Are there Americans on Mars? There are already secret bases of earthlings on Mars

The theory according to which the American program to conquer Mars is an imitation, akin to the notorious “moon scam,” is becoming increasingly popular not only in ufological, but also in scientific circles. Under this theory, researchers such as, for example, the German Gerhard Wisniewski, provide a financial basis: spending - even over 51 years (since 1964) - 120 billion dollars on a “Martian adventure” is at least wasteful. Therefore, they say, NASA decided to fool the world's average citizen once again.

How valid is this conspiracy theory? Let's figure it out. And let us immediately point out one sensational circumstance: none of the specialists who doubt that the US “Mars program” is real indicate the place where it is actually being carried out. Question: why?

Theory of the issue

In front of me is the latest research belonging to Richard Hall, a former engineer at the Rolls-Royce automobile concern. Hall starts with the basics: explaining why NASA made a secret decision to simulate space probe flights to Mars - of the previous 44 missions, five were canceled due to the presence of defects in the technology discovered at an early stage, four probes flew past the target, seven were injured as a result of disasters, and only six probes out of the eleven that “supposedly” reached the orbit of Mars still landed on the Red Planet. However, Hall reminds us, the media has hammered information about 44 “successful” Mars missions into the head of the American taxpayer. Otherwise, the public might be outraged that $120 billion - including $2.5 billion spent on the new Mars robots Opportunity and Curiosity - was invested in such an ineffective program.

However, even when creating “Mars rovers”, originally intended for use on Earth and nowhere else, the simulators from the US Aerospace Agency, in the engineer’s opinion, “save money by considering the entire world community to be some kind of simpleton.” As proof: the same Curiosity, which continues to pamper us with images (more on them later), allegedly “transmitted from Mars,” is equipped with a lithium-ion battery with a “power” of 140 (!) watts. Any owner of a modern mobile phone will tell you how quickly such batteries run out as soon as the ambient temperature drops below zero. The researcher made calculations and points out: when NASA claims that the batteries equipped with Mars rovers operate without failures for 10 or more years in Mars conditions (where the average annual temperature is minus 55 degrees Celsius), it is simply deceiving us.

And more than that: the ill-fated 140 watts will not be enough even in the hothouse conditions of the Earth to power (often simultaneously) 39 motors of a “Mars rover” like Curiosity. Dozens of motors are needed for the robot to, for example, control cameras that take pictures, move, maneuver, and drill rocks. The American engineer cites on 55 pages of his newest research dozens of similar facts indicating that the “Mars rovers” never left – and could not leave – the boundaries of the Earth. But we will not dwell on the above information. And let's turn to another.

According to the behests of cousin Benedict

Devon Island in 2004, when Mars conditions were simulated there

Fans of Jules Verne probably remember the episode from the book “The Fifteen-Year-Old Captain” when entomologist Cousin Benedict finds an insect that is not found in America. The scientist screams with joy, believing that he has made a discovery, and explains to his companions: such insects are characteristic of Africa, but no one has ever found them in America before him. The pirates, leading the entomologist and the entire crew of the ship full of slave traders, are not happy. In fact, the scientist, without knowing it, exposed the plans of the villains who presented the Dark Continent as America.

Now attention: already in our century this story has repeated itself as a farce... In front of me is a study by the American Charles Schultz. It's called A Guide to Martian Fossils. The scientist, having conscientiously analyzed hundreds of photographs allegedly transmitted by “Mars rovers” from the Red Planet, is full of enthusiasm: “The Viking, Pathfinder, MER, and Phoenix spacecraft have provided us with dozens of evidence that there is, or at least was, life on Mars!” And indeed: on 400 pages of his work, Schultz cites dozens of sensational photographs taken from the official NASA website. Here is a lemming, apparently drinking water. But the shin of the animal - here the scientist ridicules ufologists who mistake it for part of the body of an alien - is apparently the shin of a walrus. And here, finally, quite according to the behests of cousin Benedict, and the wing of some insect. Against this background, lichen growing on Mars is pure nonsense.

NASA employees did not like Schultz’s “discoveries” to the same extent as Benedict’s “discoveries” did not appeal to pirate captain Pereira. Moreover, Schultz immediately found numerous followers. For example, American ufologist Scott Waring, who first drew attention to the oddities of the “Martian photograph” allegedly taken by Curiosity back in 2012 (it is now on the NASA website). Let's take a closer look: the shadow of a person performing some manipulations on the robot is clearly visible in the photo. As soon as Waring's discovery became public knowledge, some hotheads immediately put forward a version according to which the United States already has “secret populated bases” on Mars. However, now we will disappoint them. As, indeed, those who saw in the sensational photograph... “a Martian dressed in a spacesuit.”

Looking in the wrong place!

The public, which floods NASA with letters asking them to explain the earthly background of photographs allegedly transmitted by Mars missions from the Red Planet, is almost always skillfully put to shame by representatives of the aerospace department. And that's why. Enthusiasts are looking for filming sites where they say Martian landscapes are imitated, in the deserts of Nevada and Arizona, and the sands of California. To which the creators of the Mars program quite logically respond: “The remains of walruses, lemmings, lichen - in the desert? Sorry, this is complete nonsense!

Well, that's how it is. For the real set on which Mars is simulated (and the corresponding photos) is located in the Canadian Arctic - on the largest uninhabited island in the world, called Devon. All the flora and fauna that so unfortunately fall into the lenses of Curiosity and Opportunity are precisely characteristic of the conditions of the tundra there. And what’s more: the landscapes of Devon, where, apparently, “cosmic Hollywood” is located, are ideal for turning into Martian landscapes. Apply a little red in the same Photoshop program to the pictures taken in Devon, and there you have it - “Mars”!

As for the mysterious man “on Mars”, performing some manipulations on the “Mars rover” Curiosity, he, too, fits perfectly into this version. Firstly, as the already quoted engineer Richard Hall rightly points out, the solar panels that charge the rover’s weak battery would have to be cleaned periodically, whether on the Red Planet or on Earth.

While experts are only speculating about the possibility of a human flight to Mars, information is appearing in the media that expeditions to the Red Planet have supposedly already taken place. Moreover, they not only built scientific bases there, but also found Martians... Retired American Marine Captain Jeremy Kay recently told foreign journalists about this.

According to Kay, for the last 17 years he has served... on Mars, commanding one of the units of the secret space fleet, under the command of an international organization called Earth Defense

Force (“Earth Defense Service”), which included representatives of the United States, China and Russia. Their tasks included protecting the earthly colonists from the “unfriendly local population.”

Under the protection of Kei's unit were five research bases built by earthlings. Before serving, Jeremy had to undergo special three-year training at a secret base located on the Moon. It was called Lunar Operations Command. As a result, the captain learned to fly three types of space fighters and three types of bombers designed for combat in airless space.

The service was not easy. The fact is that the indigenous population of Mars was hostile and aggressive towards aliens from Earth, and the earth’s guards constantly had to be on alert. Eventually, Kay became so tired of guarding the Earth bases that he asked to resign. The command even organized a pompous farewell ceremony in his honor.

It is clear that this story, told by the Exonews portal, most of all looks like an ordinary “duck”. But the fact is that there is other information related to Martian bases. So, about twelve years ago, the Western press published a photograph called a still from a video film shot in 1962 and telling about the landing on Mars of some kind of expedition - either American, or Russian, or joint... In the unclearly taken photograph you can make out a small figure in a spacesuit, which is drilling the soil. The date was also indicated - May 22, 1962.

But how could a flight to Mars take place in 1962? After all, at that time, none of the largest space powers - neither the USA nor the USSR - had a launch vehicle with the power necessary for such missions. True, the Korolev Design Bureau was developing a project for landing Soviet cosmonauts on Mars, scheduled for 1985. But, according to official data, even by this time humanity was not yet ready for such travel.

In June 2011, American amateur astronomer David Martinez discovered a strange object over 210 meters long and about 45 meters wide in satellite images of the Red Planet in Google Earth, which he mistook for a research station. Suggestions have been made about its origin: either it is a station of an extraterrestrial civilization, or earthlings have long settled on Mars... Martinez even came up with his own name for the object - “Alpha Biostation.” He repeatedly contacted NASA with demands to comment on the find, but in response he received only one comment from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which was extremely skeptical...

Oh, Schiaparelli's apparatus crashed!.. What a surprise

This is Mars...Oh, no, this is the Mauna Loa volcano. Taken from the web.

The Schiaparelli spacecraft, sent to Mars as part of the ExoMars mission “to search for biological traces of life on this planet,” crashed on the surface of the Red Planet. He separated from the parachute early, laments ESA head Jan Werner, “and the engine braking lasted too short. The device fell at a much higher speed than it should have."

Sadly. But not surprising. For some reason.
Usually the program is designed in such a way that the engines run for as long as required for a normal descent, and the parachutes are not unfastened ahead of time. If such failures occur, then there are apparently some reasons for this. Which?

In a strange way, Schiaparelli suffers a catastrophe precisely when the American rover Curiosity is on Mars, which has already become a legend for its photo reports from the surface of the Red Planet.

At first, photographs of creatures very similar to earthly, distant lights, rocks, very similar to monuments, greeted with a storm of emotions, over time they began to cause, let’s say, distrust. It was no longer so groundless.

Let's start with the fact that from the first day of Curiosity's appearance on Mars, amateur researchers exposed NASA in insincerity: by comparing the coloring of the rover before leaving for space travel, with the coloring of the parts of the device already on the surface of Mars. It turned out that the details of the rover in the photographs published by NASA, for some reason, do not match the colors taken on Earth. When the rover was returned to its natural color, photographs of the surface of the planet suddenly took on a different color: instead of dull, gray and light brown desert landscapes, the researchers saw a blue sky and areas covered with something green.
For what purpose American scientists came up with such a substitution, there is no need to guess. For some reason, NASA really wanted Mars to live up to the existing legend about its lifelessness and hostility to humans.
With every day of the rover's operation, inquisitive amateur ufologists found more and more oddities: in the photographs sent, objects were increasingly found that were surprisingly similar to the silhouettes of terrestrial animals, and even people. And one day the photo created a sensation: the shadow of an astronaut repairing the Mars rover.

These oddities increasingly aroused distrust among meticulous researchers. Moreover, there was a reason for this.
The expeditions to the Moon of American astronauts, which in fact turned out to be a bluff: it turned out that the comrades did not fly anywhere, and they filmed the heroic breakthrough into space in Hollywood pavilions. Well, film footage, photographs and film footage from the Moon, as well as tens of kilograms of samples, as we know, were unexpectedly lost. There you go, just lost! Some supply manager or whoever took the priceless materials and threw them away...

Now they are pushing us on Mars with strange photographs of landscapes very similar to those on Earth.

Moreover, there is reason for doubt if you look at the reports of an experiment that lasted a whole year on the northern slope of the dormant volcano Mauna Loa in Hawaii, which was conducted by NASA, studying “the psychological and physiological problems that participants in a future manned flight to Mars might encounter.” .
The photographs of the Hawaiian test site were surprisingly similar to those photographed and sent to Earth by the Curiosity rover.

Of course, critical ufologists, and simply readers of the Internet, immediately began to put forward versions of another forgery by American scientists, now connected with Mars.

The disaster of the Schiaparelli spacecraft, in my opinion, confirms this version, which is not too unexpected today.

Schiaparelli, the brainchild of Russian and European scientists, could quite possibly, with his photographs of the surface of Mars, expose another NASA fake. A scandal of this magnitude, of course, could not help but worry American researchers. And that's why…

Is it really difficult today to create a sabotage by stopping an experiment, putting a comma or an ellipsis instead of a period in the program... Well, the programmer forgot, got distracted, reaching for a cup of coffee brought by a colleague, who happens to everyone.
By the way, several accidents with Russian missiles occurred precisely because of programmer errors. Why, in this case, not think about sabotage, stopping the opportunity to expose a new NASA scam?

The other day space agency director NASA Charles Bolden speaking live on the most famous British channel ITV News stated that there was life on Mars, there is now and, probably, in the near future there will be a personal meeting of earthlings with the inhabitants of the Red Planet. According to him,Mars used to be almost identical to Earth, and some similarities still remain - this is evidenced by signs discovered as part of the Mars Science Laboratory project.

Charles Bolden's performance is certainly noteworthy. Firstly, he is a recognized expert in the space industry: he was previously an astronaut and went into orbit four times - on two missions as a crew commander. Then Bolden made a brilliant administrative career: under his leadership, NASA has been successfully operating for five years. And secondly, the statement by the head of NASA indicates that the Americans have successfully advanced in the exploration of Mars. The fact is that recently NASA has carefully filtered information coming from the Red Planet. The public was given exclusively “routine” facts, such as: the Curiosity rover drilled wells in an area of ​​rocky rock, the rover discovered rounded pebbles and other data of no particular scientific value.

But a device worth more than $2 billion, equipped with super-expensive modern equipment, has been on Mars since August 2012. At its launch, it was stated that the main objectives of the Curiosity mission were to conduct detailed geological and geochemical studies, study the atmosphere and climate of the planet, search for water or traces of its presence, and organic substances. This data should determine whether there once was and whether there is now life on Mars. The program included a route of approximately 22 km and even an ascent of Mount Sharp, 5.5 km high in the center of Gale Crater. Of course, the world was expecting a barrage of information, but so far the Americans have not reported anything sensational.

During all this time, it was possible to find out that the water content in the soil of Gale Crater is small and is only about 2%. This water is not free, it is part of red iron hydroxides and you should look for water not here, but at the bottom of the Marineris gorge. The analyzes of methane in the atmosphere as an indicator of life, carried out by American scientists, also turned out to be unreliable - it turned out that there is none after all. So nothing special.

At the same time, many space experts are convinced that Americans are hiding really interesting finds, because previous American probes and rovers on Mars gave out sensations almost every month: they found huge river valleys, grandiose volcanoes, the giant Marineris gorge, various sedimentary and igneous rocks, an abundance of the rare mineral maghemite on Earth, as well as clear traces of the past life. But the current Curiosity is a super-perfect model, which embodies the best space technologies of our time. In particular, the device is equipped with a set of chemical analyzers, with the help of which man-made objects can be identified and conclusions can be drawn about the possibility that they belong to a highly developed civilization.

But everything started very well. Curiosity's first images were very promising: they photographed an object that looked like the sole of a sandal, a snake-like rusty wire, and a mysterious dome on the horizon. It was clear that by studying only these objects, one could learn a lot of interesting things. But suddenly the information stopped coming. It can be assumed that American researchers encountered undoubted evidence of the existence in the past or present of the remnants of a technogenic civilization, but for some reason they decided not to advertise it. It seems that NASA representatives are playing for time, trying to hide truly sensational data behind a stream of insignificant information.

And the current speech by the head of the space agency, Charles Bolden, is clear evidence that Americans have long known about the presence of civilization on Mars. They know, but are silent - perhaps because they do not want the whole world to receive their discoveries, in which they have invested billions, for free.