Criterion 4 Russian language exam. Evaluation criteria for the Unified State Exam. Compliance with ethical standards

Document punctuation has been preserved.

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account 1.

1. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150-300 words 2.

2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.

When evaluating an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors four types(K7-K10) decreases.

2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 - one to three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to criteria K7-K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is graded 0 points.

If the work, which is a rewrite or retelling of the original text, contains fragments of text
the examinee, then the test takes into account only the number of words that belong to the examinee.

Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.

1 When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” - one word, “five years” - two
words).
2 If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs average general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205)
"61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the Unified State Examination paper with a detailed answer...
62. If there is a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject.
The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”

In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are assessed, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are essays based on the text. Today in test tasks it is necessary to either write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or find two correct answers from those proposed (task 1 and 15), or name the numbers indicating the correct placement of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which the errors were made.

Essay evaluation criteria

When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150–300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.

When counting words, both independent and functional parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” is one word, “five years” is two words).
If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.

When assessing an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 – there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 – there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made).

1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 – no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 – one to three mistakes were made;
K9 – no grammatical errors;
K10 – no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to criteria K7–K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is graded 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the Unified State Examination paper with a detailed answer... 62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject. The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more. primary points between the sums of points awarded by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment positions for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.

An essay based on the text read is task 25 in the Unified State Exam in the Russian language. To prepare for this task you need to pay attention Special attention, since at best it can bring 24 points, which is more than 40% of the total number of points that can be scored in the exam.

Essay on the Unified State Examination in the Russian language- this is the final work that tests all the student’s knowledge and skills in the subject: the ability to identify a problem in a text and argue one’s opinion, the ability to coherently express one’s thoughts and, of course, knowledge of the rules of the Russian language.

Let us immediately note that the final essay should consist of 150-300 words - this is the optimal length. Shorter essays may be scored lower on some criteria, and if the essay is less than 70 words, it will be scored 0 points on each criterion. At the same time, you need to remember: the longer the essay, the greater the likelihood of making mistakes in it, so there is no point in writing too much large text, exceeding 300 words.

Let's consider the basic rules and evaluation criteria that need to be taken into account when writing an essay, and also draw up rough plan on which you need to write an essay.

Plan for writing an Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language (content of the essay)

How to write an Unified State Exam essay in Russian? The essay must comply with a certain plan, for this you can earn from 0 to 8 points. We list the main criteria that relate to the content of the essay:

• K1. Formulation of the text problem (0-1 points). First you need to carefully read the text and highlight the main problem in him. As a rule, the source text is devoted to one of the following thematic areas: friendship and enmity, victory and defeat, reason and feeling, honor and dishonor, experience and mistakes. Correctly identifying the problem of the text will give only one point, but if the problem was identified incorrectly, the examinee will immediately lose 8 points.
• K2. Comments on the formulated problem (0-3 points). Next you need to confirm a specific problem two examples from the text.
• K3. Reflection of the author's position (0-1 points). Based on the above comments from the text, you need to formulate the author's attitude to the problem text.
• K4. Argumentation of your own opinion (0-3 points). After this, the examinee must express your opinion about the problem, using 2 arguments, and at least one of them must be cited from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature (preferably both). You need to carefully choose the arguments that are appropriate in this particular case. It is best to prepare your arguments for each topic in advance by reading a number of recommended literary works.

Speech formatting of an Unified State Examination essay in the Russian language

To write an Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language, you need to be able to coherently and accurately express your thoughts. For this you can get from 0 to 4 points. There are 2 criteria here:

• K5. Semantic integrity and coherence (0-2 points). The essay must correspond to the plan, be integral and coherent, the order of presentation must not be disrupted, thoughts must flow smoothly from one another. It is worth paying attention to the correct division of the text into separate paragraphs and the absence of logical errors in the essay (there should be no contradictions in the text).
• K6. Accuracy and expressiveness (0-2 points). All thoughts and ideas must be accurately and clearly expressed in the essay. In addition, the essay must contain a variety of grammatical structure of speech. That is, in the text when expressing your thoughts there should not be monotony, there should be (in moderation) complex sentences, involved and participial phrases, comparative turnover, introductory words and etc.

Literacy when writing an Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language

When writing an essay, you need to know and follow all the norms of the Russian language. For these criteria in total you can get from 0 to 12 points (half of all points for the essay). There are 6 main criteria here:

• K7. Compliance with spelling standards (0-3 points) or writing words according to all the rules of the Russian language.
• K8. Compliance with punctuation standards (0-3 points) or correct punctuation.
• K9. Compliance with language norms (0-2 points): lexical (meanings of words and rules for using them together with other words), morphological (rules of word formation and correct use of word forms), syntactic (rules for constructing phrases and sentences) and stylistic (rules for choosing linguistic means).
• K10. Compliance with speech norms (0-2 points) or the correct use of words and phraseological units in the text.
• K11. Compliance with ethical standards (0-1 points) or correct construction of sentences in an essay (without aggression or hostility).
• K12. Maintain factual accuracy (0-1 points) or indicating in the essay the exact facts that the examinee cites in the text (facts that do not contradict reality: for example, the correct dates).

We have listed all the main criteria that need to be taken into account in order to write an Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language for maximum score.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

EXAMINATION IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11TH GRADE (USE)

For correct execution everyone tasks exam paper can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.

For correct execution everyone tasks parts 1 (except for tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point each. For an incorrect answer or lack thereof, 0 points are given.

For completion tasks 7 may be exhibited from 0 to 5 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to a number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no errors; 4 points: 1 error made; 3 points: 2 errors made; 2 points: 2 digits indicated correctly; 1 point: correctly indicated only one digit; 0 points: completely incorrect answer, i.e. incorrect sequence of numbers or lack thereof). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.

For completion tasks 15 may be exhibited from 0 to 2 points. For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the answer number, the examinee receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are given correctly, the examinee receives 2 points.

For completion tasks 24 may be exhibited from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of a term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no errors; 3 points: 1 error made; 2 points: 2 errors made; 1 point: only one number is indicated correctly; 0 points: a completely incorrect answer, i.e. an incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence.The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.

Maximum points, which can be received by a student who correctly completes the task parts 2, is 23 points.

Criteria for assessing an assignment with a detailed answer (essay)

Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1

Points

I

Contents of the essay

K1

Formulation of source text problems

The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text.


There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem

1

The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text.

0

K2

Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors associated with understanding the problem of the source text,
 no in comments

2

The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on,or there were more than 1 factual errors in the comments related to understanding the source text, or another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on,or a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as comments,
 or a large fragment of the source text is quoted as comments

0

K3

The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text

1

0

K4

Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)

3

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or provided only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature

2

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge and life experience

1

The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments, or the examinee’s opinion is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected in the work at all

0

II

Speech design of the essay

K5

Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation:
– there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;
– there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work

2

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, But 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work

1

The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent,
 but more than 1 logical error was made,
 and/or there are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text

0

K6

Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech.
*The examinee receives the highest score for this criterion only if the highest score is obtained for the K10 criterion

2

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts

1

The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of grammatical structure of speech

0

III

Literacy

K7

Compliance with spelling standards

no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)

3

no more than 2 mistakes were made

2

3–4 mistakes were made

1

more than 4 mistakes were made

0

K8

Compliance with punctuation standards

no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)

3

1–3 mistakes were made

2

4–5 mistakes were made

1

more than 5 mistakes were made

0

K9

Compliance with language norms

no grammatical errors

2

1–2 mistakes were made

1

more than 2 mistakes were made

0

K10

Compliance with speech norms

no more than 1 speech error was made

2

2–3 mistakes were made

1

more than 3 mistakes were made

0

K11

Compliance with ethical standards

there are no ethical errors in the work

1

ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)

0

K12.

Maintain factual accuracy in background material

there are no factual errors in the background material

1

there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material

0

Maximum points for all written work (K1–K12)

When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150–300 words.

If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored zero points, the task is considered uncompleted.

When assessing an essay of from 70 to 150 words number of allowed errors four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:

K7 – no spelling errors (or 1 minor error was made);

K8 – no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).

1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:

K7 – no more than 2 mistakes were made;

K8 – 1–3 mistakes were made;

K9 – no grammatical errors;

K10 – no more than 1 speech error was made.

Highest mark according to criteria K7–K12 for work of volume from 70 to 150 words Not is put.

If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored zero points.

If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.

GOOD LUCK TO YOU,

GRADUATES!