Legends and real stories about Bigfoot. Bigfoot Yeti - interesting facts about Bigfoot Myths and testimonies of ancient peoples

There are many rumors and legends in the world, the heroes of which become. They come to life not only in folklore: there are witnesses who claim to have met these creatures in reality. Bigfoot is one such enigmatic character.

Who is Bigfoot?

Bigfoot is a mysterious humanoid creature, possibly a relic mammal, preserved from prehistoric times. Enthusiasts around the world talk about meetings with him. The creature is given many names - bigfoot, yeti, sasquatch, enji, migo, almasty, avtoshka - depending on the area in which the beast or its tracks were seen. But until the yeti is caught, its skin and skeleton are not found, one cannot speak of it as a real animal. We have to be content with the opinion of "eyewitnesses", dozens of videos, audio and photographs, the authenticity of which is in doubt.

Where does Bigfoot live?

Assumptions about where Bigfoot lives can only be put forward based on the words of those who met him. Most of the testimony is given by the inhabitants of America and Asia, who saw a demi-human in forest and mountainous regions. There are suggestions that even today Yeti populations live far from civilization. They build nests in tree branches and hide in caves, carefully avoiding contact with humans. It is assumed that in our country, yetis live in the Urals. Evidence of the existence of bigfoot has been found in such areas as:

• Himalayas;
• Pamir;
• Chukotka;
• Transbaikalia;
• Caucasus;
• California;
• Canada.

What does a snowman look like?

Since information about Bigfoot is rarely documented, its appearance cannot be accurately described, only speculation. The opinions of people interested in this issue may be divided. And yet the Bigfoot Yeti is seen by people as:

• giant growth from 1.5 to 3 meters;
• massive build with broad shoulders and long limbs;
• with a body completely covered with hair (white, gray or brown);
• pointed head;
• wide feet (hence the nickname bigfoot).

In the 1950s, Soviet scientists, together with their foreign colleagues, raised the question of the reality of the Yeti. The famous Norwegian traveler Thor Heyerdall suggested the existence of three types of humanoids unknown to science. This is:

1. Dwarf yeti up to one meter tall, found in India, Nepal, Tibet.
2. A true bigfoot is a large animal (up to 2 m tall) with thick hair and a conical head shape, on which a long “hair” grows.
3. Giant yeti (height reaches 3 m) with a flat head, sloping skull. His footprints strongly resemble those of humans.

What do Bigfoot footprints look like?

If the beast itself did not get into the camera, but the traces of Bigfoot are “discovered” everywhere. Sometimes paw prints of other animals (bears, snow leopards, etc.) are mistaken for them, sometimes they inflate a story that does not exist. But still, researchers in mountainous areas continue to replenish the piggy bank of traces of unknown creatures, classifying them as footprints of yeti bare feet. They strongly resemble human ones, but wider, longer. Most of the traces of Bigfoot were found in the Himalayas: in forests, caves and at the foot of Everest.

What does a snowman eat?

If yetis exist, they must feed on something. The researchers suggest that the real Bigfoot belongs to the order of primates, which means that it has the same diet as large monkeys. Yetis eat:

• mushrooms, fruits and berries;
• herbs, leaves, roots; moss;
• small animals;
• insects;
• snakes.

Does Bigfoot really exist?

Cryptozoology is the study of species unknown to biology. Researchers are trying to find traces of legendary, almost mythical animals and prove their reality. Cryptozoologists also ponder the question: does Bigfoot exist? While the facts are not enough. Even considering that the number of statements from people who saw the yeti, filmed it on camera or found traces of the beast is not decreasing, all the materials presented (audio, video, photos) are of very poor quality and may be fake. Meetings with Bigfoot in his habitats are also not a proven fact.

Bigfoot Facts

Some people really want to believe that all the tales of the Yeti are true, and the story will continue in the near future. But only the following facts about Bigfoot can be considered indisputable:

1. Roger Patterson's 1967 short film featuring a female yeti is a hoax.
2. Japanese climber Makoto Nebuka, who has been chasing Bigfoot for 12 years, has suggested that he is dealing with a Himalayan bear. And the Russian ufologist B.A. Shurinov believes that the mysterious beast of extraterrestrial origin.
3. A brown-colored scalp is kept in the monastery of Nepal, which is attributed to Bigfoot.
4. The American Society of Cryptozoologists has offered a $1 million reward for the Yeti's capture.

Currently, rumors about the Yeti are replenished, discussions in the scientific community do not subside, and "evidence" is multiplying. Genetic research is being carried out around the world: saliva and hair belonging to Bigfoot (according to eyewitnesses) are being identified. Some specimens belong to known animals, but there are others that have a different origin. Until now, Bigfoot remains an unsolved mystery of our planet.

Since prehistoric times, human fear of the unknown has given rise to legends about bloodthirsty monsters living in places untouched by civilization. It is still unknown, for example, whether it exists only in fairy tales or whether there is real scientific evidence.

Myths and evidence of ancient peoples

The legendary animal has many names, depending on the region where it was seen:

• Nepalese Yeti;
• American Sasquatch or Bigfoot;
• Australian yowie;
• Chinese yeren.

Titles minche and zu-teh in the Tibetan language, they refer to an unknown animal as a bear.

The Indian Lepcha people, who live in the Sikkim region of the Himalayas, revere a "creature from a glacier" described as similar to prehistoric hominid, considers the deity of hunting and compares appearance with a bear.

In the Bon religion, the blood of the world, or "wild man", was used for special ceremonies.

Scientists study the yeti phenomenon

When eyewitness accounts were sketchy, records, bones or other physical evidence were not found, anthropologists suggested that Bigfoot is a hominid, a descendant of Neanderthals who has survived to this day. Carl Linnaeus came up with the name Homo troglodytes(caveman).

• The first documented footprints were described by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Howard-Bury in his book Mount Everest. Intelligence" in 1921. A local Sherpa guide told the climber that he had seen what the Tibetans call the metoh-kangmi, or "wild man of the snows."
• In 1925 photographer Tombazi on the slope of Zemu noticed a tall creature with red hair at an altitude of 4600m. above sea level, and also found footprints belonging to a bipedal five-toed hominid with a foot length of 33 cm.
• A family lives on the territory of the former USSR in Abkhazia, whose ancestor, according to the stories of local residents, is the wild monkey-like Zana. At the end of the 19th century, Prince Achba caught her and presented her to his vassal, who brought the wild woman to Tkhina. Rural centenarians say that Zana's body was covered with gray long hair, her height reached two meters, she ran faster than horses and carried weights without much effort.
• Since 1975 Igor Burtsev, Candidate of Historical Sciences, took up the study of Zana's descendants. He managed to get permission to dig up and send for examination the skull of the son of an unusual woman Tkhin. The results showed that these people originated from West Africa. It is also believed that Zana was just a mentally retarded runaway.

What does a snowman look like?

In mass culture, the image of the bigfoot has formed as a giant-sized ape-like creature with a white skin and elongated forelimbs. People are afraid of him as a monster that can drag and devour people. This view is different from the one that cryptozoologists make on the basis of eyewitness accounts.

If we sum up the impressions of the lucky ones who saw the traces of the animal and himself, the yeti really looks like a huge upright orangutan, whose height reaches 3m. The body of the beast is covered with brown, gray or red hair, the head is about twice the size of a human and has a pointed shape.

He deftly moves through the mountains and climbs trees, surpasses people in strength and speed. Scientists suggest that Bigfoot is omnivorous, eating small animals, insects and berries.

Where does the legendary Bigfoot live?

Judging by the legends, the descendant of ancient primates likes to hide in the mountains. Yeti is known in more than a dozen regions on three continents:

1. They talk about meetings with an unknown "wild man" in the Himalayas, Dagestan, Abkhazia, Bhutan, Pamir, the Caucasus, the Urals, Chukotka;
2. More than 300 testimonies have been recorded in China;
3. Arriving on the Australian continent, the Europeans encountered wild ape-like natives and even fought with them;
4. North America and Canada also have their own Sasquatch legend.

Since they met with bigfoot most often on the territory of the former USSR, in 1957. A Commission was created at the Academy of Sciences, which brought together scientists of related specialties (geologist, mountaineer, doctor, anthropologist) to study the phenomenon. However, this work did not give serious results.

Does Bigfoot really exist?

At the end of the 20th century, only cryptozoologists and fanatics believed in the reality of the Yeti. The scientific community considered all information regarding the hominid to be erroneous or fabricated. However, in 2013 Oxford University professor Brian Sykes and his team conducted a genetic analysis of the hair of a mummified Bigfoot from Ladakh, North India, and wool found by a Bhutanese resident. These specimens were between 20 and 40 years old. The result showed that the DNA of the samples coincided 100% with the genetic material of the ancestor of polar bears, who lived in the Pleistocene era, that is, from 40,000 to 120,000 years ago.

After publishing this news, Brian Sykes continued to collect genetic material from everyone who claimed to have encountered a monster. The rest of the received samples belonged to different types of predators, domestic dogs, some turned out to be vegetable and even synthetic fibers.

In 2016, a paper was presented at the 69th Annual Anthropological Research Conference in the USA. It dealt with the study of the traces of teeth discovered in 2013-2014. in the Mount St. Helena region of Washington state. Mitchell Townsend claimed that impressions on deer rib bones indicated a hominid with a jaw twice the size of a human. The scientist concluded that the animal that gnawed the ribs held them with one hand, as primates do.

At the beginning of the 21st century, the approach to the issue of searching for information about ancient monsters has changed. If earlier the subjective ideas of scientists about the finds and stories of witnesses played a big role, now there are tools that give accurate answers. Based on new data in the near-scientific environment, disputes do not subside whether Bigfoot exists or not. It remains only to wait for the next discoveries to put an end to this issue.

5 most reliable video facts of the existence of the yeti

In this video, anthropologist Vladimir Perevalov will show real-life footage in which Bigfoot was captured:

Many secrets keep the expanses of our vast planet. Mysterious creatures hiding from the human world have always aroused genuine interest among scientists and enthusiastic researchers. One of these mysteries was Bigfoot.

Yeti, Bigfoot, Angry, Sasquatch - these are all his names. It is believed that he belongs to the class of mammals, the order of primates, the genus man.

Of course, its existence has not been proven by scientists, however, according to eyewitnesses and many researchers, today we have a complete description of this creature.

What does the legendary cryptid look like?

The most popular image of Bigfoot

His physique is thick and muscular, with thick hair covering the entire surface of the body, with the exception of the palms and feet, which, according to people who met the Yeti, remain completely naked.

The color of the coat can be different depending on the habitat - white, black, gray, red.

The faces are always dark, and the hair on the head is longer than on the rest of the body. According to some reports, the beard and mustache are completely absent, or they are very short and rare.

The skull has a pointed shape and a massive lower jaw.

The growth of these creatures varies from 1.5 to 3 meters. Other witnesses claimed to have met taller individuals.

Features of the Bigfoot body are also long arms and shortened hips.

The Yeti's habitat is a controversial issue, as people claim to have seen it in America, Asia, and even Russia. Presumably, they can be found in the Urals, the Caucasus and Chukotka.

These mysterious creatures live far from civilization, carefully hiding from human attention. Nests can be located in trees or in caves.

But no matter how carefully the snowmen tried to hide, there were local residents who claimed to have seen them.

First eyewitnesses

The first who happened to see the mysterious creature live were Chinese peasants. According to available information, the meeting was not a single one, but numbered about a hundred cases.

After such statements, several countries, including America and Great Britain, sent an expedition in search of traces.

Thanks to the collaboration of two eminent scientists, Richard Greenwell and Gene Poirier, evidence has been found for the existence of the Yeti.

The find was hair that was supposed to belong only to him. However, later, in 1960, Edmund Hillary got the opportunity to examine the scalp again.

His conclusion was unequivocal: the “find” was made of antelope wool.

As expected, many scientists did not agree with this version, finding more and more confirmations of the previously put forward theory.

Bigfoot scalp

In addition to the hairline found, the identity of which is still a controversial issue, there is no other documented evidence.

Except for countless photographs, footprints and eyewitness accounts.

Photos are often of very poor quality, so they do not allow you to reliably determine if these frames are real or fake.

Footprints, which, of course, are similar to human ones, but wider and longer, scientists rank among the traces of famous animals living in the find area.

And even the stories of eyewitnesses who, according to them, met Bigfoot, do not allow us to establish for certain the fact of their existence.

Bigfoot on video

However, in 1967, two men were able to film Bigfoot.

They were R. Patterson and B. Gimlin from Northern California. Being shepherds, one autumn, on the banks of the river, they noticed a creature, which, realizing that it had been found, immediately set off on the run.

Grabbing a camera, Roger Patterson set off to catch up with an unusual creature, which was mistaken for a yeti.

The film aroused genuine interest among scientists who for many years tried to prove or disprove the existence of a mythical creature.

Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson

A number of features proved that the film was not a fake.

The size of the body and the unusual gait indicated that it was not a person.

The video noted a clear image of the body and limbs of the creature, which ruled out the creation of a special costume for filming the film.

Some structural features of the body allowed scientists to draw conclusions about the similarity of the individual from the video frames with the prehistoric ancestor of man - the Neanderthal ( approx. the last Neanderthals lived about 40 thousand years ago), but very large in size: growth reached 2.5 meters, and weight - 200 kg.

After numerous examinations, the film was found to be authentic.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, who initiated this filming, his relatives and acquaintances reported that the film was completely staged: a man in a specially tailored suit portrayed an American Yeti, and unusual footprints were left by artificial forms.

But they did not provide evidence that the film was fake. Later, experts conducted an experiment in which a trained person tried to repeat the shots taken in a suit.

They came to the conclusion that at the time the film was made, it was not possible to produce such a quality production.

There were other encounters with the unusual being, most of them in America. For example, in North Carolina, Texas and near the state of Missouri, but unfortunately there is no evidence of these meetings, except for the oral stories of people.

A woman named Zana from Abkhazia

An interesting and unusual confirmation of the existence of these individuals was a woman named Zana, who lived in Abkhazia in the 19th century.

Raisa Khvitovna, Zana's granddaughter - the daughter of Khvit and a Russian woman named Maria

The description of her appearance is similar to the available descriptions of Bigfoot: red hair that covered her dark skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on her whole body.

She did not speak articulately, but uttered only cries and isolated sounds.

The face was large, the cheekbones protruded, and the jaw protruded strongly forward, which gave it a ferocious look.

Zana was able to integrate into human society and even gave birth to several children from local men.

Later, scientists conducted research on the genetic material of Zana's descendants.

According to some sources, their origin originates in West Africa.

The results of the examination indicate the possibility of the existence of a population in Abkhazia during the life of Zana, which means that it is not excluded in other regions.

Makoto Nebuka reveals the secret

One of the enthusiasts who wanted to prove the existence of the Yeti was the Japanese climber Makoto Nebuka.

He hunted Bigfoot for 12 years, exploring the Himalayas.

After so many years of persecution, he came to a disappointing conclusion: the legendary humanoid creature turned out to be just a Himalayan brown bear.

The book with his research describes some interesting facts. It turns out that the word "yeti" is nothing more than a distorted word "meti", which means "bear" in the local dialect.

The Tibetan clans considered the bear to be a supernatural creature that possessed power. Perhaps these concepts were combined, and the myth of Bigfoot spread everywhere.

Research from different countries

Numerous studies have been carried out by many scientists around the world. The USSR was no exception.

Geologists, anthropologists and botanists worked in the commission for the study of Bigfoot. As a result of their work, a theory was put forward that states that Bigfoot is a degraded branch of Neanderthals.

However, then the work of the commission was terminated, and only a few enthusiasts continued to work on research.

Genetic studies of available samples deny the existence of the Yeti. An Oxford University professor, after analyzing the hair, proved that they belonged to a polar bear that existed several thousand years ago.

Still from a film shot in Northern California 10/20/1967

At present, the discussions do not subside.

The question of the existence of another mystery of nature remains open, and the society of cryptozoologists is still trying to find evidence.

All the facts available today do not give one hundred percent certainty in the reality of this creature, although some people really want to believe in it.

Obviously, only a film shot in Northern California can be considered proof of the existence of the object under study.

Some people tend to believe that Bigfoot is of alien origin.

That is why it is so difficult to detect, and all genetic and anthropological analyzes lead scientists to wrong results.

Someone is sure that science is hushing up the fact of their existence and publishes false studies, because there are so many eyewitnesses.

But questions are only multiplying every day, and answers are extremely rare. And although many believe in the existence of Bigfoot, science still denies this fact.

Many people believe in the existence of the Yeti. The question has been raised more than once by scientists, but no direct evidence of the life of such creatures on the planet has been provided by witnesses. The most common opinion is that Bigfoot is a mythical humanoid creature that lives in snowy forests and mountains. But the Yeti myth or reality - no one knows for sure.

Description of Bigfoot

The prehistoric bipedal hominid was named Homo troglodytes by Carl Linnaeus, which means "caveman". Creatures belong to the order of primates. Depending on the habitat, they received different names. So bigfoot or sasquatch is a bigfoot that lives in America, in Asia Homo troglodytes is called a yeti, in India - a barung.

Outwardly, they are something between a huge ape and a man. The creatures look intimidating. Their weight is about 200 kg. They have a large physique with large muscle mass, long arms - up to the knees, massive jaws and a small frontal part. The creature has stocky, muscular legs with short thighs.

The whole body of Bigfoot is covered with a long (palm-sized) and dense hairline, the color of which is white, red, black, brown. The face of the Bigfoot in the lower part protrudes forward and also has hair starting from the eyebrows. The head is conical. The feet are wide, with long movable toes. The growth of the giant is 2-3 m. Yeti footprints are similar to human ones. Usually, eyewitnesses talk about the unpleasant smell that accompanies the Sasquatch.

Norwegian traveler Thor Heyerdahl proposed a classification of bigfoot:

• dwarf yeti, which are found in India, Nepal, Tibet, up to 1 m tall;
• true bigfoot has a height of up to 2 m, thick hairline, long hair on the head;
• giant yeti - 2.5-3 m tall, the traces of a savage are very similar to human ones.

Yeti food

Cryptozoologists involved in the study of species not discovered by science suggest that Bigfoot belongs to primates, and therefore has a diet similar to large monkeys. Yeti eats:

• fresh fruits, vegetables, berries, honey;
• edible herbs, nuts, roots, mushrooms;
• insects, snakes;
• small animals, birds, fish;
• frogs, other amphibians.

It is safe to assume that this creature will not disappear in any habitat and will find something to eat.

Bigfoot Habitat

Everyone can try to catch Bigfoot. To do this, you just need to know what Bigfoot looks like and where it lives. Yeti reports come mainly from mountainous areas or forests. In grottoes and caves, among rocks or in impenetrable thickets, he feels most secure. Travelers claim to have seen Sasquatch or their footprints in certain places.

1. Himalayas. This is Bigfoot's home. Here, for the first time in 1951, a huge footprint, similar to a human, was recorded on camera.
2. The slopes of the Tien Shan mountains. Climbers and rangers of this area do not cease to assert the existence of bigfoot here.
3. Altai mountains. Witnesses recorded Bigfoot approaching human settlements in search of food.
4. Karelian isthmus. The military testified that they saw a yeti with white hair in the mountains. Their data was confirmed by local residents and an expedition organized by the authorities.
5. Northeastern Siberia. Bigfoot traces were found in the course of ongoing research.
6. Texas. According to eyewitnesses, the Yeti lives in the local Sam Houston nature reserve. Those wishing to catch it come here regularly, but so far not a single hunt has been successful.
7. California. Ray Wallace, a resident of San Diego, made a film in 1958 in which he showed a female Sasquatch that lives in the mountains in this area. Later, information surfaced about the falsification of filming, the role of the yeti was played by Wallace's wife, dressed in a fur suit.
8. Tajikistan. In the summer of 1979, a photo of a footprint 34 cm long, discovered in the Hissar mountains, appeared.
9. India. A three-meter tall monster covered with black hair is often encountered here. The locals call him barunga. They managed to get a sample of the animal's fur. It bears a resemblance to a yeti hair obtained by the British climber E. Hillary on the slope of Mount Everest.
10. Also, evidence of the existence of bigfoot in real life was found in Abkhazia, Vancouver, Yamal and in the US state of Oregon.

It is quite difficult to understand whether the existence of Bigfoot is a myth or reality. The chronicles of Tibetan monks contain records of humanoid animals covered with wool seen by temple attendants. Footprints of Bigfoot were first discovered in this region. Sasquatch stories appeared in printed editions for the first time in the 50s of the last century. They were told by climbers who conquered Everest. Immediately there were new adventurers who wanted to see the giant wild people.

Bigfoot family and offspring

The existence of tribes of snow people and children found by hunters, completely covered with wool, is evidenced by the stories of the inhabitants of Tajikistan. A family of wild people - a man, a woman and a child - was seen near Lake Paryen. The locals called them "odes of the ob", i.e. water people. The yeti family approached the water and more than once scared the Tajiks away from their homes. Numerous traces of bigfoot presence were also present here. But due to the dusty sandy soil and the insufficient clarity of the contour, it turned out to be impossible to make a plaster cast. There is no real material evidence of these stories.

The analysis of the DNA of a real female Bigfoot was written by The Times in 2015. It was about the legendary wild woman Zana, who lived in the 19th century in Abkhazia. The story goes that Prince Achba caught and kept her in his cage. She was a tall woman with dark gray skin. Hair covered her entire massive body and face. The cone-shaped head was distinguished by a protruding jaw, a flat nose with raised nostrils. The eyes had a reddish tinge. The legs were strong with thin shins, wide feet ended in long flexible fingers.

The legend says that over time the woman's temper subsided and she lived freely in a hole dug with her own hands. She walked around the village, expressed emotions with cries and gestures, did not learn the human language until the end of her life, but responded to her name. She did not use household items and clothes. She is credited with extraordinary strength, speed and agility. Her body retained young features until old age: her hair did not turn gray, her teeth did not fall out, her skin remained elastic and smooth.

Zana had five children from local men. She drowned her firstborn, so the rest of the descendants were taken from the woman immediately after birth. One of Zana's sons remained in the village of Tkhin. He had a daughter, who was interviewed by researchers in search of information. The descendants of Zana did not have signs of a hominid, they only had features of the Negroid race. DNA research has shown that the woman has West African roots. Her children did not have body hair, so there was speculation that the villagers may have embellished the story to attract attention.

Bigfoot by Frank Hansen

At the end of 1968 in Minnesota, in one of the wandering booths, the body of a Bigfoot frozen into a block of ice appeared. Yeti was shown to the audience for the purpose of profit. The owner of an unusual creature resembling a monkey was the famous showman Frank Hansen. A strange exhibit attracted the attention of police and scientists. Zoologists Bernard Euvelmans and Ivan Sanders urgently flew to the city of Rollingstone.

The researchers took photos and sketches of the Yeti for several days. Bigfoot was huge, had large legs and arms, a flattened nose, and brown fur. The big toe was adjacent to the rest, like in humans. The head and arm were pierced by a bullet wound. The owner reacted calmly to the scientists' remarks and claimed that the body had been smuggled out of Kamchatka. The story began to gain more and more popularity among journalists and the public.

The researchers began to insist on defrosting and further study of the corpse. Hansen was offered a huge sum for the right to examine Bigfoot, and then he admitted that the body was an elaborate dummy made at the monster factory in Hollywood.

Later, when the hype subsided, in his memoirs, Hansen again stated the reality of Bigfoot and told how he personally shot him while hunting deer in Wisconsin. Zoologists Bernard Euvelmans and Ivan Sanders continued to insist on the plausibility of the yeti, stating that they smelled decomposition when they examined the creature, so there can be no doubt that it is real.

Photo and video evidence of the existence of Bigfoot

To this day, no material evidence of the existence of bigfoot has been found. Samples of wool, hair, bones, provided by eyewitnesses and owners of private collections, have long been studied.

Their DNA matched the DNA of animals known to science: brown, polar and Himalayan bears, raccoons, cows, horses, deer and other forest dwellers. One of the samples belonged to an ordinary dog.

Skeletons, skins, bones or other remains of Bigfoot have not been found. In one of the Nepalese monasteries, a skull is kept, allegedly belonging to Bigfoot. Laboratory analysis of a hair on the skull indicated morphological features of the DNA of the Himalayan ibex.

Witnesses provided numerous videos and photos of evidence of the existence of the Sasquatch, but the quality of the images leaves much to be desired each time. Eyewitnesses attribute the lack of clarity in the images to an inexplicable phenomenon.

The equipment stops working when approaching the Bigfoot. The look of Bigfoot has a hypnotic effect, introducing those present into an unconscious state when it is impossible to control their actions. Yeti also cannot be fixed clearly due to its high speed of movement and overall dimensions. Often fear and poor health prevent people from making a normal video or photo.

Yeti tales debunked

Zoologists are inclined to believe that stories about the existence of Bigfoot are unrealistic. There are no unexplored places and territories left on Earth. The last time scientists discovered a new large animal was over a century ago.

Even the discovery of an unknown species of fungus is now considered a huge event, although there are about 100 thousand of them. Opponents of the version of the existence of the yeti point to a well-known biological fact: for a population to survive, more than a hundred individuals are needed, and such a number cannot be overlooked.

Numerous eyewitness accounts in the mountains and forests can be caused by the following facts:

• oxygen starvation of the brain in high altitude conditions;
• poor visibility in foggy areas, twilight, observer errors;
• intentionally lying to get attention;
• fear, which gives rise to a game of imagination;
• retellings of professional and folk legends and belief in them;
• Yeti footprints found may be left by other animals, for example, the snow leopard puts its paws in one line and its imprint looks like the footprint of a huge bare foot.

Despite the fact that no material evidence of the reality of the Yeti, confirmed by genetic examinations, has been found, rumors about mythical creatures do not subside. There are all new evidence, photos, audio and video data that are of dubious quality and may be fake.

DNA testing is ongoing on the provided bone, saliva and hair samples, which always match DNA from other animals. Bigfoot, according to eyewitnesses, is approaching human settlements, expanding the boundaries of its range.

Exactly fifty years ago, two Americans - Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin- made a film that made all supporters of paranormal phenomena tremble with delight. Men videotaped Bigfoot in Blif Creek Gorge in northern California. It was this recording that became the first and only “non-blurry” video evidence of its existence. On it, the creature is not just a spot, but a living organism about six feet tall and with short, thick hair all over its body. The controversy around this tape has not subsided so far. Some argue that bigfoot is real, while others argue that resourceful cameramen also turned out to be excellent directors who shot an ordinary person in a gorilla costume.

AiF.ru spoke with Leading Researcher of the Faculty of Biology of Moscow State University, Doctor of Biology Petr Kamensky and found out why the yeti is fiction.

Population and size

From the point of view of science, it is very difficult to prove that something does not exist, it is much easier to do the opposite. Therefore, I will not swear on blood that there is no Bigfoot. However, I will give facts that will explain why Bigfoot living in California, Tibet, Kuzbass or anywhere else is absurd and unlikely.

Firstly, almost all corners of our planet have already been studied, and there are no places left on Earth where people would not climb in search of large life forms. The last time scientists found and described a large animal was over 100 years ago. Since then, no new species have been discovered. And this suggests that, apparently, this is where all the large individuals unknown to science ended.

For understanding, I will give you the following example: this year a grandiose and very important event happened at Moscow State University - people who deal with mushrooms described a new species in the Tver region. It was a real revolution in science, because this territory is well studied, and finding it there was something beyond. And, for a moment, these are mushrooms. They are small. Finding them is much more difficult than finding a huge beast. Namely, such dimensions are attributed by the “eyewitnesses” to the Yeti: it is taller (approximately 220 cm) and much larger than an ordinary person, moreover, it is covered with thick hair. If such a “colossus” existed, it would definitely be noticed! But since there is still no documented evidence of something like this, this only says one thing: Bigfoot does not exist.

In addition, in order for Bigfoot to continue his race, he must not be alone. A whole population is needed, and quite a large one, at least a few dozen individuals, so that the so-called yetis do not degenerate. And if there was such a set of individuals, it would definitely not be missed.

false evidence

Bigfoot is big and cannot hide in such a way that in 200 years people have not discovered it. Meerkats, for example, have also been seen by few, but no one doubts that they exist. And all because they were found, described, made a lot of videos and photographs.

Sometimes there are some "sacred" objects that supposedly belong to Bigfoot: bones, pieces of wool, footprints, etc. All these things, of course, are being studied by scientists. But after genetic analyzes, they turn out to be “dummy”, which refer to already known animals. Often, human DNA is also found in the material, but this only indicates that the samples were contaminated: people held them in their hands and left their “information”.

In general, some funny stories are constantly unfolding around the evidence obtained. For example, if my memory serves me right, once some enthusiast, literally risking his life, stole a "Bigfoot bone" from a Tibetan monastery. He delivered it for research, which showed that it did not belong to a bigfoot at all, but to a real bear, only a large one.

So, if someone ever saw something, then most likely it was the same brown predator that stood on its hind legs. It’s just that someone once imagined it, while others picked up this fantasy and began to believe in it.