Have you ever wondered why such a longitudinal depression is made on the blade of a knife? And it is found on knives quite often. Yes, this is a bloodstream! - you say. And you will be a little wrong. There is absolutely no point in such bloodletting. Hunters confirm that if you stick such a knife into the carcass of an animal, only a few drops of blood will run out. The purpose of this groove on the knife is slightly different, but we will call it correctly - dol . So…
A longitudinal recess on the knife blade can be made on either one or both sides.
Dol (dola) - a groove, a longitudinal depression on the blade of a bladed weapon. The Germans call it “hohlkehle”, and the British call it “fuller”.
In a company of knife makers, call this part of the knife gutter, valley, hohlkehle, fuller or simply deepening, but try not to use the concept of “blood flow, blood flow”. Well, in order to really show off my erudition, for reference I provide the following information:
By the way, the use of a groove on short-bladed knives (up to 9 cm) is nothing more than decoration and makes no sense.
Well, now a little evidence. I admit honestly, for some time I thought that the fuller on the blade adds some rigidity to it. But I received a response from our buyer, who mathematically proved that this is not so. Calculations Viktor Belyaev, I quote below:
Without going into the jungle of strength of materials, I will try to explain why the fuller does not increase but decreases the rigidity of the blade.
Hardness and rigidity are different concepts. Hardness is the resistance of a material to the penetration of more solid. Stiffness is the ability of elements to resist deformation.
Hardness depends on the material (various steels, hardening, hardening, etc.) and is determined by various methods: Rockwell, Vickers, etc.
Hardness depends on bearing capacity material, element shape, structure, loading pattern, etc.
For example, let’s say that a knife with fullers is an I-beam No. 10 GOST 8239-79, without fullers it is a solid block with a cross-section like an I-beam 100x55 mm (10x5.5 cm), their length and material are the same. They are fixed at one end and forces are applied to the other, respectively. Rd- to the I-beam, RB- to the beam.
Bending moment M=P*l kg*cm, where P kg-force l cm shoulder - distance from fastening to the point of application of forces. Also, from evidence M=g*w kg*cm, where g-kg/cm sq. - permissible stress in the material due to force, w cm\3 (centimeter to the third power) - section moment of resistance.
W= b*h sq (cm\3). Equating, we get for the I-beam Рд*l = g*w d; for timber Pb*l=g*wb. Dividing the second equation by the first and canceling equal values we get: Pb / Pd = Wb / Wd, those. the maximum force applied to the beam will be as many times greater than the maximum force applied to the I-beam as the moment of resistance of the beam more torque I-beam resistance.
Wb = b*hkv/6 = 10*5.5\2/6 =50.4 cm\3; according to the assortment, the moment of resistance Wy of I-beam No. 10 = 6.49 cm\3. 50,4\6,49=7,7.
Accordingly, the permissible force applied to the beam will be 7.7 times greater than the force applied to the I-beam.
For blades with a solid cross-section and with a fuller, this ratio will be significantly less due to a slight decrease in the cross-sectional area, but less!
Speaking about the purpose of the fuller, many people claim that it is done to increase the rigidity of the blade - this is absolutely wrong. This is what those who don’t know the evidence can say. Reducing the cross-sectional area when making a fuller without increasing the thickness and (or) width of the blade leads to a decrease in the moment of resistance W and, accordingly, a decrease in rigidity. I believe: duty is a reduction in weight, a reduction in the friction surface, aesthetics, a tribute to fashion, tradition, even blood flow - if you are used to saying so, but not to increase rigidity.
Anyone want to argue? Write in the comments. And about others, we’ll talk next time.
Review article “Krovostok or still a valley? Let’s figure it out” prepared by the online store
Santoku is a universal Japanese kitchen knife. It was originally developed as a modification of the Western (specifically French) chef's knife for cutting beef, and then it was adapted for the needs of Japanese cuisine.
"Santoku" literally translates to "three good things" or "three uses", which refers to the knife's ability to cut, chop and chop well. The size of the santoku is convenient for cutting into small slices or cubes both meat and vegetables. Compared to the Japanese original, Western Santoku models have different balancing, blade design, and are made of softer steel, which affects the thickness of the blade and edge.
Also, European variations of santoku may have pockets on the blade (they are also called “grantons”), designed to reduce the sticking of food to the knife (cooked raw sausage, etc.)
"Krovostok" on a knife- the topic is extremely popular, and in almost all conversations regarding knives, conducted on a variety of forums, the eternal question comes up: “What is knives with blood flow, and, frankly speaking, why blood flow Is this the one you need?"
This fundamentally erroneous term, as is known, means a special groove on the knife, or rather on his blade. But be prepared for the fact that for mentioning the word “bloodstock” on serious knife forums you will be beaten (maybe even kicked), since it is correct and correct to call this thing on the blade “dol”. And “krovostok” is vulgar jargon, unworthy of the speech of a kniffer, and all that. Nevertheless, even on fairly serious knife forums, a variety of versions are exaggerated about why this is actually needed. dol on the knife. That's what we'll talk about today...
From the point of view of the average person, a knife with a “blood cap” is a strictly required attribute of a terrifying fighting beast like director John Rambo - thanks to Hollywood. In fact, this is not true at all.
Hello, friends! We continue our topic about knife myths. This article is a logical continuation of the article “”, so if anyone is not familiar yet, start with it. The topic is really quite broad, so it cannot be fit into one part.
By the way, I would like to take this opportunity to inform all my readers about an excellent store offering excellent handmade knives at reasonable prices and delivery throughout Russia (I want to buy such a knife). Well, now let's get back to our topic today.
So, let's begin.
Myth No. 1.
A longitudinal notch on a knife blade is a “blood hole.”
This is a fundamentally wrong concept. According to (), clause 6, subclause 6.1.1.5.1, the term “krovostok” is an unacceptable synonym for the term “dol”. Dol- This is a longitudinal notch on the blade.
Fuller A clear example of reducing the weight of a knife due to the fuller
Dol on a knife
And here there is no need to start ranting on the topic of what can be called one way or another, the main thing is that it is clear to everyone. And in general, that " bloodstream" is a common noun. Remember - the term " bloodstream" And " dol" are two different concepts and should not be linked.
The second myth is a continuation of the first.
Myth No. 2.
If a knife has a “bleed”, then such a knife is a bladed weapon.
Initially, there was an opinion that the presence of “ blood flow"on a knife increases bleeding if you leave the knife in the wound after a blow. But, apart from fiction and an attempt to pass off wishful thinking as reality, there is nothing more to this opinion.
Here is the real “Krovostok” and its leader “Shiloh”
Once again - this longitudinal notch - “ dol", and it serves, first of all, to lighten the weight of the blade and balance it, as well as to strengthen the entire structure.
And, moreover, it is impossible to judge any transfer of a knife to the category of edged weapons, due to the presence of a fuller on the blade. There is, and this is the only thing that will give the product such a proud name. Therefore, this is not even a myth, but rather nonsense and ignorance of regulatory documents.
Myth No. 3.
A sure sign of a bladed weapon is an anatomical handle.
What is important here is an understanding of what an anatomical handle is. This can be either a regular handle, which has special finger grooves, or a custom-made handle based on a cast of the hand and exactly repeating its shape. Individually made handles are an extremely rare phenomenon and have nothing to do with the concept edged weapons.
Myth No. 4.
IN Russian Federation knives with one-handed opening are prohibited.
Any adherent of this opinion will send you straight to, shouting - “Look, everything is written here - you can’t!”
You can refer to the article “Which knives are prohibited in Russia” for details, and in short, knives with automatic, inertial opening and the “butterfly” type with a blade length are prohibited more than 90 mm.
Butterfly knife Automatic knife Folding knife
We are not talking about any other products. Thus, the vast majority of folding knives with flippers, hooks, pins, etc., have never been banned.
Myth No. 5.
If a knife has a lanyard, then you cannot carry such a knife with you.
No matter how crazy it may sound, such an opinion still exists. Of course, additional questions may arise from law enforcement officers, but in general, the presence of a lanyard does not in any way affect the involvement of the knife as a bladed weapon. To help you, the same article, which says nothing about it.
Leather lanyard Lanyards-keychains Lanyard on a knife
These are far from all the myths on knife topics, but that’s enough for today. Leave yours in the comments controversial issues about knives, and I will try to answer them. That's all, like and subscribe to our news and updates.
Also join our official group.
nanbaby.ru - Health and beauty. Fashion. Children and parents. Leisure. Life House