Wars during the Victorian era. Victorian England

This is how the British called the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901). During this period there was no major wars, the economy, especially industry, has stabilized. It is no coincidence that this time was dubbed the “railroad age” and the “age of coal and iron.” In 1836-1837 The construction of railways began in England, and within ten years the whole country was covered with them.

Comfortable landaulets, two-wheeled and four-wheeled cabs, as well as omnibuses (a kind of horse-drawn bus) drove around the city streets. In rural areas they traveled in convertibles, charabancs and pony-drawn carriages.

At the same time, the electric telegraph appeared. This was followed by the replacement of the sailing fleet with ships made of iron and steel, which were propelled by steam. The demand for metal increased sharply, but by the middle of the century Britain was producing about half of the total amount of pig iron smelted in the world.

Significantly replenished the English treasury with income from foreign trade. The discovery of gold mines in the colonies of Australia and North America strengthened England's position in world trade. In 1870, the volume of foreign trade of Great Britain exceeded that of France, Germany and Italy combined, and was 3-4 times higher than the volume of trade of the United States of America.

In agricultural work, various machines began to be used more often, and Agriculture moved along the path of progress. After the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846, food prices stabilized. The wealth accumulated by the mid-Victorian era greatly eased social tensions in the country, as working people's incomes increased significantly. However, this did not mean the disappearance of social inequality. One researcher wrote this about England at the end of Queen Victoria's reign: “Nowhere are the contrasts of wealth and poverty so sharp as in England, and none of the European capitals has anything like the “poverty quarters” of London. The English are not divided into two races - into the red-cheeked race and the sallow-faced race."

If in the western part of London, the West End, there were many magnificent mansions, then in the eastern part, across the Thames and on the outskirts, the poor lived in slums. Terrible cramped conditions and dampness reigned in these dwellings. Many had no roof over their heads at all.

From constant malnutrition and poor nutritional food, the poor quickly lost strength and efficiency and already looked like 60 years old after only 30 years. It was not until 1878 that a law was passed limiting the working day to 14 hours. However, in some places the owners forced their workers to work 17-18 hours a day.

The lot of women and children employed in industrial production has eased somewhat. They stopped taking children under 12-14 years old into factories. They were not accepted into foundries for “harmful” production (using lead, arsenic, phosphorus), and they were required to have a health certificate upon entering the factory. However, such government measures could hardly save poor families from poverty. Charles Dickens wrote a lot about England of the Victorian era, about its social contrasts, about the life of little ragamuffins in the London slums. The national wealth of England in the Victorian era was created through truly hard work.

Life presented a completely different picture.” powerful of the world this." Lords, government dignitaries, high church officials, and ambassadors of great powers lived in the aristocratic area of ​​the western part of the city, built up with magnificent mansions. One Russian traveler described the scene of a tea party in such a house: “The table is covered with a snow-white tablecloth, laden with expensive dishes and silver. Luxury dishes and abundance in everything - characteristic feature middle- and upper-class English households. In front of the mistress of the house's chair is a tray with cups and a teapot; A huge vessel of water is boiling over burning coals. The whole family: the older children, father, mother come out in full dress to the tea table... As soon as the family has sat down, the door opens and a maid in a white apron and a white cap brings in the food.”

The British in the Victorian era devoted a lot of time to sports and various physical exercise. They were engaged in hunting, horse racing, horse riding, swimming, fishing, playing ball, and boxing. In the evening they attended theaters, balls, and various entertainment venues. However, these entertainments were affordable only for the richest. Small traders and officials, highly paid workers and employees rested one day a week - on Sunday. As a rule, they spent this day off in nature, in the park, on the lawn. Here's how Dickens described these walks: “Gentlemen in waistcoats of stunning colors with watch chains running through them walk along the grass in a row, striking everyone with their importance (“peacock-like” - in the words of one joker); ladies, fanning themselves with new scarves the size of a small tablecloth, frolic on the lawn... grooms, not afraid of expense, order bottles of ginger lemonade for their beloved, and their beloved wash it down with countless oysters and shrimp; young men in tall top hats jauntily tilted to one side smoke cigars and pretend to enjoy it; Gentlemen in pink shirts and blue vests swing canes, occasionally knocking themselves and other walkers over with them. The toilets here often make you smile, but in general these people have a neat, contented appearance, they are in a good-natured mood and willingly communicate with each other.”

For almost a century, the country did not wage major wars and was not exposed to any serious national danger. This allowed the British to devote all their attention to internal affairs: invent new and improve old machines and mechanisms, erect beautiful buildings, take care of the upbringing and education of the younger generation. That is why they remember the Victorian era with extraordinary warmth as the “golden age” in the history of England.

But to end of the 19th century A. England lost its industrial primacy, losing it to the USA and Germany in steel smelting and coal mining. England's monopoly position on the world market also came to an end. The war with the Boers began. The Victorian era is over.

Victorian Britain is the period of Queen Victoria's reign on the English throne, which lasted from 1837 to 1901. This period is also called the “Victorian era” or “Victorian age”.
The ideal partner for parliamentary rule is Queen Victoria. She was the force that ensured stability in Great Britain.
Victoria is the last queen of the Hanoverian dynasty (the Hanoverian dynasty ruled in Great Britain for 123 years). Under Victoria's rule, Great Britain became one of the leading countries in the world, where the industrial revolution was one of the first to end. Queen Victoria strictly adhered to all laws regulating the activities of Parliament. During the reign of Queen Victoria, a two-party parliamentary system was legally established.
Great Britain - “workshop of the world”
50-60s pp. XIX century - the beginning of the “golden era” of economic and political development Great Britain. At this time she did not have a single serious opponent in the world. Great Britain has become the “workshop of the world”, the “world banker”, the “world carrier”. Capitalist Great Britain was an all-powerful master of the world market for industrial goods, which were distinguished high quality and relatively low prices. They were better and cheaper than products from other countries.
Great Britain has turned into. a large worldwide workshop that processed not only its own raw materials, but also raw materials that were exported from other countries. It had no serious rivals either in industry or trade.
Hence the explanation of the concept: Great Britain is the “workshop of the world.”
Preconditions for turning Great Britain into a “workshop of the world”
Completion of the industrial revolution.
Industrial monopoly.
The system of protectionism that operated in England.
Colonial expansion.
A series of wars that were fought for the sake of English trading capital.
1. Heavy industry developed rapidly, which was the basis for the re-equipment of the entire industry based on the latest achievements of science and technology.
2. The population of Great Britain in the 50-60s of the 19th century. accounted for less than 3% of the world's population, but it provided half of the world's volumes of pig iron, coal, cotton fabrics and many other goods.
3. Iron smelting and coal production in Great Britain were constantly growing.

In 1865, the tonnage of steam ships exceeded the tonnage of sailing ships.
9. The steam merchant fleet ensured the transportation of English goods, and also transported goods from other countries, which allowed shipowners to make huge profits.
Great Britain in the middle of the 19th century, as well as Holland in the 17th century. called the “world carrier.”
10. In the middle of the 19th century. The world's largest ship, the Big Eastern, was built. She could sail to India and back on her coal, carrying 4,400 passengers.
11. British products were exported to different countries the world, which, in turn, supplied Great Britain with raw materials and food products.
Reasons for Britain's predominance in industry and trade
1. In Great Britain, the industrial revolution occurred earlier than in other countries of the world.
2. It was equipped with the best machinery and equipment in the world:
mechanical machines for metal processing;
mechanical spindles;
steam engines.
3. Many goods were produced only in Great Britain, which no other country in the world had:
improved headers;
sewing machines;
refrigerators.
4. In Great Britain, thanks to the use of machines, labor productivity at that time was the highest in the world.
5. Great Britain had no serious competitors in the world market.
6. Machinery and equipment at that time were exported only from Great Britain.
7. Possession of a colonial empire is one of the conditions for industrial and commercial advantage in the world.
8. Stability of the monetary unit - the British pound sterling.
conclusions
The position of Great Britain as the “workshop of the world” provided the English bourgeoisie with huge profits.
Great Britain has become the richest and most powerful state in the world.
English entrepreneurs were the first in the world to begin exporting not only goods, but also capital, abroad, building enterprises, railways, and founding banks.
Affirmation of liberalism
50-60s of the XIX century. The period of establishment of the principles of liberalism in Great Britain.
Liberalism is a socio-political movement that unites supporters of the parliamentary system, political rights and freedoms, democratization of society, and private entrepreneurship.
In the 50-60s of the 19th century. Great Britain was the most democratic country in Europe, in which the principles of liberalism were established. No country had such personal freedoms, freedom of free trade and entrepreneurship, freedom of assembly and the press. Great Britain served as a refuge for political emigrants.
Liberalism developed in two parallel directions.
1. Political liberalism, which defended:
rule of law;
individual freedoms and rights, which should be limited only when they infringe on the rights of other people;
small police force;
small bureaucratic administrative apparatus;
religious tolerance;
universal suffrage;
providing political protection to emigrants from other countries;
reform course of development;
local self-government rather than centralization of power.
2. Economic liberalism, which was based on:
inviolability of private property;
free trade concepts;
policy of non-interference by the state in economic life countries;
eliminating all restrictions on trade and industrial activities;
development of free competition;
eliminating economic barriers within the country and between countries.
The ideologists of British liberalism were G. Cobden and D. Bright, who developed theories of the country's liberal development. They believed that:
“freedom of trade and entrepreneurship” ensures unhindered control over all trade transactions;
“freedom of competition” helps to encourage new branches of industry, the unhindered search for new markets for their goods;
victory over competitors due to industrial and economic advantages;
the personality must be freed from all obstacles;
the state should not interfere in the activities of a private entrepreneur.
Formation of the liberal and conservative parties
In the 50-60s of the 19th century. the country was dominated by landowners and the monetary bourgeoisie, who ruled the country without the industrial bourgeoisie, headed by both main political parties - the Tories (conservatives) and the Whigs (liberals). Subsequently, the industrial bourgeoisie began to play an increasingly important role.
In the middle of the 19th century. The two-party system was finally established. This period became the “golden age” of English parliamentarism, because parliament played the role of the center of state life. There were no significant differences between the Conservative and Liberal parties, but there was a constant struggle for power.
The Liberal Party sought reforms.
The Conservative Party tried not to change anything, to adhere to old traditions. Both parties defended the existing system and the foundations of democracy, and sought to prevent the possibility of a repetition of a political movement of workers similar to Chartism.
The most prominent politician in the ranks of the Conservative Party was Benjamin Disraeli, and the Liberal Party - Henry Palmerston and Gladstone.
For 20 years (1850-1870 pp.), the Tories (conservatives) formed government cabinets for only three years. For the remaining 17 years, power was in the hands of the Whigs (liberals). The Liberal Party was led for 36 years by outstanding statesmen G. Palmerston and J. Russell, who, showing flexibility, made timely concessions to broad sections of the population. However, the Whigs stubbornly resisted the further expansion of voting rights after the reform of 1832 and did not want to carry out new democratic changes.
The main content of the foreign policy actions of all British governments was to ensure the interests and protection of British capital.
British political system
In the XIX century. Great Britain was a constitutional monarchy with a bicameral parliament, in which the lower house (House of Commons) played the main role. The government headed by the Prime Minister, who was appointed only from the representative of the party that won the elections, had broad powers in governing the country.
Features of the English political system
1. At that time, Great Britain was the most democratic state in Europe, in which the principles of liberalism were established.
2. No country had such personal freedoms, freedom of free trade and entrepreneurship, freedom of assembly and the press. Great Britain served as a refuge for political emigrants.
3. No one represented workers, farmers, or farm laborers in parliament.
4. In political life, Great Britain was distinguished by the fact that it did not have a large bureaucratic apparatus.
5. The role of the state was reduced to maintaining law and order, legality, providing defense, conducting foreign policy, collecting taxes and facilitating trade.

When eight-year-old boys from aristocratic families went to live in schools, what did their sisters do at this time?

They learned to count and write first with nannies, and then with governesses. They spent several hours a day, yawning and bored, looking longingly out the window, in the room reserved for classes, thinking about how wonderful the weather was for riding. The room contained a table or desk for the student and governess, a bookcase with books, and sometimes a blackboard. The entrance to the study room was often directly from the nursery.

“My governess, her name was Miss Blackburn, was very pretty, but terribly strict! Extremely strict! I was afraid of her like fire! In the summer my lessons started at six in the morning, and in the winter at seven, and if I arrived late, I paid a penny for every five minutes I was late. Breakfast was at eight in the morning, always the same, a bowl of milk and bread and nothing else until I became a teenager. I still can’t stand either one or the other. We only didn’t study for half a day on Sunday and the whole day on the name day. The classroom had a closet where books for classes were kept. Miss Blackburn placed a piece of bread for her lunch on the same plate. Every time I couldn’t remember something, or didn’t listen, or objected to something, she locked me in this closet, where I sat in the dark and trembled with fear. I was especially afraid that a mouse would come running in there to eat Miss Blackburn's bread. I remained in my captivity until, suppressing my sobs, I could calmly say that now I was good. Miss Blackburn made me memorize pages of history or long poems, and if I missed a word, she made me learn twice as much!”

If nannies were always adored, poor governesses were loved quite rarely. Maybe because the nannies chose their fate voluntarily and remained with the family until the end of their days, and they always became governesses by the will of circumstances. Most often, educated girls from the middle class, the daughters of penniless professors and clerks, were forced into this profession in order to help a bankrupt family and earn their dowry. Sometimes the daughters of aristocrats who had lost their fortune were forced to become governesses. For such girls, the humiliation of their position was an obstacle to their being able to receive at least some pleasure from their work. They were very lonely, and the servants tried their best to express their contempt for them. The more noble the poor governess's family, the worse they treated her.

The servants believed that if a woman was forced to work, then she was equal in position to them, and did not want to look after her, diligently demonstrating their disdain. If the poor girl was placed in a family that did not have aristocratic roots, then the owners, suspecting that she looked down on them and despised them for her lack of proper manners, disliked her and tolerated her only so that their daughters would learn to behave in society.

Apart from teaching their daughters languages, playing the piano and watercolor painting, parents cared little about deep knowledge. The girls read a lot, but they chose not moralizing books, but romance novels, which they slowly stole from their home library. They went down to the common dining room only for lunch, where they sat at a separate table with their governess. At five o'clock tea and baked goods were taken upstairs to the study room. After this, the children did not receive any food until the next morning.

“We were allowed to spread butter or jam on our bread, but never both, and eat only one portion of cheesecakes or muffins, which we washed down big amount fresh milk. When we turned fifteen or sixteen, we no longer had enough food and constantly went to bed hungry. After we heard that the governess had gone into her room, carrying a tray with a large portion of dinner, we slowly walked barefoot down the back stairs to the kitchen, knowing that there was no one there at that time, since loud conversation and laughter were heard from the room, where the servants ate. Stealthily we collected what we could and returned to our bedrooms satisfied.”

Often to teach daughters French and German languages French and German women were invited as governesses. “One day, Mademoiselle and I were walking down the street and met my mother’s friends. That same day they wrote her a letter saying that my prospects for marriage were being jeopardized because the ignorant governess was wearing brown shoes instead of black ones. “Darling,” they wrote, “the cocottes wear brown shoes. What can they think of dear Betty if such a mentor is looking after her!”

Lady Gartwrich (Betty) was the younger sister of Lady Twendolen, who married Jack Churchill. When she came of age, she was invited to hunt quite far from home. To get there, she had to use the railroad. She was escorted to the station early in the morning by a groom, who was obliged to meet her here that same evening. Then, with luggage, which was all the equipment for hunting, she rode in a stall car along with the horse. It was considered quite normal and acceptable for a young girl to travel sitting on straw with her horse, as it was believed that it would act as her protection and would kick anyone who entered the stall car. However, if she were unaccompanied in a passenger carriage with the entire public, among whom there could be men, society would condemn such a girl.

In carriages drawn by small ponies, the girls could travel alone outside the estate, visiting their girlfriends. Sometimes the path lay through forests and fields. The absolute freedom that the young ladies enjoyed on the estates disappeared instantly as soon as they entered the city. Conventions awaited them here at every turn. “I was allowed to ride alone in the dark through forests and fields, but if in the morning I wanted to walk through a park in the center of London, full of walking people, to meet my friend, they would immediately assign a maid to me.”

For three months, while the parents and older daughters moved in society, the younger ones, on their top floor, together with the governess, repeated their lessons.

One of the famous and very expensive governesses, Miss Woolf, opened classes for girls in 1900, which operated until the Second World War. “I attended them myself when I was 16, so I know from personal experience what the best education for girls was like at that time. Miss Woolf had previously taught the best aristocratic families and, in the end, inherited enough money to buy big house on South Adley Street Mather. In one part of it she set up classes for selected girls. She taught the best ladies of our high society, and I can safely say that I myself gained a lot from this beautifully organized mess in her educational process. At three o'clock in the morning we girls and girls different ages, met at a long table in our cozy study room, the former living room in this elegant 18th-century mansion. Miss Wolf, a small, frail woman with huge glasses that made her look like a dragonfly, explained to us the subject we were to study that day, then went to the bookcases and took out books for each of us. At the end of classes there was a discussion, sometimes we wrote essays on topics in history, literature, and geography. One of our girls wanted to study Spanish, and Miss Wolf immediately began teaching her grammar. It seemed that there was no subject that she did not know! But her most important talent was that she knew how to kindle in young heads the fire of thirst for knowledge and curiosity about the subjects being studied. She taught us to find interesting sides in everything. She had many male acquaintances who sometimes came to our school, and we received a point of view on the subject of the opposite sex.”

In addition to the listed lessons, the girls also learned dancing, music, handicrafts and the ability to behave in society. In many schools, as a test before admission, they were given the task of sewing on a button or sewing a buttonhole. However, a similar picture was observed only in England. Russian and German girls were much more educated (according to Lady Gartwrich) and knew three or four languages ​​perfectly, and in France the girls were more refined in their behavior.

How difficult it is now for our free-thinking generation, practically not subject to public opinion, to understand that just a little over a hundred years ago it was this opinion that determined the fate of a person, especially girls. It is also impossible for a generation that grew up outside the boundaries of estate and class to imagine a world in which insurmountable restrictions and obstacles arose at every step. Girls from good families they were never allowed to be alone with a man, even for a few minutes in the living room of their own home. Society was convinced that as soon as a man was alone with a girl, he would immediately harass her. These were the conventions of the time. Men were in search of victims and prey, and girls were protected from those who wanted to pluck the flower of innocence.

All Victorian mothers were very concerned about the latter circumstance, and in order to prevent rumors about their daughters, which were often spread in order to eliminate a happier rival, they did not let them go and controlled their every step. Girls and young women were also under constant surveillance by the servants. The maids woke them up, dressed them, served them at the table, the young ladies made morning visits accompanied by a footman and groom, at balls or at the theater they were with mothers and matchmakers, and in the evening, when they returned home, sleepy maids undressed them. The poor things were hardly left alone at all. If a miss (an unmarried lady) slipped away from her maid, matchmaker, sister and acquaintances for only an hour, then dirty assumptions were already made that something might have happened. From that moment on, the contenders for their hand and heart seemed to evaporate.

Beatrix Potter, the beloved English children's writer, recalled in her memoirs how she once went to the theater with her family. She was 18 years old at the time and had lived in London all her life. However, she had never been near Buckingham Palace, the Houses of Parliament, the Strand and the Monument - famous places in the city center that you couldn’t help but drive past. “It’s amazing to say that this was the first time in my life! - she wrote in her memoirs. “After all, if I could, I would gladly walk here alone, without waiting for anyone to accompany me!”

At the same time, Bella Wilfer, from Dickens's book Our Mutual Friend, traveled alone across the city from Oxford Street to Hollowen Prison (more than three miles), according to the author, “as if a crow were flying,” and no one I didn't think it was strange. One evening she went to look for her father downtown and was only noticed because there were only a few women on the street in the financial district at the time. It’s strange, two girls of the same age, and so differently treated one question: can they go out alone? Of course, Bella Wilfer - fictional character, and Beatrix Potter actually lived, but the thing is that there were different rules for different classes. The poor girls were much freer in their movements due to the fact that there was no one to watch them and accompany them wherever they went. And if they worked as servants or in a factory, then they traveled there and back alone and no one thought it was indecent. The higher the status of a woman, the more rules and decency she was entangled with.

An unmarried American woman, who came accompanied by her aunt to England to visit relatives, had to return home on inheritance matters. The aunt, who was afraid of another long voyage, did not go with her. When six months later the girl reappeared in British society, she was received very coldly by all the important ladies on whom public opinion depended. After the girl had traveled such a long distance on her own, they did not consider her virtuous enough for their circle, suggesting that, being unattended, she could do something illegal. The young American woman's marriage was in jeopardy. Fortunately, having a flexible mind, she did not reproach the ladies for the outdatedness of their views and prove them wrong, but instead demonstrated exemplary behavior for several months and, having established herself in society on the right side, also possessing pleasant appearance, got married very successfully.

Having become a countess, she quickly silenced all the gossips who still had the desire to discuss her “dark past.”

The wife had to obey and submit to her husband in everything, just like the children. A man must be strong, decisive, businesslike and fair, since he was responsible for the entire family. Here's an example ideal woman: “There was something inexplicably tender in her image. I will never allow myself to raise my voice or just talk to her loudly and quickly for fear of scaring her and hurting her! Such a delicate flower should feed only on love!”

Tenderness, silence, ignorance of life were typical features of the ideal bride. If a girl reads a lot and, God forbid, does not read etiquette manuals, is not religious or classic literature, not biographies of famous artists and musicians or other decent publications, if in her hands they saw Darwin's book “On the Origin of Species” or similar scientific works, then it looked as bad in the eyes of society as if she had been seen reading a French novel . After all, an intelligent wife, having read such “nasty”, would begin to express ideas to her husband, and he would not only feel stupider than her, but would also not be able to keep her in check. This is how Molly Hages, an unmarried girl from a poor family who had to earn her own living, writes about it. Being a milliner and having lost her business, she went to Cornwall to visit her cousin, who was afraid of her, considering her modern. “After a while, my cousin complimented me: “They told us that you were smart. But you are not at all!”

In the language of the 19th century, this meant that it turns out that you are a worthy girl with whom I would be happy to make friends. Moreover, it was expressed by a girl from the outback to a girl who came from the capital - a hotbed of vice. These words from her cousin gave Molly an idea of ​​how she should have behaved: “I must hide the fact that I received an education and worked myself, and even more hide my interest in books, paintings and politics. Soon, with all my soul, I gave myself over to gossip about romance novels and “to what extent some girls can go” is a favorite topic of local society. At the same time, I found it quite comfortable to appear somewhat strange. This was not considered a vice or shortcoming. Knowledge is what I had to hide from everyone!”

The already mentioned girl from America, Sarah Duncan, remarked bitterly: “In England, an unmarried girl of my age should not talk much... It was quite difficult for me to accept this, but later I understood why. You need to keep your opinions to yourself. I began to speak rarely, little, and found that best theme, which suits everyone, is a zoo. No one will judge me if I talk about animals."

Opera is also a great topic of conversation. The opera Gilbert and Sullivan was considered very popular at this time. In Gissing’s work entitled “Women in Disarray,” the hero visited the friend of an emancipated woman:

“Is this new opera by Schilberg and Sillivan really that good? - he asked her.

- Very! Have you really not seen it yet?

- No! I’m really ashamed to admit this!

- Go this evening. If, of course, you get free space. Which part of the theater do you prefer?

- I am a poor man, as you know. I must be content with a cheap place.”

A few more questions and answers - a typical mixture of banality and tense insolence, and the hero, peering into the face of his interlocutor, could not help but smile. “Isn’t it true, our conversation would be approved over traditional tea at five o’clock. I heard exactly the same dialogue yesterday in the living room!”

Such communication with conversations about nothing led some to despair, but the majority were quite happy.

Until the age of 17-18, girls were considered invisible. They attended parties, but did not have the right to say a word until someone addressed them. And even then their answers should be very brief. They seemed to have an understanding that the girl was noticed only out of politeness. Parents continued to dress their daughters in similar simple dresses so that they would not attract the attention of suitors intended for their older sisters. No one dared to jump their turn, as happened to Eliza Bennet's younger sister in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. When their time finally came, all attention was immediately turned to the blossoming flower, the parents dressed the girl in her best so that she could take her rightful place among the first brides of the country and be able to attract the attention of profitable suitors.

Every girl, entering the world, experienced terrible excitement! After all, from that moment on, she became noticeable. She was no longer a child who, with a pat on the head, was sent out of the hall where the adults were. Theoretically, she was prepared for this, but in practice she did not have the slightest experience of how to behave in such a situation. After all, at that time the idea of ​​evenings for young people did not exist at all, as well as entertainment for children. Balls and receptions were given for the nobility, for royalty, for guests of parents, and the young were only allowed to attend these events.

Many girls sought to get married only because they considered the worst of evils to be their own mother, who said that it was ugly to sit with your legs crossed. They really had no concept of life, and this was considered their great advantage. Experience was seen as bad manners and almost equated with a bad reputation. No man would want to marry a girl with what was thought to be a bold, daring outlook on life. Innocence and modesty were traits that were highly valued in young maidens by the Victorians. Even the colors of their dresses when they went to the ball were surprisingly monotonous - different shades of white (a symbol of innocence). Before marriage, they did not wear jewelry and could not wear bright dresses.

What a contrast with the spectacular ladies who dressed in the best outfits, traveled in the best carriages, and cheerfully and relaxedly received guests in richly furnished houses. When mothers went out into the street with their daughters, in order to avoid explanations of who these beautiful ladies were, they forced the girls to turn away. The young lady was not supposed to know anything about this “secret” side of life. It was all the more a blow for her when, after marriage, she discovered that she was uninteresting to her husband and he preferred to spend time in the company of such cocottes. Here's how a Daily Telegraph journalist describes them:

“I gazed at the sylphs as they flew or sailed in their delightful riding costumes and intoxicatingly beautiful hats, some in beaver hunting hats with flowing veils, others in coquettish cavalry hats with green feathers. And while this magnificent cavalcade passed by, the mischievous wind slightly lifted their skirts, revealing small, tight-fitting boots with military heels, or tight riding trousers.”

How much excitement there is at the sight of dressed legs, much more than now at the sight of undressed ones!

Not only was the entire structure of life structured in such a way as to preserve morality, but clothing was also an inevitable barrier to vice, because the girl was wearing up to fifteen layers of undershirts, skirts, bodices and corsets, which she could not get rid of without the help of a maid. Even if we assume that her date was experienced in lingerie and could help her, most of the date would have been spent getting rid of the clothes and then putting them back on. In this case, the experienced eye of the maid would instantly see problems in petticoats and chemises, and the secret would still be revealed.

Months, or even years, passed in Victorian times between the emergence of sympathy for each other, beginning with the fluttering of eyelashes, timid glances lingering a little longer on the object of interest, sighs, a slight blush, rapid heartbeat, excitement in the chest, and the decisive explanation. From that moment on, everything depended on whether the girl’s parents liked the candidate for her hand and heart. If not, then they tried to find another candidate who met the main criteria of that time: title, respectability (or public opinion) and money. Having become interested in their daughter’s future chosen one, who could be several times older than her and cause disgust, the parents reassured her that he would endure it and fall in love. In such a situation, the opportunity to quickly become a widow was attractive, especially if the husband left a will in her favor.

If a girl did not marry and lived with her parents, then most often she was a captive in her own home, where she continued to be treated as a minor who did not have her own opinions and desires. After the death of her father and mother, the inheritance was most often left to the older brother, and she, having no means of subsistence, moved to live with his family, where she was always put in last place. The servants carried her around at the table, her brother’s wife commanded her, and again she found herself completely dependent. If there were no brothers, then the girl, after her parents left this world, moved to her sister’s family, because it was believed that an unmarried girl, even if she was an adult, was not able to take care of herself. It was even worse there, since in this case her fate was decided by her brother-in-law, that is, a stranger. When a woman got married, she ceased to be the owner of her own money, which was given as a dowry for her. The husband could drink them away, skip them, lose them, or give them to his mistress, and the wife could not even reproach him, since this would be condemned in society. Of course, she could be lucky, and her beloved husband could be successful in business and take into account her opinion, then life really passed in happiness and peace. But if he turned out to be a tyrant and a tyrant, then one could only wait for his death and be afraid at the same time of being left without money and a roof over his head.

To get the right groom, no expense was spared. Here is a scene from a popular play that Lord Ernest himself wrote and often performed in his home theater:

“A rich house on an estate where Hilda, sitting in her own bedroom in front of the mirror, combs her hair after an event that occurred during a game of hide and seek. Her mother Lady Dragon enters.

Lady Dragoy. Well, you've done a lot, my dear!

Hilda. What's up, mom?

Lady Dragon (mockingly). What's going on! Sitting in a closet with a man all night and not getting him to propose!

Hilda, Not all night at all, but just a short time before dinner.

Lady Dragon. It is the same!

Hilda. Well, what could I do, mom?

Lady Dragon. Don't play dumb! There are a thousand things you could do! Did he kiss you?

Hilda. Yes mom!

Lady Dragon. And you just sat there like an idiot and allowed yourself to be kissed for an hour?

Hilda (sobbing). Well, you yourself said that I should not resist Lord Paty. And if he wants to kiss me, then I have to let him.

Lady Dragon. You really are a real fool! Why didn’t you scream when the prince found you two in his wardrobe?

Hilda. Why did I have to scream?

Lady Dragon. You have no brains at all! Don't you know that as soon as you heard the sound of footsteps, you should have shouted: "Help! Help! Get your hands off me, sir!" Or something similar. Then he would be forced to marry you!

Hilda. Mom, but you never told me about this!

Lady Dragon. God! Well, it's so natural! You should have figured it out yourself! How will I explain to my father now... Well, okay. It's no use talking to a brainless chicken!

A maid enters with a note on a tray.

Housemaid. My lady, a letter for Miss Hilda!

Hilda (after reading the note). Mother! It's Lord Paty! He asks me to marry him!

Lady Dragoy (kissing her daughter). My dear, dear girl! You can't imagine how happy I am! I always said that you are smart!”

The above passage shows another contradiction of its time. Lady Dragon did not see anything reprehensible in the fact that her daughter, contrary to all Standards of Behavior, was alone with a man for an entire hour! And even in the closet! And all this because they were playing a very common home game of “hide and seek”, where the rules not only allowed, but also ordered them to run away in pairs, since the girls could be scared of dark rooms lit only by oil lamps and candles. In this case, it was allowed to hide anywhere, even in the owner’s closet, as was the case in the above case.

With the beginning of the season, there was a revival in the world, and if a girl had not found a husband last year, her worried mother could change the matchmaker and start hunting for suitors all over again. In this case, the age of the matchmaker did not matter. Sometimes she was even younger and more playful than the treasure she offered and at the same time carefully guarded. It was allowed to retire to the winter garden only for the purpose of proposing marriage.

If a girl disappeared for 10 minutes during a dance, then in the eyes of society she had already noticeably lost her value, so the matchmaker during the ball constantly turned her head in all directions so that her ward remained in sight. During the dances, the girls sat on a well-lit sofa or in a row of chairs, and young people approached them to sign up in a ballroom book for a specific dance number.

Two dances in a row with the same gentleman attracted everyone's attention, and the matchmakers began to whisper about the engagement. Only Prince Albert and Queen Victoria were allowed three in a row.

And it was certainly completely inappropriate for ladies to visit a gentleman, except on very important matters. Every now and then in the English literature of that time examples are given: “She knocked nervously and immediately regretted it and looked around, afraid to see suspicion or ridicule among the respectable matrons passing by. She had doubts, because a lonely girl should not visit a lonely man. She pulled herself together, straightened up and knocked again more confidently. The gentleman was her manager, and she really needed to talk to him urgently.”

However, all conventions ended where poverty reigned. What kind of supervision could there be over girls forced to earn a piece of bread? Did anyone think that they walked alone through the dark streets, looking for their drunken father, and at work, no one cared that the maid was left alone in the room with the owner. Moral standards for the lower class they were completely different, although here the main thing was that the girl should take care of herself and not cross the last line.

Those born in poor families worked until exhaustion and could not resist when, for example, the owner of the store where they worked persuaded them to cohabitate. They could not refuse, even knowing what fate befell many others who had previously worked in the same place. The addiction was terrible. Having refused, the girl lost her place and was doomed to spend long weeks, or even months, looking for a new one. And if the last money was paid for housing, it means that she had nothing to eat, she could faint from hunger at any moment, but she was in a hurry to find a job, otherwise she could lose the roof over her head.

Imagine if at the same time she had to feed her elderly parents and little sisters! She had no choice but to sacrifice herself for them! For many poor girls, this could have been a way out of poverty, if not for the children born out of wedlock, which changed everything in their situation. At the slightest hint of pregnancy, the lover left them, sometimes without any means of subsistence. Even if he helped for a while, the money still ran out very quickly, and the parents, who had previously encouraged their daughter to feed the whole family with the money she earned in this way, now, not receiving any more money, disgraced her daily and showered her with curses. All the gifts she had previously received from her rich lover were eaten away. Shame and humiliation awaited her at every turn. It was impossible for a pregnant woman to get a job - this meant that she was putting an extra strain on the neck of an already poor family, and after the birth of the child there were constant worries about who would look after him while she was at work.

And all the same, even knowing all the circumstances, before the temptation to hide at least for a while from oppressive poverty, to open the curtain to a completely different joyful, elegant world, to walk down the street in stunningly beautiful and expensive outfits and look down on the people from whom so much For years, work, and therefore life, depended, it was almost impossible to resist! To some extent, this was their chance, which they would regret in any case, accepting it or rejecting it.

The statistics were inexorable. For every former saleswoman from a store who proudly walked in expensive outfits into the apartment that her lover rented for her, there were hundreds whose lives were ruined for the same reason. A man could lie about his status, or intimidate, or bribe, or take by force, you never know the ways in which resistance can be broken. But, having achieved his goal, he most often remained indifferent to what would happen to the poor girl, who would definitely tire of him. Will the poor thing be able to arrange her life? How will she recover from the shame that has befallen her? Will she die of grief and humiliation or will she be able to survive? What will happen to their common child? The former lover, the culprit of her shame, now shunned the unfortunate woman and, as if afraid of getting dirty, turned away to the side, making it clear that there could be nothing in common between him and this dirty girl. She might also be a thief! Cab driver, go!”

Even worse was the situation of the poor illegitimate child. Even if his father provided financial assistance until he came of age, even then, every minute of his life he felt that they did not want him to be born and that he was not like others. Not yet understanding the word illegitimate, he already knew that it had a shameful meaning, and all his life he could not wash himself of the dirt.

Mr. William Whiteley persuaded all his saleswomen to cohabitate and abandoned them when they became pregnant. When one of his illegitimate sons grew up, he, feeling a burning hatred for his father, one day came to the store and shot him. In 1886, Lord Creslingford wrote in his journal, after walking down one of the main streets of Mayfair after dinner: “It is strange to walk through rows of women silently offering their bodies to the passing men.” This was the result of almost all poor girls who, to use nineteenth-century terminology, “threw themselves into the abyss of depravity.” Cruel times did not forgive those who disdained public opinion. The Victorian world was divided into only two colors: white and black! Either she is virtuous to the point of absurdity, or she is depraved! Moreover, one could be classified in the last category, as we saw above, simply because of the wrong color of shoes, because of flirting in front of everyone with a gentleman during a dance, but you never know because of which young girls were awarded a stigma from the old ones maidens who, compressing their lips into a thin thread, watched the youth at the balls.

Text by Tatiana Dittrich (from the book "Daily Life of Victorian England".

Reproductions of paintings by James Tissot.

source
http://gorod.tomsk.ru/

Victorian era, 1837–1901

These years, like the Elizabethan era, are often depicted as a golden age in English history. Trade flourished, industrial production gained unprecedented strength, vibrant cities grew everywhere, and the possessions of the British Empire extended throughout the world.

Among the many changes that took place in those years, I would like to note one, the most significant, - the outflow of the population from rural areas to cities. If in 1801, according to the census, urban population accounted for only 30% of the total number of Englishmen, then by the middle of the century this figure had increased to 50%, and in 1901 80% of the population lived in cities and their suburbs. This trend, undoubtedly, was very convenient for developing industry, since it created an inexhaustible reserve of labor, but it also generated serious problems. Due to the great overcrowding, terrible dirt and poverty reigned in the cities. At first, the government tried to turn a blind eye to the plight of poor citizens, but then individual employers appeared who tried to take care of their employees. Gradually they realized that this could only be done properly if there were appropriate government laws. Such laws began to appear under pressure from industrialists, and each new law controlling the living and working conditions of workers meant more and more interference in the lives of British citizens. The army of civil servants grew steadily: in 1832 there were about 21 thousand of them, by 1880 there were already over 50 thousand, and in 1914 over 280 thousand hired workers worked at state enterprises.

Victoria: Queen and Wife

For many years, Queen Victoria was a symbol of reliability and stability for the entire nation. This woman, even in her youth, showed extraordinary strength of character, as evidenced by her refusal to sign documents while ill with typhoid fever in 1835. However, she achieved true greatness when she ascended the English throne. Already in the first year of her reign, one of the journalists noted: “She never leaves her post for a minute - the most hardworking and obliging queen in the world.” Although there were those who considered Victoria a limited and stubborn person.

A year after her coronation, in 1838, the queen fell in love with her brilliant cousin, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, and the wedding soon took place. Since then, Victoria relied on her husband in everything, recognizing his intellectual superiority. Those around him immediately felt Prince Albert's influence. If before that Victoria had the habit of sleeping late, then the very next day after her marriage, her subjects saw their queen walking hand in hand with her husband in the predawn fog. As one of the courtiers sarcastically remarked: “Not the best way to give the country a Prince of Wales.”

It was an extremely successful marriage, although, naturally, there were some disagreements: the parents did not always see eye to eye on raising children. And they had a lot of children - nine. The first, in 1840, was born Victoria, who later became the wife of the German emperor. She was followed in 1841 by Edward, Prince of Wales, the future King Edward VII. Besides them there were three more boys and four girls. Prince Albert attached great importance to family life, taking particular care of his children's education. Their married couple served as role models throughout England for many years.

Queen Victoria

If in previous centuries members of the royal family were often distinguished by their penchant for gambling, drinking and love affairs, then the current monarchs expressed ardent disapproval of all these vices. Part of this condemnation fell on their eldest son, who indulged too zealously in the joys of life. Victoria inherited three estates - Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the Royal Pavilion in Brighton. Either these buildings were not spacious enough for royal family, or seemed insufficiently private, but the family purchased two more houses - Osborne House on the Isle of Wight and Balmoral Castle in Scotland. In these places they finally found the peace and solitude they had so dreamed of. Queen Victoria later wrote: “Here we can stroll peacefully without fear of running into a crowd of curious people.”

From the book History of the USA author Ivanyan Eduard Alexandrovich

Chapter X The era of “new imperialism” (1901–1921) Figures of American history: Theodore Roosevelt (1858–1919), 26th President of the United States (1901–1909) William Howard Taft (1857–1930), 27th President of the United States (1909) –1913) Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924), 28th President of the United States (1913–1921) Events and dates: 1902 - Introduction of national quotas for

From the book History of the British Isles by Black Jeremy

Victorian Era The contrast with the turbulent political events on the continent, often accompanied by violence, led to a certain complacency. Surviving defeats and colonial uprisings from 1791-1835, Britain's colonial and maritime rivals for the next four

From book Sinister Secrets Antarctica. Swastika in the ice author Osovin Igor Alekseevich

Hans Kammler: youth and youth, 1901–1933 Hans (Heinz) Friedrich Karl Franz Kammler was born on August 26, 1901 in the German city of Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland). In 1919, after voluntary service in the army, he joined the so-called “Freikorps”, “free

From the book History of Russian Literature of the 19th Century. Part 1. 1795-1830 author Skibin Sergey Mikhailovich

1830s (1830–1837). Boldin autumns of 1830 and 1833 Several events in Pushkin's life influenced his life and work in the 1830s. Among them: matchmaking with N.N. Goncharova and her marriage, the Polish uprising, to which the poet responded with several works,

From the book Grand Admiral. Memoirs of the commander of the Navy of the Third Reich. 1935-1943 by Raeder Erich

From book Short story England author Jenkins Simon

Edwardian Era 1901-1914 The Viceroy of India, the most brilliant of all colonial governors in the world, celebrated the coronation of Edward VII (1901-1910) belatedly, but with incredible scope. In 1903, Baron Curzon summoned all the maharajas and nabobs of the country stretching from

From the book Jews of Russia. Times and events. History of the Jews Russian Empire author Kandel Felix Solomonovich

Part Four (1901–1917)

From the book Scramble for Antarctica. Book 2 author Osovin Igor

Part 10 HANS KAMMLER: YOUTH AND YOUTH, 1901-1933 SS Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler and super-secret technologies evacuated from the Third Reich in the spring of 1945 “The name of SS Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler was not even mentioned at the trial against war criminals in

author Daniel Christopher

Chapter 7. Order and disorder, 1714–1837 Five bright stars stand out on the political horizon of England in the 18th century. This is, first of all, King George II (1727–1760), then his grandson George III (1760–1811). Special mention should be made politicians- prime ministers

From the book England. History of the country author Daniel Christopher

William IV, 1830–1837 Compared to the extravagant George IV, William looked much simpler and more unpretentious. At one time he served in navy- since then the nickname “Sailor Billy” has stuck to him, - some eccentricities even allowed him to be called

From the book England. History of the country author Daniel Christopher

Chapter 8. Victoria and the Empire 1837–1910 Succession to the Throne Queen Victoria, born on May 24, 1819, received the name Alexandrina Victoria at baptism. Her father, the Duke of Kent, brother of King William IV, died in 1820, when the girl was only eight months old.

From the book England. History of the country author Daniel Christopher

Domestic Unrest and the Restoration of Peace, 1837–1851 The Hungry Forties: Chartists, Bread and Potatoes Despite the pomp and splendor of Queen Victoria's coronation, things were not going so well for the country. An industrial and agricultural decline was brewing in England.

From the book Theory of Wars author Kvasha Grigory Semenovich

Chapter 7 THE VICTORIAN AGE On the one hand, this is just the sum of the third and fourth phases of the Fourth England (1833-1905). Likewise, Soviet era– this is just the sum of the second and third phases of the Fourth Russia (1917–1989). On the other hand, the concept "Victorian era" is given

author Commission of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks

From the book Grand Admiral. Memoirs of the commander of the Navy of the Third Reich. 1935-1943 by Raeder Erich

On Land and at Sea, 1901-1905 After two years at sea and forty-five days' leave with my parents in Grünberg, I was assigned to the 1st Fleet Crew at Kiel, first as platoon commander and later as second adjutant. commander. The naval crew of that

From the book A Short Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) author Commission of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks

CHAPTER I THE STRUGGLE FOR THE CREATION OF A SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC WORKERS' PARTY IN RUSSIA (1883-1901

They were animated by a firm determination to oppose any further triumph of the democratic principle. New elections, called as a result of the change in monarch, strengthened the Conservative Party. The large cities of England, Scotland and Ireland voted predominantly in favor of the liberal and radical factions, but the English counties for the most part elected opponents of the ministry.

Meanwhile, the policies of previous years created significant difficulties for the government. In Canada, the discord between the mother country and the local parliament has reached dangerous proportions. The Ministry received permission to suspend the Canadian Constitution and sent Earl Dergham to Canada with extensive powers. Dergam acted energetically and skillfully, but the opposition accused him of abuse of power, as a result of which he had to resign from his position.

The government's weakness showed itself even more clearly in Irish affairs. The Ministry could achieve approval of the Irish tithe bill only after the complete elimination of the appropriation paragraph.

Chartism

At that time, the radicals formed an extreme faction that developed the “People's Charter” - a petition to parliament, which demanded universal suffrage, secret voting, annually renewed parliaments, etc. Beginning in the fall of 1838, the Chartists launched a strong campaign at meetings, collecting signatures for petitions and convened the so-called national convention in London at the beginning of 1839, looking for supporters among the working population of factory towns. The uprising that took place in the summer of 1839 was suppressed; the main Chartist leaders were put on trial and sent into exile. Chartism achieved a reduction in the working day.

Foreign and domestic policy

The year 1850 began under more favorable conditions. Habeas Corpus was restored in Ireland; thanks to free trade, revenues generated a surplus of 2 million pounds sterling, while the tax for the benefit of the poor was reduced by 400,000 pounds compared to the previous year.

In the discord between Russia and Austria, on the one hand, and Turkey, on the other, caused by the case of the Hungarian fugitives, England took the side of the Porte. In January 1850, an English squadron unexpectedly appeared in sight of Athens demanding payment of old bills, among which in the foreground was the reward of the Portuguese Jew Pacifico, who was an English citizen, for damage to his house during popular unrest. The response to the refusal of the Greek government was the blockade of all Greek harbors. Greece could only protest against this abuse of force; Envoys of other states expressed their censure of England's mode of action in more or less energetic terms. A month later the blockade was lifted; its consequence was a cooling of relations towards France and Russia. Lord Stanley invited the Upper House to censure the government for its conduct in Greece.

This proposal was accepted, but the lower house, at the suggestion of Roebuck, expressed formal approval of Palmerston's policy. However, the upper house vote was not without consequences. Palmerston realized the need to extricate himself from the isolated position in which he had placed England, and all the more diligently tried to get closer to the Great Powers on the Schleswig-Holstein question, resolved by the London protocols of July 4 and August 12, 1850.

The sudden death of Robert Peel was a sensitive blow for the ministry. At the same time, the Austrian General Haynau, who arrived in London, suffered a personal insult from the workers at the Barclay brewery, and since Palmerston was in no hurry to give satisfaction, this further aggravated mutual relations to Austria, whose policy in Germany, especially the desire to include all Austrian lands in the German Confederation, provoked decisive resistance from England.

The Roman Curia prepared great difficulties for the Whig ministry. The papal breve of September 30 immediately appointed nine Catholic bishops for Great Britain; Cardinal Wiseman received the title of Archbishop of Westminister. This revived in the English clergy and people the deep-rooted hatred and aversion to Rome; the old “No Popery” click sounded again. At the beginning of 1851, Rossel introduced a bill on ecclesiastical titles, which prohibited the assumption of the episcopal title by all clergy who did not belong to the state church, and declared invalid all donations made in favor of such persons. To liberals and even to some Peelites, this bill seemed too harsh, and in the eyes of zealous Protestants it was still too timid.

Meanwhile, the lower house, despite the protest of the ministry, accepted Lock King's proposal to grant English and Welsh counties the same voting rights as cities. A ministerial crisis ensued, ending with the restoration of the previous cabinet, since Lord Stanley, the leader of the protectionists, failed to form a strong cabinet and attract people like Gladstone to it.

Politics took a back seat for a time thanks to the first World's Fair, which opened in London on May 1, 1851. A new source of weakness for the Ministry was the conduct of Lord Palmerston. True, he ensured that the Hungarian fugitives settled in Turkey, including Kossuth, were released; but the outcome of the struggle over Pacifico was a heavy defeat for him. The mediation commission elected on this issue recognized Pacifico's right to a reward of no more than 150 pounds sterling - and because of such a sum, the minister almost caused a European war.

Then a diplomatic break with Naples occurred as a result of Gladstone's letters about the cruelties of the Neapolitan government being sent to English envoys on the continent.

The coup d'etat, which took place in France on December 2, was joyfully welcomed by Palmerston, without the knowledge of the ministry and the crown. Rossel took advantage of this to get rid of his inconvenient comrade. Palmerston repaid him by introducing an amendment to one of the government proposals, the adoption of which caused the resignation of the ministry. This time, Lord Stanley (who received the title of Earl of Derby after the death of his father) managed to form a ministry (in February 1852). In the new cabinet, strictly Tory, he himself took the place of First Lord of the Treasury, Disraeli received the portfolio of finance, and foreign affairs passed to the Earl of Malmesbury.

The protectionist sympathies of the ministry led to the resumption of free trade agitation. The Cobden League has reopened; Rallies were held throughout the country and preparations were made for new elections. The government was in the lower house in an undoubted minority and owed its existence solely to disagreements among the liberal parties. In view of all this, Disraeli spoke in favor of continuing the customs policy of his predecessors.

The long-awaited dissolution of parliament followed in July, and new elections were immediately called. The ministry acquired a few extra votes, but not enough to have a majority in parliament. A considerable loss for him was the death of Wellington (September 14), who enjoyed a pacifying influence on the parties. Disraeli's financial proposals were rejected by a majority of 19 votes, and the Tory ministry was forced to resign (December 1852).

The cabinet that replaced him was made up of various parties who entered into an alliance with each other to overthrow Derby. The Peelites had their representatives in it in the person of Lord Aberdeen (First Minister) and Gladstone, who received the portfolio of finance, the Whigs in the person of Lord John Rossel, and the radicals in the person of Molesworth and Baines. Palmerston received the Ministry of the Interior.

Crimean War

Events in India were no less favorable. Since the capture of Delhi by the British, the center of gravity of the uprising shifted to Oudh and its capital Lucknow. In March 1858, the main quarters of Lucnow were taken by storm. In vain did the leaders of the insurgents seek help in Nepal, the only Indian state that still retained signs of independence: the ruler of Nepal entered into an alliance with the British.

Lord Stanley, the talented son of the Earl of Derby, successfully carried out the plan for the reorganization of India. The dominance of the East India Company ended, the board of directors was abolished, and in its place the position of a special minister responsible to parliament was created with a board of 15 members.

Shortly before this, the ministry suffered a severe defeat on the question of the Jews. When the bill for the admission of Jews into Parliament was rejected for the third time by the peers at the insistence of Lord Derby, the opposition, indignant at such disrespect for the resolutions of the lower house, proposed to the house a simple resolution to recognize Baron Rothschild as representative of the City of London. Lord Derby had to yield. He introduced a new bill of oath into the upper house, which made it possible for the admission of Jews. This bill was passed by the Lords, after which Rothschild took his place in the House of Commons.

In the same 1858, Lord Elgin concluded an agreement with Japan, which brought enormous trade advantages to England.

In England itself, reformist agitation assumed impressive proportions in 1859; Shortly before the opening of parliament, Bright came up with a reform project of a purely democratic nature. The ministry decided to introduce its own bill in order to calm public opinion with some concessions. The Whigs entered into an agreement with the Radicals to reject this bill, which did not meet with approval among the Tories. On the 21st March Lord John Rossel moved the House to declare that the Reform Bill was not suited to the needs of the country; this proposal was adopted by a majority of 39 votes. Following this, the dissolution of parliament was announced.

This step caused great excitement in the country, especially since the foreign policy of the ministry threatened new dangerous complications. At the first signs of a clash between Austria and France in the Italian affair, although the government assumed the guise of complete impartiality, from its statements one could understand that it was leaning more towards the side of Austria, while sincere sympathy for the cause of Italian freedom prevailed among the people. Mediation offered by Lord Malmesbury was rejected by Napoleon III.

The extensive naval armaments announced by the government, the strengthening of the Mediterranean fleet, Lord Derby's statement that England might find herself forced to occupy Trieste, the call for the formation of volunteer detachments, even the declaration of neutrality, interpreted in a sense favorable to Austria, all this maintained public distrust of the intentions. ministers and influenced new elections. The fear of being drawn into a war to maintain European absolutism prompted the radicals to forget their dislike of Lord Palmerston.

Lord Rossel was reconciled with his long-time enemy; a coalition was formed of all liberal factions with the aim of overthrowing the Conservative ministry, to which the new House of Commons expressed its distrust (June 1859). The Tories have fallen. Palmerston took over as First Minister, Rossel became Foreign Minister, and the remaining portfolios were distributed to Whigs, Peelites and Radicals. The ministers included Gladstone and Milner-Jibson. There was no more talk of sabotage into the Adriatic Sea to defend Trieste; in alliance with Russia, an attempt was made to divert the Prussian court from intervention in favor of Austria.

All other interests were relegated to the background due to the North American crisis that broke out in early 1861. If the seemingly inevitable collapse of the proud republic aroused a certain sense of schadenfreude in the British aristocracy, then the influence of the internecine war on cotton production, which fed a significant part of the working population of England, inspired serious fears. Gladstone's budget indicated continued improvement in finances. Revenues promised a surplus of almost 2 million, which is why the Chancellor of the Exchequer proposed not only the abolition of the paper tax, but also a reduction in income tax. In order to deprive the lords of the opportunity to reject the first of these measures a second time, the financial proposals of the ministry were submitted to the upper house not separately, but together with the budget, and although the lords protested against this, they, on the advice of Lord Derby, did not bring matters to a collision with the House of Commons.

The treaty between England, France and Spain, by virtue of which the demands made by these three powers on the Mexican government were to be supported by military force if necessary, indicated the intention of the Allies to take advantage of the critical situation of the alliance to intervene in American affairs.

Thanks to an unexpected incident, matters suddenly became so acute that one could fear a decisive break. The English mail steamer Trent, on which the commissioners were traveling southern states Mazon and Slidel were detained by an American military corvette under the command of Captain Wilks, who arrested the commissioners and took them to New York. The news of this caused great indignation in England. The British envoy in Washington, Lord Lyons, immediately received orders to demand the extradition of the prisoners and satisfaction for the insult inflicted on the British flag. The government of President Lincoln understood that, under these conditions, a break with England could have the most fatal consequences for the union. It condemned the action of its officer and released the prisoners. The peaceful outcome of the clash was partly Prince Albert's business. This was the last service he rendered to his second fatherland. He died on December 14, 1861, sincerely mourned by the British nation.

The joint intervention undertaken by England, France and Spain in Mexican affairs had a completely unexpected outcome. Spain and England were not slow to realize that the plans of the French emperor went much further than the original goal of the expedition. First English and then Spanish troops left Mexico. This step could not help but touch the heart of the French emperor, but he hid his displeasure because he needed further assistance from England for his transatlantic plans.

On October 30, 1862, Minister Drouin de Luis sent an invitation to the London and St. Petersburg courts to take measures to end the internecine war in America, transparently hinting at the possibility of armed intervention. But the St. Petersburg court decisively rejected the French invitation, and Lord Rossel followed his example.

The revolution in Greece, which cost King Otto the throne (October 1862), produced new turn in the eastern politics of England. In order to prevent the election of the Prince of Leuchtenberg, the nephew of the Russian emperor, as king, it was decided to make a territorial sacrifice to Greece. The Greeks were given to understand that if they made a choice pleasing to the British cabinet, the latter intended to agree to the annexation of the Ionian Islands to the Greek kingdom.

The bombing of a London prison to free Fenian prisoners again brought the Irish question to the fore. Realizing the impossibility of resolving it through persecution alone, Gladstone, at the very beginning of the 1868 session, introduced three famous resolutions into Parliament, which stated the need to destroy the Irish state church. They were adopted by a majority of 65 votes. The ministry, headed by Disraeli due to Derby's illness, decided to remain in office and appeal to the people. On July 31, the last parliament elected under the 1832 law dissolved.

By this time, the war with Abyssinia, caused by the refusal to release British prisoners, had ended successfully.

New elections gave a Liberal majority of 118 votes. Disraeli resigned; the drafting of the ministry was entrusted to Gladstone (December 1868). In addition to members of the former Liberal cabinet, the ministry included John Bright and Adulamite Low, who managed to make peace with the Liberals.

The 1869 session opened with the release of a significant number of Fenians and the announcement of the impending restoration of Habeas corpus in Ireland. On March 1, Gladstone introduced his Irish Church Bill into the Lower House. He proposed to immediately stop the payment of allowances to Irish priests and to transfer all church property into the hands of a royal commission, which would undertake the payment of lifetime income to the owners of ecclesiastical places. Irish bishops were to lose their seats in the upper house, Irish ecclesiastical courts were to cease their activities. Of the 16.5 million value of the property of the Irish Church, it retained the right to only 6.5 million, while the remaining 10 million were to be used partly for general useful purposes, partly for benefits to Catholics and Presbyterians. The Lower House adopted this bill with a majority of 361 votes to 247. Although the House of Lords approved it in the third reading, it did so with many amendments. Since these amendments were rejected by the lower house, and the Lords did not yield, fears arose at one time that the reform would not take place; but the conflict was removed by a compromise between the Earl of Granville and Lord Cairns, the leader of the opposition.

After the resolution of the Irish church question, another reform, which was in connection with the Irish unrest, should have come next - namely, a change in land relations in Ireland. This constituted the main task of the 1870 session. Already on February 15, Gladstone introduced his Irish Bill into the lower house. It was supposed to recognize farmers at the end of the lease period as having the right to compensation for all improvements and buildings they had made; to make it easier for farmers, through benefits from the state treasury, to purchase land property, and for farmers to cultivate infertile lands; finally, establish arbitration courts to resolve all disputes and misunderstandings between farmers and landowners. The bill passed both houses and became law on August 1. In addition, both houses approved the new law on public education proposed by Forster (initially for England and Wallis). The whole country was supposed to be divided into school districts and then found out how the existing schools in each district corresponded to the true needs of the population. Those districts in which the condition of the schools turned out to be satisfactory were to remain in the same position, while in the rest it was planned to open a corresponding number of new schools. The following three basic rules were established for these new schools:

  • 1) compliance of teaching with the program approved by parliament,
  • 2) supervision of government inspectors regardless of religious differences,
  • 3) complete freedom of conscience, due to which none of the students can be forced, against the will of the parents, to participate in religious teaching.

The acceptance or non-acceptance of these rules is left to the good will of the school authorities, but only if they are accepted does the school become entitled to benefits from Parliament.

The English commissioners were greeted in London with noisy rejoicings, as messengers of an “honorable peace.” peace with honor). Lord Hartington's proposal to vote censure on the ministry's eastern policy was rejected by 388 votes to 195. Important legislative measures were out of the question during the 1878 session in view of the predominant importance of foreign policy. The Home Ruler Party resumed its obstructive tactics on various occasions, but refrained from repeating scenes like last year. An important event in history there was a gap between its moderate and revolutionary elements over the debate about the murder of a large landowner, the Earl of Leitrim.

Late Victorian period

Soon after the closure of parliament, news arrived of the Russian movement towards the Amu Darya and the arrival of the Russian embassy in Kabul. This was Russia's response to sending Indian troops to Malta. For his part, Lord Beaconsfield decided to abandon the policy of non-intervention in Afghanistan that his predecessors adhered to. When the Afghan emir Shir Ali did not agree to the presence of British residents in Kandahar and Herat, the Anglo-Indian army entered Afghanistan and quickly occupied the Peiwar Pass, thus removing one of the main obstacles to Kabul.

At the beginning of 1879, Shir Ali fled Kabul and soon died. His successor, Yakub Khan, made peace with England.

In Ireland the general excitement was maintained by huge rallies. Parnell proposed a system of public ostracism against anyone who dared to lease lands from which the previous tenants had been expelled, or who in any way acted contrary to the land league. A whole series of violence was committed against court officials, land agents, farmers who remained faithful to the contracts, and in general against all persons who for some reason were unpleasant to the league. All this aroused all the greater fears because the perpetrators were not found and the police were powerless.

The government increased the number of troops and brought 14 leading members of the Land League, including Parnell, to trial on charges of sedition. The extent to which the Irish people took to heart the means of social ostracism recommended by Parnell was shown by the story of Captain Boycott, a farmer and land agent in Mayo, after whom this whole system, which took on the character of real terror, received the name of boycott. Soon in Ireland, except Ulster, there was not a single corner left where the league did not have its own branches and secret courts, the members of which had at their disposal the terrible weapon of boycott. In the case of the Land League members, the jury could not reach an agreement, and the trial remained without result. At the beginning of 1881, a bill was proposed to parliament to suppress anarchy in Ireland and a land bill tending to transform agrarian relations. Home Rulers declared their firm intention to slow down the first of these bills at all costs. The debate dragged on for 42 hours straight. Finally the bill passed its first reading; but already on the same day, regarding the proposal for a second reading, the home rules resumed their obstructive tactics.

The need for changes in the charter of the chamber itself became absolutely clear. Gladstone's proposal in this regard caused new stormy scenes. It was adopted, but the Irish deputies still managed to delay the approval of the bill for as many as 12 meetings. Then came the turn of the Land Bill. It contained the following main regulations: restriction of the landowner’s right to refuse the farmer further maintenance of the lease; providing farmers with the cost of all improvements they have made on the leased plot; review of excessively high rents by special assessment offices, the determinations of which should be equally binding on both landowners and farmers; increase in lease terms; finally, the issuance of loans for the improvement or purchase of rented estates, for the raising of empty lands, as well as for the resettlement of the hopelessly impoverished. Despite many amendments, the bill remained unchanged in its essential points; but after being examined by the Lords he returned to the lower house unrecognized. The Ministry expressed its readiness to make concessions, but rejected all amendments that violated the main objective bill. The lords stood their ground. Gladstone made several more concessions, and finally the bill received royal assent (August 1881).

In April of the same year, Lord Beaconsfield died, who was succeeded as leader of the Conservative Party in the upper house by Lord Salisbury. A Boer uprising broke out in the Transvaal. Through the Orange Republic, negotiations were opened, which ended in peace, which was based on the recognition of the sovereign rights of the Queen and self-government of the Boers.

The government calmly looked at the occupation of Tunisia by France, but in advance declared its protest against the expansion of French influence in Tripoli.

Efforts to renew the Anglo-French trade agreement concluded by Cobden in 1860, in which Charles Dilck took an outstanding part from the English side, were defeated by the resistance of French protectionists.

The Irish Land League was closed by the government; assessment presences for rent review opened their activities, reviving hopes for a better future. But already in the first days of 1882, a new ferment of hostile elements was discovered. Fenian secret societies tried to occupy the gap left by the destruction of the land league; they were supported by cash benefits and emissaries from America.

At the beginning of the 1882 session there was a clash between Gladstone and the Upper House. The latter decided to elect a special commission to examine the results of the Irish Land Bill. In Gladstone's opinion, such a commission, appointed by landowners and in the interests of landowners, could only have a harmful effect on the work of pacification begun in Ireland. He therefore proposed that the censure be voted on by the upper house, which was adopted by a majority of 303 votes to 235.

The Lords nevertheless elected a commission, but without the assistance of the government, it remained stillborn. The Tories themselves found it necessary to meet the demands of the Land League and made a proposal to assist farmers in purchasing their leased plots with benefits from the treasury, while at the same time demanding stricter measures against secret societies. The conciliatory mood was disturbed by the news of the murder of the new Secretary of State for Ireland, Lord Frederick Cavendish, and his comrade Bork in Phoenix Park, Dublin (May 6). This murder was the work of secret societies who did not want to hear about the agreement. Already on May 11, Garcourt introduced into the lower house a crime prevention bill, which, in addition to other measures to protect public safety, included permission to conduct house searches day and night, the appointment of emergency courts, the right to ban newspapers and public gatherings. The bill was passed by both houses. Following this, Gladstone passed another law aimed at helping the poorest Irish tenants.

In the sphere of foreign policy, Egyptian affairs were of main interest. Back in the fall of 1881, a military party was formed in Egypt under the leadership of Arabi Pasha, which openly became hostile to foreigners. In this regard, on June 11, 1882, there was an indignation of the mob in Alexandria, and the British consul was wounded. On June 15, Gladstone formulated in parliament his Egyptian policy in 3 main points: joint action with France, respect for the sovereign rights of the Porte and the establishment of a lasting order in Egypt in the interests of Europe and with the approval of the great powers. The European Conference that met in Constantinople (June 23) acted in the same spirit. But the slowness of the Porte, the reluctance of France to intervene armed, and the increasingly provocative manner of Arabi's actions soon forced England to a more energetic course of action. On July 6, the English government sent Arabi Pasha a demand to suspend the fortress work he had begun in Alexandria, and since Arabi ignored this demand, on July 11 the British fleet under the command of Admiral Seymour opened fire on the Alexandrian forts.

On July 13, Arabi left the city, which was set on fire by the mob. Having occupied Alexandria, the British turned their forces against Arabi. The most outstanding English commander, Wolseley, was sent to Egypt, and on August 13 he won a brilliant victory over Arabi Pasha at Tel el-Kebir. The latter surrendered and was taken to the island of Ceylon.

By the end of the session, Gladstone's proposed changes to the parliamentary statutes were adopted. The most important of them was the so-called. closure rule closure), by which the speaker was given the right, with the consent of the majority, to declare the debate over and the establishment of the so-called large committees (eng. grand committees) for the preliminary development of special issues that have hitherto been discussed in the full sitting of the House. These two regulations largely limit the possibility of abuse of freedom of speech. There have been important changes in the composition of the ministry. Bright retired immediately after the bombing of Alexandria. Gladstone ceded the portfolio of finance to Childers, reserving only the post of First Minister, and new members joined the cabinet: Lord Derby, who openly went over to the liberal camp, and Charles Dilke, who belonged to the radical wing of the party.

In the 1883 session the ministry still had a majority in the House of Commons. A bill against the manufacture and sale of explosives passed both houses on the same day. Thanks to large committees elected on the basis of the new parliamentary statute, the chamber with unusual speed adopted laws introduced by the ministry on insolvency, on abuses in parliamentary elections and on protecting the rights of inventors. In the same way, a law was passed, although not without strong resistance, to improve the living conditions of English and Scottish farmers.

In Ireland things continued as before. How far the network of Fenian conspiracies spread was demonstrated by the murder of Carey, one of the crown witnesses in the trial against the murderers in Phoenix Park; he was killed on a British steamer just as he was about to land on the African shore.

In Egypt, matters became more complicated due to unrest that broke out in Sudan. Back in 1882, a national-religious movement arose there, headed by the Mahdi (prophet) Mohammed-Ahmed. On November 1, 1883, he utterly defeated the Egyptian army, commanded by British officers, and a few days later another detachment suffered a brutal defeat at Suakim. The outburst of indignation that gripped the entire nation forced Gladstone to agree to send General Gordon to the Sudan as Governor-General. Gordon immediately hurried to his destination, but was poorly supplied with troops and money. The Egyptian army under the command of the Englishman Baker was completely defeated (February 11, 1884) by Osman Digma at El-Teb, and Gordon himself was forced to lock himself in Khartoum, without provisions and with a garrison overcrowded with traitors. The whole nation demanded that the brave general not be abandoned to the mercy of fate, and the ministry decided to send General Wolsley to his rescue. But before the vanguard new army reached Khartoum, the city succumbed to starvation and Gordon was killed (January 26, 1885). Wolseley was ordered to retreat. By the end of May, all British military forces had returned to Upper Egypt.

If, despite the dismal outcome of Egyptian affairs, the House rejected the Tories' proposed censure of the ministry, this is explained by the fact that, through a number of reforms in the field of domestic policy, Gladstone was able to acquire reliable supporters among the radicals. Among these reforms, the first place was occupied by a new electoral law, which eliminated the difference between rural and urban voters and granted suffrage in the counties to every tenant of an apartment; In addition, the right to vote was granted to servants with a qualification of 10 pounds. In this way, 2 million new voters were created. The lower house passed this bill on June 26, 1884, but the upper house decided not to proceed to the second reading until the ministry introduced its bill on the distribution of electoral districts. Gladstone did not agree to this demand.

Under pressure from the press, the lords yielded; the electoral bill was adopted by them. Soon after this, the other half of the reform was carried out: many small towns were deprived of the right to have their own special deputy, the number of representatives from large cities was increased, the counties were divided into electoral districts of approximately equal population. Gladstone's weak successes in the field of foreign policy, and on the other hand, his courtesy to the radicals and Irish autonomists, had long caused an estrangement between him and the moderate Whigs. This led to the fact that when on June 3, 1885, regarding the budget, Gix Beach introduced a resolution expressing no confidence in the government, the latter was defeated and resigned.

The creation of a new cabinet was entrusted to the head of the Tories, the Marquis of Salisbury. He himself took over the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Northcote, who at this time passed with the title of Lord Iddesley into the upper house, became president of the privy council, Gix Beach received control of finance, and Lord Churchill received the Ministry of Indian Affairs.

The new cabinet pursued its foreign policy quite happily: relations with Germany, shaken by the latter’s successes in Africa, improved, disagreement with Russia over the Afghan borders was settled, General Prendergast occupied Burma, and already on January 1, 1886, the Viceroy of India proclaimed the annexation of Burma to British Empire.

Meanwhile, at the beginning of December 1885, parliamentary elections took place on the basis of the new electoral law, giving the liberals a significant number of votes thanks to the assistance of rural voters who wished to express their gratitude to Gladstone and his friends for the political rights granted to them. In total, 333 Liberals, 251 Tories and 86 Irish autonomists were elected. In Parliament, the Irish united with Gladstone's friends, and already on January 26, 1886, the Salisbury cabinet was defeated over the address. The Tories resigned.

Since moderate Whigs, like Lord Hartington and Goshen, stood aside, the cabinet was composed mainly of Gladstone's friends and radicals - Lord Rosbury, Childers, Morley, Chamberlain. Gladstone immediately introduced two bills to pacify Ireland in the lower house. One of them intended, with the help of a redemption operation, to convert large land property, which was exclusively in the hands of the British, into free peasant ownership, and the other - to grant Ireland a native government and a special people's parliament. The new Irish Parliament was to consist of ²/3 elected members and 1/3 members appointed by the English government. All matters relating to Ireland were to be subject to his jurisdiction, with the exception of foreign policy, customs and military matters; in return, Irish members would lose their seats in the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

There was a violent opposition in the country against this last bill; Not only all the conservatives, but also the moderate Whigs, led by Lord Hartington, took up arms against him; even many radicals spoke out against the law, the consequence of which would be such a far-reaching separation between Ireland and England. Chamberlain left the office with his friend Trevelyan. The Irish Autonomy Act was rejected in the Lower House (June 7) by a majority of 341 to 311. Gladstone appealed to the country, but after an unusually excited electoral struggle, the people spoke out, in July 1886, against the ministry. In addition to 86 Irish autonomists, only 191 Gladstone supporters got into the new parliament, while the Tories received 317 seats and the liberal unionists 76.

Since Hartington refused to join the cabinet, Salisbury formed a purely Tory ministry, which included, among other things, Lord Iddesley, Gicks Beach, Lord Churchill and Cranbrook. Ireland responded to the overthrow of Gladstone's ministry with new agrarian crimes and street riots. Dillon and O'Brien, leaders of the national league that was formed in place of the former land league, recruited supporters everywhere for their “plan for a new campaign.” By this plan it was proposed to appoint trustees from the league to fix the rents of every private estate in Ireland; If the landlords do not accept the assessments made by these trustees, then the tenants must stop paying rent altogether. Irish MPs tried to challenge the government in the lower house, but Parnell's amendment to the address was rejected along with his land bill, which was supposed to reduce rent by 50%.

At the end of 1886 and at the beginning of 1887, some changes took place in the ministry. First of all, Lord Churchill unexpectedly resigned. His place was offered to the leader of the Liberal Unionists, Lord Hartington, who himself refused to accept the position, but persuaded his friend Goschen to join the ministry as Chancellor of the Exchequer. This marked the beginning of a rapprochement with the moderate Whigs. Lord Iddesley and Geeks Beach then left the ministry; the latter's place was taken by Balfour, Salisbury's nephew.

The unrest in Ireland forced the government, at the end of March 1887, to introduce a draft of a new pacification law. Despite strong opposition from Gladstone's supporters and Irish MPs, the ministry's proposal received a majority and came into force in June 1887.

In August 1887, the Irish National League was closed as a dangerous society, and its branches were dissolved; the consequence of this was new disturbances.

In April, the Imperial Conference opened in London. Imperial conference) of all British colonies with the aim of more closely linking the ties between the colonies and the mother country.

In the field of foreign policy, disagreement arose with France over the New Hebrides Islands, which was soon settled; There were misunderstandings with Russia on issues of the Afghan borders and Bulgarian affairs. When, after a long interregnum, the Bulgarians elected Ferdinand of Coburg as prince, the St. Petersburg cabinet turned to the Porte with a demand to recognize the illegality of this election. But England, supported by Austria and Italy, refused to accede to this demand, and the meeting of Queen Victoria with Emperor Franz Joseph in April 1888, apparently, did not remain without influence on the fact that Austria and England took a hostile position in the Bulgarian question Russia.

In Ireland, despite special laws and emergency courts, agrarian unrest did not stop. The statement of the Roman Curia (1888), which in harsh terms condemned the boycott system, caused great irritation in the country. The Irish replied that they did not intend to borrow their policy from either Italy or England, and flatly refused to stop the measures of violence condemned by the Pope. In August, Parliament discussed a proposal to set a trial for Parnell, accused by the Times newspaper of being an accomplice to the murderers of Cavendish and Borke. Parnell, without waiting for the decision of the commission appointed by Parliament, began legal action against the Times for libel; Pigot, who delivered letters compromising Parnell to The Times, confessed to the forgery and committed suicide (February 1889).

Parnell's trial with the Times made a deep impression in the country. The series of private elections that followed showed that the Tory cabinet was increasingly losing ground. New trial of Parnell, convicted of illegal cohabitation with married woman(whom, however, he later married), alienated Gladstone’s supporters from him and created a split within the Irish autonomists themselves, who demanded that Parnell temporarily renounce leadership of the party and parliamentary activities in general. The most important internal measure that marked the reign of the Conservative Ministry for last years, consisted in the transformation local government on a more democratic basis.

This new law came into force on April 1, 1889. In the same year, a special Ministry of Agriculture was established. In 1890, £33 million was allocated to assist Irish tenants in purchasing their leased estates; in 1891 a new bill was passed to the same end, allowing tenants who were forcibly removed for non-payment of rent to sell their tenancy to others within a period of five years. The Conservative majority in the House of Commons, although reduced (through separate elections favorable to the Liberals), is still strong enough to prevent the adoption of radical reforms, such as free primary education, rejected (February 1890) by a majority of 223 votes to 163. Budgetary the surplus is, however, used for development public education and improving the situation of public teachers. The queen's request to allocate special sums for the maintenance of her grandchildren (the son and daughter of the Prince of Wales) met with opposition from the leaders of the radical party, Labouchere and Morley. The House of Commons agreed only to a slight increase in the funds allocated to the Queen personally (August 1889).

In both 1889 and 1890 there were major workers' strikes in London and other large cities in England.

English troops took part in the defeat of the Dervishes who invaded Egypt from the south.

Disagreements arose between the USA and Great Britain over freedom of navigation in the Bering Sea, and between France and England over fishing off the coast of Newfoundland (1890). England recognized the rights of France to Madagascar, France - the rights of England to Zanzibar (established under the Zanzibar Treaty of 1890 with Germany).

1899 - the beginning of the Anglo-Boer War.

Fight for Africa

Long-standing misunderstandings between England and Germany on the issue of the South African possessions of both powers were put to an end by the treaty of July 1, 1890, according to which Germany made great concessions to England in Africa, but received the island of Heligoland from England.

In Africa, there were reasons for strife between Portugal and England, which at one time threatened war.

In 1891, Parnell, who failed to return to his former role as leader of the Irish autonomists.

Victorian morality

The values ​​professed by the middle class and supported by both the Anglican Church and the opinion of the bourgeois elite of society began to prevail in society. Middle-class values ​​and energy underpinned all the achievements of the Victorian era.

Sobriety, punctuality, hard work, frugality and thrift were valued even before Victoria's reign, but it was during her era that these qualities became the dominant norm. The queen herself set an example: her life, completely subordinate to duty and family, was strikingly different from the life of her two predecessors. Most of the aristocracy followed suit, abandoning the flashy lifestyle of the previous generation. The skilled part of the working class did the same Lewis Carroll You can Middle Ages Wikipedia




  • What else to read