Below are the criteria for assessing essays on the Unified State Exam in the Russian language for 2020. In the new demo versions in Russian 2020 assessment criteria have been changed K2 And K4.
What can give you the most points for:
Argumentation of your own opinion on the problem - REMOVED in 2019!
Maximum you can get it for writing 24 points.
Maximum amount points for all written work (K1–K12) - 24 points.
2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
The highest score according to criteria K7–K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.
Solve in Russian
An essay in the Unified State Exam in Russian is the main part of the exam. Experts have prepared a list of criteria for essays in the Unified State Examination, according to which this part is assessed. In preparation for the exam, the student must familiarize himself with the requirements for the text. Let's take a closer look at this information: detailed description You can study the criteria for assessing the Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language on the official website of the FIPI.
So, by what criteria is an essay assessed in 2016?
Thus, for an essay in the Unified State Exam, a student can earn 24 points according to 12 criteria. Please note that the highest grades for these criteria are awarded when requirements regarding the length of the text are met. 150-300 words is the recommended length of an essay. You can study the essay assessment system in more detail on the FIPI website; there are also demo versions available that allow you to evaluate the format of the assignments.
An essay based on the text read is task 25 in the Unified State Exam in the Russian language. To prepare for this task you need to pay attention Special attention, since at best it can bring 24 points, which is more than 40% of the total number of points that can be scored in the exam.
Essay on the Unified State Examination in the Russian language- this is the final work that tests all the student’s knowledge and skills in the subject: the ability to identify a problem in a text and argue one’s opinion, the ability to coherently express one’s thoughts and, of course, knowledge of the rules of the Russian language.
Let us immediately note that the final essay should consist of 150-300 words - this is the optimal length. Shorter essays may be scored lower on some criteria, and if the essay is less than 70 words, it will be scored 0 points on each criterion. At the same time, you need to remember: the longer the essay, the greater the likelihood of making mistakes in it, so there is no point in writing too much large text, exceeding 300 words.
Let's consider the basic rules and evaluation criteria that need to be taken into account when writing an essay, and also draw up rough plan on which you need to write an essay.
How to write an Unified State Exam essay in Russian? The essay must comply with a certain plan, for this you can earn from 0 to 8 points. We list the main criteria that relate to the content of the essay:
To write an Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language, you need to be able to coherently and accurately express your thoughts. For this you can get from 0 to 4 points. There are 2 criteria here:
When writing an essay, you need to know and follow all the norms of the Russian language. For these criteria in total you can get from 0 to 12 points (half of all points for the essay). There are 6 main criteria here:
We have listed all the main criteria that need to be taken into account in order to write an Unified State Exam essay in the Russian language for maximum score.
Document punctuation has been preserved.
№ | Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1 | Points |
I |
||
K1 |
Formulation of source text problems |
|
The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem |
1 | |
The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text. |
0 | |
K2 |
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the text read that are important for understanding the problem. |
3 | |
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the text read, important for understanding the problem. |
2 | |
The text problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text, But the examinee did not give a single example from the read text that was important for understanding the problem, or There was one factual error in the commentary related to understanding the problem in the source text |
1 | |
The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on. or commented without reference to the source text, or there is more than one factual error in the commentary related to understanding the source text, or another commented, |
0 | |
K3 |
Reflection of the position of the author of the source text |
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. |
1 | |
The position of the author of the source text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the source text is not formulated |
0 | |
K4 |
Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature) |
3 | |
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or provided only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature |
2 | |
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge and life experience |
1 | |
The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments, or the examinee’s opinion is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected in the work at all |
0 | |
II |
Speech design of the essay |
|
K5 |
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation: |
2 | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, |
1 | |
The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent, But more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph division of the text |
0 | |
K6 |
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech. *The examinee receives the highest score for this criterion only if the highest score is obtained for the K10 criterion |
2 | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts |
1 | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of grammatical structure of speech | 0 | |
III |
Literacy |
|
K7 |
Compliance with spelling standards |
|
no spelling errors (or 1 minor error) | 3 | |
no more than 2 mistakes were made | 2 | |
3-4 mistakes were made | 1 | |
more than 4 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K8 |
Compliance with punctuation standards |
|
no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error) | 3 | |
1-3 mistakes were made | 2 | |
4-5 mistakes were made | 1 | |
more than 5 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K9 |
Compliance with language norms |
|
no grammatical errors | 2 | |
1-2 mistakes were made | 1 | |
more than 2 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K10 |
Compliance with speech norms |
|
no more than 1 speech error was made | 2 | |
2-3 mistakes were made | 1 | |
more than 3 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K11 |
Compliance with ethical standards |
|
there are no ethical errors in the work | 1 | |
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more) |
0 | |
K12. |
Maintain factual accuracy in background material |
|
there are no factual errors in the background material | 1 | |
there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material |
0 | |
Maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12) | 24 |
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account 1.
1. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150-300 words 2.
2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.
When evaluating an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 - one to three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to criteria K7-K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.
If the essay is a retelling or a complete rewrite of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored 0 points.
If the work, which is a rewrite or retelling of the original text, contains fragments of text
the examinee, then the test takes into account only the number of words that belong to the examinee.
Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.
1 When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” - one word, “five years” - two
words).
2 If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs average general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205)
"61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the Unified State Examination paper with a detailed answer...
62. If there is a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject.
The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”
nanbaby.ru - Health and beauty. Fashion. Children and parents. Leisure. Life House