had a strong influence on this decision: the defeat of Poland and France, the amazing successes of the German tank forces. A great impression was made on the American military and the technical characteristics of German tanks. Against their background, it became quite clear that, in general, a good 37-mm gun as a weapon for a medium tank is completely unpromising. It was impossible to place the available 75-mm gun in a turret borrowed from a light tank. It was then that the idea arose to install it in the right side sponson of the M2A1 tank, of course, having made the necessary finishing touches. The idea was implemented quite quickly - on June 13, 1940, the tactical and technical requirements for the new tank were approved by the department of armaments, and a month later it was standardized under the designation M3. A full-size wooden model for display to representatives of the armored forces (Armored Force) and industry was made at the Rock Island Arsenal only at the end of August 1940. The first prototype was handed over for testing at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in March 1941.

FROM "LI" TO "GRANT"

The defeat of the British troops on the European continent and the loss of almost 2/3 of their tanks forced the British to turn to their overseas ally for help. Great Britain could not quickly make up for the losses due to its own production. At the end of June 1940, a special mission arrived in the United States from the shores of Foggy Albion. The proposal to expand the production of British tanks at American factories did not arouse any enthusiasm among the Americans. This was explained by quite pragmatic considerations. In the conditions of the impending German invasion of the British Isles, the Americans did not have any confidence in the development of events in favor of England, therefore, they did not want to load their factories with the production of military equipment that did not meet American standards. It could only be about the supply of American combat vehicles. This was facilitated by the adoption of the Lend-Lease Act on March 11, 1941, which extended to Great Britain on the same day.

Nevertheless, the British insisted on making changes to the original design of the tank. In particular, they were not satisfied with the too high height of the M3. According to the English project, a new cast tower was made, lower and wider than the standard one, but having the same ring diameter. Instead of a commander's turret, they limited themselves to a round rotating double hatch. At the same time, the height decreased by only 102 mm.

An English radio station was placed in the aft niche of the tower, boxes for equipment - along the sides of the aft hull. Since the tanks were intended mainly for combat operations in Africa, they were equipped with specially shaped wings that reduced the dust cloud from the tracks. The M3 converted in this way received the official English name General Grant I. At the same time, the British, not without humor, called the standard American sample General Lee I, thus assigning the names of American generals who fought each other during the US Civil War to variants of the same tank.

MODIFICATIONS

In addition to the main and most numerous modification - M3, there were others. From February to August 1942, the American Locomotive company produced 300 М3А1, which differed from the basic version only in a cast body. It should be mentioned that a certain number of M3 and M3A1 were equipped with a Guiberson T-1400-2 diesel engine. In January 1942, another locomotive building enterprise, Baldwin Locomotive, manufactured 12 M3A2 tanks with a welded hull, and then switched to the production of the M3A3 variant. It differed from the M3A2 in the General Motors 6046 G-71 diesel power plant with a capacity of 375 hp. from. On some machines, the landing hatch in the left side of the hull was welded. Until December 1942, 322 M3A3s were manufactured. From June to August 1942, Detroit Tank Arsenal produced 109 vehicles of the M3A4 version with a Chrysler A57 Multibank engine with a capacity of 370 hp. s, which was a power unit of five automobile motors. The length of the riveted hull had to be increased to 6147 mm. The hatch on the left side of the hull was completely eliminated. The number of caterpillar tracks has increased to 83.

The design of the suspension bogies has been improved. Finally, from January to December 1942, Baldwin Locomotive produced 591 M3A5-M3s with a General Motors 6046 G-71 diesel engine.

All these modifications did not fundamentally differ from the basic version in terms of their tactical and technical characteristics. The reasons that prompted the factories to start producing them were more of a technological nature, taking into account the capabilities of a particular enterprise, traditional allied factories, etc.

M3 TANK DESIGN

The M3 received its baptism of fire in North Africa, in the battle of Gazala on May 27, 1942 as part of the 7th British Panzer Division. 167 "Grants" turned out to be an unpleasant surprise for the Germans and Italians due to their 75-mm guns.

The battle at El Alamein in October 1942 in the British 8th Army, the number of "Grants" reached 600. As part of the British troops, these tanks fought in Africa until the complete defeat of the German-Italian army of Rommel. At the same time, American crews also took part in the hostilities.

A small number of M3s were also delivered to the UK. As early as March 1945, the Lees fought against Japanese troops in Burma as part of the 150th Regiment of the Royal Tank Corps.

M3 IN BATTLE

American M3s first saw action in the Philippines as part of the 192nd Tank Battalion. Basically, they were used for educational purposes both in the United States and abroad. For example, regiments of the 1st Panzer Division of the US Army, deployed in the spring of 1942 to Northern Ireland, were armed with combat vehicles of this type. One of them - the 13th - took part in the landing of American troops in Morocco and in subsequent battles in Tunisia, by the end of which almost all Lees were replaced by Shermans. In November 1943, the M3, as part of the 193rd tank battalion, was used to a limited extent in battles in the Pacific Islands on the Mekin Atoll - with the 27th Infantry Division and on Tarawa - with the 2nd Marine Division.

M3 In the USSR

A story about the M3 tank would be incomplete without mentioning that these combat vehicles also came to the Soviet Union under the Lend-Lease program. True, the delivery figures are different: the American press reported 1386 M3 sent to the USSR (it is not known how many of them reached their destination), but according to the Soviet archives, a little more than 900 vehicles were received. Soviet tankers did not like this bulky and, in comparison with domestic tanks, completely awkward in appearance. In the Red Army, the tank received the designation M3s ("s" - medium), but tankers with black soldier humor called it "a mass grave for seven." In general, the combat qualities of the tank, which were not high for 1942, were exacerbated by the inability to adapt to new operating conditions. On the Soviet-German front, M3s were used mainly in 1942, and then were replaced by Shermans.

DESIGN FEATURES

The M3 medium tank was created on the basis of the M2 tank, using almost all components and assemblies of the power plant, transmission and chassis of the latter. The hull was riveted, assembled from flat armor plates on a frame made of corners, and the front plates had relatively large angles of inclination, while the side ones were located vertically. The bow of the hull was cast, consisting of three parts, interconnected by bolts. The casting of the bow simultaneously served as the housing for the differential and final drives. Bolting made it easier to dismantle the bow to dismantle these units and the gearbox. For boarding and disembarking the crew, there were rectangular doors with hatches and viewing devices on the sides of the hull. The roof over the engine compartment was removable. In addition, to facilitate engine maintenance, a double hatch was provided in the aft hull sheet and a hatch in the bottom.

In the sponson, which was a special-shaped casting riveted to the frontal hull plates and the turret box, a 75-mm M2 gun was installed in the armor mask on the trunnions. This gun had ballistics and ammunition identical to the French 75 mm gun of 1897. The latter was adopted by the American army during the First World War. To arm the tank, the M3 cannon was also used, similar to the M2, but with a longer barrel, higher muzzle velocity and better armor-piercing characteristics of the shells. Since the installation of the gun was balanced based on the mass and dimensions of the M3, a counterweight had to be attached to the shorter M2 barrel. The gun was serviced by two crew members: a gunner and a loader. The sighting device for the 75 mm gun was an M21A1 telescopic sight mounted in an M1 periscope sight. A similar design was used on almost all American tanks during World War II. The horizontal pointing angle of the gun was 32 °, vertical -9 ... + 18 °.

A cast cylindrical turret was mounted on a ball bearing above the fighting compartment with an offset to the left from the longitudinal axis of the tank. A 37-mm M5 or M6 gun, a 7.62-mm Browning M1919A4 machine gun paired with it, and an M2 periscope viewing device with a built-in M19A1 telescopic sight were mounted in the heavily sloping front of the turret. On the roof of the tower there was a commander's cupola with a Browning machine gun and a prismatic observation device. The elevation angle of the 37-mm cannon and machine gun in the commander's cupola reached 56°. Some of the guns had a guidance stabilizer in the vertical plane, to balance which a cylindrical counterweight was attached to the mask under the gun barrel.

In the control compartment of the tank in a fixed armored mask, two twin machine guns were mounted on a bracket. The bracket had a lever with which the elevation angle changed up to 9 °, declination - up to 4 °. Horizontal guidance was carried out by turning the tank. The fire control of machine guns was carried out by a driver. For this, the control levers were equipped with electric triggers.

5 years and 9 months ago Comments: 2

Hello, have you decided that you will pump out heavy American tanks with excellent guns and strong turrets? Well, first you will have to go through some controversial machines in order to acquire high-level bands. The first tank to go through is the M3 Lee. A rather controversial tank, and yes, by the way, this is not a medium tank at all. But more on that later. The guide consists of 6 parts:

1. Introduction to the machine
2. TTX (Tactical and Technical Characteristics)
3. Pros and Cons
4. Tactics and Use in Combat
5. Equipment, crew and equipment
6. Conclusion

Introduction to the machine

You researched this tank and bought it. What do you see in the hangar? A tank that does not have a turret, and the gun is located on the side. Unusual for a medium tank. According to the documents, he is a level 4 medium tank, but in fact it is a tank destroyer with a high damage per minute gun. Well, consider the M3 in more detail.

TTX (Tactical and Technical Characteristics)

By tradition, let's start with the gun. And the M3 Lee’s gun is excellent, short aiming time, decent one-time damage, and most importantly, one of the highest DPM at the level and even higher. Without additional equipment, the DPM is 2200 HP, excellent performance for a tier 4 tank, perhaps only the su-85B has a higher DPM, but this is a tank destroyer, both in terms of documents and characteristics. It is worth noting that, premium heavy tank 8 levels without additional equipment is equal to 1600 hp. It is important to realize our high damage per minute. The gun fails only with accuracy and lack of armor penetration, especially if you are thrown into a team where half of the 6 levels.

Our mobility is pretty good. Dynamics, confident set of speed. Specific power is 15.65 hp. per ton. Which is quite enough to occupy comfortable positions. 20% fire chance, and the transmission is in the front, which means that you can be set on fire in the forehead. This will affect the equipment you choose.
The radio station is installed on many American cars. Download last.

It seems to be there, but if you are not at the top of the list, then it evaporates, even if we are at the top of the list, we have many vulnerable areas.

Advantages and disadvantages

Pros:

A weapon that has only 2 flaws, one of the brightest ones is penetration
Good mobility
A decent view, as for level 4, especially for the ST - a medium tank
Opportunity to mask from behind cover

Minuses:

Large size, especially the bulging tower that everyone breaks through
Lack of weapon penetration if you are at the bottom of the list
High fire chance
Due to the large body, we have poor camouflage
Quite often criticize crew members

Tactics and Use in Combat

This tank performs better as a tank destroyer, i.e. can work well at medium and long distances. Being in the top, you will feel like a medium tank or a heavy tank destroyer, where you should conduct more aggressive actions. However, don't forget that HE hatzers can take out an M3 Lee with one shot. At the beginning, you can shoot opponents from a long or medium distance, and then get closer. Also, in urban conditions, it is best to leave on the left so that a strong mask repels the projectile, because. there are a lot of inexperienced players in level 4 battles, then they will shoot mainly there.

If we are among the 5 levels, here you can shoot from medium distances, the main thing is to avoid light, otherwise you will be quickly destroyed. Such armored targets as penetrated by sub-caliber shells, i.e. gold. There is a lack of armor penetration of the gun. At shorter distances, you can pierce with conventional armor-piercing shells into the slot of the mechanical drive or into the machine gun. You still have to take out.

If you were thrown to 6 levels, everything is sad here. But if you are not stingy with gold shells, then you can have fun punching strands into the side.

By the way, be careful with artillery, it can break through us by sending M3 Lee to the hangar.

Equipment, crew and equipment

Since the tank is passable, and you are unlikely to leave it for a long time, there is not much point in talking about the skills of the crew.

Equipment standard: repair kit, first aid kit, fire extinguisher. Already from level 4 it is worth carrying equipment.

Optional equipment, again due to the fact that the tank is passable, it is better to carry a removable one. Stereoscopic telescope + camouflage net. And spending a couple of hundred silver on equipment is not worth it.

Output

It is not for nothing that many players do not like this tank, yet the shortcomings greatly hinder the game. If the M3 Lee didn’t have that cardboard turret, a little higher armor penetration, then the tank would really be good. These bright shortcomings, unfortunately, make the tank passable. But do not despair, after this ambiguous vehicle, beautiful tanks are waiting for you. I want you to bend over.

Prepared by: RasSm