Soviet technology of the Second World War. Armored vehicles of the Great Patriotic War: statistics and analysis Russian equipment of the Second World War

A sharp jump in the development of weapons and military equipment occurred during the Second World War. “The influence of scientific and technological advances on the nature of this war was enormous and multifaceted. Simply put, until 1918 military operations were conducted in two dimensions (on land and at sea) within the limits of mere visibility with weapons of short range and lethal force. During the war of 1939-1945. gigantic changes took place - the third dimension (air), the ability to "see" the enemy at a distance (radar), the spaces in which battles were fought, the power of weapons were added. To this must be added all sorts of countermeasures. The greatest influence on the fighting in the war of 1939-1945. provided air power. It revolutionized the strategy and tactics of war on land and at sea.

On fig. 89 aircraft of the period of the Second World War are presented.

The aviation of different countries was armed with air bombs weighing from 1 kg to 9 thousand kg, small-caliber automatic guns (20-47 mm), heavy machine guns (11.35-13.2 mm),

rocket projectiles.

Rice. 89.

Soviet aircraft: 1 - MiG-3 fighter; 2 - La-5 fighter;

3 - Yak-3 fighter; 4 - front-line dive bomber Pe-2; 5 - front-line bomber Tu-2; 6 - attack aircraft Il-2; 7 - long-range bomber Il-4; 8 - long-range bomber Pe-2 (TB-7). Foreign aircraft: 9 - Me-109E fighter (Germany); 10 - dive bomber Ju-87 (Germany); 11 - bomber Ju-88 (Germany); 12 - fighter "Spitfire" (Great Britain); 13 - fighter "Ercobra" (USA); 14 - Mosquito bomber (Great Britain); 15 - strategic bomber "Lancaster" (Great Britain); 16 - B-29 strategic bomber (USA).

The most important role in World War II was played by tanks (Fig. 90). Nazi Germany entered World War II armed with the following tanks: light T-1 and T-II, medium T-Sh and T-IV.

However, already at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, Soviet T-34 and KV tanks showed complete superiority over Nazi tanks. In 1942, the Nazi command modernized medium tanks - the T-Sh was equipped with a 50-mm cannon instead of the 37-mm one, and the T-IV received a long-barreled 75-mm cannon instead of the short-barreled one, and the thickness of the armor increased. In 1943, heavy tanks - the T-V "Panther" and the T-VI "Tiger" - entered service with the Nazi army. However, these tanks were inferior to the Soviet T-34 tank in terms of maneuverability, and the IS-2 tank in terms of weapon power.

During the Great Patriotic War, the main Soviet tank was the famous T-34. During the war, it was repeatedly modernized - in 1942 the thickness of the armor was increased, the design was simplified, a commander's cupola was introduced, the four-speed gearbox was replaced with a five-speed one, and the capacity of the fuel tanks was increased. In the second half of 1943, the T-34-85 with an 85 mm gun entered service. In the autumn of 1941, the KV-1C tank was launched to replace the KV tank, in which, by reducing the mass due to armor, the speed increased from 35 to 42 km/h. In the summer of 1943, a more powerful 85 mm cannon in a cast turret was installed on this tank - the new vehicle was named KV-85. In 1943, a new heavy tank IS-1 was created, armed with an 85 mm cannon. Already in December of this year, a 122-mm cannon was installed on the tank. The new tank - IS-2 and its further modification IS-3 were rightfully considered the most powerful tanks of World War II. Light tanks in the USSR, as in other countries, did not receive much development. On the basis of the T-40 amphibious tank with machine gun armament, by September 1941, the T-60 light tank with a 20-mm cannon and reinforced armor was created. On the basis of the T-60 tank, at the beginning of 1942, the T-70 tank was developed, armed with a 45-mm cannon. However, in the second half of the war, light tanks turned out to be ineffective, and from 1943 their production ceased.

Rice. 90.

• 1 - heavy tank KV-2 (USSR); 2 - heavy tank IS-2 (USSR);
• 3 - medium tank T-34 (USSR); 4 - heavy tank T-VI "Tiger" (Germany); 5 - heavy tank T-V "Panther" (Germany);
• 6 - medium tank "Sherman" (USA); 7 - light tank "Locast" (USA);
• 8 - infantry tank (UK).

In the development of the tanks of the main belligerent armies, medium tanks were most widely used. However, since 1943 there has been a tendency to create new types of heavy tanks and increase their output. Medium and heavy tanks of the Second World War were single-turret, with anti-cannon armor, armed with 50-122-mm guns.

At the beginning of the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. Soviet troops fired the first salvo from rocket artillery combat vehicles ("Katyusha") (Fig. 91). During the Second World War, rocket weapons were also used by the Nazi, British and American armies. In 1943, the first large-caliber breech-loading 160-mm mortar entered service with the Soviet troops. Self-propelled artillery mounts (ACS) (Fig. 92) became widespread in the Second World War: in the Soviet Army with guns of 76, 85, 100, 122 and 152 mm caliber; in the fascist German army - 75-150 mm; in the British and American armies - 75-203 mm.

Rice. 91.

Rice. 92.

1 - SU-100 (USSR); 2 - 88-mm anti-tank self-propelled artillery "Ferdinand" (Germany); 3 - English 76-mm self-propelled artillery mount "Archer"; 4 - American 155-mm self-propelled artillery M41.

Small arms automatic weapons (especially assault rifles and submachine guns), flamethrowers of various types, incendiary ammunition, cumulative and sub-caliber projectiles, and mine-explosive weapons received further development during the Second World War.

During the Second World War, ships of various classes were used in the fight on sea and ocean theaters (Fig. 93). At the same time, aircraft carriers and submarines became the main striking force of the fleet. Anti-submarine defense ships (sloops, corvettes, frigates, etc.) have received significant development. Many landing ships (vessels) were built. During the war years, a large number of destroyers were built, but they only in some cases carried out torpedo attacks, and were mainly used for anti-aircraft defense and air defense purposes. The main types of naval weapons were various artillery systems, advanced torpedoes, mines and depth charges. Of great importance for increasing the combat effectiveness of ships was the widespread use of radar and hydroacoustic equipment.

Rice. 93.

• 1 - cruiser "Kirov" (USSR); 2 - battleship (Great Britain);
• 3 battleship "Bismarck" (Germany); 4 - battleship "Yamato" (Japan); 5 - liner "Wilhelm Gustloff" (Germany), torpedoed by the Soviet submarine S-13 under the command of A.I. Marinesko; 6 - liner "Queen Mary" (Great Britain);
• 7 - submarine type "Sch" (USSR); 8 - American ships.

In 1944, the fascist German army used V-1 guided missiles and V-2 ballistic missiles.

• B.L. Montgomery. Brief history of military battles. - M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2004. - S. 446.

On July 8, 1941, a tank battle broke out near the town of Senno, not far from the Dnieper: light Soviet T-26s fought off German T-IIIs. In the midst of the battle, a Russian tank crawled out of the thick rye, crushing potato tops into the ground, the silhouette of which was still not familiar to the Germans. “Several German tanks opened fire on him, but the shells ricocheted off his massive turret. A German 37 mm anti-tank gun stood in its path. The German gunners fired shell after shell at the advancing tank until it pressed their cannon into the ground. Then, leaving behind the set fire to the T-III, the tank went deep into the German defenses for 15 kilometers, "- this is how Western historians describe the first appearance of the legendary T-34 tank in the book" From - "Barbarossa" to "Terminal".

For a long time, German designers tried to create a tank that could compete with the 34th. This is how the German tanks T-6 "Tiger" (1942) and T-5 "Panther" (1943) appeared. However, the German giants still lost to the “best tank in the world”, as the German commander von Kleist dubbed it, in maneuverability. The brainchild of Mikhail Koshkin, which came off the assembly line of the Kharkov Locomotive Plant, contributed to the development of the so-called "tank fear" among the German troops of the Eastern Front. However, for the designer himself, the invention became fatal: from Kharkov to Moscow, where the tank was to be shown to the leadership, a cold Koshkin drove his 34-ke. Having proved that his tank could overcome such distances without problems, the designer got severe pneumonia and returned to Kharkov in a semi-conscious state. Never recovering from the disease, Mikhail Koshkin died in the hospital. This self-sacrifice convinced top officials to put the tanks into mass production. Before the start of the war, 1225 T-34 tanks were produced.

Main woman at the front

The front-line soldiers nicknamed the M-30 howitzer "Matushka", the rockets at first were called "Raisa Sergeevna" (from the abbreviation RS), but most of all they loved, of course, "Katyusha", the BM-13 field rocket artillery system. One of the first volleys of Katyushas hit the Market Square of the city of Rudnya. BM-13 during the shots made a peculiar sound in which the soldiers heard Matvey Blanter's popular song "Katyusha" before the war. The apt nickname given to the gun by Sergeant Andrei Sapronov spread throughout the entire army in a couple of days, and then became the property of the Soviet people.

Monument to Katyusha. (wikipedia.org)

The order to launch the production of Katyushas was signed a few hours before the start of the German invasion. The German troops were the first to use multiple launch rocket systems, trying to destroy the Brest Fortress at the very beginning of the offensive. However, the fortress survived and for a long time the Red Army soldiers who found themselves in it fought against the invaders. The order to start production of Katyushas was signed a few hours before the start of the German invasion. Less than a month later, Soviet troops struck back: in the summer of 1941, the Germans had to get acquainted not only with the new T-34 tank, but also with the hitherto unknown Katyusha. The chief of the German General Staff, Halder, wrote in his diary: “On July 14 near Orsha, the Russians used hitherto unknown weapons. A fiery flurry of shells burned down the Orsha railway station, all trains with personnel and military equipment of the arrived military units. The metal melted, the earth burned.

Monument to the first rocket battery of Captain Flerov. (wikipedia.org)

Rocket launchers, at the beginning of the war, most often mounted on the chassis of ZIS vehicles, then began to be mounted on anything: from Fords, Dodges and Bedfords received under the Lend-Lease program, ending with motorcycles, snowmobiles and boats. The operation in which multiple rocket launchers were used most extensively was . Then the "Stalin's bodies", as the Germans called them, fired more than 10 thousand shells and destroyed 120 buildings, where the resistance of the enemy troops was especially fierce.

IL-2, "Cement bomber"

The most massive combat aircraft in history, which for a long time was the Il-2 attack aircraft, seems to have become the champion in the number of nicknames. "Concrete plane" - this is how the German pilots called it: "IL-2" had poor maneuverability, but it was very difficult to shoot it down. The pilots even joked that the IL-2 could fly "on half a wing, but on parole." The ground troops of the Wehrmacht, seeing it as a constant threat, called the plane "butcher" or "Iron Gustav". The designers themselves called "IL-2" simply - "flying tank". And in the Red Army, the plane, due to the unusual shape of the hull, was nicknamed "humped".

In this form, the IL-2 flew to the airfield. (wikipedia.org)

The first serial Il-2 aircraft was produced on March 10, 1941 at the Voronezh aircraft plant, since then 36,183 of the same attack aircraft have risen above the ground. However, at the time the war began, the Red Army had only 249 vehicles at its disposal. Initially, Ilyushin, the chief designer, created a two-seat "armored attack aircraft", but after the very first tests, it was decided to install an additional gas tank instead of the second place.

All the time, the Soviet command lacked specialized combat aircraft. This is largely why the IL-2, being the most common machine, was used for various tasks. So, for example, for all Il-2 aircraft, a mandatory bomb load was established, which was jokingly called the “Stalin outfit”. In addition to the bombing, "IL-2" was used, despite its impressive dimensions, as a reconnaissance aircraft. One of the interesting features of the attack aircraft is that the pilots, if the car caught fire in battle, often landed the plane on its "belly" without releasing the landing gear. The most difficult thing for the pilot was to get out of the fuselage in time and run away before the "" explodes.

The exhibition of weapons, military equipment and fortifications of the Central Museum of the Great Patriotic War presents a fairly complete collection of Soviet armored vehicles of the war period, British and American armored vehicles supplied to the Soviet Union in 1941-1945 under Lend-Lease, as well as armored vehicles of our main opponents in war years - Germany and Japan.

During the Second World War, armored forces, as the experience of their combat use showed, played a decisive role in battles, performing a wide range of tasks in all types of combat, both independently and together with other branches of the military. They grew both quantitatively and qualitatively, rightfully becoming the main striking force of the armies of various states. During the six years of World War II, about 350,000 armored combat vehicles took part in the battles on both sides: tanks, self-propelled artillery mounts (ACS), armored vehicles (BA) and armored personnel carriers (APCs).

Soviet military thought in the prewar years assigned an important role to tanks. They were supposed to be used in all types of hostilities. As part of rifle formations, they were intended to break through the tactical defense zone as a means of direct infantry support (NPP), operating in close cooperation with other branches of the military. Most of the tanks were in service with tank and mechanized formations, which had the task of developing success in the operational depth after breaking through the defense.

During the first five-year plans in the Soviet Union, the necessary production base for the mass production of tanks was created. Already in 1931, the factories gave the Red Army 740 vehicles. For comparison: in 1930, the troops received only 170 tanks, and in 1932 - 3121 vehicles, including 1032 T-26 light tanks, 396 BT-2 light fast tanks and 1693 T-27 tankettes. No other country built such a number of tanks at that time. And this pace was practically maintained until the beginning of the Great Patriotic War.

In 1931 - 1941, 42 samples of various types of tanks were created in the USSR, of which 20 samples were adopted and put into mass production: tankettes T-27; light infantry escort tanks T-26; light wheeled-tracked high-speed tanks of mechanized units BT-5/BT-7; light reconnaissance amphibious tanks T-37/T-38/T-40; medium tanks of direct infantry support T-28; heavy tanks of additional quality reinforcement when breaking through the fortified T-35 lanes. At the same time, attempts were made in the Soviet Union to create self-propelled artillery installations. However, it was not possible to fully work out and put into mass production the self-propelled guns.

In total, 29,262 tanks of all types were manufactured in the Soviet Union during these ten years. In the 1930s in our country, when developing light tanks, preference was given to wheeled-tracked vehicles, which then formed the basis of the tank fleet of the Red Army.

The fighting during the Spanish Civil War of 1936 - 1939 showed that tanks with bulletproof armor were already outdated. Soviet tankmen and technicians who visited Spain came to the conclusion that it was necessary to increase the thickness of the frontal armor of the hull and turret to 60 mm. Then the tank will not be afraid of anti-tank guns, which the ground forces of various countries began to equip. For such a relatively heavy machine, as tests have shown, a purely caterpillar mover was optimal. This conclusion of Soviet designers formed the basis for the creation of a new medium tank T-34, which rightfully won the glory of the best tank in the world during the Great Patriotic War.

At the turn of the 1930s - 1940s, domestic tank builders developed a clear idea of ​​​​the prospects for the development of armored vehicles. Various measures were taken in the Soviet Union to strengthen the Armed Forces. As a result, the Red Army received new medium (T-34) and heavy (KV-1 and KV-2) tanks, which had anti-cannon armor, powerful weapons and high mobility. In terms of combat qualities, they surpassed foreign models and fully met modern requirements.

The development of tanks, engines, weapons in the USSR was carried out by design teams led by N.N. Kozyreva (T-27), N.N. Barykova (T-26 and T-28), A.O. Firsova (BT), N.A. Astrov (T-37), O.M. Ivanova (T-35), M.I. Koshkin and A.A. Morozova (T-34), Zh.Ya. Kotin (KV and IS-2), M.F. Balzhi (IS-3), I.Ya. Trashutin and K. Chelpan (V-2 diesel engine), V.G. Grabina (tank guns, V.A. Degtyarev (tank machine guns), E.I. Maron and V.A. Agntsev (tank sights).

By 1941, mass production of tanks was organized in the USSR, meeting all the requirements of that time. By the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, and then during the war, tanks were produced by about two dozen factories in the country: the Leningrad Kirov Plant, the Moscow Plant named after. S. Ordzhonikidze, Kharkov Locomotive Plant, Stalingrad Tractor Plant, Gorky Krasnoe Sormovo Plant, Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant (“Tankograd”), Ural Tank Plant in Nizhny Tagil, etc.

Mass deliveries of armored vehicles made it possible to start organizing mechanized corps in the Red Army in the mid-1930s, which was 5-6 years ahead of the appearance of similar formations in the armed forces of Germany and other countries. Already in 1934, a new type of troops was created in the Red Army - armored troops (from December 1942 - armored and mechanized troops), which to this day are the main striking force of the Ground Forces. At the same time, the 5th, 7th, 11th and 57th special mechanized corps were deployed, converted in August 1938 into tank corps. However, the armored forces were in the process of reorganization. In 1939, these formations were disbanded due to an incorrect assessment of the combat experience of using tanks in Spain. In May 1940, the armored forces of the Red Army consisted of: one T-35 tank brigade; three brigades T-28; 16 BT tank brigades; 22 T-26 tank brigades; three armored brigades; two separate tank regiments; one training tank regiment and one training battalion of armored units. Their total number was 111,228 people. The ground forces also included six motorized divisions. Each of them had one tank regiment. In total, the motorized division had 258 light tanks in the state.

The study of the combat experience of using armored and mechanized troops during the outbreak of World War II allowed Soviet military specialists to develop a scientifically based theory of the combat use of tank and mechanized formations and units, both in combined arms combat and in independent operations. This theory was further developed during the Great Patriotic War.

The fighting that took place near the river. Khalkhin-Gol units and formations of the Red Army clearly proved that much can be achieved by the active use of mobile tank formations. Powerful tank formations were widely used by Germany during the first period of World War II. All this proved that it was urgent to return to the creation of large armored formations. Therefore, in 1940, the restoration of 9 mechanized corps, 18 tank and 8 mechanized divisions began in the Red Army, and in February - March 1941, the formation of another 21 mechanized corps began. To fully equip the new mechanized corps, 16,600 tanks of only new types were required, and in total - about 32,000 tanks.

On June 13, 1941, Deputy Chief of the General Staff, Lieutenant-General N.F. Vatutin in his “Information on the deployment of the Armed Forces of the USSR in case of war in the West” noted: “In total, there are 303 divisions in the USSR: rifle divisions - 198, tank divisions - 61, motorized divisions - 31 ...” Thus, instead of 42 previous tank divisions brigades and six motorized divisions in the Red Army a week before the start of the war, there were 92nd tank and motorized divisions. However, due to such a rapid reorganization of the troops, less than half of the formed corps received the necessary weapons and military equipment in full. In the tank units, there was an acute shortage of tank commanders and technical specialists, since the commanders who came from rifle and cavalry formations did not have practical experience in the combat use of tank troops and the operation of armored vehicles.

On June 1, 1941, the tank fleet of the Soviet ground forces consisted of 23,106 tanks, including 18,690 combat-ready ones. In the five western border districts - Leningrad, Baltic Special, Western Special, Kiev Special and Odessa - on June 22, 1941, there were 12,989 tanks, of which 10,746 were combat-ready and 2,243 needed repairs. Of the total number of vehicles, about 87% were light tanks T-26 and BT. Relatively new samples there were light T-40s with machine guns, medium T-34s (1105 units), heavy KV-1 and KV-2 (549 units).

In the battles of the first period of the Great Patriotic War with Wehrmacht strike groups, units of the Red Army lost a large amount of their military equipment. Only in 1941, during the Baltic defensive operation (June 22 - July 9), 2523 tanks were lost; in Belorusskaya (June 22 - July 9) - 4799 cars; in Western Ukraine (June 22 - July 6) - 4381 tanks. Compensation for losses became one of the main tasks of Soviet tank builders.

During the course of the war, the relative number of light tanks in the active army was continuously decreasing, although in 1941-1942 their output increased in quantitative terms. This was explained by the need to supply the troops with the largest possible number of combat vehicles in a short time, and it was relatively easy to establish the production of light tanks.

At the same time, they were modernized, and first of all, armor was strengthened.

In the autumn of 1941, the T-60 light tank was created, and in 1942, the T-70. Their introduction into serial production was facilitated by the low cost of production, due to the use of automotive units, as well as the simplicity of design. But the war showed that light tanks were not effective enough on the battlefield due to the weakness of weapons and armor. Therefore, from the end of 1942, their production was noticeably reduced, and in the late autumn of 1943 it was discontinued.

The vacated production facilities were used to produce light self-propelled guns SU-76, created on the basis of the T-70. Medium tanks T-34 from the first days took part in the hostilities. They had an undeniable superiority over the German Pz tanks. Krfw. III and Pz. Krfw. IV. German specialists had to urgently upgrade their machines.

In the spring of 1942, the Pz tank appeared on the Eastern Front. Krfw. IV modification F2 with a new 75-mm cannon and reinforced armor. In a duel, he won the T-34, but was inferior to him in maneuverability and maneuverability. In response, Soviet designers increased the T-34's cannon and the thickness of the turret's frontal armor. By the summer of 1943, the Germans equipped tank units with new tanks and self-propelled artillery mounts (Pz. Krfw. V "Panther"; Pz. Krfw.VI "Tiger"; self-propelled guns "Ferdinand", etc.) with more powerful armor protection, fire from their 75 - and 88-mm long-barreled guns hit our armored vehicles from a distance of 1000 meters or more.

The new Soviet tanks T-34-85 and IS-2, armed with 85-mm and 122-mm guns (respectively), by the beginning of 1944 were able to restore the advantage of Soviet armored vehicles in terms of armor protection and firepower. All this taken together allowed the Soviet Union to gain an unconditional advantage over Germany, both in terms of the quality of armored vehicles and the number of samples produced.

In addition, starting in 1943, the Red Army began to receive a large number of self-propelled artillery mounts. The need for them was revealed in the first months of hostilities, and already in the summer of 1941 at the Moscow Automobile Plant. I.V. Stalin, in a hurry, a 57-mm ZIS-2 anti-tank gun of the 1941 model was mounted on semi-armored artillery tractors T-20 Komsomolets. These self-propelled units received the designation ZIS-30.

On October 23, 1942, the State Defense Committee decided to start work on the creation of two types of self-propelled guns: light ones - for direct fire support of infantry and medium ones, armored like a T-34 medium tank - to support and escort tanks in battle. Tank builders for a light self-propelled gun equipped with a 76-mm ZIS-3 cannon used the base of the T-70 tank. This machine was well developed and relatively easy to manufacture. It was also taken into account that the supply of light tanks to the front was gradually reduced. Then came: the medium self-propelled guns SU-122 - a 122 mm howitzer based on the T-34 tank and the heavy SU-152 - a 152 mm howitzer gun based on the KV-1S tank. In 1943, the Supreme High Command decides to transfer self-propelled artillery installations from the GAU to the jurisdiction of the Commander of Armored and Mechanized Forces. This contributed to a sharp increase in the quality of self-propelled guns and the growth of their production. In the same year, 1943, the formation of self-propelled artillery regiments for tank, mechanized and cavalry corps began. In the offensive, light self-propelled guns accompanied the infantry, medium and heavy self-propelled guns fought against tanks, assault guns, anti-tank artillery of the enemy, and destroyed defensive structures.

The role of self-propelled guns has increased in the context of the widespread use of Panther and Tiger tanks by the enemy. To combat them, Soviet troops received SU-85 and SU-100 vehicles.

The 100-mm gun mounted on the SU-100 self-propelled guns surpassed the 88-mm cannons of German tanks and self-propelled guns in terms of the power of armor-piercing and high-explosive fragmentation shells, not inferior to them in rate of fire. During the war, self-propelled artillery mounts proved to be a highly effective formidable weapon and, at the suggestion of tankers, the designers developed self-propelled guns based on heavy IS-2 tanks, and armor-piercing shells were added to the ammunition load of heavy self-propelled mounts ISU-122 and ISU-152, which allowed, at the final stage of the war , hit almost all types of German tanks and self-propelled guns. Light self-propelled guns were developed in the design bureau under the leadership of S.A. Ginzburg (SU-76); L.L. Terentiev and M.N. Shchukin (SU-76 M); medium - in design bureaus under the leadership of N.V. Kurina, L.I. Gorlitsky, A.N. Balashova, V.N. Sidorenko (SU-122, SU-85, SU-100); heavy - in the design bureau under the leadership of Zh.Ya. Kotina, S.N. Makhonina, L.S. Troyanova, S.P. Gurenko, F.F. Petrov (SU-152, ISU-152, ISU-122).

In January 1943, the formation of tank armies of a homogeneous composition began in the Red Army - the 1st and 2nd tank armies appeared, and by the summer of that year, the Red Army already had five tank armies, which consisted of two tank and one mechanized corps. Now armored and mechanized troops included: tank armies, tank and mechanized corps, tank and mechanized brigades and regiments.

During the war, Soviet armored vehicles were not inferior to Wehrmacht equipment, and often surpassed it both qualitatively and quantitatively. Already in 1942, 24,504 tanks and self-propelled guns were produced in the USSR, i.e. four times more than the German industry produced in the same year (5953 tanks and self-propelled guns). Given the failures of the first period of the war, this was a real feat of Soviet tank builders.

Colonel General of the Engineering and Technical Service Zh.Ya. Kotin noted that an invaluable feature of the Soviet school of tank building played a huge role in this - the maximum possible simplicity of design, the desire for the complex only if the same effect cannot be achieved by simple means.

The number of Soviet tanks participating in operations was constantly increasing: 780 tanks participated in the Moscow battle (1941-1942), 979 tanks participated in the Stalingrad battle (1942-1943), 5200 tanks participated in the Belarusian strategic offensive operation (1944), and 5200 tanks participated in the Berlin operation (1945) - 6250 tanks and self-propelled guns. According to the Chief of the General Staff of the Red Army, General of the Army A.I. Antonova, “... the second half of the war was marked by the predominance of our tanks and self-propelled artillery on the battlefields. This allowed us to carry out operational maneuvers on a huge scale, to surround large enemy groupings, to pursue him until complete destruction.

In total, in 1941 - 1945, the Soviet tank industry gave the front 103,170 tanks and self-propelled guns (the latter - 22,500, of which more than 2,000 were medium-sized, and more than 4,200 were heavy), Of this amount, light tanks accounted for 18.8%, medium - 70.4% (T-34 with a 76-mm cannon - 36,331, and with an 85-mm cannon - another 17,898 tanks) and heavy - 10.8%.

During the fighting, about 430,000 combat vehicles were returned to service after repairs in the field or at the factory, that is, each tank manufactured by the industry was repaired and restored on average more than four times.

Along with the mass production of armored vehicles during the Great Patriotic War, the Red Army received tanks and self-propelled guns that came from Great Britain, Canada and the USA under Lend-Lease. The transportation of armored vehicles was carried out mainly along three routes: the northern one - through the Atlantic and the Barents Sea, the southern one - through the Indian Ocean, the Persian Gulf and Iran, the eastern one - through the Pacific Ocean. The first transport with tanks arrived in the USSR from Great Britain in September 1941. And by the beginning of 1942, the Red Army received 750 British and 180 American tanks. Many of them were used in the battle near Moscow in the winter of 1941-1942. In total, the years of the Great Patriotic War for the Soviet Union, according to Western sources, 3805 tanks were shipped to Great Britain, including 2394 Valentine, 1084 Matilda, 301 Churchill, 20 Tetrarch, 6 Cromwell. To these should be added 25 Valentine bridge tanks. Canada provided the USSR with 1,388 Valentine tanks. In the United States, 7172 tanks were loaded on ships under Lend-Lease, including 1676 light MZA1, 7 light M5 and M24, 1386 medium MZAZ, 4102 medium M4A2, one M26, as well as 707 anti-tank self-propelled guns (mainly M10 and M18), 1100 anti-aircraft self-propelled guns (M15, M16 and M 17), and 6666 armored personnel carriers. However, not all of these machines took part in the hostilities. So, under the blows of the German fleet and aviation, along with the ships of the Arctic convoys, 860 American and 615 British tanks were sent to the seabed. With a fairly high degree of certainty, we can say that 18,566 units of armored vehicles were delivered to the USSR during the four years of the war, of which: 10,395 tanks, 6,242 armored personnel carriers, 1,802 self-propelled guns and 127 armored vehicles, which were used in units, formations and training units of the Red Army.

Soviet tankers during the Great Patriotic War showed examples of the effective use of armored weapons, although the enemy was strong and had very powerful military equipment. The motherland duly noted the feat of Soviet tankers: in their ranks there were 1150 Heroes of the Soviet Union (including 16 twice Heroes), and more than 250,000 were awarded orders and medals. On July 1, 1946, by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the professional holiday "Tankman's Day" was established - to commemorate the great merits of armored and mechanized troops in defeating the enemy during the Great Patriotic War, as well as for the merits of tank builders in equipping the country's Armed Forces with armored vehicles. It is deeply symbolic that the legendary T-34 tank was often installed on the pedestals of monuments in honor of the liberation of Soviet cities from Nazi captivity, and many of the Soviet tanks of that time took their place of honor in many domestic museums.

In its modern form, the armored forces represent the main striking force of the Ground Forces, being a powerful means of armed struggle designed to solve the most important tasks in various types of military operations. The significance of tank troops as one of the main arms of the Ground Forces will continue in the foreseeable future. At the same time, the tank will retain its role as the leading universal combat weapon of the Ground Forces. In the post-war years, numerous modern models of tanks, self-propelled artillery mounts, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles and airborne combat vehicles, which embodied the latest achievements of domestic science and technology, entered service with the armored forces.

The German army, our main enemy during the Great Patriotic War, had very powerful armored forces (Panzerwaffe). The Versailles Peace Treaty of 1919 forbade Germany to have tank troops and produce armored vehicles. However, in violation of its terms, already at the end of the 1920s, the Germans began to secretly work in the field of tank building, and with the coming to power of Hitler in January 1933, all the restrictions of the Versailles Treaty were discarded, and in Germany the creation of a mass army began at an accelerated pace. A special place in it was intended for tanks.

The initiator of the construction of armored forces and the theorist of their use in the war was General G. Guderian. According to his views, tanks should have been used massively as part of large mechanized strike formations in cooperation with other branches of the armed forces, primarily with aviation. Having broken through the enemy defenses, and without waiting for the infantry, the tanks must enter the operational space, smash the rear, disrupting communications and paralyzing the work of enemy headquarters. He listed the advantages of tanks in the following order: mobility, weapons, armor and communications.

The German Panzerwaffe became the basis of the "blitzkrieg" during the Second World War, constituting the main strike force of the Ground Forces of the Third Reich. The Wehrmacht abandoned the division of tanks according to purpose - into infantry and cruising. Tanks, consolidated into large formations, were supposed to perform any functions if necessary: ​​both infantry escort tanks and success development tanks. Although the complete rejection of relatively small tank units designed for close interaction with infantry formations and units also cannot be considered successful. In the Wehrmacht, they switched (similar to the Red Army) to the division of tanks into light, medium and heavy. But if in the USSR only the mass of the tank was such a criterion, then in Germany tanks were divided into classes for a long time, both in terms of mass and armament. For example, the original tank Pz. Krfw. IV was considered as a heavy combat vehicle, based on its armament - a 75-mm gun - and was considered as such until the summer of 1943.

All tanks that entered service with the Wehrmacht received the letter abbreviation Pz. Krfw. (short for Panzegkampfwagen - armored fighting vehicle) and serial number. Modifications were designated by letters of the Latin alphabet and the abbreviation Ausf. - (abbr. Ausfuhrung - model, option). Command tanks were designated Рz.Bf.Wg. (Panzerbefehlswagen). Simultaneously with this type of designation, a through system was also used for all Wehrmacht mobile vehicles. According to the through system, most of the Wehrmacht armored vehicles (with some exceptions) received the designation Sd. Kfz. (abbr. Sonderkraftfahrzeug - special purpose vehicle) and serial number.

Self-propelled artillery mounts, considered as a means of reinforcing infantry and tanks on the battlefield, were designated differently, since the Wehrmacht and the SS troops had a large number of their classes and types. Assault guns had their own designation system, self-propelled howitzers, ZSU and anti-tank installations had their own. At the same time, the official designation of almost any self-propelled guns, as a rule, included information about the tank chassis on the basis of which it was created. Like tanks, most self-propelled artillery mounts also had end-to-end indexes with serial numbers in the Sd system. Kfz. The classification of Wehrmacht self-propelled artillery installations differed in several main classes: assault guns (Sturmgeschutz; StuG); assault howitzers (Sturmhaubitze; StuH); self-propelled carriages and chassis (Selbstfahrlafetten; Sf.); assault infantry guns (Sturminfanteriengeschutz; StuIG); assault tanks (Sturmpanzer; StuPz.); tank destroyers / self-propelled anti-tank guns (Panzerjager, Pz.Jg; Jagdpanzer Jgd.Pz); howitzer self-propelled guns (Panzerhaubitze; Рz.Н); self-propelled anti-aircraft installations (Flakpanzer, Fl.Pz). The disorder with classification and designations was aggravated by the fact that machines of one of the types, after modernization and changes in their design, acquired completely different properties, the so-called. 75mm StuG assault gun. III, which after the installation of a 75-mm long-barreled gun in it, actually turned into a tank destroyer, but continued to be listed as an assault gun. The Marder self-propelled anti-tank guns also underwent a change in designation, instead of the original "Pak Slf" (self-propelled anti-tank gun), they became known as the "Ranzerjager" (tank destroyer).

The first mass-produced German tank was the light Pz. Krfw. I, which entered the troops in 1934. The following year, the second light tank Pz appeared. Krfw. II. These machines were tested in combat conditions during the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939.

The creation of medium tanks in Germany was delayed due to unsteady tactical and technical requirements for them, although some firms started developing a prototype with a 75-mm gun back in 1934. Guderian considered it necessary to have two types of medium tanks: the main one (Pz. Krfw. III) with a 37-mm cannon and a support tank with a 75-mm short-barreled gun (Pz. Krfw. IV). Production of tanks Rz. Krfw. III and Pz. Krfw. IV began only in 1938.

After the capture of the Czech Republic, in March 1939, the Wehrmacht received more than 400 modern Czech tanks LT-35 (Pz. Krfw. 35 (t)). In addition, the German tank forces were significantly strengthened by the LT-38 tanks (Pz.Krfw. 38 (t)) produced in occupied Moravia, but already under German orders, which had higher combat characteristics than the Pz tanks. Krfw. I and Rz. Krfw. II.

On September 1, 1939, the Wehrmacht tank fleet in combat, training units and bases consisted of 3195 vehicles. There were about 2800 of them in the active army.

German losses in armored vehicles during the Polish campaign were small (198 destroyed and 361 damaged) and were quickly replenished by industry. As a result of the September (1939) battles, Guderian demanded to strengthen the armor and firepower of tanks and increase the production of Pz. Krfw. W and Rz. Krfw. IV. By the beginning of the campaign in France (May 10, 1940), 5 German tank corps had 2580 tanks. The British and French tanks were superior to the enemy in terms of armor and armament, but the German tank troops had higher training and combat experience, and were also better controlled. They were used massively, while the allies fought tank battles in small groups, sometimes not having close interaction either with each other or with the infantry. The victory went to the German shock groups.

To attack the Soviet Union, the German command, consisting of 17 tank divisions, concentrated 3582 tanks and self-propelled guns. These included 1698 light tanks: 180 Rz. Krfw. I; 746 Rz. Krfw. II; 149 Rz. 35(t); 623 Rz. 38(t) and 1404 medium tanks: 965 Рz. Krfw. III; 439 Rz. Krfw. IV, as well as 250 assault guns. The troops had another 230 command tanks that did not have cannon weapons. The fighting on the Soviet-German front revealed a number of technical shortcomings of German tanks. Their cross-country ability and mobility on the ground turned out to be low. In terms of armament and armor, they were significantly inferior to the Soviet T-34 and KV. It became clear to the Wehrmacht command that the troops needed stronger vehicles. While the development of new medium and heavy tanks was underway, the re-equipment of the Pz began. Krfw. IV (a long-barreled 75-mm cannon was installed with simultaneous strengthening of its armor). This temporarily equalized it with Soviet tanks in terms of armament and armor. But according to the rest of the data, the T-34 retained its superiority.

Even at the height of World War II, the Germans did not immediately begin to speed up the production of military equipment, but only when the specter of defeat loomed before them. At the same time, in the course of hostilities, the material part of the German tank forces was continuously improved qualitatively and grew quantitatively. Since 1943, the Germans began to massively use the Pz medium tank on the battlefields. Krfw. V "Panther" and heavy Rz. Krfw. VI "Tiger". In these new tanks of the Wehrmacht, weapons were better worked out, and their disadvantage was, first of all, a large mass. Thick armor did not save the Wehrmacht vehicles from the shells of Soviet guns mounted on T-34-85 and IS-2 tanks and SU-100 and ISU-122 self-propelled guns. In order to gain superiority over the Soviet IS-2 tank, in 1944 a new heavy tank Pz.Krfw was created. VI In "Royal Tiger". It was the heaviest production tank of World War II. During the war, German industry began to produce more and more self-propelled artillery mounts for various purposes. As the Wehrmacht moved to defensive operations, the proportion of self-propelled artillery grew in comparison with tanks. In 1943, the production of self-propelled guns exceeded the production of tanks, and in the last months of the war it tripled. On the Soviet-German front at different times there were approximately 65 to 80% of the armored vehicles of the Wehrmacht.

If the armored vehicles of Germany, created in the period 1934 - 1940, were mainly distinguished by high reliability, simplicity and ease of maintenance and operation, ease of control, then the equipment created during the war years could no longer boast of such indicators. Haste and haste in the development and launch of the tanks Pz.Krfw.V "Panther", Pz.Krfw.VI Ausf.E "Tiger" and Pz.Krfw.VI Ausf. B ("Royal Tiger") had a negative impact on their reliability and performance, especially the Panther and Royal Tiger tanks. In addition, the Wehrmacht also used captured armored vehicles, but in rather limited quantities. Captured tanks, as a rule, were outdated and of little value to the front (except for the Czechoslovak LT-38 model). The Wehrmacht used them in secondary theaters of operations, for the occupying forces and the fight against partisans, as well as for the training of tankers.

Captured equipment was also used for conversion into self-propelled artillery mounts, armored personnel carriers for the delivery of ammunition, etc. All the factories of the European states occupied by the Germans also worked for the German Wehrmacht. Two large Czech factories "Skoda" (Pilsen) and SKD (Prague), renamed VMM, produced tanks and self-propelled guns based on them until the end of the war. In total, Czech factories produced more than 6,000 tanks and self-propelled guns. French tank-building factories were involved mainly in the conversion of captured French tanks, their repair or the manufacture of some spare parts for them, but not a single new tank or self-propelled guns was assembled there. In Austria, annexed during the Anschluss of 1938 to the Third Reich, during the Second World War, the Niebelungwerke tank assembly plant (Steyr-Daimler-Puch) was established in St. Valentine. Its products were included in the total production of factories in Germany. After the capitulation of Italy in 1943, its territory was partially occupied by German troops. Some tank-building factories in northern Italy, for example, Fiat-Ansaldo (Turin), continued to produce tanks and self-propelled guns for German formations operating in Italy. In 1943 - 1945 they produced more than 400 cars. In total, from September 1939 to March 1945, German industry produced about 46,000 tanks and self-propelled guns, with the latter accounting for more than 22,100 units. In addition to these vehicles, in Germany during the Second World War, tracked, wheeled and half-tracked armored personnel carriers, armored vehicles, tractor-transporters were also produced.

The first English Mk V tanks arrived in Japan in 1918, and in 1921 - Mk A tanks and French Renault FT 17. In 1925, two tank companies were formed from these vehicles. The Japanese began their own tank building only in 1927, when several prototypes of multi-turreted tanks weighing about 20 tons were created. In the same years, the British Vickers-6-ton tanks and the Karden-Loyd MkVI tankette, the French Renault NC1 tanks were purchased (the latter were in service until 1940 under the designation "Otsu"). On their basis, Japanese firms began developing tankettes and light tanks.

In 1931-1936, a medium tank type 89 was produced in small batches. This designation of military equipment was adopted in the armed forces based on the Japanese chronology, according to which the Japanese year 2589 corresponded to 1929 of the Gregorian calendar. In 1933, the leadership of Japan and the military command decided to mechanize the Japanese army and issued corresponding orders to industry. At first, Japanese designers preferred wedges. The first of these was the Type 92 (1932), followed by the Type 94 ultra-small tank (1934) and the Type 97 "Te-ke" small tank (1937). In total, more than 1000 tankettes were built until 1937. However, further production of this class of vehicles ceased due to their low combat qualities, although it was in Japan that the wedge design reached its greatest development.

Since the mid-1930s, the Japanese tank building industry has completely switched to the development of light and medium vehicles. In 1935, the most massive light tank "Ha-go" was created, and in 1937 - the medium "Chi-ha". The latter, until the end of World War II, was the main model of the Japanese armored forces. In 1937, the pace of tank production increased in connection with deliveries to the Kwantung Army in Manchuria. At the same time, the Ha-go and Chi-ha machines were modernized. In the mid-1930s, the command of the Japanese army for the first time showed interest in the production of amphibious tanks, which were necessary for the implementation of amphibious assault operations in a future war. At this time, samples of amphibious tanks are being developed.

Japanese tank building in the 1920s and 1930s is characterized by a thorough study of foreign experience; hobby for wedges; concentration of efforts on the creation of light and medium tanks for arming the Kwantung Army in China, as well as, starting from 1933, the use of diesel engines in tanks. Japanese tanks were tested in combat during the fighting in the 1930s and early 1940s in the Far East against Chinese and Mongolian troops, as well as units of the Red Army. The experience gained in the combat use of tanks made Japanese designers, first of all, look for ways to increase their firepower and armor protection. In total, in 1931 - 1939, the Japanese industry produced 2020 tanks. 16 samples were developed, including 7 serial ones.

With the outbreak of war in Europe, the production of tanks in Japan was gaining momentum: in 1940, 1023 vehicles were manufactured, in 1941 - 1024. Taking into account the country's insular position, the Japanese military leadership did not seek to build up its tank and troops. In the manual for training troops published in 1935, it was noted: "The main purpose of tanks is to fight in close cooperation with the infantry." From a tactical point of view, tanks were considered only as a means of supporting infantry and were reduced to small units. Their main tasks were considered to be: combating firing points and field artillery and making passages for infantry in barriers. Tanks could be sent on “close raids” beyond the front line of the enemy’s defense to a depth of no more than 600 m. At the same time, having violated his defense system, they had to return to their infantry and support its attack. The most maneuverable type of fighting was "deep raids" with cavalry, motorized infantry in vehicles, sappers and field artillery. In defense, tanks were used to carry out frequent counterattacks (mostly at night) or to fire from an ambush. The fight against enemy tanks was allowed only when absolutely necessary. In November 1941, according to the operational plan of the headquarters, the main forces of the fleet and aviation were involved in the capture of the Philippine Islands, Malaya, Burma and other territories, and 11 infantry divisions and only 9 tank regiments were allocated from the ground forces.

By December 1941, the tank fleet of the Japanese army consisted of about 2,000 vehicles: mainly Hago light tanks and tankettes, there were several hundred Chi-ha medium tanks. Since 1940, the main tanks "Ha-go" and "Chi-ha" have been modernized. As a result, the Ke-nu light tank and the Chi-he medium tank were built in appreciable quantities during the war years. In 1942, the designers created the Ka-mi amphibious tank, which experts consider to be the best example in the history of Japanese tank building. But its release was extremely limited. In the same year, a limited number of self-propelled artillery mounts went into the Japanese army to fight the allied tanks and support their troops.

Japanese tanks had weak weapons and armor, satisfactory mobility, and were also not reliable enough and did not have good means of observation and communication. In terms of armament, protection and other characteristics, these vehicles lagged behind the models of other warring countries. Therefore, by the end of the war, Japanese instructions already considered tanks as one of the most effective anti-tank weapons, and tanks were often buried in the ground in defense. The main feature of Japanese tank building was the widespread use of diesel engines. During the war, Japanese tank building experienced a constant shortage of raw materials (steel) and skilled labor. The production of tanks in Japan reached its maximum level in 1942 and then began to fall. In total, Japanese industry produced 2377 tanks and 147 self-propelled guns in 1942-1945.

The Central Museum of the Great Patriotic War is persistently working to identify and collect material evidence of the heroic and tragic past. With each subsequent year after the war, it becomes more and more difficult to carry out work on completing their collections with new models of armored vehicles. Currently, the museum has tanks and other armored objects of domestic production of the pre-war, military and post-war periods of production. This makes it possible to reveal the main stages of domestic tank building, to show the hard work of workers, engineers, designers, technologists, production organizers, all home front workers in achieving Victory in incredibly difficult conditions.

The collection of armored vehicles of the USSR, Great Britain, USA, Germany and Japan has been created by the museum staff since 1990. Great assistance in this work was provided by the Main Armored Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the leadership of the Border Troops of the FSB of Russia, military-patriotic public associations, search groups, veteran organizations of tankers. The museum recreates the missing samples of armored vehicles by building their models from the preserved fragments found by the search teams. In this way, the layout of the heavy tank KV-1, models of Japanese tanks was recreated. A number of exhibits were restored by specialists of the 38th Research and Testing Institute of Armored Vehicles of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation before they were placed at the arms exhibition.

Military equipment from the Great Patriotic War, installed as monuments and museum exhibits in St. Petersburg.

Wall newspapers of the charitable educational project "Briefly and clearly about the most interesting" (website website) are intended for schoolchildren, parents and teachers of St. Petersburg. They are delivered free of charge to most educational institutions, as well as to a number of hospitals, orphanages and other institutions in the city. The publications of the project do not contain any advertising (only logos of the founders), politically and religiously neutral, written in easy language, well illustrated. They are conceived as an information "slowdown" of students, the awakening of cognitive activity and the desire to read. Authors and publishers, without claiming to be academically complete in the presentation of the material, publish interesting facts, illustrations, interviews with famous figures of science and culture, and thereby hope to increase the interest of schoolchildren in the educational process. Please send comments and suggestions to: [email protected] We thank the Department of Education of the Administration of the Kirovsky District of St. Petersburg and everyone who selflessly helps in distributing our wall newspapers. We thank the project "Book of Memory", the Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineer and Signal Corps, the Museum and Exhibition Complex "Sestroretsky Frontier" and Sergey Sharov for the materials provided in the issue. Many thanks to Alexei Shvarev and Denis Chaliapin for valuable comments.

This issue is dedicated to military equipment that fought on the fields of the Great Patriotic War, and is now installed as monuments on the territory of St. Petersburg. With the help of these tanks, ships, aircraft and guns, the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union defeated Nazi Germany, driving the enemy out of our country and freeing the peoples of Europe. These combat vehicles (and some of them remained in single copies) are worthy of being carefully preserved, studied, remembered and proud of them. The issue was prepared in cooperation with the Book of Memory project, whose task is to find and systematize all the monuments dedicated to the events of the Second World War of 1939-1945 in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. Post-war monuments have remained “behind the scenes” of the newspaper: the T-80 tank on the Oil Road, the “rocket train” in the Museum of Railway Engineering, the S-189 submarine on the Lieutenant Schmidt Embankment, the MIG-19 aircraft in the Aviators’ Park , the Triton-2M submarine in Kronstadt and some others. And we plan to devote a separate newspaper to the military equipment installed on pedestals in the Leningrad Region. Also in a separate issue we will talk about the extensive collection of the Artillery Museum on Kronverksky Island.

Admiralteisky district

1. 305 mm railway artillery mount

Photo: Vitaly V. Kuzmin

The Museum of Railway Technology at the former Varshavsky railway station exhibits many unique exhibits. One of the most interesting is a huge weapon. The explanatory plate says: “Railway artillery installation TM-3-12. Gun caliber - 305 mm. The maximum firing range is 30 km. Rate of fire - 2 shots per minute. Weight - 340 tons. Built at the Nikolaev State Plant in 1938. In total, 3 installations of this type were built, while guns dismantled from the battleship Empress Maria were used. Participated in the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-1940. From June to December 1941, they took part in the defense of the Soviet naval base on the Hanko Peninsula (Finland). Disabled by Soviet sailors during the evacuation of the base, subsequently restored by Finnish specialists using the guns of the Russian battleship Alexander III. They were in service until 1991, decommissioned in 1999. The installation arrived at the museum in February 2000.” The same artillery transporter is in the Moscow Museum on Poklonnaya Hill. Address: Obvodny Canal Embankment, 118, Museum of Railway Engineering.

2. Railway armored platform

This 22-ton armored platform was made in 1935. During the Great Patriotic War, such armored platforms equipped with anti-aircraft guns or machine guns were used to protect trains from attacks by enemy aircraft. Address: Obvodny Canal Embankment, 118, Museum of Railway Engineering.

Vasileostrovskiy district

3. Icebreaker "Krasin"

Photo: website, Georgy Popov

The icebreaker "Krasin" (until 1927 - "Svyatogor") was built in 1916 in England by order of the Russian government. For several decades, it was the most powerful Arctic icebreaker in the world. In 1928, the Krasin rescued the surviving members of the expedition to the North Pole on the airship Italia, which crashed off the coast of Svalbard. After that, "Krasin" became known throughout the world. During the Second World War, the famous icebreaker acquired naval artillery and paved the way for the "polar convoys". That was the name of the caravans of ships with military and civilian cargo that our allies (USA and Great Britain) sent to the USSR. Dozens of ships led "Krasin" through the ice of the Kara Sea, the Laptev Sea and the White Sea. Over 300 Krasinsk residents received government awards for courage and bravery shown during the escort during the war years. Since 2004, the icebreaker has been a branch of the Museum of the World Ocean. Address: Lieutenant Schmidt embankment near the 23rd line of Vasilyevsky Island.

4. Towers of the main caliber of the cruiser "Kirov"

Photo: website, Georgy Popov

The Soviet light artillery cruiser "Kirov" was built at the Baltic Shipyard No. 189 in Leningrad and launched in 1936. On the very first day of the war, it repelled an air raid on Riga with an anti-aircraft caliber, then massive air raids on the Main Base of the Baltic Fleet in Tallinn. After the relocation of the Baltic Fleet squadron to Kronstadt and until the end of the war, the Kirov remained the flagship (this is the name of the ship on which the commander is located). Actively participated in the defense of Leningrad. In total, during the war, "Kirov" repelled the attacks of 347 enemy aircraft. In 1942-44, he occupied a position mainly between the Palace Bridge and the Lieutenant Schmidt Bridge, from where he conducted live firing. At the end of the war, with its main caliber, it supported the offensive operations of our army. 100-kilogram shells fired from triple guns 10 meters long hit the target at a record distance of 40 kilometers for those times. More than a thousand crew members were awarded government awards for heroism and courage. In 1961, the Kirov was retrained as a training ship and regularly made trips with cadets in the Baltic Sea. After the ship was excluded from the lists of the fleet in 1974, it was decided to install its two bow 180-mm towers and propellers as a Memorial to the feat of the sailors of the Baltic Fleet. Installed in 1990. Address: Sea embankment, 15-17.

5. Torpedo boat project "Komsomolets"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Leonid Maslov

Although this boat on a granite pedestal is post-war, it was installed in memory of the feat of sailors of torpedo boats of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet in the Great Patriotic War. Similar torpedo boats of the Komsomolets project of the Baltic Fleet sank 119 enemy ships and vessels during the war years. Installed in 1973. Address: Harbour, the territory of the exhibition complex "Lenexpo", Bolshoy Prospekt Vasilyevsky Island, 103.

6. Submarine "Narodovolets"

Photo: website, Georgy Popov

This diesel-electric torpedo submarine was built at the Baltic Shipyard No. 189 in Leningrad in 1929. At first, such boats were called "Narodovolets", then they were renamed "D-2" (according to the first letter of the name of the lead ship - "Decembrist"). The boat took a direct part in the battles of the Great Patriotic War. The first ships sunk by her were a transport with a cargo of coal and a sea ferry. After the end of the war, the boat continued to serve in the Baltic Fleet, and then was based in Kronstadt as a training station. In 1989, after restoration work, the boat was installed on the shore as a monument to the heroic submariners, scientists, designers and shipbuilders of the Great Patriotic War. The Submarine Museum opened in 1994. Address: Shkiperskiy protok, 10.

Vyborgsky district

7. "Katyusha"

This legendary Katyusha (multiple launch rocket system based on a 6-wheeled 4-ton ZIS-6 off-road truck) is a monument to the military and labor glory of the Karl Marx Machine-Building Association, on whose territory it was installed. At the enterprise, which traditionally produced spinning machines for cotton and wool, with the beginning of the war they began to make ammunition and weapons, including Katyushas. On a granite pedestal there is an inscription: "To you who left here for the front, to you who remained to forge the weapons of Victory, to the soldiers and workers of the Great Patriotic War, this monument will be erected." To the right and left behind the car are bronze groups of soldiers and workers. The monument was opened in 1985. Address: Bolshoi Sampsonievsky prospect, 68.

8. Cannon "ZIS-3" on Courage Square

Photo: lenww2.ru, Olga Isaeva

A memorial composition consisting of the legendary ZIS-3 cannon of the 1942 model and four anti-tank "hedgehogs". The flowers on the pedestal are planted in the form of the inscription "Remember". The 76-mm ZIS-3 divisional gun became the most massive Soviet artillery gun produced during the Great Patriotic War (a total of 103,000 guns were fired). This gun is also recognized by experts as one of the best guns of the entire Second World War due to its outstanding qualities, economy and simplicity. In the post-war period, the ZIS-3 was in service with the Soviet Army for a long time, and was also actively exported to a number of countries, in some of which it is still in service. The memorial was opened in 2011. Address: Courage Square.

Kalininsky district

9. Cannon "ZIS-3" on Metallistov Avenue

Photo: lenww2.ru, Olga Isaeva

During the war years, in the building of the North-West Regional Center of the Ministry of Emergency Situations (Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Disaster Relief), there was a school of MPVO (local air defense) and artillery courses. In honor of this, a 76-mm ZIS-3 cannon was installed on a granite slab in the park in front of the building, which participated in the defense of Leningrad. Eight stars are drawn on the shield of the gun - according to the number of enemy aircraft shot down. To the left of the gun, on a separate granite pedestal, there is a symbolic open book, on the pages of which St. Isaac's Cathedral is depicted during the Siege and the Victory salute. Address: Metallistov Avenue, 119.

Kirovsky district

10. Tank "IS-2" on the territory of the Kirov plant

Photo: website, Georgy Popov

On the territory of the Kirovsky Zavod association there is an IS-2 tank, produced at the end of the war in Chelyabinsk. On a pedestal of granite blocks there is a bronze plaque with the text: “1941–1945. This heavy tank was installed here in memory of the glorious deeds of the tank builders of the Kirov Plant. "IS-2" was the most powerful and most armored of the Soviet serial tanks of the war period and one of the strongest tanks at that time in the world. These tanks have been produced since 1943 at the Chelyabinsk Kirov plant, created in the shortest possible time on the basis of equipment evacuated from Leningrad. Tanks of this type played a big role in the battles of 1944-1945, especially distinguishing themselves during the storming of cities. After the end of the war, the IS-2s were modernized and were in service with the Soviet and Russian armies until 1995. The memorial was opened in 1952. Address: Stachek Avenue, 47.

11. KV-85 tank on Stachek Avenue

Photo: website, Georgy Popov

This copy (one of the two known surviving ones) of the KV-85 tank was installed in 1951 at the initiative of the tank designer Joseph Kotin. "Tank-winner" is part of the Kirovsky Val memorial, which is part of the "Green Belt of Glory of Leningrad". The heavy tank "KV" ("Klim Voroshilov") was produced at the Chelyabinsk Tank Plant from 1939 to 1942 and had no equal for a long time. Index "85" means the caliber of the gun in millimeters. Shells fired from standard German anti-tank guns bounced off him, leaving no damage to his armor. It was produced only in August-October 1943. A total of 148 machines of this type were manufactured. The forerunner of the IS heavy tank. Address: Stachek Avenue, 106-108.

12. Izhora Tower on Korabelnaya Street

Near the well-preserved bunker (Long-term firing point), the so-called Izhora Tower was installed - a machine-gun armored turret for the Maxim heavy machine gun of the 1910-1930 model. The tower was found by search engines on the Karelian Isthmus near the Yatka River. Armor thickness - 3 centimeters, weight about 500 kilograms. Such machine-gun armored turrets were produced by the Izhora plant and were actively used on the defense lines of Leningrad. The memorial appeared here in 2011 with the support of the administration of the Kirovsky district. Address: Korabelnaya street, in the square at the intersection with Kronstadtskaya street.

Kolpinsky district

13. "Izhora Tower" in Kolpino

Photo: lenww2.ru, Alexey Sedelnikov

The same armored tower was installed in Kolpino as part of the memorial "To the Armored Workers of the Izhora Plants". The armored tower had lain in the Sinyavino swamps for more than 50 years and was found by the Zvezda search team. It has marks from artillery shell fragments. The inscriptions on the stone, also brought from Sinyavino, read: “A low bow to all the creators of Russian armor at the Izhora factories” and “A memorial sign to the Armored Workers of the Izhora factories” was installed in the year of the 100th anniversary of the birth of M.I. Koshkin, the general designer of the tank “ T-34"". Mikhail Koshkin insisted that the turret of his famous tank should also be made of heavy-duty armor cast using the Izhora technology. The memorial was erected in 1998. Address: Kolpino, at the intersection of Proletarskaya Street and Tankistov Street.

Krasnogvardeisky district

14. 406-mm gun at the Rzhev range

The barrel length of this unique B-37 cannon is 16 meters, a two-meter projectile for it weighs more than a ton, and the firing range is 45 kilometers. A plate is attached to the armored turret: “406-mm gun mount of the Navy of the USSR. This weapon of the Red Banner NIMAP (Scientific and Testing Naval Artillery Range) from August 29, 1941 to June 10, 1944 took an active part in the defense of Leningrad and the defeat of the enemy. With well-aimed fire, it destroyed powerful strongholds and nodes of resistance, destroyed military equipment and manpower of the enemy, supported the actions of the Red Army units of the Leningrad Front and the Red Banner Baltic Fleet in the Nevsky, Kolpinsky, Uritsko-Pushkinsky, Krasnoselsky and Karelian directions. Clarification from the NIMAP website: “In January 1944, during the breakthrough of the blockade of Leningrad, 33 shells were fired at the enemy from this gun. One of the shells hit the building of power plant No. 8, occupied by the enemy. As a result of the hit, the building was completely destroyed. A crater from a 406-mm projectile with a diameter of 12 m and a depth of 3 m was found nearby. This experimental installation was the most powerful Soviet artillery system used during the Second World War. It was planned to equip four Sovetsky Soyuz-type battleships laid down in 1939–1940 with such guns in three-gun turrets. In connection with the outbreak of war, none of the ships of this project could not be built.

15. 305-mm gun at the Rzhev range

Photo: aroundspb.ru, Sergey Sharov

This naval cannon was made at the Obukhov plant in 1914 on a Zhuravl-type proving ground. Four of these guns were one of the batteries of the Krasnaya Gorka fort during the Great Patriotic War. Two such former Russian guns are today in Finland, and only one has survived in Russia - this. Text on the memorial plaque: "From August 29, 1941 to June 10, 1944, a 305-mm naval gun mount fired on Nazi troops during the defense of Leningrad." The most powerful weapon ever mass-produced on ships of the Russian or Soviet navy. The Rzhev test site called "experimental artillery battery" was established more than a century and a half ago with the aim of testing new types of guns. Over time, the battery turned into the main artillery range of Tsarist Russia, and then the Soviet Union. The Scientific and Testing Naval Artillery Range (NIMAP) today occupies a significant area northeast of St. Petersburg. Unique artillery pieces that participated in the defense of Leningrad during the Great Patriotic War are stored here. So far, the territory of the landfill is closed to the public, but the issue of assigning the status of monuments of history and culture of the Russian Federation to these famous guns is being discussed.

16. Anti-aircraft gun "52-K"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Alexey Sedelnikov

The 85-mm anti-aircraft gun of the 1939 model "52-K" is an exhibit of the State Museum of the History of St. Petersburg. This blockade military weapon, together with the memorial sign "Regulator" is part of the memorial complex "Road of Life - 1st kilometer". The memorial was erected in 2010. Address: Ryabovskoe highway, near the house 129.

Krasnoselsky district

17. Aircraft, tank and anti-aircraft guns in the village of Khvoyny

Photo: lenww2.ru, Alexey Sedelnikov

The village of Khvoyny is a "piece" of the Krasnoselsky district of St. Petersburg, surrounded on all sides by the territory of the Gatchinsky district of the Leningrad region. This is an active military unit, but the passage to the memorial is free. On the stele with a bas-relief depicting besieged Leningrad, there is a quote from the speech of L.I. Brezhnev (the leader of the USSR in 1966-1982) when Leningrad was awarded the "Gold Star of the Hero": "... Legends of gray antiquity and tragic pages of the not so distant past pale before that an incomparable epic of human courage, steadfastness and selfless patriotism, which was the heroic 900-day defense of besieged Leningrad during the Great Patriotic War. It was one of the most outstanding, most amazing mass feats of the people and the army in the entire history of wars on earth. Nearby on the site there is a T-34/85 tank (1944) with the inscription "For the Motherland", a 130-mm anti-aircraft gun KS-30 (1948) and a model of the Yak-50P aircraft. Under the anti-aircraft gun there is a memorial plaque with the inscription: “To the anti-aircraft gunners who defended Leningrad during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945. Leningrad was saved by the courage of the brave. Eternal glory to the heroes."

Kronstadt district

18. Torpedo boat project "Komsomolets"

Photo: wikipedia.org, Vasyatka1

Post-war torpedo boat of the Komsomolets project, similar to the one installed in Gavan. Here, in the area of ​​the former Litke base, torpedo boats were based during the war. The armament of the boat is clearly visible - two 450-mm torpedo tubes and aft twin installation of 14.5-mm machine guns. "To sailors-katerniks of the Baltic" - it is written on the plate. A square was laid out around the monument, lindens were planted. Historical reference of the newspaper "Kronstadt Bulletin": "During the Great Patriotic War, in the fighting of surface ships in the waters of the shallow Gulf of Finland, which was completely littered with mines, the Baltic boat crews of torpedo boat brigades mainly participated. They were fearless and daring, and their attacks inflicted great damage on the enemy. And many commanders of these small but formidable ships became Heroes of the Soviet Union. Both during the war and decades after it, minesweeping brigades worked in the Gulf of Finland, stuffed with mines, which included special flat-bottomed boats - minesweepers. More than ten such ships and more than a hundred sailors perished in the course of operations to clear the fairways. In memory of the courage and dedication of boat sailors, this sign is established. The memorial was opened in 2009. Address: Kronstadt, Gidrostroiteley street, 10.

19. Artillery installation of the battleship "Gangut"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Oleg Ivanov

76-mm two-gun artillery mount 81-K of the battleship "Gangut" (after 1925 the battleship was called the "October Revolution"). "Gangut" was laid down in 1909 at the Admiralty Shipyard in St. Petersburg under the leadership of the outstanding Russian shipbuilder A.N. Krylov. He took part in the First World War. During the Great Patriotic War, he participated in the defense of Leningrad, was damaged by German artillery fire and aviation. Since 1954 she was used as a training ship, in 1956 she was expelled from the Navy and dismantled. The text of the plate on the gun: "Two-gun installation of foreman of the 1st class Ivan Tambasov." The monument was opened in 1957. Address: Kronstadt, Kommunisticheskaya street, intersection with Obvodny Canal. Nearby are two anchors of the famous battleship.

20. Cutting the submarine "Narodovolets"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Leonid Kharitonov

Part of the fencing of the cabin of a diesel-electric torpedo submarine of the Narodovolets (D-2) series. Text on the memorial plaque: “The firstborn of the Soviet submarine shipbuilding. Laid down in 1927 in Leningrad. Entered service in 1931. From 1933 to 1939 she was part of the Northern Military Flotilla. From 1941 to 1945, she conducted active military operations against the fascist invaders at the KBF (Red Banner Baltic Fleet). During the war, she sank 5 enemy ships with a total displacement of 40,000 tons. It is located in the closed territory of the 123rd Red Banner Submarine Brigade.

resort area

21. Artillery semi-caponier "Elephant"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Olga Isaeva

Caponier (from the French word "deepening") - a defensive structure for conducting flank (side) fire in both directions. Accordingly, the semi-caponier is designed to fire at the enemy in only one direction along the fortress wall. In the photo - artillery semi-caponier No. 1 (call sign - "Elephant") of the Forward Line of the Karelian fortified area ("KaUR"), built to protect the old Soviet-Finnish border. Caponier is the main exhibit of the Sestroretsky Frontier Museum and Exhibition Complex. During the Great Patriotic War, the "Elephant" shot through the lowland from the Kurort to Beloostrov, the approaches to the Sestra River and the railway bridge with artillery fire. The interior of the semi-caponier has been restored in the museum, and a collection of search finds has been placed. The outdoor exposition includes various types of small fortifications: two reinforced concrete firing points delivered from the area of ​​Beloostrov and Mednoye Lake, the Izhora tower already known to us, an observation tower of the 1938 model, firing points based on the towers of the tanks T-28, KV -1", "T-70", "BT-2", Finnish machine-gun armored cap, gouges, hedgehogs, barriers and other interesting exhibits. Address: Sestroretsky Frontier Museum and Exhibition Complex, Sestroretsk, not far from the intersection of the Primorskoye Highway with the Kurort-Beloostrov railway.

22. Firing point from the body of the tank "T-28"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Olga Isaeva

This is a copy of the firing point discovered by search engines on the Karelian Isthmus. It was built from the hull of a three-turreted T-28 medium tank, produced in 1933–1940 at the Kirov Plant in Leningrad. The tank was turned over, placed on a wooden foundation and covered with earth. The entrance was through the removed grille. This procedure was described in the book "Manual for Engineers: Fortifications" in the chapter "Using an inverted tank hull to set up a machine-gun blockhouse." Museum and Exhibition Complex "Sestroretsky Frontier".

23. Firing point with the tower of the tank "KV-1"

Photo: Sergey Sharov

This is a copy of the turret of the KV-1 tank, which was installed on a concrete casemate built in 1943 on the Karelian Isthmus. Such turret artillery mounts with 76-mm cannons mounted in the turrets of KV tanks were intended to strengthen the anti-tank defense of fortified areas. Museum and Exhibition Complex "Sestroretsky Frontier".

24. Defensive-offensive armor sliders

Photo: Sergey Sharov

Two armored sliders are on display at the Sestroretsky Frontier Museum and Exhibition Complex. It is known about one of them that he was armed with a casemate artillery mount based on a 76-mm tank gun of the 1938 model and had the call sign "Halva" (in the photo he is in the background). In the book of B.V. Bychevsky “City-Front” there is such a description: “... The creation of the so-called “armor belt” around Leningrad began. We have developed a technology for the mass production of various types of prefabricated pillboxes. Somehow they brought a front-line machine gunner to the Izhora plant to check the newly made squat structure of armor plates. The machine gunner climbed under the cap, examined it inside and got out. “You know what, friend,” he turned to the welder, “let's cut a wider hole in the bottom. We will make a frame of logs for this thing and put it right on the trench.” “Or maybe weld a towing hook to the wall? suggested the welder. - Go on the offensive and take it with you. A tractor or a tank will boldly drag it!” “And that’s true,” the machine gunner rejoiced. “It will be kind of like a slider for us: both for defense and for the offensive.” That is how we christened this structure that day - “defensive-offensive armored slider”. Under this name, she became widely known throughout the Leningrad front. Museum and Exhibition Complex "Sestroretsky Frontier".

Moskovsky district

25. T-34-85 tanks of the Pulkovsky Frontier memorial

Photo: lenww2.ru, Alexey Sedelnikov

The Pulkovsky Frontier memorial is included in the Green Belt of Glory. It was here that in 1941-1944 the front line of the defense of Leningrad passed. The memorial includes a mosaic panel dedicated to the combat and labor exploits of Leningraders, a birch alley and concrete anti-tank gouges. On both sides of the memorial there are two T-34-85 tanks with tail numbers 112 and 113. The T-34-85 is a Soviet medium tank of the Great Patriotic War period, put into service in 1944 and forming the basis of the tank forces of the Soviet Army up until the mid 1950s. The installation of a more powerful 85-mm gun significantly increased the combat effectiveness of the tank compared to its predecessor, the T-34-76. The memorial was opened in 1967. Address: 20th kilometer of Pulkovskoye Highway.

Nevsky district

26. Tank "T-34-85" on the territory of the plant "Zvezda"

Photo: lenww2.ru, Olga Isaeva

The T-34-85 tank was installed on the territory of the Zvezda machine-building plant, which until recently bore the name of K.E. Voroshilov. A bronze plaque was fixed on the pedestal: "In memory of the military and labor feat of the Voroshilovites." It was founded in 1932 in Leningrad on the basis of the Machine-Building Department of the oldest enterprise in the country - the Bolshevik plant (now the Obukhovsky Plant) and initially specialized in the production of tanks. In the pre-war period and during the Great Patriotic War, the plant produced about 14.5 thousand tanks. During the war, evacuated factory workers created almost 6,000 T-34 tanks in Omsk and more than 10,000 tank engines in Barnaul. In the shops of the plant in besieged Leningrad, tanks were repaired, mines and armored shields were produced. The monument was opened in 1975. Address: Babushkina street, 123, on the territory of OAO Zvezda.

27. Firing point with the tower of the tank "KV-1"

A model of the turret of the KV tank was installed at the bunker of the Izhora defensive line. As the press service of the city administration reported, “during the war, a similar tower was located in the same place, as evidenced by the tank’s rotary mechanism built into the upper part of the pillbox. Enthusiasts, relying on historical drawings, restored the tank's turret, returning the pillbox to its original appearance. The memorial was restored in 2013. Address: Rybatskoye, Murzinskaya street, not far from the intersection with Obukhovskoy oborony avenue.

Petrogradsky district

28. Cruiser "Aurora"

Photo: wikipedia.org, George Shuklin

Avrora, a cruiser of the 1st rank of the Baltic Fleet, was launched in 1900 at the New Admiralty shipyard, one of the oldest shipbuilding enterprises in Russia. Emperor Nicholas II ordered the name of the ship "Aurora" (the Roman goddess of dawn) in honor of the sailing frigate "Aurora", which became famous during the defense of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky during the Crimean War of 1853-1856. During the Great Patriotic War, the cruiser was in Oranienbaum and defended Kronstadt from air raids. Nine 130-mm guns removed from the cruiser (together with part of the crew) became part of the Duderhof battery, which heroically fought against German tanks. Monuments and memorials included in the "Green Belt of Glory" were erected on the positions of the guns of the Aurora battery. Since 1948, the Aurora has been permanently moored at the Nakhimov Naval School. In 2010, the cruiser was withdrawn from the Navy and is a branch of the Central Naval Museum. In September 2014, the Aurora was towed to the repair dock of the Kronstadt Marine Plant, where it will remain until 2016.

29. "Three-inch" of the late XIX century in the Artillery Museum

Photo: VIMAIViVS

3-inch (76-mm) experimental rapid-fire field gun model 1898 in the outdoor display of the Artillery Museum. This is one of the first famous "three-inch", famous as one of the best guns of its time. Previously, guns were loaded from the muzzle, which was long and inefficient. Thanks to the efforts of outstanding Russian artillery scientists, a completely new gun was developed at the Putilov plant in St. Petersburg. So, for the first time in these guns, a quick-acting piston valve with locking, impact and ejection mechanisms and a fuse, an elastic carriage and opener, a recoil brake and a goniometer were used. The excellent qualities of the new gun were confirmed on the fields of the Russian-Japanese (1904-1905) and the First World War (1914-1918). After modernization in 1930, these guns were actively used throughout the Great Patriotic War, proving to be an effective means of fighting German light tanks. Address: Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineers and Signal Corps, Kronverksky Island.

30. Guns of the 1930s in the Artillery Museum

Photo: Sergey Sharov

305 mm howitzer model 1939 (foreground) and 210 mm gun model 1939. These powerful guns were created by the famous Soviet designer Ilya Ivanov. The collection of cannons of the 1930s of the Artillery Museum is of particular interest - with these guns, so familiar to us from war films, the Red Army entered the Great Patriotic War. Their uniqueness lies in the fact that they were created in record time. Among the guns of the same period, it should be noted the famous divisional (76-mm guns of the model of 1936 and 1939, chief designer Vasily Grabin), and corps, army guns (107-mm gun of the model of 1940 and 152-mm howitzer-gun of the model of 1937, chief designer Fedor Petrov). There is also a gun here (a 122-mm howitzer of the 1938 model), which was in service with our country until the 1980s. Address: Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineers and Signal Corps, Kronverksky Island.

31. Artillery 1941-1945 in the Artillery Museum

Photo: Sergey Sharov

These systems were created directly during the Great Patriotic War. During this period, excellent samples were made using the high-speed method, taking into account the experience of the combat use of artillery. Many of them are associated with the name of the famous Soviet designer Fyodor Petrov. The photograph shows one of his developments, a 152-mm howitzer of the 1943 model D-1. It is hard to imagine, but it took less than three weeks to create it, and it was in service for more than thirty years. The first powerful 100-, 122- and 152-mm self-propelled artillery mounts adjoin it - a thunderstorm of German tanks and self-propelled guns. Address: Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineers and Signal Corps, Kronverksky Island.

Photo: Sergey Sharov

The 57-mm anti-tank gun of the 1943 model "ZIS-2" (left) is the most powerful weapon of this caliber during the Great Patriotic War. This gun had the ability to penetrate 145 mm of armor, so it could hit all German tanks. A special place among the guns of the war years is occupied by the 76-mm divisional gun of the 1942 model - the famous ZIS-3 (in the center). It became more compact and as much as 400 kg lighter, and also significantly surpassed its predecessor of the 1939 model in all other respects. In it, for the first time, a muzzle brake was used for divisional guns - a special device that made it possible to reduce the recoil of the barrel. Guns of this design were cheap to manufacture (three times cheaper than before). They were very maneuverable and reliable. All this has found clear confirmation in combat conditions. The formidable and beautiful cannon earned respect even from enemies. Wolff, Hitler's artillery consultant, considered it to be the best gun of World War II, "one of the most ingenious designs in the history of cannon artillery." Address: Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineers and Signal Corps, Kronverksky Island.

Photo: Sergey Sharov

It will be interesting to know that Soviet anti-aircraft artillery successfully hit not only air, but also ground targets, including tanks. This 14.5-mm quadruple anti-aircraft machine gun mount designed by Leshchinsky "ZPU-4" destroyed both aircraft (at altitudes up to 2000 meters), and lightly armored ground targets and enemy manpower. Its rate of fire is 600 rounds per minute. Almost all anti-aircraft guns created and in service in the pre-war and war years are presented in the courtyard of the museum. These are 25- and 37-mm automatic anti-aircraft guns of the model of 1940 and 1939 and an 85-mm anti-aircraft gun of the model of 1939, which proved themselves well during the Great Patriotic War. Address: Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineers and Signal Corps, Kronverksky Island.

Photo: pomnite-nas.ru, Dmitry Panov

Heavy self-propelled artillery mount based on the IS tank - ISU-152 model 1943. The main armament of the self-propelled gun was the 152-mm howitzer-gun "ML-20", the firepower of which made it easy to deal with the "Tigers" and "Panthers" - the main enemy tanks. For this, the famous self-propelled gun received the nickname "St. John's wort". In the post-war period, the ISU-152 underwent modernization and was in service with the Soviet army for a long time. The development of the ISU-152 was led by Joseph Kotin, chief designer of the Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant, built on the basis of the evacuated Leningrad Kirov Plant. Address: Military Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineers and Signal Corps, Kronverksky Island.

32. Historical tools in the Peter and Paul Fortress

Photo: website, Georgy Popov

152-mm howitzers of the 1937 model "ML-20" in the Peter and Paul Fortress on the square near the Naryshkin bastion. “These howitzers in 1992-2002 served as signal guns for the Peter and Paul Fortress and fired the traditional midday shot every day,” the information plate says. Every Saturday (from the end of May to October) five minutes before noon, a guard of honor ceremony is held here. The ML-20 howitzer occupies an honorable place among the best cannon artillery designs. It was these guns that were installed on the "St. John's Wort" - powerful self-propelled artillery mounts. Address: Peter and Paul Fortress.

Frunze district

33. Firing point with the tower of the tank "KV-1"

Photo: kupsilla.ru, Denis Chaliapin

In the summer of 2014, a firing point covered with earth and construction debris was accidentally discovered by a local resident. Historians became interested in the find, achieved the assignment of the status of a monument to the fortification and raised money for its restoration. An exact copy of the turret of the KV-1 heavy tank was made, which was solemnly installed in its original place. This bunker was part of the Izhora defensive line built in 1943. Local historian Denis Chaliapin of Kupchinsky commented on the opening of the monument: “The tank tower, installed on a concrete casemate (which in itself is a rare case) on one of the central thoroughfares of the city, will definitely be noticed by everyone passing along the avenue. Thus, Kupchino will receive a unique monument that can rightfully become one of the symbols of the region.” The monument was opened in 2015. Address: Glory Avenue, opposite the house 30.

-When I saw the Russians, I was surprised. How did the Russians get from the Volga to Berlin in such primitive vehicles? When I saw them and the horses, I thought it couldn't be. Technically advanced German and artillery were very much inferior to Russian technology. Do you know why? We have to be accurate. And the snow and dirt of accuracy do not help. When I was taken prisoner, I had a "Sturmgever", a modern weapon, but it failed after three shots - sand got in ... - Gunter Kühne, Wehrmacht soldier

Any war is a clash not only of troops, but also of the industrial and economic systems of the belligerents. This question must be remembered when trying to evaluate the merits of certain types of military equipment, as well as the successes of the troops achieved on this equipment. When evaluating the success or failure of a combat vehicle, one must clearly remember not only its technical characteristics, but also the costs that were invested in its production, the number of units produced, and so on. In other words, an integrated approach is important.
That is why the assessment of a single tank or aircraft and loud statements about the "best" model of war must be critically evaluated every time. It is possible to create an invincible tank, but quality issues almost always conflict with issues of ease of manufacture and mass production of such equipment. There is no point in creating an invincible tank if the industry cannot mass-produce it, and the cost of the tank will be like that of an aircraft carrier. A balance is important between the combat qualities of equipment and the ability to quickly establish large-scale production.

In this regard, it is of interest how this balance was observed by the belligerent powers at different levels of the military-industrial system of the state. How much and what kind of military equipment was produced, and how it affected the results of the war. This article attempts to bring together statistical data on the production of armored vehicles by Germany and the USSR during the Second World War and the immediate pre-war period.

Statistics.

The data obtained are summarized in a table, to which some explanations are required.

1. Approximate numbers are in red font. Basically, they concern two types - captured French vehicles, as well as the number of self-propelled guns produced on the chassis of German armored personnel carriers. The first is due to the inability to determine exactly how many trophies were actually used by the Germans in the troops. The second is due to the fact that the production of self-propelled guns on the chassis of an armored personnel carrier was often carried out by retrofitting already produced armored personnel carriers without heavy weapons, by installing a gun with a machine tool on an armored personnel carrier chassis.

2. The table contains information about all guns, tanks and armored vehicles. For example, the line "assault guns" includes German self-propelled guns sd.kfz.250/8 and sd.kfz.251/9, which are armored personnel carrier chassis with a short-barreled gun of 75 cm caliber installed. The corresponding number of linear armored personnel carriers is excluded from the line "armored personnel carriers" etc.

3. Soviet self-propelled guns did not have a narrow specialization, and could fight both tanks and support infantry. However, they are divided into different categories. For example, according to the designers, the closest to the German assault guns were the Soviet breakthrough self-propelled guns SU/ISU-122/152, as well as the Su-76 infantry support self-propelled guns. And such self-propelled guns as the Su-85 and Su-100 had a pronounced anti-tank character and were classified as "tank destroyers".

4. The “self-propelled artillery” category included guns designed primarily for firing from closed positions out of direct line of sight of targets, including rocket-propelled mortars on armored chassis. From the Soviet side, only BM-8-24 MLRS on the T-60 and T-40 chassis fell into this category.

5. Statistics include all production from 1932 to May 9, 1945. It was this technique, one way or another, that made up the potential of the warring parties and was used in the war. The technique of earlier production by the beginning of the Second World War was outdated and of no serious importance.

the USSR

The data obtained fit well into the well-known historical situation. The production of armored vehicles in the USSR was deployed on an incredible, massive scale, which fully corresponded to the aspirations of the Soviet side - preparation for a war of survival in the vast expanses from the Arctic to the Caucasus. To a certain extent, for the sake of mass character, the quality and debugging of military equipment were sacrificed. It is known that the equipment of Soviet tanks with high-quality communications equipment, optics and interior decoration was significantly worse than that of the Germans.

A clear imbalance in the weapon system is striking. In favor of the production of tanks, there are no entire classes of armored vehicles - armored personnel carriers, ZSU, control vehicles, etc. Last but not least, this situation is determined by the desire of the USSR to overcome the serious backlog in the main types of weapons, which was inherited after the collapse of the Republic of Ingushetia and the civil war. Attention was concentrated on saturating the troops with the main striking force - tanks, while support vehicles were ignored. This is logical - it is stupid to invest in the design of bridge layers and ARVs in conditions where the production of the main armament - tanks - has not been debugged.

At the same time, the USSR was aware of the inferiority of such a weapon system, and already on the eve of the Second World War, they were actively designing a wide variety of support equipment. These are armored personnel carriers, self-propelled artillery, repair and recovery vehicles, bridge layers, etc. Most of this equipment did not have time to be introduced into production before the start of the Second World War, and already during the war its development had to be stopped. All this could not but affect the level of losses during the hostilities. So, for example, the absence of armored personnel carriers had a negative impact on infantry losses and their mobility. Making multi-kilometer foot marches, the infantrymen lost strength and part of their combat capability even before contact with the enemy.

Partially, the gaps in the weapons system were filled with supplies from the allies. It is no coincidence that armored personnel carriers, self-propelled guns and SPAAGs on the chassis of American armored personnel carriers were supplied to the USSR. The total number of such vehicles was about 8500, which is not much less than the number of tanks received - 12300.

Germany

The German side followed a completely different path. Having suffered a defeat in WWI, Germany did not lose its design school and did not lose its technological superiority. Recall that in the USSR there was nothing to lose, tanks were not produced in the Russian Empire. Therefore, the Germans did not need to rush through the path from an agrarian state to an industrial state in a wild hurry.

Having begun preparations for war, the Germans were well aware that they could only defeat numerous and economically strong opponents in the person of Great Britain and France, and then the USSR, only by providing a qualitative superiority, which, traditionally, the Germans are excellent. But the issue of mass character for Germany was not so acute - relying on the blitzkrieg strategy and the quality of weapons gave a chance to achieve victory with small forces. The first attempts confirmed the success of the chosen course. Although not without problems, the Germans managed to defeat Poland, then France, and so on. The spatial scope of hostilities in the center of compact Europe fully corresponded to the number of tank forces that the Germans had at their disposal. Obviously, these victories further convinced the German command of the correctness of the chosen strategy.

Actually, that is why the Germans initially paid close attention to the balance of their weapons system. Here we see a variety of types of armored vehicles - ZSU, ammunition transporters, forward observers vehicles, BREM. All this made it possible to build a well-functioning mechanism for waging war, which, like a steamroller, went through all of Europe. Such a close attention to the technology of support, which also contributes to the achievement of victory, can only be admired.

Actually, the first shoots of the future defeat were laid in this weapon system. The Germans are Germans in everything. Quality and reliability! But as mentioned above, quality and mass are almost always in conflict. And one day the Germans started a war where everything was different - they attacked the USSR.

Already in the first year of the war, the blitzkrieg mechanism failed. The Russian open spaces were absolutely indifferent to the ideally debugged, but small German technology. Here a different scope was required. And although the Red Army suffered defeat after defeat, it became difficult for the Germans to maneuver with the modest forces that they had. Losses in the protracted conflict grew, and already in 1942 it became obvious that it was impossible to produce high-quality German equipment in the quantities necessary to make up for losses. Or rather, it is impossible in the same mode of operation of the economy. I had to start mobilizing the economy. However, these actions were very late - it was necessary to prepare for the current situation before the attack.

Technique

Assessing the potential of the parties, it is necessary to clearly separate the equipment for its intended purpose. The decisive influence on the outcome of the battle is exerted primarily by "battlefield" vehicles - equipment engaged in the destruction of the enemy by direct fire in the advanced echelons of troops. These are tanks and self-propelled guns. It should be recognized that in this category the USSR had an absolute superiority, having produced 2.6 times more military equipment.

Light tanks with machine-gun weapons, as well as wedges, are allocated in a separate category. Formally, being tanks, they represented a very low combat value for 1941. Neither the German Pz. I, neither the Soviet T-37 and T-38 tongue turns out to be included on a par with the formidable T-34 and even light BT or T-26. Passion for such technology in the USSR should be considered not a very successful experiment.

Separately, self-propelled artillery is indicated. The difference between this category of armored vehicles from assault guns, tank destroyers and other self-propelled guns lies in the possibility of firing from closed positions. Destruction of troops by direct fire for them is rather an exception to the rule than a typical task. In fact, these are ordinary field howitzers or MLRS mounted on the chassis of armored vehicles. Currently, this practice has become the norm, as a rule, any artillery gun has a towed (for example, 152-mm howitzer MSTA-B) and self-propelled version (MSTA-S). At that time it was a novelty, and the Germans were one of the first to implement the idea of ​​self-propelled artillery, covered with armor. The USSR limited itself only to experiments in this area, and the self-propelled guns built using howitzers were used not as classic artillery, but as breakthrough weapons. At the same time, 64 BM-8-24 rocket systems were produced on the T-40 and T-60 chassis. There is information that the troops were satisfied with them, and why their mass release was not arranged is not clear.

The next category is combined arms armored vehicles, whose task is to support first-line equipment, but not designed to destroy targets on the battlefield. This category includes armored personnel carriers and SPAAGs on armored chassis, armored vehicles. It is important to understand that such vehicles, by their design, are not designed to fight in the same formation with tanks and infantry, although they should be located behind them in close proximity. It is erroneously considered that an armored personnel carrier is a battlefield vehicle. In fact, the armored personnel carriers were originally intended to transport infantry in the front line and protect it from fragments of artillery shells at the initial lines of attack. On the battlefield, armored personnel carriers, armed with a machine gun and protected by thin armor, could not help either the infantry or the tanks. Their large silhouette makes them an excellent and easy target. If in reality they did fight, it was forced. Vehicles of this category influence the outcome of the battle indirectly - saving the lives and forces of the infantry. Their value in battle is significantly lower than that of tanks, although they are also necessary. In this category, the USSR practically did not produce its own equipment, and only by the middle of the war acquired a small number of vehicles supplied under Lend-Lease.

The temptation to attribute armored personnel carriers to battlefield technology is fueled by the presence of very weak tanks in the ranks of the Red Army, for example, the T-60. Thin armor, primitive equipment, a weak gun - why is a German armored personnel carrier worse? Why is a tank with such weak performance characteristics a battlefield machine, but an armored personnel carrier is not? First of all, a tank is a specialized vehicle, the main task of which is precisely the destruction of targets on the battlefield, which cannot be said about the armored personnel carrier. Even though their armor is similar, but the low squat silhouette of the tank, its mobility, the ability to fire from a cannon clearly speaks of its purpose. An armored personnel carrier is precisely a transporter, and not a means of destroying the enemy. However, those German armored personnel carriers that received specialized weapons, for example, 75 cm or 3.7 cm anti-tank guns, are included in the table in the corresponding rows - anti-tank self-propelled guns. This is true, since this armored personnel carrier was eventually made into a vehicle designed to destroy the enemy on the battlefield, albeit with weak armor and a high, clearly visible silhouette of the transporter.

As for armored vehicles, they were mainly intended for reconnaissance and security. The USSR produced a huge number of machines of this class, and the combat capabilities of a number of models came close to the capabilities of light tanks. However, this applies primarily to pre-war technology. It seems that the forces and means spent on their manufacture could have been spent with a better use. For example, if some of them were intended for the transport of infantry, like conventional armored personnel carriers.

The next category is special vehicles without weapons. Their task is to provide troops, and armor is needed primarily to protect against random fragments and bullets. Their presence in combat formations should be short-lived; they do not need to constantly accompany the advancing troops. Their task is to solve specific tasks at the right time and in the right place, advancing from the rear, avoiding contact with the enemy if possible.

The Germans produced about 700 repair and recovery vehicles, plus about 200 were converted from previously released equipment. In the USSR, such machines were created only on the basis of the T-26 and produced in the amount of 183 units. It is difficult to fully assess the potential of the parties' repair forces, since the matter was not limited to BREM alone. Feeling the need for this type of equipment, both Germany and the USSR were engaged in makeshift conversion of obsolete and partially defective tanks into tow trucks and tractors. In the Red Army there were a lot of such vehicles with dismantled towers based on T-34, KV and IS tanks. It is not possible to establish their exact number, since they were all made in combat units of the army, and not in factories. In the German army, despite the presence of specialized ARVs, similar homemade products were also made, and their number is also unknown.

Ammunition transporters were intended by the Germans primarily to supply advanced artillery units. In the Red Army, the same task was solved by ordinary trucks, the security of which, of course, was lower.

Forward observers' vehicles were also mainly needed by the gunners. In the modern army, their counterparts are the vehicles of senior battery officers and mobile reconnaissance posts of the PRP. However, in those years the USSR did not produce such machines.

In terms of bridgelayers, their presence in the Red Army may be surprising. Nevertheless, it was the USSR that produced 65 such vehicles on the basis of the T-26 tank under the designation ST-26 before the war. The Germans, on the other hand, made several of these vehicles based on the Pz IV, Pz II and Pz I. However, neither the Soviet ST-26 nor the German bridge layers had any effect on the course of the war.

Finally, the Germans mass-produced such specific machines as demolition charge stackers. The most massive of these machines, the Goliath, was a remotely controlled disposable tankette. This type of machine is difficult to attribute to any category, so their tasks are unique. The USSR did not produce such machines.

conclusions

Analyzing the impact of the production of weapons on the consequences of the war, two factors must be taken into account - the balance of the weapons system and the balance of equipment in terms of quality / quantity.

The balance of the German army's weapons system is extremely commendable. The USSR in the pre-war period was unable to create anything of the kind, although the need for this was recognized by the leadership. The lack of auxiliary equipment had a negative impact on the combat capabilities of the Red Army, primarily in the mobility of support units and infantry. Of all the wide range of auxiliary equipment, one should regret the absence in the Red Army, first of all, of armored personnel carriers and self-propelled anti-aircraft guns. The absence of such exotic vehicles as remote demolition charges and artillery observer vehicles could be endured without tears. As for the BREM, their role was quite successfully solved by tractors based on tanks with weapons removed, and there are still no armored ammunition transporters in the army, and the troops as a whole cope with this task with the help of conventional trucks.

The production of armored personnel carriers in Germany should be considered justified. Knowing the cost of military equipment, it is not difficult to calculate that the production of the entire fleet of armored personnel carriers cost the Germans about 450 million marks. For this money, the Germans could build about 4000 Pz. IV or 3000 Pz.V. Obviously, such a number of tanks would not greatly affect the outcome of the war.

As for the USSR, its leadership, overcoming the technological lag behind Western countries, correctly assessed the importance of tanks as the main striking force of the troops. The emphasis on improving and developing tanks eventually gave the USSR an advantage over the German army directly on the battlefield. With the high utility of support technology, it was the battlefield vehicles that played the decisive role in the outcome of the battles, which in the Soviet army had the highest development priority. A large number of support vehicles in the end did nothing to help Germany win the war, although it certainly saved a considerable number of lives of German soldiers.

But the balance between quality and quantity in the end was not in favor of Germany. The traditional tendency of the Germans to strive for the achievement of the ideal in everything, even where this should be neglected, played a cruel joke. Preparing for a war with the USSR, it was necessary to pay close attention to the mass production of equipment. Even the most advanced combat vehicles in small numbers are not able to turn the tide of events. The gap between the combat capabilities of Soviet and German technology was not so large that the German qualitative superiority could play a decisive role. But the quantitative superiority of the USSR turned out to be able not only to make up for the losses of the first period of the war, but also to influence the course of the war as a whole. The ubiquitous T-34s, supplemented by small Su-76s and T-60s, were everywhere, while the Germans from the very beginning of the Second World War did not have enough equipment to saturate the huge front.

Speaking about the quantitative superiority of the USSR, it is impossible to bypass the discussion of the traditional template of "filled up with corpses." Having discovered such a striking superiority of the Red Army in technology, it is difficult to resist the temptation to put forward the thesis that we fought in numbers, and not in skill. Such statements should be stopped immediately. Not a single, even the most talented commander, will give up quantitative superiority over the enemy, even if he can fight with a much smaller number of troops. Quantitative superiority gives the commander the widest possibilities for planning a battle and does not at all mean an inability to fight in small numbers. If you have a lot of troops, this does not mean that you will immediately enthusiastically throw them into a frontal attack, in the hope that they will crush the enemy with their mass. Whatever the quantitative superiority is, it is not infinite. To provide our troops with the opportunity to operate in greater numbers is the most important task of industry and the state. And the Germans understood this very well, having squeezed out everything that was possible from their economy in the years 43-45 in an attempt to achieve at least not superiority, but parity with the USSR. They did not do it in the best way, but the Soviet side did it excellently. Which became one of the many bricks in the foundation of victory.

P.S.
The author does not consider this work exhaustive and final. Perhaps there are experts who can significantly supplement the information presented. Any reader can get acquainted with the collected statistics in detail by downloading the full version of the statistical table presented in this article from the link below.
https://yadi.sk/i/WWxqmJlOucUdP

References:
A.G. Solyankin, M.V. Pavlov, I.V. Pavlov, I.G. Zheltov “Domestic armored vehicles. XX century. (in 4 volumes)
W. Oswald. "Complete Catalog of German Military Vehicles and Tanks 1900 - 1982"
P. Chamberlain, H. Doyle, "Encyclopedia of German tanks of the Second World War."